Doc: NR 5.3 Add \single command (issue 6742057)

2012-10-20 Thread pkx166h 

Reviewers: ,

Message:
Here is the first draft of reworking NR 5.3 while adding the \single
command.

I _expect_ to have lots of edits and go through a few iterations of
this, the point is to get something moving in terms of updating this
section, especially with recent discussions about the new commands
(\single, \omit, \no etc.) where it was evident that some were unhappy
about it.

I don't claim to understand many of the finer points so I have not added
any new information (apart from the \single command) but have rearranged
this section in a more logical order and removed some (I think)
unnecessary cruft, repetition, syntactically poor grammar. Of course
this is all my own opinion, but I saw no point in just tacking yet
another subsubheading on to the end of this section just to tick the 'I
have documented \single' box.

The @lilypond examples are as they were before as I'd like to at least
get the technical descriptions right before I attempt to put some better
@lilypond examples - for example make some less complex and include more
for commands like \single and \tweak especially.

Description:
Doc: NR 5.3 Add \single command

Add the new \single command.

This section has also had a tidy up to rearrange some parts to avoid
repetition, simplify the explanations, remove some redundant
explanations,
give more/better @lilypond examples.

Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6742057/

Affected files:
  M Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely
  M Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
  M Documentation/notation/editorial.itely
  M Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

2.16.1

2012-10-20 Thread Phil Holmes 

David,

I see you've done a lot of moving updates into 2.16.1.  When do you expect 
to want a release for this?


--
Phil Holmes



___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: 2.16.1

2012-10-20 Thread David Kastrup 
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:

 David,

 I see you've done a lot of moving updates into 2.16.1.  When do you
 expect to want a release for this?

I've asked on the translator list whether they want to get something
translated from all the cherry-picking, and feedback is incomplete yet.

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: 2.16.1

2012-10-20 Thread Federico Bruni 
Il giorno 21/ott/2012 05:17, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org ha scritto:

 Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:

  David,
 
  I see you've done a lot of moving updates into 2.16.1.  When do you
  expect to want a release for this?

 I've asked on the translator list whether they want to get something
 translated from all the cherry-picking, and feedback is incomplete yet.


Hi David,

When did you ask? I may have missed your email..
I think that all translators should update the inaccuracies in LM.
I'll try to do it today, even if I'm abroad and with a Windows laptop.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel