Re: modify coord-rotate to get exact values for (sin PI) etc (issue 269530043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)
On 2015/10/30 22:59:54, thomasmorley651 wrote: On 2015/10/30 21:46:55, benko.pal wrote: > > And PostScript (and PDF and METAFONT) _do_ represent angles in degrees. > > So it's sort of silly that we cannot get an angle of 180 degrees > > straight into PostScript without change. > > now that convinced me. if we want to output angles in degrees, we > don't want to switch back and forth neither between degrees and > radians, nor between angles and sines. at most one atan (acos) call > somewhere. > > p Just back home, noticing the discussion here. Current patch tries to solve (or better: workaround) the problem in guile. I have some other pending patches _needing_ exact values from coord-rotate. I'd suggest to push it as is (unless some serious defect would be detected) after countdown. So that I can go ahead with the follow up stuff. Opinions? I hope to get to a "degree rework", but this patch is sort of unrelated even though I hope to eventually make it unneeded. So it might as well go ahead for now. LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/269530043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypon.org down
According to: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/lilypond.org It's down. -David - Original Message - > From: "Jean-Charles Malahieude"> To: "lilypond-devel" > Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2015 12:54:31 PM > Subject: lilypon.org down > > > LP.org is down here in France since yesterday afternoon. Are we the only > one? > > Cheers, > Jean-Charles > > ___ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
lilypon.org down
LP.org is down here in France since yesterday afternoon. Are we the only one? Cheers, Jean-Charles ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: quarter tones in tablature - FretBoards
On 2015-10-31 12:49, pls wrote: d...@faithful.be writes: On 2015-10-31 11:39, pls wrote: Thomas Morleywrites: Personally, I don't like any of those and lean towards excluding quarter-tones from FretBoards at all and let output the warning about "Missing fret for pitch ~a on string ~a" as before. Letting only TabStaff display quarter-tones. I'm of the same opinion as it doesn't/shouldn't really matter pitchwise where exactly you place your finger within a fret space on a fretted instrument. I'm no guitarist, but don't they sometimes pull sideways on the string or use a mechanical attachment to sharpen a note? Yes, pull-offs are quite common but it's rather a technique to pluck the string with your fretting hand. With "mechanical attachment" you're probably alluding to a capo. It acts like a sort of artificial "barre". It fits around the neck of the guitar and raises the pitch of all (or only some of the) strings. LilyPond already displays capo indications as a thick bar in fret diagrams. Bottlenecks are also used to sharpen or lower a note. It works like some sort of a "movable fret". But I've never seen quarter tone indications in fret diagrams. Cheers, Patrick I was thinking of things like these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrato_systems_for_guitar BTW: Did you deliberately not reply to the list? No. I'm stuck using an unfamiliar web-mail interface while my main computer is being repaired; I must have hit the wrong button. Thanks for noticing. -- Dan ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: modify coord-rotate to get exact values for (sin PI) etc (issue 269530043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)
> Just back home, noticing the discussion here. > > Current patch tries to solve (or better: workaround) the problem in > guile. > I have some other pending patches _needing_ exact values from > coord-rotate. > I'd suggest to push it as is (unless some serious defect would be > detected) after countdown. So that I can go ahead with the follow up > stuff. > > Opinions? Fine with me. > Nevertheless, I'd love to work with degrees, rather than radians. > Though, I can't help implementing it as soon as C++ etc is involved. I may help with c++. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: quarter tones in tablature - FretBoards
d...@faithful.be writes: > On 2015-10-31 12:49, pls wrote: >> d...@faithful.be writes: >> >>> On 2015-10-31 11:39, pls wrote: Thomas Morleywrites: > Personally, I don't like any of those and lean towards excluding > quarter-tones from FretBoards at all and let output the warning > about > "Missing fret for pitch ~a on string ~a" as before. > Letting only TabStaff display quarter-tones. I'm of the same opinion as it doesn't/shouldn't really matter pitchwise where exactly you place your finger within a fret space on a fretted instrument. >>> >>> I'm no guitarist, but don't they sometimes pull sideways on the string >>> or use a mechanical attachment to sharpen a note? >> >> Yes, pull-offs are quite common but it's rather a technique to pluck >> the >> string with your fretting hand. With "mechanical attachment" you're >> probably alluding to a capo. It acts like a sort of artificial >> "barre". It fits around the neck of the guitar and raises the pitch of >> all (or only some of the) strings. LilyPond already displays capo >> indications as a thick bar >> in fret diagrams. Bottlenecks are also used to sharpen or lower a >> note. It works like some sort of a "movable fret". >> But I've never seen quarter tone indications in fret diagrams. >> >> Cheers, >> Patrick > > I was thinking of things like these: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrato_systems_for_guitar Yes, electric guitars can be equipped with a whammy bar. Those effects usually have their own symbols in traditional notation and tablature but not in fret diagrams (see attachment). > >> BTW: Did you deliberately not reply to the list? > > No. I'm stuck using an unfamiliar web-mail interface while my main > computer is being repaired; I must have hit the wrong button. Thanks > for noticing. You're welcome! Patrick ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: quarter tones in tablature - FretBoards
Thomas Morleywrites: > Personally, I don't like any of those and lean towards excluding > quarter-tones from FretBoards at all and let output the warning about > "Missing fret for pitch ~a on string ~a" as before. > Letting only TabStaff display quarter-tones. I'm of the same opinion as it doesn't/shouldn't really matter pitchwise where exactly you place your finger within a fret space on a fretted instrument. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
quarter tones in tablature - FretBoards
Hi all, I'm working on "quarter tones in tablature" https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4643/ I've locally some code which does it by modifying `determine-frets' from translation-functions.scm Though automatic fret-diagrams in FretBoards rely on it as well. The problem arises how to print quarter-tones in fret-diagrams and how to print/format a fret-label. In the attached image you'll see that in first position the dot moves within a fret. In a higher position a fret-label would be needed, though, currently it's impossible to display a non-integer. But I could code to put out one of the listed possibilities. Personally, I don't like any of those and lean towards excluding quarter-tones from FretBoards at all and let output the warning about "Missing fret for pitch ~a on string ~a" as before. Letting only TabStaff display quarter-tones. Opinions/suggestions? Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypon.org down
Le 31/10/2015 14:03, bobr...@centrum.is a écrit : According to: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/lilypond.org It's down. -David From: "Jean-Charles Malahieude" LP.org is down here in France since yesterday afternoon. Are we the only one? But download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/ is still available… Chhers, Jean-Charles ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel