Re: ly:moment<=? ??

[David Nalesnik]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Simon Albrecht 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> while getting to terms with the accidentalStyle code I found that it would
> be useful (currently only for dodecaphonic-no-repeat-rule,
> scm/music-functions.scm:line 1682f.) to have a ly:moment<=? Scheme
> predicate function. It’s easy to do in Scheme:
>
> (define (ly:moment<=? a b)
>  (or (equal? a b)
>   (ly:moment
> but I see that the ly:moment lily/moment-scheme.cc.
> Do you think it’s worth it to generally provide such a procedure? Or just
> define it locally in music-functions.scm?
>
>
It has already been provided: see moment<=? in scm/lily-library,scm.

David
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

ly:moment<=? ??

[Simon Albrecht]

Hello,

while getting to terms with the accidentalStyle code I found that it 
would be useful (currently only for dodecaphonic-no-repeat-rule, 
scm/music-functions.scm:line 1682f.) to have a ly:moment<=? Scheme 
predicate function. It’s easy to do in Scheme:


(define (ly:moment<=? a b)
 (or (equal? a b)
  (ly:momentbut I see that the ly:momentlily/moment-scheme.cc.
Do you think it’s worth it to generally provide such a procedure? Or 
just define it locally in music-functions.scm?


Yours, Simon

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

LilyPond release

[Phil Holmes]

We were due a release today, but what with Carol services (two today) and 
other stuff I had to do, it slipped my mind.  I'll plan to do one early in 
the coming week.


___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel