Re: tab characters in the source code
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 03:32:43 pm Mark Polesky wrote:
I was fiddling around with output-ps.scm (specifically
the grob-cause procedure on line 159) and was getting
frustrated with the poor indentation displaying in my
editor when I realized that this was being caused by
tab characters in the source.
Is there an easy way to address this? I don't know how
many tab characters there are in the source, nor do I
know how to find out. But it can be frustrating. Any
solutions?
Here's a hack I wrote for my Amiga files in 1994 'cos I was fed up of tabs.
Error checking is minimal and boundary checking is non existent.
#include stdio.h
#include ctype.h
#include math.h
main(int argc, char *argv*[]) {
int tab, c, ts;
if (argc !=2 ) {
fprintf(stderr, Use: expandtab n\n);
exit(27);
}
ts = atoi(argv[1]);
tab = 0;
while ((c=getchar()) != EOF) {
if (c=='\t') {
tab %= ts;
do {
putchar(' ');
++tab;
} while (tab != ts);
}
else {
putchar(c);
++tab;
}
if ( c=='\n' )
tab = 0;
}
}
Ian
--
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond
On Wednesday 07 November 2007 21:39:23 Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 02:03 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: As a composer by myself, it's a mystery to me why so many composers love to use 128th and 256th, most time for no good reason. Let's ask ourselves about that well-known piano hack, Ludwig van Beethoven. Later we'll turn to Mozart, who didn't confine himself to 128th notes, but used 256th notes too. I'm sure you'll start explaining why you're a better composer than Beethoven and Mozart, at least, you're not given to such notational distortions as those two well-known fools. I'll mention another incompetent composer who writes 128th notes. Bach. Variation 16 of the Goldberg Variations. What was he thinking? Ian -- ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: MIDI staffs or voices?
On Sunday 28 October 2007 17:42:09 Juergen Reuter wrote: Yes, but according to the GM standard channel #10 is reserved for drums; hence only 15 are left. GM standard was foisted on to the industry by Roland, and many synth makers still do not comply with it. My Kurzweil PC2R pays lip service to GM by supplying GM sounds to be loaded into user memory. I never use it. Channel 10 is just another channel for me, and in the following music, the 'cellos are on channel 10 of the PC2R. Ian, http://www.opus131.com/music/mozart40.mp3 -- ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
lilypond web site
I clicked on the W3C icon at the bottom of the home page and was shown ten errors by the Markup Validation Service. Ian -- ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
copyright symbol?
I have the following line in lilypond 2.4.2 ..
tagline=Engraved by LilyPond, 2.4.2 { } Copyright \copyright { } 2005 Ian
Stirling, { } Some Rights Reserved
With 2.4.2 the \copyright was printed as the copyright symbol.
I used convert-ly in 2.11.0 to update the file,
but that copyright symbol isn't translated by convert-ly.
Ian
--
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond on FreeBSD?
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 14:56, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote: On Friday 20 October 2006 16:02, Ian Stirling wrote: Some other error occurred trying to compile and install the 2.8 version. Was it by chance something like the following? It appears to be called in by ./mf/GNUMakefile on line 4. Anyone know if that line is important, old debris, or being brought in by a bad build stepon my part? [extra details snipped] Traceback (most recent call last): File /mnt/ufs/mirror176/ports/print/lilypond/work/lilypond-2.8.7/stepmake/bin/install.py, line 78, in ? shutil.copy2 (f, dest) File /usr/local/lib/python2.4/shutil.py, line 92, in copy2 copyfile(src, dst) File /usr/local/lib/python2.4/shutil.py, line 47, in copyfile fsrc = open(src, 'rb') IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: './out/CenturySchL-Ital.otf' gmake[1]: *** [local-install-outfiles] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/ufs/mirror176/ports/print/lilypond/work/lilypond-2.8.7/mf' gmake: *** [install] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /mnt/ufs/mirror176/ports/print/lilypond. *** Error code 1 I compiled with gmake -f GNUmakefile, which compiled successfully. But subsequently gmake -f GNUmakefile install produced essentially the same error - Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/ians/.build/lilypond-2.8.7/stepmake/bin/install.py, line 78, in ? shutil.copy2 (f, dest) File /usr/local/lib/python2.4/shutil.py, line 92, in copy2 copyfile(src, dst) File /usr/local/lib/python2.4/shutil.py, line 47, in copyfile fsrc = open(src, 'rb') IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: './out/CenturySchL-Ital.otf' gmake[1]: *** [local-install-outfiles] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/ians/.build/lilypond-2.8.7/mf' gmake: *** [install] Error 2 Ian -- ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond on FreeBSD?
On Saturday 21 October 2006 03:55, you wrote:
Ian Stirling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't managed to make Lilypond work on my
FreeBSD 6.1 system. The precompiled version gives
a runtime error looking for a non existent library.
What library is that?
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libm.so.2 not found, required by
lilypond
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.4 not found, required by
lilypond
By using quick and dirty symbolic links pointing to the
current libraries, libm.so.4 and libc.so.6, the FreeBSD
Lilypond 2.9.26 build from the site works, at least as far
as issuing the help message when invoked with no arguments.
We base the FreeBSD binaries on 4.10-RELEASE-p2. Would it make
sense to support 6.x as well? If so, we need a binary of
the c library to bootstrap the build
I'd certainly like you to support FreeBSD 6.x.
The version of Lilypond in the FreeBSD ports is the ancient 2.2.2.
tar -C / --exclude=zlib.h --exclude=zconf.h --exclude=gmp.h -czf
public_html/freebsd-runtime-$(uname -r).tar.gz
/usr/lib/{lib{c,c_r,m}{.a,.so{,.*}},crt{i,n,1}.o} /usr/include
I have added /lib through that filter to the tar file because
libc.so.* and libm.so.* are there. I'll send you a private email
with a link to the file on a private page on my web site.
No answers from anyone so far about where to find that
VeraBd.pfd. Am I reaching the list?
Yes. I do not have that file either. It is not required to build
LilyPond. I do have a ttf version, however
I get the following error installing 2.9.22 and 2.9.24.
Cannot open /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.pfb
The requested file, VeraBd.pfb, does not exist
Open: Failed to open: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.pfb
Called from...
../buildscripts/pfx2ttf.fontforge: line 3
gmake[1]: *** [out/CenturySchL-Ital.otf] Error 1
Compiling 2.9.26 fails with the following..
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
polynomial.cc: In member function 'void Polynomial::check_sol(Real) const':
polynomial.cc:170: warning: empty body in an if-statement
gmake[1]: *** [out/polynomial.o] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/ians/.build/lilypond-2.9.26/flower'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
Ian
--
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
lilypond on FreeBSD?
I haven't managed to make Lilypond work on my FreeBSD 6.1 system. The precompiled version gives a runtime error looking for a non existent library. In any case, I prefer to compile from source. 2.9.24 fails to install because this file is missing and a google search for it only finds my request. Failed to open: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.pfb Some other error occurred trying to compile and install the 2.8 version. No answers from anyone so far about where to find that VeraBd.pfd. Am I reaching the list? Ian -- ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
source build problem 2.9.24
I asked about this with 2.9.22 and had no answer. On FreeBSD RELEASE-6.1, Failed to open: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.pfb This file is not in the bitstream-vera on my system. Please, where can I get it or make it? Ian -- ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
source build problem 2.9.22
I have the following error trying to build 2.9.22 from source on a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE system with bitstream-vera 1.10_2. Cannot open /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.pfb The requested file, VeraBd.pfb, does not exist Open: Failed to open: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.pfb Called from... ../buildscripts/pfx2ttf.fontforge: line 3 gmake[1]: *** [out/CenturySchL-Ital.otf] Error 1 There are ttf files in that directory but none of type pfb. This file is not in the file ttf-bitstream-vera-1.10.tar.gz 16-Apr-2003 21:54 342K that I fetched from http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/ttf-bitstream-vera/1.10/ Does anyone know where I can get this file and any others that might be associated with this error? Ian -- ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
