Re: Bug status
On Saturday 25 September 2004 20.36, Graham Percival wrote: On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the bottom line is way off. see attachment. There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is wrong. Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks? http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/ Rehearsal-marks.html Yes, it's exactly the same. Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Bug status
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Saturday 25 September 2004 20.36, Graham Percival wrote: On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the bottom line is way off. see attachment. There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is wrong. Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks? http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/ Rehearsal-marks.html Yes, it's exactly the same. Take a look at the regression test for part combining. Hopefully that makes it clear what part combining should look like. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Bug status
I checked through the bugs quickly, and I only found one bug that makes 2.3 strictly worse than 2.2, and hence prevent 3.0. That's titling-piece.ly. Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2.3.17 bug status
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [updating bug database] Good! The bugs document now looks considerably shorter. Incidentally, the slur-staccato is also fixed (for good, hopefully). And Han-Wen: Beware, for I have a list of 30 unhandled email messages reporting about possible bugs. So new bug reports may soon pop up (i don't have more time today for that though). I'll return soon. Yes, you're right, but if 3.0 is better than 2.2, then nobody is served by delaying the release, so I propose that we proceed, carefully. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
