RE: Duplication in NR 1.6.3 - snippets no longer needed?
Hello, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of Carl Sorensen )Sent: 11 June 2011 00:23 )To: Keith OHara; lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: Duplication in NR 1.6.3 - snippets no longer needed? ) )On 6/10/11 12:05 AM, "Keith OHara" wrote: ) )> James Lowe datacore.com> writes: )>> )>> I think we have some duplication in this section but would like a )>> second opinion )> )> I agree. The two snippets do not need to be quoted in the )> documentation because you cover all the concepts earlier. ) )I concur. The Selected Snippets have no reason for being; the same )concepts are taught in the main text, and there is no reason the snippets )need to be selected snippets (i.e. they don't use \override or \set (except )for the instrument name). ) )Please eliminate the selected snippets. ) [James' reply:] Pushed as f5c4be989bf3c8b4659a3b9382674475919273c0 James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Duplication in NR 1.6.3 - snippets no longer needed?
On 6/10/11 12:05 AM, "Keith OHara" wrote: > James Lowe datacore.com> writes: >> >> I think we have some duplication in this section but would like a second >> opinion > > I agree. The two snippets do not need to be quoted in the documentation > because > you cover all the concepts earlier. I concur. The Selected Snippets have no reason for being; the same concepts are taught in the main text, and there is no reason the snippets need to be selected snippets (i.e. they don't use \override or \set (except for the instrument name). Please eliminate the selected snippets. Thanks, Carl ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Duplication in NR 1.6.3 - snippets no longer needed?
James Lowe datacore.com> writes: > > I think we have some duplication in this section but would like a second > opinion I agree. The two snippets do not need to be quoted in the documentation because you cover all the concepts earlier. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Duplication in NR 1.6.3 - snippets no longer needed?
Hello, I think we have some duplication in this section but would like a second opinion as I think we can remove the snippets as we explain what the snippets do in the previous text, therefore making them redundant and the doc larger than it needs to be. Specifically: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/writing-parts#quoting-other-voices See snippets both snippets 'Quoting another voice' and 'Quoting another voice with transposition' Thanks for your time James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel