Re: Huge PDF doc files
> The very problem seems to be that the PDF snippets in 'lybook-db' are > no longer created with `-dgs-never-embed-fonts=#t`. It seems `-dgs-never-embed-fonts=#t` does not work in current LilyPond. I've created merge request !218 that fixes it.
Re: Huge PDF doc files
>> compiling the documentation of current git I get huge PDFs. For >> example, the NR is now 44.7MByte – previously (in my case two months >> ago), it was 7MByte. > > I can see the 44M number here, but I have extractpdfmark > disabled. Can you confiirm it is being run? It is, definitely. The very problem seems to be that the PDF snippets in 'lybook-db' are no longer created with `-dgs-never-embed-fonts=#t`. As a consequence, the new PDF file of the NR contains 3721 fonts, while the old one only has 74 fonts. Werner
Re: Huge PDF doc files
Am 23.06.2020 um 21:30 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:44 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: Folks, compiling the documentation of current git I get huge PDFs. For example, the NR is now 44.7MByte – previously (in my case two months ago), it was 7MByte. Then I used gs 9.21, now I use version 9.52; I guess this is the culprit since I don't think that any other program in my environment has changed. Can anyone confirm my observations? Masamichi-san? I can see the 44M number here, but I have extractpdfmark disabled. Can you confiirm it is being run? My NR is 44MByte, too, with gs 9.26 and extractpdfmark enabled. (At least I have *.pdfmark residual files in out-www and would thus deduce that it has been run...) Interesting, however, is that compiling the NR with a simple texi2pdf run gives only 40MByte size for me. Seems that extractpdfmark does not give a reduction in size here Cheers, Michael
Re: Huge PDF doc files
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:44 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Folks, > > > compiling the documentation of current git I get huge PDFs. For > example, the NR is now 44.7MByte – previously (in my case two months > ago), it was 7MByte. > > Then I used gs 9.21, now I use version 9.52; I guess this is the > culprit since I don't think that any other program in my environment > has changed. > > Can anyone confirm my observations? Masamichi-san? I can see the 44M number here, but I have extractpdfmark disabled. Can you confiirm it is being run? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Huge PDF doc files
Folks, compiling the documentation of current git I get huge PDFs. For example, the NR is now 44.7MByte – previously (in my case two months ago), it was 7MByte. Then I used gs 9.21, now I use version 9.52; I guess this is the culprit since I don't think that any other program in my environment has changed. Can anyone confirm my observations? Masamichi-san? Werner
