Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Il giorno dom 16 dic 2018 alle 2:33, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Re hanging VM, I tried downloading the Fedora VM for 0.2 release. It worked fine. I redownloaded the Debian release for 0.3 and now it works fine. Given the SHA sum file is wrong and that you can't check the download, I wonder if the first two downloads were corrupt (although I very, very rarely see corrupt downloads on my link)? Can we please fix the SHA sums file? That would be helpful. I'm uploading the correct checksum file. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Oops - the dev user and password is given on github. Andrew On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 at 12:33, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Re hanging VM, I tried downloading the Fedora VM for 0.2 release. It > worked fine. I redownloaded the Debian release for 0.3 and now it works > fine. Given the SHA sum file is wrong and that you can't check the > download, I wonder if the first two downloads were corrupt (although I > very, very rarely see corrupt downloads on my link)? Can we please fix the > SHA sums file? That would be helpful. > > I guessed the password to login. I seem to be in the dark regarding the > documentation for things like this. Where is it located? [Sorry I am so > dull and plodding on this topic.] > > Andrew > > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 00:15, Andrew Bernard > wrote: > >> To clarify, on W10 host, I can make any 64 bit guestin Virtualbox. In a >> Fedora 29 or Debian 9 guest VM, Virtualbox 5.2 will not show 64 bit machine >> options, despite enabling VT-x/AMD-V in the vm machine settings. >> >> Running lilydev 0.3 Debian just hangs at the UEFI shell prompt, in a >> machine running as a guest on W10. >> >> ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Re hanging VM, I tried downloading the Fedora VM for 0.2 release. It worked fine. I redownloaded the Debian release for 0.3 and now it works fine. Given the SHA sum file is wrong and that you can't check the download, I wonder if the first two downloads were corrupt (although I very, very rarely see corrupt downloads on my link)? Can we please fix the SHA sums file? That would be helpful. I guessed the password to login. I seem to be in the dark regarding the documentation for things like this. Where is it located? [Sorry I am so dull and plodding on this topic.] Andrew On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 00:15, Andrew Bernard wrote: > To clarify, on W10 host, I can make any 64 bit guestin Virtualbox. In a > Fedora 29 or Debian 9 guest VM, Virtualbox 5.2 will not show 64 bit machine > options, despite enabling VT-x/AMD-V in the vm machine settings. > > Running lilydev 0.3 Debian just hangs at the UEFI shell prompt, in a > machine running as a guest on W10. > > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
To clarify, on W10 host, I can make any 64 bit guestin Virtualbox. In a Fedora 29 or Debian 9 guest VM, Virtualbox 5.2 will not show 64 bit machine options, despite enabling VT-x/AMD-V in the vm machine settings. Running lilydev 0.3 Debian just hangs at the UEFI shell prompt, in a machine running as a guest on W10. Andrew On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 23:53, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Thank you David. I have read all the many pages on the web on that topic! > Does not work for me. Perhaps my BIOS is incompatible (new machine, > though...) > > Andrew > > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 23:27, Davide Liessi > wrote: > >> >> If you have a 64 bit CPU but cannot make 64 bit VMs, you probably need >> to enable CPU virtualization (Intel's VT-x or AMD's AMD-v) in your >> BIOS. >> I had to do the same on my machine. >> See, e.g., https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62339 . >> >> Best wishes. >> >> Davide >> > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Thank you David. I have read all the many pages on the web on that topic! Does not work for me. Perhaps my BIOS is incompatible (new machine, though...) Andrew On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 23:27, Davide Liessi wrote: > > If you have a 64 bit CPU but cannot make 64 bit VMs, you probably need > to enable CPU virtualization (Intel's VT-x or AMD's AMD-v) in your > BIOS. > I had to do the same on my machine. > See, e.g., https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62339 . > > Best wishes. > > Davide > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Il giorno ven 14 dic 2018 alle ore 13:21 Andrew Bernard ha scritto: > I have installed Fedora 29 and Virtualbox 5.2. I have enabled EFI. I can > only make 32 VM's. I understand this is a common - but tricky - issue. Do > we need 64 bit? What architecture is the lilydev image? I could not find a > reference to that info. I run Virtualbox on Windows 10 host. If you have a 64 bit CPU but cannot make 64 bit VMs, you probably need to enable CPU virtualization (Intel's VT-x or AMD's AMD-v) in your BIOS. I had to do the same on my machine. See, e.g., https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62339 . Best wishes. Davide ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Hi Federico, I have installed Fedora 29 and Virtualbox 5.2. I have enabled EFI. I can only make 32 VM's. I understand this is a common - but tricky - issue. Do we need 64 bit? What architecture is the lilydev image? I could not find a reference to that info. I run Virtualbox on Windows 10 host. Andrew On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 21:07, Federico Bruni wrote: > > I'm using Fedora 29 and VirtualBox 5.2.22. > > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Or, if you want to insist with VM, you can try libvirt as described here: https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDevOS/tree/master/mkosi#qemulibvirt Il giorno ven 14 dic 2018 alle 11:03, Federico Bruni ha scritto: Hi Andrew I'm using Fedora 29 and VirtualBox 5.2.22. All I have to do to run the VM in VirtualBox is enabling EFI in VB machine settings. Did you do it? See attached screenshot. If you did it and still have this problem, then it may be some other misconfiguration. But I'm afraid I cannot help you, since I don't use VirtualBox anymore and I don't have much experience. Il giorno ven 14 dic 2018 alle 10:16, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Ok. Just wanting to persist for the moment with a Vritualbox VM, I studied up on how boot with a UEFI system. Previously I was just getting a Shell> prompt. Now I understand you must create startup.nsh containing I think: \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI But when I restart with this script, it just prints that out and sits there, no further activity. Is there a whole bunch of doco on this I have simply failed to uncover? What am I doing wrong now? Andrew On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 12:51, Paul Morris wrote: On 12/13/18 8:47 PM, Paul Morris wrote: > I also recommend the container approach. Here are the steps for the container setup: https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDevOS/tree/v0.3/mkosi#container -Paul ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Ok. Just wanting to persist for the moment with a Vritualbox VM, I studied up on how boot with a UEFI system. Previously I was just getting a Shell> prompt. Now I understand you must create startup.nsh containing I think: \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI But when I restart with this script, it just prints that out and sits there, no further activity. Is there a whole bunch of doco on this I have simply failed to uncover? What am I doing wrong now? Andrew On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 12:51, Paul Morris wrote: > On 12/13/18 8:47 PM, Paul Morris wrote: > > > I also recommend the container approach. > > Here are the steps for the container setup: > > https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDevOS/tree/v0.3/mkosi#container > > -Paul > > > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
On 12/13/18 8:47 PM, Paul Morris wrote: I also recommend the container approach. Here are the steps for the container setup: https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDevOS/tree/v0.3/mkosi#container -Paul ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Hi Andrew, On 12/13/18 6:17 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: [I don't know anything about containers, but I am willing to learn. But it would be goodo to get the VM machine going alos.] I also recommend the container approach. I hadn't used them before Federico brought them to LilyDev. Basically after following the setup steps you end up with an open terminal and that is how you access and use the container environment (there's no GUI like with VirtualBox VM). In that container terminal you run make, make doc, etc., anything that needs the dependencies, and that's basically all you need to use the container for. You can access the source code files and edit them in your usual (host) OS using your usual tools. Also using git and pushing patches up to Reitveld can be done in the host environment (where you have access to a browser, etc.). It's nicer to use than a VM because you work in your familiar OS with familiar tools, and you basically get the full power of your machine (in terms of RAM, etc.) when compiling. I'd like to add details like this on how it works to the LilyDev documentation if I can find time. Thanks for working on the Python migration, BTW. Cheers, -Paul ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Hi Federico, Small steps but moving forward. Enabling EFI works, but it boots to a prompt Shell>. Whjat next? [I don't know anything about containers, but I am willing to learn. But it would be goodo to get the VM machine going alos.] Andrew On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 02:17, Federico Bruni wrote: > Hi Andrew > > As you can read in the big Note text under the 6th step here: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lilydev > > Note: The image can be booted only on EFI, so you must enable it within > the virtual machine’s settings – click on System → Motherboard > and select ‘Extended features: Enable EFI’. > > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Hi Andrew As you can read in the big Note text under the 6th step here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lilydev Note: The image can be booted only on EFI, so you must enable it within the virtual machine’s settings – click on System → Motherboard and select ‘Extended features: Enable EFI’. BTW, why don't you use the container on Debian 9? You may have systemd-nspawn already installed, so you can launch it without installing anything. It's one command, no configuration needed, and lightweight. Il giorno gio 13 dic 2018 alle 14:01, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Carrying on despite sha256sum mismatch, vboxmanage converts and does not complain. Running up the image in Virtualbox 5.2 on Debian 9 and on Windows 10: no bootable image found. Andrew On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 23:25, Andrew Bernard wrote: Downloaded from github twice. I get this sum: $ sha256sum lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw 169270d9539202a90339aca91c6932195dcf474cff113db47aaa3cf6d5005476 lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw That does not match the SHA256SUMS file: $ cat SHA256SUMS 7442b6788ae71eaef13b3f1e7e33150d3bc9fb1677226fd7d6c3cfd80d1f66a6 *lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw What is happening here? Andrew ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Hi Federico, A bit confusng then! Still does not explain why the image will not boot. Any advice there? Andrew On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 01:03, Federico Bruni wrote: > > > Il giorno gio 13 dic 2018 alle 13:25, Andrew Bernard > ha scritto: > > Downloaded from github twice. I get this sum: > > > > $ sha256sum lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw > > 169270d9539202a90339aca91c6932195dcf474cff113db47aaa3cf6d5005476 > > lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw > > > > That does not match the SHA256SUMS file: > > > > $ cat SHA256SUMS > > 7442b6788ae71eaef13b3f1e7e33150d3bc9fb1677226fd7d6c3cfd80d1f66a6 > > *lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw > > > > What is happening here? > > > > > > I have the same. > > The first one is correct, while the second is an older one. The file is > correct, no need to download it again. > SHA256SUMS is automatically generated by mkosi after the build. I don't > know why it was not updated. > > > > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Il giorno gio 13 dic 2018 alle 13:25, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Downloaded from github twice. I get this sum: $ sha256sum lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw 169270d9539202a90339aca91c6932195dcf474cff113db47aaa3cf6d5005476 lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw That does not match the SHA256SUMS file: $ cat SHA256SUMS 7442b6788ae71eaef13b3f1e7e33150d3bc9fb1677226fd7d6c3cfd80d1f66a6 *lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw What is happening here? I have the same. The first one is correct, while the second is an older one. The file is correct, no need to download it again. SHA256SUMS is automatically generated by mkosi after the build. I don't know why it was not updated. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Carrying on despite sha256sum mismatch, vboxmanage converts and does not complain. Running up the image in Virtualbox 5.2 on Debian 9 and on Windows 10: no bootable image found. Andrew On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 23:25, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Downloaded from github twice. I get this sum: > > $ sha256sum lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw > 169270d9539202a90339aca91c6932195dcf474cff113db47aaa3cf6d5005476 > lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw > > That does not match the SHA256SUMS file: > > $ cat SHA256SUMS > 7442b6788ae71eaef13b3f1e7e33150d3bc9fb1677226fd7d6c3cfd80d1f66a6 > *lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw > > What is happening here? > > Andrew > > ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LilyDev 0.3 sha256sum
Downloaded from github twice. I get this sum: $ sha256sum lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw 169270d9539202a90339aca91c6932195dcf474cff113db47aaa3cf6d5005476 lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw That does not match the SHA256SUMS file: $ cat SHA256SUMS 7442b6788ae71eaef13b3f1e7e33150d3bc9fb1677226fd7d6c3cfd80d1f66a6 *lilydev-debian-vm-0.3.raw What is happening here? Andrew ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
