New instrument name posititioning in scheme displays instr. name for haraiki'ed staves
Since the patch b8a1b9b174a3b68f05bb3e08fb5f754649b92574, short instrument
names for harakiried staves are still printed (above each other, at the top of
the system).
Example attached.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
--
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
\version 2.13.4
\pointAndClickOff
\score {
\new StaffGroup
\new Staff {
\set Staff.shortInstrumentName = A 1
c''1 \break c''1
}
\new Staff {
\set Staff.shortInstrumentName = B 2
R1*2
}
\new Staff {
\set Staff.shortInstrumentName = C 3
R1*2
}
\layout {
\context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }
}
}
iname.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: New instrument name posititioning in scheme displays instr. name for haraiki'ed staves
2009/8/10 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com: Since the patch b8a1b9b174a3b68f05bb3e08fb5f754649b92574, short instrument names for harakiried staves are still printed (above each other, at the top of the system). Oh dear, that's not good. :) It looks like I should have paid more attention to `instrument-name-hara-kirk.ly' (and to Joe's comment about applying interval-center to an empty interval, since this would only occur if the elements list is empty, i.e., hara-kiried); unfortunately, this regression didn't show up with `make check'. I'll push a fix once I've double checked the regression tests. Cheers, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: New instrument name posititioning in scheme displays instr. name for haraiki'ed staves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 10. August 2009 22:56:09 schrieb Neil Puttock: 2009/8/10 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com: Since the patch b8a1b9b174a3b68f05bb3e08fb5f754649b92574, short instrument names for harakiried staves are still printed (above each other, at the top of the system). Oh dear, that's not good. :) [...] I'll push a fix once I've double checked the regression tests. ... and added a new regression test for this bug, right? ;-) Cheers, Reinhold - -- - -- Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFKgI0/TqjEwhXvPN0RAnkyAJ91QPKZ4VVYx4HJDq9h7XJtpzGRCwCfYJ+u o9nsA5RNe/y26Fuy1xsVlGs= =QzYC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: New instrument name posititioning in scheme displays instr. name for haraiki'ed staves
2009/8/10 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com: ... and added a new regression test for this bug, right? ;-) Heheh, I'm hoping it won't come to that if I can get the existing test to work properly (I'm hopeful making the name longer will work). Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: New instrument name posititioning in scheme displays instr. name for haraiki'ed staves
2009/8/10 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com: Heheh, I'm hoping it won't come to that if I can get the existing test to work properly (I'm hopeful making the name longer will work). Well this is rather puzzling: if I fix the bug, `make check' shows the correction with a distance of 1.00 (even without changing shortInstrumentName), whereas testing current master against a baseline of 1ac472 (just before the instrument name patch) doesn't reveal the regression. Can anybody explain what's going on? Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
