Re: Flag functions instead of defining glyphs directly (issue4625067)

2011-07-11 Thread lemniskata . bernoullego 

This was just pushed by Mike.
I close the issue.

thanks,
Janek

http://codereview.appspot.com/4625067/

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Flag functions instead of defining glyphs directly (issue4625067)

2011-07-04 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen 

lgtm

I can see how this will work well for defining a whole set.

Carl


http://codereview.appspot.com/4625067/

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Flag functions instead of defining glyphs directly (issue4625067)

2011-06-30 Thread hanwenn 

LGTM

(I am assuming the glyphs don't change)

http://codereview.appspot.com/4625067/

___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel