Re: GDP: six
Valentin Villenave wrote: 2007/9/14, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Ancient notation _could_ be split genre-wise into two separate chunks "Gregorian Chant" and "Mensural Notation". However, for a _reference_ manual, I think it is ok as it currently is (e.g. having a single section on ligatures rather than separate ones per genre). For a _tutorial_, however, IMO you definitely would like to split it genre-wise. I would be OK to split the Ancient notation. Thanks for suggesting, btw; feel free to suggest any other improvement you might think of, since this whole part would otherwise remain more or less untouched -- as most of us, when it comes to such subjects, are complete ignoramuses ;) Actually, I'd rather leave Ancient notation completely untouched until somebody knowledgeable about it has the time to deal with it. (that doesn't just mean Juergen; there's other people around that use this) In any case, I think it's safe to leave it alone until GDP would naturally get to that section -- that will probably be in Dec or Jan. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GDP: six
2007/9/14, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ancient notation _could_ be split genre-wise into two separate chunks > "Gregorian Chant" and "Mensural Notation". However, for a _reference_ > manual, I think it is ok as it currently is (e.g. having a single section > on ligatures rather than separate ones per genre). For a _tutorial_, > however, IMO you definitely would like to split it genre-wise. I would be OK to split the Ancient notation. Thanks for suggesting, btw; feel free to suggest any other improvement you might think of, since this whole part would otherwise remain more or less untouched -- as most of us, when it comes to such subjects, are complete ignoramuses ;) Regards, Valentin ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GDP: six
Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: Just one question: due to the alignement and their "timing effect", wouldn't it be judicious to move the "grace notes" to the "1.2.6 Special rhythmic concerns", at least through a link? Of course we'll have @seealso links everywhere in the manual. That's not a concern. That said, the "timing effect" argument has convinced me, so I moved grace notes into 1.2.6. Besides, I like having "grace notes" inside a subsection called "special rhythmic concerns". Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GDP: six
Le 14.09.2007 17:23, Graham Percival disait : http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Doc Sounds very promising. I like this progressive discovery. Just one question: due to the alignement and their "timing effect", wouldn't it be judicious to move the "grace notes" to the "1.2.6 Special rhythmic concerns", at least through a link? Cheers, Jean-Charles ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GDP: six
Just for the record: Ancient notation _could_ be split genre-wise into two separate chunks "Gregorian Chant" and "Mensural Notation". However, for a _reference_ manual, I think it is ok as it currently is (e.g. having a single section on ligatures rather than separate ones per genre). For a _tutorial_, however, IMO you definitely would like to split it genre-wise. Greetings, Juergen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: GDP: six
2007/9/14, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Doc To me, it's the one. :) V.V. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
