lilypond.org - Denemo
Greetings List, I noticed that on http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html Denemo is described as using an outdated version Lilypond. I would like to ask where you got that information and why do you think it is (still) valid. Denemo works with 2.12 and 2.13 just well and emits that version information to our Lilypond generator. Greetings, Nils http://www.denemo.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond.org - Denemo
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:49:03PM +0100, Nils Gey wrote: I noticed that on http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html Denemo is described as using an outdated version Lilypond. I would like to ask where you got that information and why do you think it is (still) valid. We have asked for help with the new website extensively in the summer of 2009 and (coincidently) summer of 2010. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-05/msg00072.html for example. Since nobody pointed out this problem before, I'm not shedding any tears now. Denemo works with 2.12 and 2.13 just well and emits that version information to our Lilypond generator. Hopefully somebody will send a patch. - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond.org - Denemo
Hopefully somebody will send a patch. Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box? A dedicated webmaster (maybe in personal union with other tasks) is a good thing because people like to have one person as contact if they have problems with the webpage. I strongly recommend to create such a post and/or to use a Wiki-like CMS to build your website around so that (trusted) users can edit the pages themselves if its too much work. Greetings, Nils On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:03:41 + Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:49:03PM +0100, Nils Gey wrote: I noticed that on http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html Denemo is described as using an outdated version Lilypond. I would like to ask where you got that information and why do you think it is (still) valid. We have asked for help with the new website extensively in the summer of 2009 and (coincidently) summer of 2010. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-05/msg00072.html for example. Since nobody pointed out this problem before, I'm not shedding any tears now. Denemo works with 2.12 and 2.13 just well and emits that version information to our Lilypond generator. Hopefully somebody will send a patch. - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond.org - Denemo
Nils On 05/01/2011 15:22, Nils Gey wrote: Hopefully somebody will send a patch. Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box? The website is generated in the same way we generate all of our 'documentation' (there are some differences but essentially it is the same). That is anyone can submit a patch to change the website, however there is a Doc 'meister' who reviews this and approves any changes to the website which will get updated periodically. A dedicated webmaster (maybe in personal union with other tasks) is a good thing because people like to have one person as contact if they have problems with the webpage. I strongly recommend to create such a post and/or to use a Wiki-like CMS to build your website around so that (trusted) users can edit the pages themselves if its too much work. We do have such a person. He just sent you a response previously ;) Do you have any specific suggestions on what it should say or can we just remove the box entirely? James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond.org - Denemo
2011/1/5 James james.l...@datacore.com:
Nils
On 05/01/2011 15:22, Nils Gey wrote:
Hopefully somebody will send a patch.
Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box?
The website is generated in the same way we generate all of our
'documentation' (there are some differences but essentially it is the same).
That is anyone can submit a patch to change the website, however there is a
Doc 'meister' who reviews this and approves any changes to the website which
will get updated periodically.
A dedicated webmaster (maybe in personal union with other tasks) is a good
thing because people like to have one person as contact if they have
problems with the webpage. I strongly recommend to create such a post and/or
to use a Wiki-like CMS to build your website around so that (trusted) users
can edit the pages themselves if its too much work.
We do have such a person. He just sent you a response previously ;)
Do you have any specific suggestions on what it should say or can we just
remove the box entirely?
The attached patch removes the box.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
From 37057211bc1ab4491dc21431cf0ec260c3f66d1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francisco Vila francisco.v...@hispalinux.es
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 22:57:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Web: Remove warning about version used by Denemo.
---
Documentation/web/introduction.itexi |5 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi b/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
index 75226eb..79a71c7 100644
--- a/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
+++ b/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
@@ -1058,11 +1058,6 @@ Moving the cursor in the LilyPond text moves the cursor in the graphical
view, and any syntax errors in your LilyPond tweaks are highlighted in
the text view when printed from there.
-...@warning{denemo officially supports an outdated Lilypond version 2.8.7,
-which lacks many of the features added since then. The Denemo developers
-are actively working to bring it up to our present stable version, 2.12.}
-...@divend
-
@divClass{column-center-top}
@subheading Text editors
--
1.7.0.4
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond.org - Denemo
2011/1/5 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
The attached patch removes the box.
Sorry! use this instead, the other removes a @divEnd and it shouldn't.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
From 0ebb81d9a8f278cd1c9211936100b13419def84b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francisco Vila francisco.v...@hispalinux.es
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 22:57:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Web: Remove warning about version used by Denemo.
---
Documentation/web/introduction.itexi |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi b/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
index 75226eb..018b151 100644
--- a/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
+++ b/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
@@ -1058,9 +1058,6 @@ Moving the cursor in the LilyPond text moves the cursor in the graphical
view, and any syntax errors in your LilyPond tweaks are highlighted in
the text view when printed from there.
-...@warning{denemo officially supports an outdated Lilypond version 2.8.7,
-which lacks many of the features added since then. The Denemo developers
-are actively working to bring it up to our present stable version, 2.12.}
@divEnd
@divClass{column-center-top}
--
1.7.0.4
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond.org - Denemo
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/5 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com: The attached patch removes the box. Sorry! use this instead, the other removes a @divEnd and it shouldn't. Thanks, pushed. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
