Re: Hey SEXY!
Yo Sexy Baby See My Nude Photos @ http://www.adultillusions.com ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Can this kind of junk be kept out of the list? (Was: Re: Hey SEXY!)
Can the list's mailman be configured to block spam, like, say, from a realtime blackhole list? El mié, 25-09-2002 a las 01:16, Jodana Cox escribió: Yo Sexy Baby See My Nude Photos @ http://www.xxx.com ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can this kind of junk be kept out of the list? (Was: Re: HeySEXY!)
I think the offending message got through Mailman's spam filter. One of the messages' hidden headers reads: Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17uD1p-0006Zk-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:20:42 -0400 Maybe a simpler option would be to unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list. In order to post to the list, he/she/it must have subscribed first, no? But I think trying to flood the offender with e-mails could be inneffective (it could be a fake e-mail address) or could backfire (we would provide the spammers with many legitimate and marketable addresses). I already wrote to the offender's ISP ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to complain. I hope they do something, and I also hope the list's managers do something too. Regards from El Salvador Oscar Valdez El mié, 25-09-2002 a las 10:49, Manuel de Roo escribió: obviously no but you are not the only subscriber to the lilypond mailinglist feeling disturbed by all this bullshit maybe all of us lilypond mailing receivers should send these people SO MUCH e-Mails that their servers get stuck best wishes from tyrol Manuel de Roo Oscar A. Valdez wrote: Can the list's mailman be configured to block spam, like, say, from a realtime blackhole list? El mié, 25-09-2002 a las 01:16, Jodana Cox escribió: Yo Sexy Baby See My Nude Photos @ http://www.xxx.com ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can this kind of junk be kept out of the list? (Was: Re: Hey SEXY!)
Maybe a simpler option would be to unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list. In order to post to the list, he/she/it must have subscribed first, no? No. Posting to the Lilypond-User list is explicitly *not* restricted to list members. This state is a conscious choice, not the result of an oversight. We (the project leaders and I) want people to be able to post to the user list without forcing them to subscribe to it. There *are* filters on the GNU Music lists - this message just happened to slip through them. I already wrote to the offender's ISP ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to complain. I hope they do something, and I also hope the list's managers do something too. If this problem recurs, I will take further steps to deal with it. Since I am subscribed to all lot of GNU mailing lists, I personally received *many* copies of the Hey SEXY message. Most of these things happen only once and then there is a new and different problem to chase so I plan to wait for a repeat of this problem before I act. David -- David R. Linn - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - mailing list manager for the GNU Music project ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Different time signatures
you also have to insert \alias Timing together with the timing
engraver, like this:
\translator {
\StaffContext
\alias Timing
}
Then you can use both the \bar command and the \time command
independently in the staves.
This is a very recent feature of lilypond. Notice that it means that you
don't any longer have to specify the bar lines with a property-statement
- you CAN use \bar |.
-Rune
OK, how to syncronize them properly? Look at the example...
--- Dmitry Rutsky
RH = \context Staff = upper \notes \relative c
{
\time 4/4
c'4 e g c
\bar |.
}
LH = \context Staff = lower \notes \relative c
{
\time 12/8
c'8 d e d e f g a b a b c
\bar |.
}
\score
{
\context PianoStaff
\RH
\LH
\paper
{
\translator
{
\ScoreContext \remove Timing_engraver
\alias Timing
}
\translator
{
\StaffContext \consists Timing_engraver
\alias Timing
}
}
}
\version 1.6.4
cannot convert `SCM (*)()' to `SCM (*)(...)'
[I sent this email a couple of hours ago and it is not showing in the Archives, so I'm sending again. Sorry if you are receiving twice] It seems that I'm the only one who have already tried to install lilypond on Solaris 8 :-/ It's been a pain ... I tried lots of stuff. Now I successfully run configure, but can't make it yet. The error I have now is: bash-2.03$ make all make --no-builtin-rules PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=lilypond -C buildscripts all make --no-builtin-rules PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=e snip make[1]: Entering directory `/var/home/users/rodrigo/lilypond-1.6.1/lily' cp -p /var/home/users/rodrigo/lilypond-1.6.1/config.h out/config.h rm -f ./out/cxx-function-smob.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT=./out/cxx-function-smob.dep ./out/cxx-function-smob.o c++ -c -DHAVE_CONFc cxx-function-smob.cc: In function `void cxx_function_typeinit()': cxx-function-smob.cc:34: cannot convert `SCM (*)()' to `SCM (*)(...)' for argument `5' to `SCM scm_make_gsubr(const char*, int, int, int, SCM (*)(...))' make[1]: *** [out/cxx-function-smob.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/home/users/rodrigo/lilypond-1.6.1/lily' make: *** [all] Error 2 bash-2.03$ This is the line 34 of cxx-function-smob.cc LY_DEFINE(cxx_function_type, c++-function?, 1, 0, 0, (SCM x), Is this an encapsulated C++ function ?) Any idea ? []s, Rodrigo ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Different time signatures
Dmitry Rutsky wrote: OK, how to syncronize them properly? Look at the example... What is the problem? The upper staff contains one quarter per two eights in the lower staff - as it should. If you wan't triplets instead of eights then you should use the triplet features of lilypond (\times 2/3, that is). -Rune ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
cannot convert `SCM (*)()' to `SCM (*)(...)'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is the line 34 of cxx-function-smob.cc LY_DEFINE(cxx_function_type, c++-function?, 1, 0, 0, (SCM x), Is this an encapsulated C++ function ?) Any idea ? What version of GCC? What version of GUILE? BTW, you might want to try 1.6.4 -- not that it will compile any easier, but it fixes a couple of other bugs. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
cannot convert `SCM (*)()' to `SCM (*)(...)'
It seems that I'm the only one who have already tried to install lilypond on Solaris 8 :-/ It's been a pain ... I tried lots of stuff. Now I successfully run configure, but can't make it yet. The error I have now is: bash-2.03$ make all make --no-builtin-rules PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=lilypond -C buildscripts all make --no-builtin-rules PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=e snip make[1]: Entering directory `/var/home/users/rodrigo/lilypond-1.6.1/lily' cp -p /var/home/users/rodrigo/lilypond-1.6.1/config.h out/config.h rm -f ./out/cxx-function-smob.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT=./out/cxx-function-smob.dep ./out/cxx-function-smob.o c++ -c -DHAVE_CONFc cxx-function-smob.cc: In function `void cxx_function_typeinit()': cxx-function-smob.cc:34: cannot convert `SCM (*)()' to `SCM (*)(...)' for argument `5' to `SCM scm_make_gsubr(const char*, int, int, int, SCM (*)(...))' make[1]: *** [out/cxx-function-smob.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/home/users/rodrigo/lilypond-1.6.1/lily' make: *** [all] Error 2 bash-2.03$ This is the line 34 of cxx-function-smob.cc LY_DEFINE(cxx_function_type, c++-function?, 1, 0, 0, (SCM x), Is this an encapsulated C++ function ?) Any idea ? []s, Rodrigo ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: cannot convert `SCM (*)()' to `SCM (*)(...)'
bash-2.03$ guile --version Guile 1.4.1 Copyright (c) 1995, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2002 Free Software Foundation Guile may be distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public Licence; certain other uses are permitted as well. For details, see the file `COPYING', which is included in the Guile distribution. There is no warranty, to the extent permitted by law. bash-2.03$ gcc --version 3.0.3 bash-2.03$ I'm downloading 1.6.4 now. Let's see how it goes. Tks, Rodrigo At 23:23 25/09/2002 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is the line 34 of cxx-function-smob.cc LY_DEFINE(cxx_function_type, c++-function?, 1, 0, 0, (SCM x), Is this an encapsulated C++ function ?) Any idea ? What version of GCC? What version of GUILE? BTW, you might want to try 1.6.4 -- not that it will compile any easier, but it fixes a couple of other bugs. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: cannot convert `SCM (*)()' to `SCM (*)(...)'
I'm using 1.6.4 now ... bash-2.03$ make all skip auto-beam-engraver.cc:493:19: warning: multi-line string literals are deprecated rm -f ./out/auto-change-iterator.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT=./out/auto-change-iterator.dep ./out/auto-change-iterator.o c++ -c -Dc auto-change-iterator.cc: In function `void Auto_change_iteratorconstructorinit()': auto-change-iterator.cc:145: cannot convert `SCM (*)()' to `SCM (*)(...)' for argument `5' to `SCM scm_make_gsubr(const char*, int, int, int, SCM (*)(...))' make[1]: *** [out/auto-change-iterator.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/home/users/rodrigo/lilypond-1.6.4/lily' make: *** [all] Error 2 bash-2.03$ guile --version Guile 1.4.1 Copyright (c) 1995, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2002 Free Software Foundation Guile may be distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public Licence; certain other uses are permitted as well. For details, see the file `COPYING', which is included in the Guile distribution. There is no warranty, to the extent permitted by law. bash-2.03$ gcc --version 3.0.3 bash-2.03$ Tks, Rodrigo PS: Before this error I had another ... In file included from include/string-data.hh:90, from include/string-handle.icc:16, from include/string-handle.hh:66, from include/string.hh:25, from axis.cc:11: include/string-data.icc: In member function `void String_data::set(const char*)': include/string-data.icc:126: `strlen' undeclared (first use this function) include/string-data.icc:126: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) make[1]: *** [out/axis.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/home/users/rodrigo/lilypond-1.6.4/flower' make: *** [all] Error 2 I included the line #include string.h in ./flower/include/string-data.icc and it seems to have corrected. At 23:23 25/09/2002 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is the line 34 of cxx-function-smob.cc LY_DEFINE(cxx_function_type, c++-function?, 1, 0, 0, (SCM x), Is this an encapsulated C++ function ?) Any idea ? What version of GCC? What version of GUILE? BTW, you might want to try 1.6.4 -- not that it will compile any easier, but it fixes a couple of other bugs. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
! LaTeX Error: File `geometry.sty' not found.
Hi I am new to the list and just starting to learn LilyPond. I know this has been discussed here before but I haven't seen a solution. ! LaTeX Error: File `geometry.sty' not found. is the familiar message. I don't have the file and Google searches haven't shown where I get it or what generates it. TIA, Paul Scott ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
