Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-25 Thread Russell Smiley
I've attached the dvipslist and xdvilist. They appear to have different
lists of fonts in them. I also printed the dvips generated file and it
looks just like it does in gv (completely messed up).

Russell.


On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 02:58, Mats Bengtsson wrote:

 Try the following:
 
 export KPATHSEA_DEBUG=32
 dvips yourfile.dvi 21 | grep '='  | grep feta  dvipslist
 xdvi yourfile.dvi 21 | grep '='  | grep feta  xdvilist
 
 This will give you two log files with paths to the font files
 that dvips and xdvi use. Normally, the same fonts should be
 used by both dvips and xdvi. 
 
 By the way, have you tried to print the PS file generated by
 dvips. Some month ago, one guy on the list experienced font
 problems when viewing the PS file in gv/ghostview/... but
 they printed nicely on paper and when he sent an example file, 
 it looked completely normal here. 
 
 /Mats
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Lilypond-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 
-- 
Russell Smiley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.vf) =
kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.720pk) = ./feta-nummer8.720pk
kdebug:search(feta16.vf) =
kdebug:search(feta16.720pk) = ./feta16.720pk
kdebug:search(feta-braces4.vf) =
kdebug:search(feta-braces4.720pk) = ./feta-braces4.720pk

kdebug:search(feta-braces4.vf) =
kdebug:search(feta-braces4.300pk) = /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta-braces4.300pk
kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.vf) =
kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.300pk) = /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta-nummer8.300pk
kdebug:search(feta16.vf) =
kdebug:search(feta16.300pk) = /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta16.300pk



Re: Persistent font problems

2002-10-25 Thread Mats Bengtsson
 dvipslist:

 kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.vf) =
 kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.720pk) = ./feta-nummer8.720pk
 kdebug:search(feta16.vf) =
 kdebug:search(feta16.720pk) = ./feta16.720pk
 kdebug:search(feta-braces4.vf) =
 kdebug:search(feta-braces4.720pk) = ./feta-braces4.720pk

Simply remove the feta* files in your working directory and
everything should be fine. Apparently, you used paper16 in 
your file, that's why our instructions to look for feta20
didn't give any output. 

Strange that dvips and xdvi use different paths.

 xdvilist:

 kdebug:search(feta-braces4.vf) =
 kdebug:search(feta-braces4.300pk) = /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta-braces4.300pk
 kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.vf) =
 kdebug:search(feta-nummer8.300pk) = /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta-nummer8.300pk
 kdebug:search(feta16.vf) =
 kdebug:search(feta16.300pk) = /var/lib/texmf/pk/cx/feta16.300pk
 


  /Mats




___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



common rests between two voices in one staff

2002-10-25 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
I am just doing some SATB pieces and I wonder if there is a way
to share common rests between the two voices of one staff.

The default behaviour for something like the following is that there
are two rests generated, one typeset above the other.

I know of the possibility to use s instead of r in one of the voices,
but consider this more to be a workaround, then a solution because it
makes voice extracts a little uncomfortable.

thanks in advance for any comments and ideas

--sample
\score {
	\context Staff = women 
		\notes \context Voice = soprano {
			r1
		}
		\notes \context Voice = alto {
			r1
		}
	
}
---end sample---



___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



Re: common rests between two voices in one staff

2002-10-25 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Here's a third to answer your request. Take a look at 
\partcombine, see 
http://lilypond.org/stable/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Automatic-part-combining.html

   /Mats

 I am just doing some SATB pieces and I wonder if there is a way
 to share common rests between the two voices of one staff.
 
 The default behaviour for something like the following is that there
 are two rests generated, one typeset above the other.
 
 I know of the possibility to use s instead of r in one of the voices,
 but consider this more to be a workaround, then a solution because it
 makes voice extracts a little uncomfortable.
 
 thanks in advance for any comments and ideas
 
 --sample
 \score {
   \context Staff = women 
   \notes \context Voice = soprano {
   r1
   }
   \notes \context Voice = alto {
   r1
   }
   
 }
 ---end sample---
 
 
 
 ___
 Lilypond-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



Re: tempo markings

2002-10-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:30:06 -0700
Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 For a simple piece with score and parts how do I cause the tempo marking 
 to appear only at once above the top part in the score and and once at 
 the beginning of each part.  This will be a fairly standard marking like:

AFAIK, there is no easy good way of doing this.  I've been thinking about
requesting this feature for a while.
 
 where I do know how to create 'note = 100' as per the manual.

Text markup, IIRC.  It's in one of the text sections in the reference manual.

 So far I put it in the first part and it, of course, appeared on the 
 score and on the first part and of course not on the other parts.

Three options:
- Place a mark (see the reference manual) in every single part of your piece.
Print parts.  Then go back and comment out the marks in all parts apart from
the first one, then print a score.
- use something like \header {meter=Allegro (quarter = 120)
- define a tempopart part which looks like this:
tempopart = \notes { s1^#(note (something = 120) see-refman) }
In your parts, include both the actual part and tempopart.
\context Staff  \violinpart \tempopart
In the full score, only include the \tempopart in the first staff.


I've done all three of them, and they all have disadvantages.

HTH,
- Graham


___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



Re: HaraKiriStaffContext question

2002-10-25 Thread Rune Zedeler
Graham Percival wrote:



One of these days I'll add a note to HaraKiri refman that empty lyrics
don't count as empty bars.


A Much Better (tm) solution would be to add a property telling whether 
to look at lyrics when determining if a measure is empty.

This would also solve the lyrics as chords hari-kiri-problem.

-Rune



___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: HaraKiriStaffContext question

2002-10-25 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:37:47 +0200
Rune Zedeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Graham Percival wrote:
  One of these days I'll add a note to HaraKiri refman that empty lyrics
  don't count as empty bars.
 
 A Much Better (tm) solution would be to add a property telling whether 
 to look at lyrics when determining if a measure is empty.

Probably.  Are you volunteering?

I don't code, and I've never used lyrics.  My intention is to help out by
editing documentation and doing odd documentation jobs.  When difficulties
arise and are solved on the maillists, I try to add the solution to the
docs (although I'm a bit behind on that).

As Jan or Han said a while ago, there are Bugs (Lilypond's behaviour doesn't
match with what the docs say it should do) and Problems (Lilypond doesn't
do something).  My goal is to eliminate Bugs by documenting things.  :)

Cheers,
- Graham


___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



Re: tempo markings

2002-10-25 Thread Paul Scott
Graham Percival wrote:


On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:30:06 -0700
Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

For a simple piece with score and parts how do I cause the tempo marking 
to appear only at once above the top part in the score and and once at 
the beginning of each part.  This will be a fairly standard marking like:
   


AFAIK, there is no easy good way of doing this.  I've been thinking about
requesting this feature for a while.


Actually your last two solutions sound like they have possibilities. 
Possibly something from this could be added to the docs when you have 
time.  When I get clearer on this I'll post my solution.  Of course this 
also needs to work anywhere else in the score.

where I do know how to create 'note = 100' as per the manual.
   

Text markup, IIRC.  It's in one of the text sections in the reference manual.


As I said I found that one:

One practical application of complicated markup is to fake a metronome 
marking:

even though I intend to dig further into how those defines work.

So far I put it in the first part and it, of course, appeared on the 
score and on the first part and of course not on the other parts.
   


Three options:
- Place a mark (see the reference manual) in every single part of your piece.
Print parts.  Then go back and comment out the marks in all parts apart from
the first one, then print a score.


That sounds very awkward for a full orchestral score.  (Not for me in 
this case but for others).

- use something like \header {meter=Allegro (quarter = 120)


That has possibilities and might solve another problem.  I'm going to 
post a question or two about vertical spacing when I get a chance.  My 
tempo marking is too close to the notes right now.

- define a tempopart part which looks like this:
tempopart = \notes { s1^#(note (something = 120) see-refman) }
In your parts, include both the actual part and tempopart.
\context Staff  \violinpart \tempopart
In the full score, only include the \tempopart in the first staff.


That sounds more straight forward.  I'll work on that.  

I've done all three of them, and they all have disadvantages.


What are the disadvantages of the last one.

Thanks very much,

Paul




___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



PS failure with 1.6.6

2002-10-25 Thread Carter Brey
Hello--

Having just downloaded and compiled the 1.6.6 sourcecode, I ran ly2dvi 
-P on an .ly sourcefile without error messages and got a surprise when I 
tried to view the results with xdvi. It loaded with this error message: 
Cannot find PostScript file for inclusion in document: 
music-drawing-routines.ps

The .ps file produced by the same ly2dvi run loaded perfectly with gv. 
The same thing happens with all my .ly sourcefiles. Is there a 
diagnostic I can run to track down the problem? This did not happen with 
1.6.5, and I was careful to run the font cleaning script after installation.

Thank you, my friends.

Carter

--

+-+
|Carter Brey ([EMAIL PROTECTED])|
+-+
Homepage:
http://www.nyplive.org/music/orchestra/index.cfm?page=profilepersonNum=7
All I can think of is a platter of organic PRUNE CRISPS being trampled
by an army of swarthy, Italian LOUNGE SINGERS ...
 9:44am  up 3 days, 23:57,  5 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.01, 0.00




___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user