Re: Trouble with lyric alignment
Basically the same question is answered for example in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-11/msg00268.html
in the mailing list archives.
/Mats
onix wrote:
I am a little bit confused about why my lyrics are not printing under
the first note in this piece. For some reason, they are starting on the
second note. Any clue? Another anomaly is that not all the lyrics
printed for this line. I want to get this cleared up before I go
farther.
lilypond 2.6.0, mandrake 10.1
\version 2.6.0
upper = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key des \major
\time 3/4
\partial 4*3 {des4} \\ {des4} f des ges des | aes
es( aes
es) aes des bes des aes des ges des { aes2. } \\
{es4( des c)}
}
lower = \relative c {
\clef bass
\key des \major
\time 3/4
\partial 4*3 f des aes des, bes bes, c aes,( c
aes) aes f {ges} \\ {ges} aes f bes es,
{aes2.} \\ {c,4( bes aes) }
}
text = \lyricmode {I want to walk as a child of the light
}
\score {
\context GrandStaff
\context Staff = upper {
\context Voice = singer \upper }
\lyricsto singer \new Lyrics \text
\context Staff = lower
\clef bass
\lower
\layout {
\context { \GrandStaff \accepts Lyrics
\override SpanBar #'break-visibility =
#center-invisible }
\context { \Lyrics \consists Bar_engraver }
}
\midi { \tempo 4=75 }
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Controlling stave separation
Hi Art! I tried \override Stem #’length = #0 but I get an unbound variable error. There's a little fault in syntax as you have to use an ' instead of ’ (\override Stem #'length = #0) Regards Thies ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Weirdo with midifiles
anders stenberg wrote: Hi! Thanks to Linda Cantoni! Did try and got the midi to work with som fiddling with changing context Voice to context Staff but lost some things in the visual apartment as the mensuralstrichte dissapeared all together. Restored the file to what it was in the beginning. Added a new Score block for midi using context choirStaff and new Staff commands and Lo I got it: visuals and midi. By tviddling around some more I.e. splitting each music and lyrics string in two: Incipit and Main, I also did get a midi sans incipit notes and a visual score con Incipit. Eaven if the accute problem thus is solved I would like to know why the combination Staffgroup, context Voice, and midi did behave in this way. Anders Stenberg Linda Cantoni wrote: Hi, I had exactly the same problem the other day, also using 2.6.4 Windows XP native. The only way I could solve it was by switching to a regular SATB choir format (i.e. using ChoirStaff instead of StaffGroup). I have no idea why that makes a difference, and I don't know if that will work for you in terms of the visual layout. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of anders stenberg Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:02 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Weirdo with midifiles Helo! I' v Had something weird happen to a few times now. Im working on Windows XP with the native - lilypond 2.6.4 through a jEdit- editor with a lilypond tool . I'v been using the Ancient notation/ transcription of mensuralnotation example from the manual as a template for editing renaisance music. When adding a midi block to the score I get a real weirdo. The midi comes out as somekind of percussion ensemble with sounds of drums, bels et.c. instead of normal notes. (It isn't the Lilytools midi listener as I also listened on Timidity and Realplayer) Changing the instrument with the \set Staff.midiInstrument = choir aahs isn't working neither with the comand put in the musicinput strings of the parts nor by putting it in the score block. I Did also try just run the orginal transcription example as it stands but adding a midiblock and I got the same weird result. I don't thing it's my set up as I get a normal midi when I build something similar from scratch. Cant figure out what in the example does this. Its anoying as using the example as a template is a convinient way to get a Incipit with the orginal notation on a score. Listening to check for errors in orginall or editingis is a necessary part of the transcripting process as auraly cheching the edditorial accidentals . ( Making my own template and use that usually ends by my loosing it some where in the files by forgetting where in which subsubsub folder its stored. So beeing able to copypaste it from the Lilyhelp in jEdit or from the manual on lilysite is convinient) Anders Stenberg ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
\stopStaff
hi,
since i hadn't seen a reply to this yet, maybe i formulated the
question unclearly.
\stopStaff doesn't seem to work for me at the very beginning of a
piece. everywhere else later in the piece it seems to work fine.
when used at the beginning of the piece, only the lines of very first
note are hidden, no matter how long the passage is before the next
\startStaff is used.
is this a known problem, or am i using it wrong?
sorry if i missed something in the archives where this was already
mentioned.
i found nothing in the news or archives of the lists that seemed to
address this specifically.
thanks again.
sean
(macos 10.4, ly 2.7.18-1)
% *
\version 2.7.18
\relative c' {
\stopStaff
c16 d e f % no matter how long this passage is made, for example
using \skip, the lines are only hidden for the first note
\startStaff
g f e d
\stopStaff
c d e f
\startStaff
g f e d
}
%
Sean Reed
Hamburg, Germany
Web: www.seanreed.de
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Weirdo with midifiles
Hi! Thanks to Linda Cantoni! Did try and got the midi to work with som fiddling with changing context Voice to context Staff but lost some things in the visual apartment as the mensuralstrichte dissapeared all together. Restored the file to what it was in the beginning. Added a new Score block for midi using context choirStaff and new Staff commands and Lo I got it: visuals and midi. By tviddling around some more I.e. splitting each music and lyrics string in two: Incipit and Main, I also did get a midi sans incipit notes and a visual score con Incipit. Eaven if the accute problem thus is solved I would like to know why the combination Staffgroup, context Voice, and midi did behave in this way. Anders Stenberg Linda Cantoni wrote: Hi, I had exactly the same problem the other day, also using 2.6.4 Windows XP native. The only way I could solve it was by switching to a regular SATB choir format (i.e. using ChoirStaff instead of StaffGroup). I have no idea why that makes a difference, and I don't know if that will work for you in terms of the visual layout. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of anders stenberg Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:02 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Weirdo with midifiles Helo! I' v Had something weird happen to a few times now. Im working on Windows XP with the native - lilypond 2.6.4 through a jEdit- editor with a lilypond tool . I'v been using the Ancient notation/ transcription of mensuralnotation example from the manual as a template for editing renaisance music. When adding a midi block to the score I get a real weirdo. The midi comes out as somekind of percussion ensemble with sounds of drums, bels et.c. instead of normal notes. (It isn't the Lilytools midi listener as I also listened on Timidity and Realplayer) Changing the instrument with the \set Staff.midiInstrument = choir aahs isn't working neither with the comand put in the musicinput strings of the parts nor by putting it in the score block. I Did also try just run the orginal transcription example as it stands but adding a midiblock and I got the same weird result. I don't thing it's my set up as I get a normal midi when I build something similar from scratch. Cant figure out what in the example does this. Its anoying as using the example as a template is a convinient way to get a Incipit with the orginal notation on a score. Listening to check for errors in orginall or editingis is a necessary part of the transcripting process as auraly cheching the edditorial accidentals . ( Making my own template and use that usually ends by my loosing it some where in the files by forgetting where in which subsubsub folder its stored. So beeing able to copypaste it from the Lilyhelp in jEdit or from the manual on lilysite is convinient) Anders Stenberg ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tweaking properties after line break
I don't have an answer to the rehearsal marks question, and I'm interested in asking the LilyPond gurus a generalization of your question: Are there currently any implementation plans for idiomatic Lily input syntax to explicitly align marks and markup explicitly with nonmusical characters such as: * key signatures (per Simon's question) * time signatures * barlines Unless you are at the beginning of a line, rehearsal marks (i.e. texts typeset using \mark) are by default center aligned over bar lines. If you want to change that alignment, use a setting like \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT The placement after line breaks is a bit special and is handled by the function pointed to by the after-line-breaking property of the RehersalMark object, which by default moves the mark 3.5 steps to the right, relative to the left end of the stave. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: RehearsalMark hack
Title: Message
Simon
-
In Version 2.4.6
the invocation line needs to be:
\override
Score.RehearsalMark #'before-line-breaking-callback =
#mark-callback
Impressive
detective work. Please add commentary about the documentation trail you
followed to discover your result. Maybe include some explanation of what
code does what.
This should be
added to Tips and Tricks. It also is a useful example for \book and
\repeat
Thanks.
- Bruce
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Simon BaileySent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 3:31
AMTo: lilypond-user@gnu.orgSubject: RehearsalMark
hackafter delving deeply into the lilypond backend
documentation (especially the scheme functions list) i managed to get my hack
working in three lines:#- SNIP LILY CODE HERE -#(define
(mark-callback grob) (if (= (ly:item-break-dir grob)
1) (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'extra-offset
'(-2.8 . 1\book {\score { \relative c''
{ \key des \major \override
Score.RehearsalMark #'before-line-breaking =
#mark-callback \repeat unfold 4 c2 \mark
\default \break c2 c \mark
\default c2 c }}\score {
\relative c'' { \key des \major
\repeat unfold 4 c2 \mark \default
\break c2 c \mark \default c2
c }}}#- END LILY CODE HERE
--gives this output: http://binabik.boldlygoingnowhere.org/r-marks.pdfthe
first score block is the one with the tweak applied, the second one without.
is anyone interested in this tweak? if so, i'll add it to lsr later
todayregards,sb.-- Do not meddle in the affairs of
trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \stopStaff
Why not send it to bug-lilypond (which is what I do now)?
I tried some obvious things like explicitly doing \new Staff
to be sure that the context is created when the command is
issued, but it didn't help.
/Mats
Sean Reed wrote:
hi,
since i hadn't seen a reply to this yet, maybe i formulated the
question unclearly.
\stopStaff doesn't seem to work for me at the very beginning of a
piece. everywhere else later in the piece it seems to work fine.
when used at the beginning of the piece, only the lines of very first
note are hidden, no matter how long the passage is before the next
\startStaff is used.
is this a known problem, or am i using it wrong?
sorry if i missed something in the archives where this was already
mentioned.
i found nothing in the news or archives of the lists that seemed to
address this specifically.
thanks again.
sean
(macos 10.4, ly 2.7.18-1)
% *
\version 2.7.18
\relative c' {
\stopStaff
c16 d e f % no matter how long this passage is made, for example
using \skip, the lines are only hidden for the first note
\startStaff
g f e d
\stopStaff
c d e f
\startStaff
g f e d
}
%
Sean Reed
Hamburg, Germany
Web: www.seanreed.de
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
timesig staff, autoskip?
In test/time-signature-staff.ly, is it possible to have the TimeSig
staff automatically skip the neccessary time instead of having to do
like this?
\new TimeSig {
\skip 4 * 9
}
/Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.com )=-
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \stopStaff
Sean Reed wrote: hi, since i hadn't seen a reply to this yet, maybe i formulated the question unclearly. \stopStaff doesn't seem to work for me at the very beginning of a piece. everywhere else later in the piece it seems to work fine. when used at the beginning of the piece, only the lines of very first note are hidden, no matter how long the passage is before the next \startStaff is used. is this a known problem, or am i using it wrong? Hi, thanks for reporting this. It's a bug, which I fixed for 2.7.19. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: RehearsalMark hack
This should be added to Tips and Tricks. It also is a useful example for \book and \repeat As far as I can see, the result will be exactly the same if you remove the \book! /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \stopStaff
hi han-wen and mats, thanks for the replies. i thought it might be a bug. it is otherwise a great feature. very helpful for modern scores. looking forward to 2.7.19. best, sean Sean Reed Hamburg, Germany Web: www.seanreed.de On 23.11.2005, at 14:08, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Sean Reed wrote: hi, since i hadn't seen a reply to this yet, maybe i formulated the question unclearly. \stopStaff doesn't seem to work for me at the very beginning of a piece. everywhere else later in the piece it seems to work fine. when used at the beginning of the piece, only the lines of very first note are hidden, no matter how long the passage is before the next \startStaff is used. is this a known problem, or am i using it wrong? Hi, thanks for reporting this. It's a bug, which I fixed for 2.7.19. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: RehearsalMark hack
hi mats, bruce, On 11/23/05, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the horizontal position, why did you not directly redefine the function that handles the placement av rehearsal marks after line breaks? The default function has the following definition (from scm/output-lib.scm): (define-public (shift-right-at-line-begin g) Shift an item to the right, but only at the start of the line. (if (and (ly:item? g) (equal? (ly:item-break-dir g) RIGHT)) (ly:grob-translate-axis! g 3.5 X))) and you can specify your own function using: \override Score.RehearsalMark #'after-line-breaking-callback = #my-shift-right-at-line-begin i didn't redefine this function, because i didn't know that rehearsalmarks were categorically shifted to the right at the beginning of a line. it is not stated in the documentation that this property is set to #shift-right-at-line-begin by default. in fact, the only documentation for after-line-breaking-callback is: This procedure is called after line breaking. Its return value is ignored. in docs for 2.6 at: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond-internals/grob_002dinterface.html and: Dummy property, used to trigger callback for after-line-breaking in the docs for 2.7 at: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond-internals/grob_002dinterface.html my naive assumption was that there is an invisible bar-line after prefatory matter over which rehearsal marks are aligned. (probably because of this: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/input/regression/out-www/lily-1278860194.ly) my solution is almost the same as your's if i'm not mistaken, except for the fact that it is called before a line break, rather than after (which is probably better and which i will change now). fairchild wrote: Impressive detective work. Please add commentary about the documentation trail you followed to discover your result. Maybe include some explanation of what code does what. the documentation trail: Difficult tweaks: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Difficult-tweaks.html -- defining a 2-line callback function for after line breaking which just categorically changed the extra-offset property. that didn't work, so i started reading the scheme functions for lily: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond-internals/Scheme-functions.html and searching for break led me to the ly:item-break-dir function. checking for beginning of line was then a matter of working out how to do an if branch in scheme. code comments: % define a function called mark-callback which receives grob as a parameter #(define (mark-callback grob) % is this item is at the beginning of the line (ly:item-break-dir returns 1) (if (= (ly:item-break-dir grob) 1) % set extra-offset to the desired shift. (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'extra-offset '(-2.8 . 1 the \book and \repeat commands are well documented in the manual. \repeat definitely is, and i only used it out of laziness in this example. for 2.4. and 2.6. please use Mats' version which is: \override Score.RehearsalMark #'after-line-breaking-callback = #mark-callback Mats' version is semantically more correct -- the only difference being that this callback seems to shift further to the left. sample output again at: http://binabik.boldlygoingnowhere.org/r-marks.pdf the whole reason i wanted this hack was for the following scenario: http://binabik.boldlygoingnowhere.org/trbns/ all three files are generated from the same source. i was having problems with the first piece in the marschbuch format (a5-landscape). lily's solution is in the standard version and collides nastily with the multimeasure rests; my solution is visible in the hacked version. [nb, the staff line vertical spacing has been seriously overriden in this document]. the reason i didn't want to hard code this in the source files is because of the concert.pdf and score.pdf which are generated from the same sources. regards, sb -- Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: RehearsalMark hack
hi, On 11/23/05, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I can see, the result will be exactly the same if you remove the \book! this is true -- i did it out of habit... sorry for the confusion. regards, sb -- Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: RehearsalMark hack
Simon Bailey wrote: i didn't redefine this function, because i didn't know that rehearsalmarks were categorically shifted to the right at the beginning of a line. it is not stated in the documentation that this property is set to #shift-right-at-line-begin by default. I can tell you a secret: I didn't look in the documentation at all, I looked directly in scm/define-grobs.scm. However, I think it's a plain bug that the documentation for this property isn't included properly, and have sent a related email to bug-lilypond. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: timesig staff, autoskip?
The only purpose of the \skip command is to keep the context alive
throughout the piece. Otherwise, it would disappear after the first note.
/Mats
Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
In test/time-signature-staff.ly, is it possible to have the TimeSig
staff automatically skip the neccessary time instead of having to do
like this?
\new TimeSig {
\skip 4 * 9
}
/Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.com )=-
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: RehearsalMark hack
On 11/23/05, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can tell you a secret: I didn't look in the documentation at all, I looked directly in scm/define-grobs.scm. However, I think it's a plain bug that the documentation for this property isn't included properly, and have sent a related email to bug-lilypond. now i know where to look next time. :) btw, i love all the really cool stuff now available in lily 2.6 -- especially the \book and vertical alignment stuff. really really neat. thanks to all and kudos to the devs... :) regards, sb -- Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
\harmonic on note outside chord.
Is there a reason not to allow \harmonic on a note that is not part of a chord? Or is this a bug? /Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.com )=- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: RehearsalMark hack
Simon - Thanks for the instructive commentary. This thread is a keeper. Just rummaged a bit on your blog, looking for the lily source -- didn't find it. As a treble clef euphoniumist, I'd like to transpose on letter size for my own entertainment. - Bruce -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Bailey Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 7:52 AM To: Mats Bengtsson Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: RehearsalMark hack hi mats, bruce, On 11/23/05, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the horizontal position, why did you not directly redefine the function that handles the placement av rehearsal marks after line breaks? The default function has the following definition (from scm/output-lib.scm): (define-public (shift-right-at-line-begin g) Shift an item to the right, but only at the start of the line. (if (and (ly:item? g) (equal? (ly:item-break-dir g) RIGHT)) (ly:grob-translate-axis! g 3.5 X))) and you can specify your own function using: \override Score.RehearsalMark #'after-line-breaking-callback = #my-shift-right-at-line-begin i didn't redefine this function, because i didn't know that rehearsalmarks were categorically shifted to the right at the beginning of a line. it is not stated in the documentation that this property is set to #shift-right-at-line-begin by default. in fact, the only documentation for after-line-breaking-callback is: This procedure is called after line breaking. Its return value is ignored. in docs for 2.6 at: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond-internals/g rob_002dinterface.html and: Dummy property, used to trigger callback for after-line-breaking in the docs for 2.7 at: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond-internals/g rob_002dinterface.html my naive assumption was that there is an invisible bar-line after prefatory matter over which rehearsal marks are aligned. (probably because of this: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/input/regression/out-www/lily-1278860194.ly) my solution is almost the same as your's if i'm not mistaken, except for the fact that it is called before a line break, rather than after (which is probably better and which i will change now). fairchild wrote: Impressive detective work. Please add commentary about the documentation trail you followed to discover your result. Maybe include some explanation of what code does what. the documentation trail: Difficult tweaks: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Difficult-t weaks.html -- defining a 2-line callback function for after line breaking which just categorically changed the extra-offset property. that didn't work, so i started reading the scheme functions for lily: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond-internals/S cheme-functions.html and searching for break led me to the ly:item-break-dir function. checking for beginning of line was then a matter of working out how to do an if branch in scheme. code comments: % define a function called mark-callback which receives grob as a parameter #(define (mark-callback grob) % is this item is at the beginning of the line (ly:item-break-dir returns 1) (if (= (ly:item-break-dir grob) 1) % set extra-offset to the desired shift. (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'extra-offset '(-2.8 . 1 the \book and \repeat commands are well documented in the manual. \repeat definitely is, and i only used it out of laziness in this example. for 2.4. and 2.6. please use Mats' version which is: \override Score.RehearsalMark #'after-line-breaking-callback = #mark-callback Mats' version is semantically more correct -- the only difference being that this callback seems to shift further to the left. sample output again at: http://binabik.boldlygoingnowhere.org/r-marks.pdf the whole reason i wanted this hack was for the following scenario: http://binabik.boldlygoingnowhere.org/trbns/ all three files are generated from the same source. i was having problems with the first piece in the marschbuch format (a5-landscape). lily's solution is in the standard version and collides nastily with the multimeasure rests; my solution is visible in the hacked version. [nb, the staff line vertical spacing has been seriously overriden in this document]. the reason i didn't want to hard code this in the source files is because of the concert.pdf and score.pdf which are generated from the same sources. regards, sb -- Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Extra staff in score with lyrics
Hi, I'm using Lilypond 2.7.17 to do a score with solo voice and strings.
Here
is a small extract from the voice line (lyric.ly) :
\version 2.7.17
lyric =
\relative
\context Staff \context Voice = melody {
f'2 \context Voice = other { \voiceOne \tiny g c f,4 } \context
Voice=melody { \voiceTwo \normalsize g,2 c f,4 } \oneVoice r4
}
\lyricsto melody \new Lyrics { Al -- le -- lu -- ja. }
And here is the full score (score.ly):
\version 2.7.17
\include lyric.ly
\score {
\new StaffGroup
\new Staff { \set Staff.instrument = Violin R1 R1 }
\new Staff { \set Staff.instrument = Viola R1 R1}
\new Staff { \set Staff.instrument = Soprano \lyric }
\new Staff { \set Staff.instrument = Cello R1 R1 }
}
For the sake of simplicity, all the staves except the soprano staff contain
only rests.
Here, when I compile score.ly, the output look good except for one thing.
The
soprano staff is at the correct position (3rd staff from the top). However,
the
lyrics, which are supposed to be below the soprano staff, are at the bottom
of
the score, below the last (cello) staff. Why is this? How can I rectify
this?
Another interesting thing is, when I replace \context Staff with \new Staff
in
lyric.ly, the full score has an extra staff above the soprano staff, but the
staff has no notes or rests, only a clef. Again, why does this happen?
Thank you.
Seng Liang.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Controlling stave separation
Thanks Thies, That curly quote symbol was copied, using the copy function, from section 7.1.5 of the PDF version of the User Manual where I note other instances of the same sort. Had I typed the string I wouldn't have had the problem as I don't have that character on my keyboard. But, it's handy to snip bits from the manual. Can that be corrected? Thies Albrecht wrote: Hi Art! I tried \override Stem #’length = #0 but I get an unbound variable error. There's a little fault in syntax as you have to use an ' instead of ’ (\override Stem #'length = #0) Regards Thies -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.7/180 - Release Date: 2005/11/23 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Curly ' (was: Controlling stave separation)
On 23-Nov-05, at 11:59 AM, Art Hixson wrote: That curly quote symbol was copied, using the copy function, from section 7.1.5 of the PDF version of the User Manual where I note other instances of the same sort. Had I typed the string I wouldn't have had the problem as I don't have that character on my keyboard. But, it's handy to snip bits from the manual. Can that be corrected? Short answer: yes. Medium answer: I don't know how. Long answer: some people have investigated this; if you're interested, search the mailist. I don't know enough about how lilypond builds documentation, and/or latex, and/or texinfo, to fix it. A patch to fix this would be __greatly__ appreciated. Cheers, - Graham Percival, LilyPond Documentation Editor. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \harmonic on note outside chord.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:29:51 -0200 Jonatan Liljedahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a reason not to allow \harmonic on a note that is not part of a chord? Or is this a bug? Also, the same question goes for stringnumbers, c\1 does not work but c\1 does! /Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.com )=- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
D.C. al Coda?
Running LP 2.2.6...
I've thoroughly scoured the documentation, examples, templates, etc.,
and I can't find a solid answer:
What's the conventional method of adding a D.C. al Coda? Specifically, I
want to know...
1. If the coda is taken at a bar line, should the symbol be positioned
above the bar or above the last notehead in the bar?
2. Is to coda necessary? If so, how is the text usually formatted?
3. Is the coda sign the same at the coda as it is when referring to the
coda? Or is it larger, and/or accompanied by Coda in larger print?
4. Does the coda usually begin a new line? Are there any margin issues
to consider?
In case you're wondering, here's the music to which I'm adding the Coda.
The Coda itself has not been coded yet. By the way, I still don't know
how to remove the H and P from slurs in tablature. Any help on that
matter would also be appreciated.
\header {
title = Tom Dooley
composer = traditional
arranger = \small arr. S L Raymond
pagenumber = no
}
changes = \chords {g1}
\score {
\notes
\context TabStaff \relative c{
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #'(-10 -13 -17 -22
-5)
\repeat volta 2 {
d,8 g d' g, e b' g d'
a16[ \glissando bes b8 d g\5] d b g b
d,8 g d' g, e b' g d'
a d\2 fis g\5 fis d\2 a d
d,8 a' d a e d' g, d'
a c d g\5 d c a d
a d g\5 bes,( a d) g e d'\coda }
\alternative {
{ g, b d g\5 d b g d' }
{ g, b d g\5 g, d' g\5 ais\1( }
}
\repeat volta 2 {
b\1) g\5 e\3 d g\5 e\2 d b
a16[ \glissando bes b8 d g\5] d b g ais'\1(
b\1) g\5 e\3 d g\5 e\2 d b
a d\2 fis g\5 fis d\2 a d
a d g\5 bes,( a d) g e d' \break }
\alternative {
{ g,4 d' g\5 d,8 d' g\5 ais\1 }
{ g,4 d' g\5 b d g\5 \bar || }
}
}
\paper { }
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \harmonic on note outside chord.
Jonatan Liljedahl wrote: Is there a reason not to allow \harmonic on a note that is not part of a chord? Or is this a bug? Also, the same question goes for stringnumbers, c\1 does not work but c\1 does! try doing \displayMusic on both c-. and c-. As you can see, in the latter case, the articulation is not attached to the note, and it would be difficult to attach the right symbol (articulation, fingering, etc.) to the right note head. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Curly '
[problem: cut pasting TeX's apostrophe yields quoteright code point] Graham Percival wrote: That curly quote symbol was copied, using the copy function, from section 7.1.5 of the PDF version of the User Manual where I note other instances of the same sort. Had I typed the string I wouldn't have had the problem as I don't have that character on my keyboard. But, it's handy to snip bits from the manual. Can that be corrected? Short answer: yes. Medium answer: I don't know how. Long answer: some people have investigated this; if you're interested, search the mailist. I don't know enough about how lilypond builds documentation, and/or latex, and/or texinfo, to fix it. A patch to fix this would be __greatly__ appreciated. I'm not sure if it is something we can fix on the (La)TeX side of things. The TeX fonts don't contain an apostrophe (quotesingle) symbol at all. I'm not familiar with cut paste for PDF, but if that works by cut pasting the glyph names/code points for the glyphs shown, then we're screwed. Then we would have to hack texinfo 1. to use a different font containing singlequote 2. to select the singlequote glyph for ' in verbatim mode. (I shudder at the thought of hacking in TeX macros) Werner? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Install of 2.6.4 on FreeBSD
Hi! My install of 2.6.4 has stopped with the following output: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/python' /bin/sh /usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -d /usr/local/share/lilypond/2.6.4/python /bin/sh /usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -m 644 ./out/midi.so /usr/local/share/lilypond/2.6.4/python/ true /usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh: ./out/midi.so does not exist. gmake[1]: *** [local-install-outfiles] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/python' gmake: *** [install] Error 2 [2:29:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4 Can anyone tell me how to proceed from here, and get back on track to complete the install? If there is a missing item (/.out/midi.so) does somebody have a copy, and where to I put it? Or if I indeed *have* it, where is it, and where does it go? Blessings, Fr. Gordon Gilbert +=+ | Angels' Roost Farm | | Rev. Fr. Gordon Gilbert Susan Gilbert | | 705-549-5056 | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | +=+ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Curly '
On 24/11/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[problem: cut pasting TeX's apostrophe yields quoteright code point]
I'm not sure if it is something we can fix on the (La)TeX side of
things. The TeX fonts don't contain an apostrophe (quotesingle) symbol
at all. I'm not familiar with cut paste for PDF, but if that works by
cut pasting the glyph names/code points for the glyphs shown, then
we're screwed. Then we would have to hack texinfo
Yes, they do contain a straight single quote. As I have posted before,
it is easy to get TeX to use straight single quotes instead of curlys,
but I don't know enough about the TeXinfo setup used for building the
documentation to provide a proper patch. Here's what I said earlier:
Quote Sven Axelsson:
Anyhow, this is how to get TeX to use straight single quotes that
work right when copied from a PDF.
Redefine the ' character as:
\catcode`'=\active\gdef'{\char0D}
The following small fragment shows the difference:
\tt Test \#'(1 . 2)
\par
\catcode`'=\active\gdef'{\char0D}
\tt Test \#'(1 . 2)
\end
End Quote
But I don't understand the TeXinfo build process well enough to tell
you where to put this to get it working. I'm using windows, so the
chance of me getting the documentation build working on my machine is
probably real slim. But maybe someone with a good grasp of how the
build works could have another look? I'm sure there is a style setup
file or a global include somewhere that could be patched.
--
Sven Axelsson
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: D.C. al Coda?
I'm running Ubuntu Breezy and for some reason, even after apt-get update, 2.2 is the latest version it will fetch. On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 20:50 -0800, Graham Percival wrote: On 23-Nov-05, at 3:48 PM, S L Raymond wrote: Running LP 2.2.6... I've thoroughly scoured the documentation, examples, templates, etc., and I can't find a solid answer: I recommend upgrading to 2.6, and looking in the 2.6 or 2.7 manuals. They include such an example in text marks, I believe. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Install of 2.6.4 on FreeBSD
I wish I could help you. Have you tried asking this on the bug list? Gordon Gilbert wrote: Hi! My install of 2.6.4 has stopped with the following output: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/python' /bin/sh /usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -d /usr/local/share/lilypond/2.6.4/python /bin/sh /usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -m 644 ./out/midi.so /usr/local/share/lilypond/2.6.4/python/ true /usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh: ./out/midi.so does not exist. gmake[1]: *** [local-install-outfiles] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4/python' gmake: *** [install] Error 2 [2:29:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/distfiles/lilypond-2.6.4 Can anyone tell me how to proceed from here, and get back on track to complete the install? If there is a missing item (/.out/midi.so) does somebody have a copy, and where to I put it? Or if I indeed *have* it, where is it, and where does it go? Blessings, Fr. Gordon Gilbert +=+ | Angels' Roost Farm | | Rev. Fr. Gordon Gilbert Susan Gilbert | | 705-549-5056 | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | +=+ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
