Re: Hebrew, UTF-8, etc.

2006-01-18 Thread John Wiedenhoeft
You could also use Crimson Editor (http://www.crimsoneditor.com/). Its
lightweight, but yet very powerful (syntax highlighting etc.)

Cheers,
John



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Homepage/ navigation/ download page needs some more guidance

2006-01-18 Thread Marc Weber
Hi.

I've started a German translation of the website some time again..
I had a lot other stuff to do..
But now I want investigate some time again.

The first time I saw the homepage I felt some kind of lost...
The first thing: I didn't know exactly where I was.. (the [] at the top
aren't that noticable if you keep in mind that the whole side does
change).. (that was my first impression).. Why not use some light
background color additional to the sourrounding [ ] reminding you where
you are exactly? 

If you see this at the top: (both should be centered, can't do this
here):

Home Introduction About[Download] Documentation Development 
Sponsoring  
   FinkCygwinFirst use   User help  

you can't notice that Fink/Cygwin/First use/ User help are _sub_ items
because all is equally in font face, color, appearance. It would be much
better making the first line bold/ having a light colored background or
something like this.

My suggestion would look like this (### beeing some light gray +++
beeing whit or some even lighter gray .. ;-) :

 

 ### Home ### Introduction ### About ###  [Download] ### Documentation ### 
Development ### Sponsoring ###
 

 +++ Fink +++  Cygwin +++ First use  +++ User help 
++
 



When clicking on download you will see the links:

Fink |  Cygwin | First use | User help  

- dowloads GNU/linux:
  debian
  Fedora
  SUSE
  Slackware
  ubunto
  any x86
- other :
  win
  win cygwin
  MacOSX/Fink
  source

The same for developement and old branch.. (you can see here that it's
really much information to read.. much more then you need)

Here I don't know where to look at at the first glance: subheaders (fink
? What is this cygwin? Ah I know.. It's for windows.. (you will miss
native port?) .. 

I don't know how many people are using the old branch (and still want to
download it..) sourceforge is hiding anything but the lastest by
default..

And anyone who wants to download lilypond wants to download this for his
OS, not for a combination (linux and Mac for example)..
So why not introduce 3(+2) short links

_GNU/linux_
_Windows_
_Mac (FINK)_ 
smallsource (warning)/small
after downloading, read our _Getting Started Guide_

There is also our 
_developement branch_ small(use if you are not satisfied with the features) 
/small and
our 
_old branch_ small(use if you want to stick with the old syntax you are
satisfied with the provided features)/small

Then all you have to read is

linux
windows
Mac
Getting Started (- The which editor to use issue here)

(source)
developement
old


with links to the GNU/linux download, Windows (native/cygwin) port and
Fink port..  beeing only 4+3 chunks of information and you are informed...

Then you can also add some short information about wether to
use cygwin/ native and what Fink is about on the subpage (does every Mac
user know? I think it's comparabe to that not every Windows user does
know cygwin.. but I don't know many Mac users..)

Then you know immediately where to click on and Windows users won't be
bothered with reading Fedora? Don't know. Ubunto? Heard about in the
radio.. and so on.

The only thing you having seen there are so many distros.. but who cares?
You want to use lilypond.. and if you change os you also have seen that
there are other ports, too.


That was just my humpled opinion. What do you think?

Marc

PS: I will look at the documentation and post my comments, too!

Oh. my tea got cold.. ;-)
Have a nice day


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


parallel versus series scoring

2006-01-18 Thread -DeeT (sent by Nabble.com)

I'm a newcomer to lilypond, having previously used abc. One thing I find vexing is how to enter scores so it is easy to see all the staves on the screen at the same time during coding (i.e. in the source code).

The Lilypond manual explains well how to code this way:

staff1, all measures
staff2, all measures
staff3, all measures

With compositions of any length, this means you can't see in the source, for instance, measure 57 from all staves at the same time, except perhaps with awkward editor screen splits.

I'd prefer to have this organization in the source:

staff1,measure-group1
staff2,measure-group1
staff3,measure-group1
%
staff1,measure-group2
staff2,measure-group2
staff3,measure-group2

This is how I'm accustomed to coding in abc, and what I like about it is that I get to the point where I can compose this way, without having to use paper first. In a sense, the source is organized similarly to the actual score, with staves aligned vertically and the notes proceeding to the right.

I suppose it would be possible to do this with the simple expedient of using one text line for each staff, no matter how long it is, but then it's not particularly scrollable or printable. A better solution would be to break each staff up into measure groups that fit in a conveniently-sized line of source.

Two ways I can think of that might work would be...

1. assign measure groups to separate strings, then concatenate the strings
2. change contexts on the fly, adding notes to each staff in turn (like abc)

Unfortunately I'm having a hard time figuring out how to do either. Could any seasoned lilyponders offer me some coding advice, and help me across the pond, so to speak?

Thanks...
David


View this message in context: parallel versus series scoring
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Double clefs?

2006-01-18 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 07.40, amhso (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
 I'm new to all this lilypond. I used to use noteworhty so this is a big
 change for me. anyways... Picture of my situation . I don't get how to
 format all this stuff. feels like programming. How do i make the second
 clef disappear? and that big tie on the bottom. here's my code too

This is the infamous grace note bug. When a piece starts with a grace note, 
this note starts at negative time, and since you added \clef treble 
_simultaneously_ with the music, that clef change comes at time 0, which is 
_after_ the grace notes. A sufficient solution in this case is to do
\new Voice { ... } instead of \new Voice  ... , in more complex situations 
with multiple staffs, you need to insert dummy skips. There are some hints in 
the documentation for grace notes.

As for the other problems, sequential appoggiaturas should be done as:

\appoggiatura { cis16[ b16 cis16] }

hope this helps,
-- 
Erik


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


TEX-Backend

2006-01-18 Thread Georg Dummer
Hi list,

does anyone have some experience with the TEX-Backend of lilypond (2.7.27,
debian). 

I tried:
lilypond -b tex --tex test.ly

But latex test.tex fails with
...
! Package inputenc Error: Keyboard character used is undefined
(inputenc)in inputencoding `latin1'.



I also tried:
lilypond -b texstr test.ly 
GNU LilyPond 2.7.27
»test.ly« wird verarbeitet
Analysieren...
Interpretation der Musik...[5]
Vorverarbeitung der grafischen Elemente... 
Berechne Zeilenumbrüche... [3][5]
Zeilenumbrüche werden berechnet...
Layout nach »test.texstr«
ausgeben.../usr/local/share/lilypond/2.7.27/scm/output-texstr.scm:19:1: In
procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #) (ly:all-stenc
il-expressions)):
/usr/local/share/lilypond/2.7.27/scm/output-texstr.scm:19:1: Wrong type
argument in position 2: (translate-stencil () . #0#)

Test.tex is empty.
Is this a bug or did I somthing wrong.


Thanks for any hint
Georg



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


How to invoke Lilypond-book (Windows / Ubuntu)

2006-01-18 Thread Bostjan Kuzman
I've succesfully installed Lilypond 2.7.27-4 in Windows and in Ubuntu Breezy 
(the autopackage - I would suggest using sudo sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux.sh to
avoid path problems here). 

However, I don't know how to invoke lilypond-book in any of this systems. I
can't even find a lilypond-book executive, only a py script.

Can someone please help me? 


Regards,
Bostjan



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: parallel versus series scoring

2006-01-18 Thread John Wiedenhoeft
Well, I don't know if Lilypond provides something like this. What I do
sometimes is using a spreadsheet editor (OOo Calc, Excel) with one cell
per bar. With this method, you are not limited to one dimension, but
have two, as in a real score. You can stack simultaneous bars under each
other. You can also use cell references to structure your score.

Cheers,
John



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Migration from Finale: music xml or etf

2006-01-18 Thread Tomasz Bojczuk
Form which format of Finale files (music xml or ETF) I will get better 
Lilypond file (some notation details like dynamic, key/tempo chenges, maybe 
fingering etc. ) ??

I can run finale under linux, but without music xml support, but if that 
format is better i'll do it under windows :-(..

Regards 
Tomasz


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: force distance between bars for chord only staff

2006-01-18 Thread freddy
May I ask again for assistance on this point ? no feedback 
for the moment, did I miss to communicate some information 
?


Thanks,
Freddy.

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:23:23 +0100
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of 
CommuniGate(r) Pro*

Hi,

I'm trying use 2.6.x to produce jazz staff without the 
melody staff. My problem is I would like to get 4 measure 
per line with the same distance between bars. It looks 
lilypond affects different distances on each measure 
depending on the number of chords per measure, and finaly 
the staff is not easy to read.


I've read a bit the documentation about the 
SpannerSpacing interface. But because I'm a newbie with 
lilypond I'm not able to use it properly, that's the 
reason why I ask lilypond users to give me some help !


Additionnaly, if you know about websites on which I 
could find lilypond templates for jazz staff, I've tryed 
to found this with google, but I didn't success with this 
too...


Thanks,
Freddy.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Hebrew, UTF-8, etc.

2006-01-18 Thread martial

 You could also use Crimson Editor (http://www.crimsoneditor.com/). 

Yeahp ! 
Adopted ! Yet I love Scite;
Her the Lilypond syntaxe highlight !
(long url 
http://www.crimsoneditor.com/english/board/
CrazyWWWBoard.cgi?db=
filesmode=readnum=1657page=
1ftype=6fval=lilypondbackdepth=1
)

small url : http://tinyurl.com/9hxhw

for auto-detec syntaxe 
write in a the pad :

LANGSPEC:Lilypond.SPC
KEYWORDS:Lilypond.KEY

save the with filename extension.ly in the 
C:\Program Files\Crimson Editor\link








___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: parallel versus series scoring

2006-01-18 Thread Graham Percival


On 18-Jan-06, at 2:15 AM, -DeeT (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:

 I'm a newcomer to lilypond, having previously used abc.  One thing I 
find vexing is how to enter scores so it is easy to see all the staves 
on the screen at the same time during coding (i.e. in the source 
code).


See sly at
http://openguitar.com/lyutilities.html

Cheers,
- Graham


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


2.7.27-4 development windows question/problem

2006-01-18 Thread coralline algae
Installed lilypond-2.7.27-4.mingw.exe and also the -3 version afterwards on a new systemwith winxp pro sp2. The install went along a bit then failed with a message aboutguile.exe I have installed the cygwin versions in the past but never liked the cygwin process for selecting components (mainly because I have dial up) I have used mingw and like it so was pleased that it is being used. Just thought I would mention this install problem in case anyone knows about it and how to proceed or can comment on what I might be doing wrong.
ThanksI mainly do everything on linux but like to keep the windows updated
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Hebrew, UTF-8, etc.

2006-01-18 Thread Mats Bengtsson

Quoting martial [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


hello


Is there a known bug in Notepad concerning UTF-8, or is it UTF-8 encoding
incompatible with Lilypond?
On the contrary, LilyPond only knows about UTF-8, since version 2.6.0, 
see the manual.



If you use The Windows NotePad they can not save in UFT-8 !

Certainly it can, at least in Windows XP (unfortunately not in Win98, though)!


If you want a simple textEditor  use NotePad2
http://www.flos-freeware.ch/notepad2.html
in the file menu choise code UFT-8


Or look at the latest weeks discussions on different text editors in 
the mailing list archives.




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Migration from Finale: music xml or etf

2006-01-18 Thread Mark Van den Borre
 Form which format of Finale files (music xml or ETF) I will get better
 Lilypond file (some notation details like dynamic, key/tempo chenges, maybe
 fingering etc. ) ??

 I can run finale under linux, but without music xml support, but if that
 format is better i'll do it under windows :-(..

MusicXML2ly is quite recent. What's there is high quality, but it's
still under development. It does take quite a lot of work off your
shoulders already, especially for monophonic and homophonic work.

shameless plug
Some of the planned musicxml2ly features are still waiting for a
sponsor, though:

http://lilypond-design.com/sponsor/open-features.html
(one or two of these have already been implemented)
/shameless plug

I've not used etf2ly, and I don't know how accurately it works. I do
know that the last little bit of coding work on etf2ly has been done
in 2004/10. This means you'll at least have to run the result of your
conversion through convert-ly to be able to use it in a recent
Lilypond.

I would also take into account the fact that etf is a dying prorietary
format for which future support is less likely than MusicXML. For
archival reasons, you'll probably want to have your music in MusicXML
anyway, rather than etf, mus or whatever.

Mark
--
Mark Van den Borre
Noormannenstraat 113
3000 Leuven, België
+32 486 961726
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: TEX-Backend

2006-01-18 Thread Thomas Ruedas
Hi,
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 12:06, Georg Dummer wrote:
 ! Package inputenc Error: Keyboard character used is undefined
 (inputenc)in inputencoding `latin1'.
I seem to recall having seen something of that kind when saving LaTeX 
source files (unrelated to lilypond) with UTF-8 encoding activated 
instead of ISO-8859-1 in my text editor (xemacs). This might be an 
issue if you have, for instance, german umlauts. Did you try that?
Can't say anything about the other stuff, sorry.
Thomas
-- 


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: writing Irish Traditional music

2006-01-18 Thread Gilles
Hi.

 
 is there any recommended sources of info on writing Irish Tradition tunes 
 using Lilypond ?
 

Are there specifics for Irish music?

 (For example, how does one stipulate rolls ?)

See:

  
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/lilypond/Tremolo-subdivisions.html#Tremolo-subdivisions

 
 Does anyone have any hints for a fast:
 
   editor - score - midi
 
 revision cycles ?


What do you mean?  [I just do what you described below.]
 
 I use timidity and xemacs.
 
 I see no point in involving products like Rosegarden or Noteedit et
 al.  I just key the Lilypond source straight into the file using
 xemacs and then browse the score and listen to the midi, before doing
 corrections.
 

Best,
Gilles


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Fw: again: PDF size

2006-01-18 Thread Eduardo Vieira

- Original Message -
From: Eduardo Vieira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Scharkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: again: PDF size


 Well I don't have answers, but I replying to keep the subject alive,
because
 it interests me too.
 I also noticed that after version 2.7.17(?) the program Acrobat Distiller
 can't convert Lilypond's ps into pdf:
 It gives this error message:
 %%[ Error: undefined; OffendingCommand: Â ]%%

 Stack:
 -dict-
 false


 %%[ Flushing: rest of job (to end-of-file) will be ignored ]%%
 %%[ Warning: PostScript error. No PDF file produced. ] %%

 - Or else:
 %%[ Error: typecheck; OffendingCommand: pdfmark; ErrorInfo:
 Border --nostringval-- ]%%

 Stack:
 /ANN
 /Link
 /Subtype
 -dict-
 /Action
 [0 0 0 0]
 /Border
 [9.99055 -54.0783 11.0906 -51.0783]
 /Rect
 -dict-


 %%[ Flushing: rest of job (to end-of-file) will be ignored ]%%
 %%[ Warning: PostScript error. No PDF file produced. ] %%

 Cheers,

 Eduardo


 - Original Message -
 From: Thomas Scharkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
 Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:25 AM
 Subject: again: PDF size


  Nobody answered to my mail from Wednesday (Jan 11), so maybe I am the
  only one who has this problem?
 
  I wrote:
  --
  I have noticed that the size of the pdfs produced by lily 2.7.27 on
  (windows xp) is much bigger than in previous versions.
  I have tested the same file unchanged with
 
  2.7.18 Win  44 KB
  2.7.23 Win  44 KB
  2.7.27 Win  1.220 KB
  --
 
  Another example:
  The pdfs produced by lily 2.7.27 are nearly as big as the ps-files!
  ps 1.768 KB
  pdf 1.343 KB
  Now I tried to convert the same ps manually with gs 8.51 and the
  resulting pdf is 91 KB!
  It seems there is something wrong with the lilypond gs setup.
  Any hints?
 
  Thank you,
  Thomas
 
 
  ___
  lilypond-user mailing list
  lilypond-user@gnu.org
  http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Migration from Finale: music xml or etf

2006-01-18 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 16.37, Tomasz Bojczuk wrote:
 Form which format of Finale files (music xml or ETF) I will get better
 Lilypond file (some notation details like dynamic, key/tempo chenges, maybe
 fingering etc. ) ??

I don't know what's better currently, but I have a feeling that MusicXML 
import will improve more over time, and be better maintained, than ETF 
import.

 I can run finale under linux, but without music xml support, 

how? why without XML?

-- 
Erik


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: About some extra .exe files in the bin folder

2006-01-18 Thread Eduardo Vieira
Just to give the chance one more chance... sorry if I'm too insistent.

- Original Message - 
From: Eduardo Vieira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: About some extra .exe files in the bin folder


 Hello list,
 
 I'm using the Windows native version of Lilypond (2.7.26-1) and have
 questions:
 1) Why are there three text editors? Namely: lilypad, lilypad-ascii and
 lilypad-unicode.
 None of the can produce utf-8 files, right?
 
 2) Why are there three Lilypond applications? Namely: lilypond,
 lilypond-windows, lilypond-windows-orig.
 Each has a size of 4.144Kb. If having only one of them is enough,
 wouldn't removing 2 of them make the install file smaller?
 
 Regards,
 
 Eduardo Vieira
 
 
 
 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list
 lilypond-user@gnu.org
 http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


using \include for fret diagrams

2006-01-18 Thread Shelagh Manton
I've been thinking about using fret diagrams in various lead sheets for
singing and finding it awkward to use fret diagrams. If I wrote a fret.ly
file with my usual set of frets in it can I include it as you would files
such as english.ly etc? 

Actually I know you can do this; probably what I'm asking is what would
the file look like? 

Shelagh



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Fw: again: PDF size

2006-01-18 Thread Toine Schreurs
See the documentation:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/user/lilypond.html#Point-and-click

The point and click links enlarge the output files significantly. For 
reducing the size of PDF and PS files, point and click may be 
switched off by issuing
#(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f)
in a .ly file. Alternately, you may pass this as an command-line option
lilypond -dno-point-and-click file.ly

   I have noticed that the size of the pdfs produced by lily 2.7.27 on
   (windows xp) is much bigger than in previous versions.
   I have tested the same file unchanged with
  
   2.7.18 Win  44 KB
   2.7.23 Win  44 KB
   2.7.27 Win  1.220 KB
   --

Toine Schreurs
-- 


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: How to invoke Lilypond-book (Windows / Ubuntu)

2006-01-18 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 19.18, Bostjan Kuzman wrote:
 I've succesfully installed Lilypond 2.7.27-4 in Windows and in Ubuntu
 Breezy (the autopackage - I would suggest using sudo sh
 lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux.sh to avoid path problems here).

 However, I don't know how to invoke lilypond-book in any of this systems. I
 can't even find a lilypond-book executive, only a py script.

lilypond-book _is_ a python script, and it should be marked executable. Try 
running it!

-- 
Erik


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Migration from Finale: music xml or etf

2006-01-18 Thread Gianluca D.
Alle 23:31, mercoledì 18 gennaio 2006, Mark Van den Borre ha scritto:
 MusicXML2ly is quite recent. What's there is high quality, but it's
 still under development. It does take quite a lot of work off your
 shoulders already, especially for monophonic and homophonic work.

I think that, at the moment, it could be a very useful alternative the xml2ly 
converter by Guido Amoruso. Have you ever tried it? It's a nice piece of 
software and its output is very neat. Also, it supports some features that 
musicxml2ly doesn't support yet.  The xml2ly converter has been posted in the 
mailing list, so I think it could be easily found in the archives. 

Best regards,

Gianluca


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Double clefs?

2006-01-18 Thread amhso (sent by Nabble.com)

i did /new Staff instead. Thanks very much it works well. I dont know how to edit the lower style part. 

\score {
  \context PianoStaff 
\context Staff = violin 
  \global 
  \clef treble

  
  \layout {
\context {
  \Score
  \override SpacingSpanner #'spacing-increment = #3
}
  }
  \midi {
\tempo 4 = 54
  }
}

%% Local Variables:
%% coding: utf-8
%% End:

the /score area. I don't need a midi so I could get rid of that. But I don't know what each tag/syntax means. does the /score just mean it puts together each of the parts that are listed?

View this message in context: Re: Double clefs?
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: 2.7.27-4 development windows question/problem

2006-01-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
coralline algae writes:

 Installed lilypond-2.7.27-4.mingw.exe and also the -3 version
 afterwards on a new system with winxp pro sp2.  The install went
 along a bit then failed with a message about guile.exe

Please try -5 and/or post the exact message you get.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien   | http://www.lilypond.org


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user