No Midi w/ crescendo

2006-10-28 Thread Kamal

I am using lilypond 2.8.6

If I use the following code snippet:
a\< b c d\!

then a silent passage will be produced in the midi output although the
documentation says that unterminated crescendos will produce that.

Can can this be overcome?


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re:The importance of a graphical interface.

2006-10-28 Thread Dave Phillips

Valentin Villenave wrote:


I've tried denemo ; it's a bit rude but definitely useable to. I'm
afraid they are'nt developing it anymore, and it's really a pity since
it was the ONLY lilypond-oriented graphical editor.


Denemo (http://denemo.sourceforge.net/) is still alive. A small but dedicated 
group has been working on CVS sources for a year or so.

Best,

dp




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: The importance of a graphical interface.

2006-10-28 Thread Valentin Villenave

Hello César ;

Just a few words.

I'm using the jEdit editor with the Lilypondtool plugin, which gives
the ability to compile, preview and even play your score with simple
shortcuts (a bit like the lilypond mac version) ; it is quite useable
and very convenient to learn.

I've tried denemo ; it's a bit rude but definitely useable to. I'm
afraid they are'nt developing it anymore, and it's really a pity since
it was the ONLY lilypond-oriented graphical editor.

There's still the possibility to use NoteEdit or canorus to input your
score and then convert it to lilypond. Or a good MusicXML editor (if
anyone knows one)

But : the lilypond language is a quite attractive language. For
instance, I've begun learning Lilypond just one month ago ; and now
with a /include "italiano.ly" (I'm French moi aussi)  I can read my
scores in genuine lilypond code !

That's why form now one I'm able to code directly in Lilypond
language, without even draw any sketch on a sheet, except for massive
and complex orchestral pages.

Of course, this implies at least two things.
-You've got to get used to "think" your music very globally, there's
hardly a way to wonder "oh, what if I put a G instead of a F?", listen
to it, revert to your F, and so on.
-You've got to think very _VERY_ horizontally, and not vertically like
in Sibelius or Finale. This has been the major difficulty to me. But
if you think about it, you'll realize that it helps you indeed by
making you work on larger sequences instead of just "fill" your score
bar after bar after bar.

One last thing. Lilypond is actually faster to me than Sibelius, as
far as I haven't anymore to correct every little detail by hand to
make my score look good. With Lilypond it does look good  in most
cases "out of the box" ; until now I've never used the \overwrite
command. I'm just way too pleased when I see the work Lilypond has
done.

As a matter of fact, I've switched to linux in the mean time I've
switched to Lilypond... But we can't ask everyone to do so, and
therefore I agree it indeed lacks a decent user interface ; especially
when you're used to Mac/Windows world, and a bit lost when you find
yourself in front of a command line (by the way, I'm under linux and
there is definitely no way to run your ABCedit here...)





2006/10/28, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

I hope you have seen the question on graphical user interfaces at
http://lilypond.org/web/about/faq

   /Mats

Quoting César Penagos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Dears Lilyponders:
> I'm a very in-love user of Lilypond, actually I have installed the 2.9.26
> version. I'm attend to update my preferred music score program.
> For many times i sow  in the user archives, people asking for a graphical
> interface. I thing there is a powerful reason.
> When you are "copying" a score, no matter with the instruments, or instrument
> colors in your orchestral score. Every musician knows what instrument will be
> the  most appropriate for the voice that is writing. As the case as the
> composers that can try every instrument they want.
> The very real problems comes when you want to arrange a piece; and
> you need to
> see the balance of the instrumentation in your score. Every body
> knows that the
> simple way is to assign the first and second voices to the violins I and II,
> the third or tenor voice to the violas and the basses to cellos and
> contrabass.
> It is Ok for very small arrange using the strings, but when you add woods,and
> winds you must be carefully what you are doing if don't want
> undesirable result.
> If you don't take care of the balance in the use of instruments your
> score will
> sound recharged, very dense.
> For this reason you have to be alert whit your instrumentation, and I
> hope that
> in the very close future some of the very smart people in Lilypond team takes
> the time to construct an a graphical interface for your great program.
> When this happens Finale, Sibelius etc, etc, etc. Will have to close their
> companies, because nobody will buy their expensiveness programs.
> I don't know if is the nature of the program that can't permit  an interface,
> but I'm taking the voice of all the people that really needs an interface to
> properly works in a score.
> An example would be the ABCedit editor from Prof.Coolgeem, is very nice and
> usable
> Please!! consider this.
>
> Cheer's
>
> César Penagos.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: The importance of a graphical interface.

2006-10-28 Thread Mats Bengtsson

I hope you have seen the question on graphical user interfaces at
http://lilypond.org/web/about/faq

  /Mats

Quoting César Penagos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Dears Lilyponders:
I'm a very in-love user of Lilypond, actually I have installed the 2.9.26
version. I'm attend to update my preferred music score program.
For many times i sow  in the user archives, people asking for a graphical
interface. I thing there is a powerful reason.
When you are "copying" a score, no matter with the instruments, or instrument
colors in your orchestral score. Every musician knows what instrument will be
the  most appropriate for the voice that is writing. As the case as the
composers that can try every instrument they want.
The very real problems comes when you want to arrange a piece; and
you need to
see the balance of the instrumentation in your score. Every body
knows that the
simple way is to assign the first and second voices to the violins I and II,
the third or tenor voice to the violas and the basses to cellos and
contrabass.
It is Ok for very small arrange using the strings, but when you add woods,and
winds you must be carefully what you are doing if don't want
undesirable result.
If you don't take care of the balance in the use of instruments your
score will
sound recharged, very dense.
For this reason you have to be alert whit your instrumentation, and I
hope that
in the very close future some of the very smart people in Lilypond team takes
the time to construct an a graphical interface for your great program.
When this happens Finale, Sibelius etc, etc, etc. Will have to close their
companies, because nobody will buy their expensiveness programs.
I don't know if is the nature of the program that can't permit  an interface,
but I'm taking the voice of all the people that really needs an interface to
properly works in a score.
An example would be the ABCedit editor from Prof.Coolgeem, is very nice and
usable
Please!! consider this.

Cheer's

César Penagos.






___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user







___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: The importance of a graphical interface.

2006-10-28 Thread Tomas Valusek

Hello,

it would be nice to be able to correct some things using mouse (most 
notably, slur shapes, system distances, markup positioning etc.) Shaping 
slurs using mouse is quite easy, but doing the same in .ly file is quite 
cumbersome.


Tomas Valusek

Bertalan Fodor napsal(a):
Actually I regard LilyPond as an engraving and not a compositing tool. 
So for my compositions and arrangements I use paper and pencil, a MIDI 
keyboard and a sequencer, but when I want a written copy, I transcribe it.


However, for copying it would really useful to have a graphical 
interface (it is a bit hard to do the transpositions from the written 
score in mind), but it need not be a full-blown graphical program, only 
a note-entry tool.


Bert

César Penagos írta:

Dears Lilyponders:
I'm a very in-love user of Lilypond, actually I have installed the 
2.9.26 version. I'm attend to update my preferred music score program.
For many times i sow  in the user archives, people asking for a 
graphical interface. I thing there is a powerful reason.
When you are "copying" a score, no matter with the instruments, or 
instrument colors in your orchestral score. Every musician knows what 
instrument will be the  most appropriate for the voice that is 
writing. As the case as the composers that can try every instrument 
they want.
The very real problems comes when you want to arrange a piece; and you 
need to see the balance of the instrumentation in your score. Every 
body knows that the simple way is to assign the first and second 
voices to the violins I and II, the third or tenor voice to the violas 
and the basses to cellos and contrabass. It is Ok for very small 
arrange using the strings, but when you add woods,and winds you must 
be carefully what you are doing if don't want undesirable result.
If you don't take care of the balance in the use of instruments your 
score will sound recharged, very dense. For this reason you have to be 
alert whit your instrumentation, and I hope that in the very close 
future some of the very smart people in Lilypond team takes the time 
to construct an a graphical interface for your great program.
When this happens Finale, Sibelius etc, etc, etc. Will have to close 
their companies, because nobody will buy their expensiveness programs.
I don't know if is the nature of the program that can't permit  an 
interface, but I'm taking the voice of all the people that really 
needs an interface to properly works in a score.
An example would be the ABCedit editor from Prof.Coolgeem, is very 
nice and usable

Please!! consider this.

Cheer's

César Penagos.






___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
  




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


(De)crescendo warning

2006-10-28 Thread Ian Hulin








I’m
using V2.8.6.  

 

I’m
getting a warning saying lily can’t find the start of a (de)crescendo,
although it seems happy with crescendo passages immediately before and after. 
As far as I can tell the syntax for the \< … \! block looks OK in all
cases.

 

Here’s
a short test file

 

\version "2.8.6" 

\include "english.ly"

ffz = #(make-dynamic-script
"ffz")

music = {

c1

<< 

  \tag #'part <<

    R1 \\

    {

  \set
fontSize = #-1

 
c4_"cue" f2 g4 }

  >>

  \tag #'score R1

>> 

\set Score.rehearsalMark = #3

\mark \default 

c1

\tag #'score \tag #'part
<<

%{ 

  No
problem with crescendo here

%}

  {\time 9/8

  c8 d e 

  \once
\override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'( 2.6 . 2.0 )

  f\trill
g\< a b c\! r^\markup {"//"}  |

\mark \default 

  R1*9/8 |

%{ 

  This crescendo passage generates a warning

  test.ly:27:52:
warning: can't find start of (de)crescendo

  

  b16\pp
b\< b\fz b a a a\fz a fs fs fs\fz fs 

   


  \!|

%}

  \time 6/8

  b16\pp
b\< b\fz b a a a\fz a fs fs fs\fz fs \!|

%{ 

  No
problem with crescendo here

%}

  b8\< b8
b8 b8 b8 b8 \! |

  } 

  >>

}

\relative c' {

   \keepWithTag
#'part \music

   

 

}

 

Is
this user error, a known restriction or a bug?

 

Thanks
in advance for your help.

 

Ian Hulin

 








--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.17/505 - Release Date: 27/10/2006
 
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: The importance of a graphical interface.

2006-10-28 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Actually I regard LilyPond as an engraving and not a compositing tool. 
So for my compositions and arrangements I use paper and pencil, a MIDI 
keyboard and a sequencer, but when I want a written copy, I transcribe it.


However, for copying it would really useful to have a graphical 
interface (it is a bit hard to do the transpositions from the written 
score in mind), but it need not be a full-blown graphical program, only 
a note-entry tool.


Bert

César Penagos írta:

Dears Lilyponders:
I'm a very in-love user of Lilypond, actually I have installed the 2.9.26 
version. I'm attend to update my preferred music score program.
For many times i sow  in the user archives, people asking for a graphical 
interface. I thing there is a powerful reason.
When you are "copying" a score, no matter with the instruments, or instrument 
colors in your orchestral score. Every musician knows what instrument will be 
the  most appropriate for the voice that is writing. As the case as the 
composers that can try every instrument they want.
The very real problems comes when you want to arrange a piece; and you need to 
see the balance of the instrumentation in your score. Every body knows that the 
simple way is to assign the first and second voices to the violins I and II, 
the third or tenor voice to the violas and the basses to cellos and contrabass. 
It is Ok for very small arrange using the strings, but when you add woods,and 
winds you must be carefully what you are doing if don't want undesirable result.
If you don't take care of the balance in the use of instruments your score will 
sound recharged, very dense. 
For this reason you have to be alert whit your instrumentation, and I hope that 
in the very close future some of the very smart people in Lilypond team takes 
the time to construct an a graphical interface for your great program.
When this happens Finale, Sibelius etc, etc, etc. Will have to close their 
companies, because nobody will buy their expensiveness programs.
I don't know if is the nature of the program that can't permit  an interface, 
but I'm taking the voice of all the people that really needs an interface to 
properly works in a score.
An example would be the ABCedit editor from Prof.Coolgeem, is very nice and 
usable

Please!! consider this.

Cheer's

César Penagos.






___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
  




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


The importance of a graphical interface.

2006-10-28 Thread César Penagos
Dears Lilyponders:
I'm a very in-love user of Lilypond, actually I have installed the 2.9.26 
version. I'm attend to update my preferred music score program.
For many times i sow  in the user archives, people asking for a graphical 
interface. I thing there is a powerful reason.
When you are "copying" a score, no matter with the instruments, or instrument 
colors in your orchestral score. Every musician knows what instrument will be 
the  most appropriate for the voice that is writing. As the case as the 
composers that can try every instrument they want.
The very real problems comes when you want to arrange a piece; and you need to 
see the balance of the instrumentation in your score. Every body knows that the 
simple way is to assign the first and second voices to the violins I and II, 
the third or tenor voice to the violas and the basses to cellos and contrabass. 
It is Ok for very small arrange using the strings, but when you add woods,and 
winds you must be carefully what you are doing if don't want undesirable result.
If you don't take care of the balance in the use of instruments your score will 
sound recharged, very dense. 
For this reason you have to be alert whit your instrumentation, and I hope that 
in the very close future some of the very smart people in Lilypond team takes 
the time to construct an a graphical interface for your great program.
When this happens Finale, Sibelius etc, etc, etc. Will have to close their 
companies, because nobody will buy their expensiveness programs.
I don't know if is the nature of the program that can't permit  an interface, 
but I'm taking the voice of all the people that really needs an interface to 
properly works in a score.
An example would be the ABCedit editor from Prof.Coolgeem, is very nice and 
usable
Please!! consider this.

Cheer's

César Penagos.






___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user