PPC Version?
I’m in the process of migrating OS’s (‘cause apple is pissing me off) and I’m wondering if there’s a linux PPC build of LilyPond. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
wrong tuplet number positioning (bug?)
Hello, as you can see in the attached file, tuplet numbers are not positioned nicely, when the tuplet crosses staffs. maybe this is regarded as a bug. another question: for asthetics i want that the accidential in the second bar (lower staff) not to claim space as if there where no staff crossing. can you have an object that is visible, but does not claim any space? temp.ly Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: PPC Version?
Depending on your distro, it can probably be acquired via the normal packaging system. I use ubuntu ppc and was easily able to install lilypond using apt... Hope that helps, JP James E. Bailey wrote: I’m in the process of migrating OS’s (‘cause apple is pissing me off) and I’m wondering if there’s a linux PPC build of LilyPond. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
misusing arpeggios
Hello, (Lily 2.9.28) I want to misuse \arpeggioBracket & \arpeggio to indicate barring over some strings in guitar music. E.g. when you play an a'', then a c'' and then an e'' (all three at the fith fret with finger 1), I want to indicate that you should use finger 1 at the a''. It should look like there is an arpeggio bracket as in \arpeggio, but e'' and c'' are not shown. I tried to attach an arpeggio to a single Note and then strech the arpeggio, but 1) you can't attach an arpeggio to a single note ( doesn't work either) and 2) I haven't found a property that would strech the arpeggio. I thought about to do something like this \hideNextNote e''>\arpeggio\recomputeStem, but I don't know, how to do it \tweak and \override doesn't seem to work, \recomputeStem should make the stem fit to the visible notes (you could do that by hand useing \override). May be there is an easy solution for it, is there? Thanks Alexander ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: PPC Version?
Julian Peterson escreveu: Depending on your distro, it can probably be acquired via the normal packaging system. I use ubuntu ppc and was easily able to install lilypond using apt... I’m in the process of migrating OS’s (‘cause apple is pissing me off) and I’m wondering if there’s a linux PPC build of LilyPond. It should be easy to add a PPC build to our GUB build infrastructure; unfortunately, we lack the hardware to test this platform. A reasonably technical person should be able to make this work. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Cannot find file for FontConfig cache
Forgot about it (see old posts) it dosen't matter or upgrade to 2.8.8 version Regards Tomasz ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
beam breaking in tuplets
Is this a bug or a feature? (2.9.27, PPC)
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
\times 3/4 { r4 g8 a16 bes a8 bes16 c d8 c16 bes } |
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 2 4)
r4 g8 a16 bes a8 bes16 c |
}
I was expecting the beam in the tuplet to be broken the same way as
in the measure after.
If I was expecting wrong, I'd appreciate a hint as to how to force
this behaviour.
Victor.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [Q] Rehearsal marks in parts
Version 2.9.27
Input:
parta = { r1 \mark\default r1 }
partb = { c1 \mark\default c1 }
\score {
<<
\new Staff = "x" {\parta}
\new Staff = "y" {\partb}
>>
}
(imagine that the two parts are in included files, because I also
want to include them in part files, so they both need the rehearsal
marks)
Output:
Interpreting music...
/Users/victor/Documents/Logic songs/Recorder/Follia score/
testscorep.ly:2:13: warning: Two simultaneous mark events, junking
this one
partb = { c1
\mark\default c1 }
/Users/victor/Documents/Logic songs/Recorder/Follia score/
testscorep.ly:1:13: warning: Previous mark event here
parta = { r1
\mark\default r1 }[2]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
I'd like for that warning to go away.
Victor.
On Nov 2, 2006, at 11:17 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Victor Eijkhout wrote:
If I put "\mark \default" in each part, then I get an annoying
warnnig message about duplicate marks when I include the parts in
a score document. What's the easiest way around this?
Can you give the version number of LilyPond you are using and a
small example?
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Golpe & Slap
Am 29.10.2006 um 22:37 schrieb Kamal:
How can a golpe or a slap notation be achieved in lilypond?
You can use the \markup command: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.9/
Documentation/user/lilypond/Overview-of-text-markup-
commands.html#Overview-of-text-markup-commands
slap = \markup{ \box \pad-around #-0.1 \fontsize #-2 \sans "x" }
golpe = \markup{ \box \fontsize #+4 "." }
c^\slap d^\golpe
Alex
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [Q] Rehearsal marks in parts
Victor Eijkhout wrote:
Version 2.9.27
Input:
parta = { r1 \mark\default r1 }
partb = { c1 \mark\default c1 }
\score {
<<
\new Staff = "x" {\parta}
\new Staff = "y" {\partb}
>>
}
My answer would be the same as Thies'
notes.ly contains:
global = { s1 \markdefault s1 }
parta = { R1 R1 }
partb = { c1 c1 }
parta.ly contains:
score {
<<
\new Staff = "x" { << \global \parta >> }
>>
}
partb.ly contains:
score {
<<
\new Staff = "x" { << \global \partb >> }
>>
}
score.ly contains:
\include "notes.ly"
score {
<<
\new Staff = "x" { << \global \parta >> }
\new Staff = "y" { \partb }
>>
}
HTH,
Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: beam breaking in tuplets
If you divide a 3/4 measure into 4 equal beats, then each beat will be
3/16 long. So, you can obtain what you want with
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 3 16)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 6 16)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 9 16)
Since this is a fairly uncommon rhythm, LilyPond does not
specify any such default behaviour.
/Mats
Quoting Victor Eijkhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is this a bug or a feature? (2.9.27, PPC)
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
\times 3/4 { r4 g8 a16 bes a8 bes16 c d8 c16 bes } |
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 2 4)
r4 g8 a16 bes a8 bes16 c |
}
I was expecting the beam in the tuplet to be broken the same way as
in the measure after.
If I was expecting wrong, I'd appreciate a hint as to how to force
this behaviour.
Victor.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: misusing arpeggios
One solution is to typeset the invisible upper and lower notes in
separate Voice contexts and then use the connectArpeggio feature to get
a single arpeggio over the three voices. By default, the engraver that
handles connected arpeggios is only available in the PianoStaff
context, so you have to add it
also to the Staff context. Also, the \arpeggioBracket macro only does
its settings in the current Voice, not for the full Staff, which is
where the connected arpeggios are handles. Therefore, you have some
extra lines of code that might look a bit strange, in the following
example:
\version "2.9.28"
\new Staff \with {\consists Span_arpeggio_engraver} \relative c''{
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\override Staff.Arpeggio #'stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-bracket
<< \new Voice {\hideNotes \arpeggio}
\new Voice { c }
\new Voice {\hideNotes \arpeggio }
}
/Mats
/Mats
Quoting Alexander Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
(Lily 2.9.28)
I want to misuse \arpeggioBracket & \arpeggio to indicate barring
over some strings in guitar music. E.g. when you play an a'', then a
c'' and then an e'' (all three at the fith fret with finger 1), I
want to indicate that you should use finger 1 at the a''. It should
look like there is an arpeggio bracket as in \arpeggio,
but e'' and c'' are not shown.
I tried to attach an arpeggio to a single Note and then strech the
arpeggio, but 1) you can't attach an arpeggio to a single note (
doesn't work either) and 2) I haven't found a property that would
strech the arpeggio.
I thought about to do something like this \hideNextNote e''>\arpeggio\recomputeStem, but I don't know, how to
do it \tweak and \override doesn't seem to work, \recomputeStem
should make the stem fit to the visible notes (you could do that by
hand useing \override).
May be there is an easy solution for it, is there?
Thanks
Alexander
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
overriding Auto Beam
Hi Everyone, I'm new to Lilypond and to the list, and I'm hoping that someone can answer what should be an easy question. I have a measure with a dotted quarter, then three eighth notes (in 3/4 time). I don't want the first of the three eighth notes to beam to the other two, but can't get it to unbeam. Here is the line: c4. c8 b8 a8 -- ° Chris° ° ><°> Christopher A. LaFond[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.celticharper.net ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: overriding Auto Beam
Try: c4. c8 b8[ a8] The [] characters are used to manually start and stop beams. --Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher A. LaFond Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 2:23 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: overriding Auto Beam Hi Everyone, I'm new to Lilypond and to the list, and I'm hoping that someone can answer what should be an easy question. I have a measure with a dotted quarter, then three eighth notes (in 3/4 time). I don't want the first of the three eighth notes to beam to the other two, but can't get it to unbeam. Here is the line: c4. c8 b8 a8 -- ° Chris° ° ><°> Christopher A. LaFond[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.celticharper.net ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: beam breaking in tuplets
I don't think you want that. Just try this:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 3 16)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 6 16)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 9 16)
\times 3/4 { r4 g8 a16 bes a8 bes16 c d8 c16 bes } |
r4 g8 a16 bes a16 bes c8 |
}
\version "2.9.27"
Bad side effects.
But I think this approach points to a design error. Beam breaking is
a visual operation, not a mathematical one. I want a sixteenth beam
broken at any beat boundary, no matter whether this is in 4/4 time or
in a 27 over 26 fragment.
Imho, of course.
Btw, that raises another question I''ve been meaning to ask: do
assignments have scope? Can I limit this beam setting overriding to
one fragment, without explicitly restoring the old rules? (Lilypond
looks so much like TeX that I would really expect such a mechanism to
exist.)
Victor.
On Nov 5, 2006, at 3:22 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
If you divide a 3/4 measure into 4 equal beats, then each beat will
be 3/16 long. So, you can obtain what you want with #(override-auto-
beam-setting '(end * * * *) 3 16)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 6 16)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 9 16)
Since this is a fairly uncommon rhythm, LilyPond does not
specify any such default behaviour.
/Mats
Quoting Victor Eijkhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is this a bug or a feature? (2.9.27, PPC)
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
\times 3/4 { r4 g8 a16 bes a8 bes16 c d8 c16 bes } |
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 * *) 2 4)
r4 g8 a16 bes a8 bes16 c |
}
I was expecting the beam in the tuplet to be broken the same way
as in the measure after.
If I was expecting wrong, I'd appreciate a hint as to how to
force this behaviour.
Victor.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [Q] Rehearsal marks in parts
On Nov 5, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Paul Scott wrote:global = { s1 \markdefault s1 } parta = { R1 R1 } partb = { c1 c1 } parta.ly contains: score { << \new Staff = "x" { << \global \parta >> } >> } Ah. I'd been wondering if there was a way to implement a "master track". Cool. Thanks.Victor.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
