Re: Polyphonic rests
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I already pointed out, you may be able to get even better help from
> the mailing list, if you include some examples of
> LilyPond code where you have trouble.
OK I´ll cut it down ...
\version "2.11.14"
\paper{#(set-default-paper-size "a4") top-margin = 0\cm left-margin =
1\cm right-margin = 1.5\cm bottom-margin = 1\cm between-system-space =
28\mm}
\header{title="Sonata op.15" composer="Fernando Sor" opus=""}
one = \relative c' {4 4 r g r g g }
two= \relative c {s1 s \times 2/3 {r8 b' d} \times 2/3 {r8 b d} \times
2/3 {r8 b d} \times 2/3 {r8 b d} }
three= \relative c, {d'4 d d d d d d r g d g g }
{\clef "G_8" \key c \major
\time 4/4<<
\one
\\
\two
\\
\\
\three
>>
}
f
--
My new CD "Know Greed":
http://cdbaby.com/cd/rogge
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tuplet Bus error
Please always send bus error or segmentation fault problems directly
to the bug-lilypond mailing list (I have done it for this email, as you
can see).
It seems that the problem is that the code that handles the tuplets
needs to have stems available. The solution is to use
\layout{
\context{
\TabStaff
\override TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
}
\context{
\TabVoice
\remove Beam_engraver
\remove Stem_engraver
\remove Tuplet_engraver
}
}
instead. Also, I don't know where you have found the
\override TupletBracket #'number-visibility = ##f setting, there
is no such property (but you can do
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
on the other hand).
/Mats
Quoting Joey Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Why is this tuplet in \partition bad? I copied it from the docs...
Slowly but surely, I may figure this out
thanks,
joey
\header{
title = "A scale in LilyPond"
}
\version "2.10.10"
\layout{
\context{
\TabStaff
\override TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
}
\context{
\TabVoice
\remove Beam_engraver
\remove Stem_engraver
\override TupletBracket #'number-visibility = ##f
}
}
partition = {
\key e \major
\times 2/3 { f8 g a }
}
<<
\new Staff {
\clef "G_8"
\partition }
\new TabStaff {
\partition
}
>>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Polyphonic rests
As I already pointed out, you may be able to get even better help from
the mailing list, if you include some examples of
LilyPond code where you have trouble.
For the voice where you want the rest to stay in the middle of the
stave, you can use
\revert Rest #'direction
/Mats
Quoting Claus Rogge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want the two upper voice to have stems up, then
you could use
<<{ \A } \\ { \B } \\ \\ { \D } >>
Thank you, also to Zoltan, this helped me understanding that. Depending
on the order of my voice, I have 32 or more "Warning(s): too many
colliding rests" and this is, as I now understand, because a voice (or
do you say "part") is either upper or lower to LP.
So there´s still the problem of the rests that I want to appear in the
middle of the staff, because they are in the middle voice. If it isn´t
possible to do taht any other way, I guess I´ll have to place every
single rest ... this is a bit awkward really.
I won´t bother you with any examples because it´s a five page
arrangement and the file must be enormous.
--
My new CD "Know Greed":
http://cdbaby.com/cd/rogge
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Hard-to-engrave bits involving polyphony
Hi Benjamin,
First off, I have a situation like this:
\relative c'' {
<< { f8 e ~ } \\
{ c4 s4 } >>
}
where I need the c4 tied to the c in the first —in other words, I
have
a chord where one note needs to be tied to a note in the same voice and
the
other note is tied to a note from a different voice! What's more, I need
an
arpeggio to the left of the first notes (the c and the f). How can I
accomplish this?
For the tie issue, if you create an invisible note in the second voice, you
can fake a tie between the two voices:
wipeNote = {
\once \override NoteHead #'transparent = ##t
\once \override Stem #'transparent = ##t
}
\relative c'' {
<< { f8 e ~ } \\
{ c4 ~ \wipeNote c } >>
}
Secondly, I have a similar situation involving polyphony:
\relative c'' {
<< { a8 d } \\
{ e,8 a } >>
}
where the first a8 needs to be tied to the second a.
I can't really help you with this, unless it's possible for the a's to be in
the same voice, i.e.
\relative c'' {
<< { a8 ~ \stemDown a } \\
{ e8 \stemUp d' } >>
}
Finally, I have a grace note situation like this:
\relative c' {
<< { c4 e g r } \\ { s2 s4 s8 \acciaccatura b8 s8 } >>
\acciaccatura b8 c1
}
where I need both grace notes tied to the c1
Using \aftergrace and \grace with an override for the acciaccatura stroke
will allow you to keep this in one voice, which solves the slur problem:
\relative c' {
c4 e g \override Stem #'stroke-style = #"grace"
\afterGrace r b8( \grace b8 \revert Stem #'stroke-style c1)
}
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Hard-to-engrave bits involving polyphony
\relative c'' {
<< { f8 e ~ } \\
{ c4 s4 } >>
}
[...] I need an
arpeggio to the left of the first notes (the c and the f). How can I
accomplish this?
The problem with the arpeggio in 2 separate voices, has just been resolved
in the french list yesterday !
And a LSR has been added (search : "arpeggio").
You can try something like that
%%
\version "2.10.20"
\new Staff
\with {
\consists Span_arpeggio_engraver
}
\relative c'' {
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
<<
{ f8\arpeggio e ~ }
\\
{ c4\arpeggio s4 } >>
}
%%
For the other problems I have no solutions.
Sorry.
Gilles
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
temporary extra voice
I have a violin part which, for some bars, split into two voices. I first tried this : - create a violin_voice_a - add a violin_voice_b, containing rests everywhere except on those few bars where there is two voices - stack the two vioces using a hara_kiri context for the second one in order to hide empty staves The result is schematized as Fig 2 (see the picture) Which is far different from what I can find in the litterature (fig 1) where, on the splitted staves but unsplitted voices, the violin_voice_a is printed on both the upper and the lower staves of the system. How could I obtain this result automagically ? thx Yota <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Polyphonic rests
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want the two upper voice to have stems up, then
> you could use
> <<{ \A } \\ { \B } \\ \\ { \D } >>
Thank you, also to Zoltan, this helped me understanding that. Depending
on the order of my voice, I have 32 or more "Warning(s): too many
colliding rests" and this is, as I now understand, because a voice (or
do you say "part") is either upper or lower to LP.
So there´s still the problem of the rests that I want to appear in the
middle of the staff, because they are in the middle voice. If it isn´t
possible to do taht any other way, I guess I´ll have to place every
single rest ... this is a bit awkward really.
I won´t bother you with any examples because it´s a five page
arrangement and the file must be enormous.
--
My new CD "Know Greed":
http://cdbaby.com/cd/rogge
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
