Re: Can I have my own custom LilyPond?
Quoting Tao Cumplido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, I also use my own font. I am no programmer, so I use skips with the chords attached as TextScript. Why not write them as a lyrics line (with explicit durations on each "syllable")? Then you don't need to type all the skips and you will also get the chords vertically aligned. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: file refuses to line or page break
2007/7/19, Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > pageBreak should include a bar check by default. Anyone for a patch? You may want to force a line or page break in the middle of a bar, using the \bar "" trick. So we should not add a barCheck to pageBreak. I know, but people that need such uncommon constructs can deal with the extra warning. They are fewer than people making mistakes. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to screen-optimize stems
2007/7/20, Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hehe, I found out there is a really simple solution of how to make stems look nice in acroread. In all its simplicity, add \paper { blot-diameter = 2 \pt } :-) Now all stems appear to have same thickness in acroread. Unfortunately it does not work with bar-lines, though. Oh, but you could simply add \override Score.BarLine #'thickness = #100 problem solved :-) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can I have my own custom LilyPond?
Hello, I also use my own font. I am no programmer, so I use skips with the chords attached as TextScript. Maybe it would really be nice to have different Chord symbol solutions available since there's not standardised way to do it. For example a major 7 chord can be written the following ways: CM CM7 CMaj7 Cmaj7 Cj7 CΔ and there are probably more. I am no great fontdesigner so my font consists for most parts of glyphs from other fonts which come with LilyPond. So far I only use it for private purposes so I don't know if it's a problem to publish a chart here on the list. But I'd like to help if I can. regards, Tao Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:32:13 +0200 Von: "Dominic Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: PabloZum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lilypond-user@gnu.org Betreff: Re: Can I have my own custom LilyPond? > Send it to the lilypond-user list and also to the devel-list > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). > > Maybe we should at first discuss on the users list if this is a > special way of setting chordnames and only you need it or if its > needed by (maybe many) other users too ... > > > 2007/7/24, PabloZum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thank you, Dominic. I'm new here and I hadn't thought of that. > > > > I'll make a pdf with my chord-name font and its various combinations. > Who > > should I send it to? > > > > (I'm sorry, I don't know how to thread this answer directly under yours > at > > the forum.) > > > > > > > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Indenting Coda System
In printed music, I often see the coda system at the end of a piece on its own line and indented. In Lilypond, I can place the coda symbol and break the line, but how do I indent the system? Can't figure it out. Thanks! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Overly thick results from markup with draw-line
Hi, Is there a reason the nibbed output of draw-line is almost 20 times thicker than usual (rather than just 2 times thicker like the rest of the TextSpanner)? %%% EX 1 %%% \version "2.11.26" \new Staff { c'4 \startTextSpan c'4 \stopTextSpan } \layout { \context { \Staff \override TextSpanner #'bound-details #'right #'text = #(markup #:draw-line '(0 . -1)) \override TextSpanner #'thickness = #2 } } %%% EX 1 %%% See attached. Bug? -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
No \markup in the \layout block?
Hi, This works fine: %%% EX 1 %%% \version "2.11.26" \new Staff { \override TextSpanner #'bound-details #'right #'text = \markup { "end" } c'4 } %%% EX 1 %%% But this causes explosions: %%% EX 2 %%% \version "2.11.26" \new Staff { c'4 } \layout { \context { \Staff \override TextSpanner #'bound-details #'right #'text = \markup { "end" } } } %%% EX 2 %%% GNU LilyPond 2.11.26 Processing `0150.ly' Parsing... 0150.ly:11:61: error: syntax error, unexpected \markup, expecting SCM_IDENTIFIER or SCM_TOKEN \override TextSpanner #'bound-details #'right #'text = \markup { "end" } Why? -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can I have my own custom LilyPond?
PabloZum terra.com.br> writes: > > > I'm rather dissatisfied with the way LilyPond prints chord names. After > trying all the ideas some people here have generously given me to try and use my > own chord-name font, I've come to the conclusion that the only practical way to > achieve what I want is by changing the sourcecode to fit my own fairly > idiossincratic chord-name style. > > Is it possible to do that? I mean, to fiddle with the sourcecode, change it > to my own requirements and have an indepedent LilyPond? > > If so, which files are relevant? I'd recommend that you look at scm/chord-generic-names.scm. To my quick look, this is where chord names come from. Rather than write your own separate Lilypond, and force you to maintain your version, I'd recommend that you just define your own chord name style. In chord-generic-names.scm you'll see that there are at least two different chord name styles, banter-chord-names and jazz-chord-names. You could add your own pablo-chord-names function, add it to Lilypond, and move on forward. You can make changes to .scm files without recompiling Lilypond, and you can send patches to the lilypond-devel list; the patches will either be approved and applied, or you'll receive suggestions on how to improve the patches to make them acceptable for Lilypond. Welcome to the Lilypond developers world. We love to have new contributors. Carl Sorensen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Horizontal brackets
Hello, I'm trying to set up upper double brackets (the 'con molta pressione' sign for strings), but I have no idea on how to do this. I found that there are analysis brackets, but I can't force them to put themselves on the top of the notes, they don't really have rectangular shape, and they don't really nest well into each other (they have space between each other). I've seen that in mensural notation there are rectangular brackets for ligatures, but I also didn't catch how to display them in ordinary scores. Does anyone know a solution? Thank you, Adam Siska Ádám +36 (70) 207-63-85 http://apocalypse.rulez.org/~sadam ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: vertical brackets
> From that idea, I get this ugly solution [...] Thanks! This is better than my solution. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: 'Bartok'-pizz.
Thank you, this works quite nice, and sorry for the duplicated question Bye, Adam Siska Ádám +36 (70) 207-63-85 http://apocalypse.rulez.org/~sadam Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Op dinsdag 24 juli 2007, schreef Siska Ádám: 'Bartok'-pizzicato You could do something like: #(define-markup-command (bartokpizz layout props) () (interpret-markup layout props (markup #:stencil (ly:stencil-translate-axis (ly:stencil-add (make-circle-stencil 0.7 0.1 #f) (ly:make-stencil (list 'draw-line 0.1 0 0.1 0 1) '(-0.1 . 0.1) '(0.1 . 1) ) ) 0.7 X ) ) ) ) bartok = \markup \bartokpizz { c4^\bartok } I found this on: http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user%40gnu.org/msg14529.html Met vriendelijke groet, Wilbert Berendsen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: 'Bartok'-pizz.
Op dinsdag 24 juli 2007, schreef Siska Ádám: > 'Bartok'-pizzicato You could do something like: #(define-markup-command (bartokpizz layout props) () (interpret-markup layout props (markup #:stencil (ly:stencil-translate-axis (ly:stencil-add (make-circle-stencil 0.7 0.1 #f) (ly:make-stencil (list 'draw-line 0.1 0 0.1 0 1) '(-0.1 . 0.1) '(0.1 . 1) ) ) 0.7 X ) ) ) ) bartok = \markup \bartokpizz { c4^\bartok } I found this on: http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user%40gnu.org/msg14529.html Met vriendelijke groet, Wilbert Berendsen -- http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/ "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Gandi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: vertical brackets
These vertical brackets are a special form of arpeggio; see 6.6.7 Arpeggio. From that idea, I get this ugly solution %% \version "2.10.25" \score { \new Staff { \override Staff.Arpeggio #'stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-bracket \override Staff.Arpeggio #'X-offset = #-1.2 << {< c' g' ees''>4 } \\ {\hideNotes < d' e' >4 \arpeggio \unHideNotes} \\ {\hideNotes < b' d''>4 \arpeggio \unHideNotes} >> \revert Staff.Arpeggio #'X-offset } } %% You have to find the right notes in the hidden voices Gilles ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: new dynamic sign
On 7/24/07, Siska Ádám <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Everyone, I'm trying to create a new dynamic sign for 'attacco impercettibile' (this can be found for example in scores of some spectralist composers, like Gérard Grisey). This sign is supposed to be something like a striked circle, like the character ɵ or ø character, and it means something like 'zero volume', so if it's at the beginning of a crescendo, you should start playing from absolute stillness, and if it's at the end of a decrescendo, you should make the decrescendo until total still. For this, I tried the following code: zeroDyn = #(make-dynamic-script "ø") This works, but the output looks quite awful, it would be better to use some other character font and/or make the character to be smaller. But if I change the "ø" to (for example) "\roman ø", I don't get the desired result. How can I set the font type and/or size used to create the dynamic symbols with make-dynamic-script? Thank you, Adam Hi Adam, Have you looked up the circled-tip attribute of the Hairpin grob in the manual? We put that in for the dal niente sort of thing you're talking about a year ago or so. I think Erlend did the implementation, and it gives very good graphic control. You won't, however, be able to get the null-style slash through the circle, IIRC. But maybe you can do without and look like Sciarrino instead of Grisey? Trevor. -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
'Bartok'-pizz.
Hello, What is the code for the articulation mark representing the so-called 'Bartok'-pizzicato? (A circle like for flageolets, but with a short vertical line crossing the circle at the top.) I hadn't found this in the table of articulation signs in the manual. Thank you, Adam Siska Ádám +36 (70) 207-63-85 http://apocalypse.rulez.org/~sadam ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
new dynamic sign
Hello Everyone, I'm trying to create a new dynamic sign for 'attacco impercettibile' (this can be found for example in scores of some spectralist composers, like Gérard Grisey). This sign is supposed to be something like a striked circle, like the character ɵ or ø character, and it means something like 'zero volume', so if it's at the beginning of a crescendo, you should start playing from absolute stillness, and if it's at the end of a decrescendo, you should make the decrescendo until total still. For this, I tried the following code: zeroDyn = #(make-dynamic-script "ø") This works, but the output looks quite awful, it would be better to use some other character font and/or make the character to be smaller. But if I change the "ø" to (for example) "\roman ø", I don't get the desired result. How can I set the font type and/or size used to create the dynamic symbols with make-dynamic-script? Thank you, Adam Siska Ádám +36 (70) 207-63-85 http://apocalypse.rulez.org/~sadam ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can I have my own custom LilyPond?
Send it to the lilypond-user list and also to the devel-list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Maybe we should at first discuss on the users list if this is a special way of setting chordnames and only you need it or if its needed by (maybe many) other users too ... 2007/7/24, PabloZum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Thank you, Dominic. I'm new here and I hadn't thought of that. I'll make a pdf with my chord-name font and its various combinations. Who should I send it to? (I'm sorry, I don't know how to thread this answer directly under yours at the forum.) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can I have my own custom LilyPond?
Thank you, Dominic. I'm new here and I hadn't thought of that. I'll make a pdf with my chord-name font and its various combinations. Who should I send it to? (I'm sorry, I don't know how to thread this answer directly under yours at the forum.) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Can I have my own custom LilyPond?
This is possible, because LilyPond is completely open source. But before trying to do this, please describe what you want to do. Maybe others are interested in that way of printing chordnames, too. Maybe there´s a way to provide a patch for LilyPond that your ideas can become part of the official LilyPond. 2007/7/24, PabloZum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm rather dissatisfied with the way LilyPond prints chord names. After trying all the ideas some people here have generously given me to try and use my own chord-name font, I've come to the conclusion that the only practical way to achieve what I want is by changing the sourcecode to fit my own fairly idiossincratic chord-name style. Is it possible to do that? I mean, to fiddle with the sourcecode, change it to my own requirements and have an indepedent LilyPond? If so, which files are relevant? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Can I have my own custom LilyPond?
I'm rather dissatisfied with the way LilyPond prints chord names. After trying all the ideas some people here have generously given me to try and use my own chord-name font, I've come to the conclusion that the only practical way to achieve what I want is by changing the sourcecode to fit my own fairly idiossincratic chord-name style. Is it possible to do that? I mean, to fiddle with the sourcecode, change it to my own requirements and have an indepedent LilyPond? If so, which files are relevant?___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
grace note leading to chord
Hi all! In a piece I am engraving with lilypond I have an acciaccatura leading to a chord. The acciaccatura should actually lead to a specific note in that chord (the highest one in my case). However, lilypond treats the chord as one unit and doesn't allow to lead the acciaccatura to one of the chord's notes. I found a partial solution by using \slurUp so that the slur leads to the highest note but I would like the slur to go down and lead to the highest note. Is this possible? If so please show me how... Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/grace-note-leading-to-chord-tf4136726.html#a11765573 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Is it possible to generate guitar tab below the notation staff ?
Yes, LP can do guitar tab, but it might leave some rock guitarists wanting. For classical pieces it would probably be adequate (there's no support, at least in the version I use - 2.6.5 - for things like bends, hammer-ons/pull-offs, etc). Just guessing, since I've never really done any serious classical guitar work. :-) I picked up how to incorporate tabs through the users manual, so I gather for even a more recent version there's got to be a good starting point in one of the sections. But I also understand that if you are new to LP the users manual can seem intinmidating (actually any computer programming/application users guide can be that way to a novice). As is usual, I am at work and don't have any example code, but I'd be glad to send an example to you later if you are still scratching your head.LP tabulature is said by some to be a bit non-standard, but I think it does the job wonderfully, especially when paired to standard notation. Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:20:47 +0300From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is it possible to generate guitar tab below the notation staff ? Hi all, I've just subscribed to the lilypond-user list and I'd like to ask a question... I am a very beginner to the classical guitar and also to the music notation... today I struggled a lot and finally I've been able to produce the notation staff of one of the pieces we've learned to play on the guitar... what I couldn't find though on the user manual is that I'd like to have the guitar tablature generated besides the music staff... is this possible with lilypond ? and if yes, could you help me find what part of the document I have to read because there is not much in the "instrument-specific notation" chapter... Many thanks in advance... Vasil _ See what you’re getting into…before you go there. http://newlivehotmail.com___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Is it possible to generate guitar tab below the notation staff ?
Hi all, I've just subscribed to the *lilypond-user* list and I'd like to ask a question... I am a very beginner to the classical guitar and also to the music notation... today I struggled a lot and finally I've been able to produce the notation staff of one of the pieces we've learned to play on the guitar... what I couldn't find though on the user manual is that I'd like to have the guitar tablature generated besides the music staff... is this possible with lilypond ? and if yes, could you help me find what part of the document I have to read because there is not much in the "instrument-specific notation" chapter... Many thanks in advance... *Vasil* ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[solved] Re: how to override only one of two textscripts?
Op dinsdag 24 juli 2007, schreef Trevor Bača: > Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > Use the \tweak command! ;-) > > c^\markup { "untweaked" } -\tweak #'padding #15 ^\markup { "tweaked" } > > I like this. > > This brings my mental list of \tweak examples to three things: > > 1. nested tuplet brackets that begin at the same moment; > 2. notes in a chord (that obviously begin at the same moment); > 3. multiple text scripts (that begin at the same moment) attaching to a > single note. Thanks! Met vriendelijke groet, Wilbert Berendsen - loving LilyPond. :) -- http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/ "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Gandi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to override only one of two textscripts?
On 7/24/07, Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Wilbert, > When I have two textscripts attached to the same note, how do I > tweak only one of them? Use the \tweak command! ;-) c^\markup { "untweaked" } -\tweak #'padding #15 ^\markup { "tweaked" } I like this. This brings my mental list of \tweak examples to three things: 1. nested tuplet brackets that begin at the same moment; 2. notes in a chord (that obviously begin at the same moment); 3. multiple text scripts (that begin at the same moment) attaching to a single note. Neat. -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to override only one of two textscripts?
Hi Wilbert, When I have two textscripts attached to the same note, how do I tweak only one of them? Use the \tweak command! ;-) c^\markup { "untweaked" } -\tweak #'padding #15 ^\markup { "tweaked" } Hope this helps! Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
how to override only one of two textscripts?
When I have two textscripts attached to the same note, how do I tweak only one of them? I want the text above at the same level as other texts above the same staff, but I do not want to change the padding for the text below the same note. \once \override TextScript #'staff-padding = #3 c4^"Principal 8'"_\markup \italic "ben legato" TIA, best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/ "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Gandi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Information on Lilypond
Hi. > What I like to do best, is play a song > on the MIDI keyboard and then have > the notes appear on the screen. To do this, you might want to have a look at the "Rosegarden 4" software. Best regards, Gilles ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Information on Lilypond
2007/7/24, Skippy G. Mardon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, Welcome on the list :) I am checking out different types of music notation software. When I am trying to read about Lilypond, the language switches from English to German, and then 2 times it switched from English to French. This is weird; can you tell us which browser and operating system you use? I assume you've already read http://lilypond.org/web/about/browser-language.html I've used Finale for 8 years. It's very complex and hard to use. What I like to do best, is play a song on the MIDI keyboard and then have the notes appear on the screen. Then I print them. I am looking for software that will do this conveniently. It depends on how you define "and then"... LilyPond is a non-graphical music notation interface. i.e. you can use a MIDI keyboard to enter your music, but what you'll see instantly appear on your screen will *not* be a score like in Finale, but some code, which you'll have to compile to get a (wonderfully displayed) score at the end. LilyPond can be quite simple to use (it took my grandmother a couple hours to learn; now she uses it frequently), but it might not be appropriated for someone who's used to graphical interfaces. Regards, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Information on Lilypond
"Skippy G. Mardon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There must be a way of setting the language > so that it doesn't change frequently. Please follow the link about automatic language selection at the bottom of the website. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ps and pdf (was Re: Compatibillity lilypond - noteedit and other quetions.)
2007/7/24, Peter Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00284.html I absoluteley agree with graham, most people never need the .ps files. The .ps file is just a temporary file. I wouldn't put it that way (to me it is an essential fact that lilypond does handle a *truely* reliable format -- which the PDF is not), but I totally agree too. I've introduced many people (among my family, or my pupils) to LilyPond, and they're often confused too see, when they compile their first score, many files (of unfamiliar formats) appear on their Desktop (the .ps, but also the .log when they're running windows version). So I think we should avoid anything that can confuse new users, which do not necessarily have the ability to use command-line options. Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Information on Lilypond
Hello, . I am checking out different types of music notation software. When I am trying to read about Lilypond, the language switches from English to German, and then 2 times it switched from English to French. There must be a way of setting the language so that it doesn't change frequently. I must have clicked on English more than 6 times, and it still doesn't understand that I want English. Ich mag keine Deutsch, weil spreche ich nicht gut Deutsch. There should be flags at the top of each page and then the reader could click on the appropriate flag. Once the flag is set, it shouldn't change languages until the reader clicks another flag. Thanks, Skippy in Canada PS I've used Finale for 8 years. It's very complex and hard to use. What I like to do best, is play a song on the MIDI keyboard and then have the notes appear on the screen. Then I print them. I am looking for software that will do this conveniently. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: vertical brackets
> > is there a better solution to get the vertical brackets displayed > > in the attached image than the code below? It's a nasty fiddling, > > and it breaks very easily... > > These vertical brackets are a special form of arpeggio; see 6.6.7 > Arpeggio. I know, however, it didn't work well. > ... or was your question how to get _two_ of them? Yep. > I would guess that this would be relatively easy, although you might > have to move the Arpeggio Engraver into the Voice context instead of > a Staff. Ah, this is something I haven't considered yet. Will try soon. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ps and pdf (was Re: Compatibillity lilypond - noteedit and other quetions.)
Valentin Villenave in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > There was a discussion about that a few months ago; maybe we should > talk about it again... Thanks to an emailed answer i have the `-ddelete-intermediate-files' option. This option is now used by default. > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00284.html I absoluteley agree with graham, most people never need the .ps files. The .ps file is just a temporary file. P. -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user