Re: jedit jaundice

2009-11-06 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)

Well, it's already been fixed in jEdit SVN.



Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:

Yes, I found now: that's a bug in the installer. I'm going to report it.

Bert


Francisco Vila wrote:

2009/11/6 Chris Angelico :
  

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, joe ferguson  wrote:


The console says:

 jedit -Xms2m -Xma8M
Invalid initial heap size: -XmsM
  


This means that  JAVA_HEAP_INIT_SIZE is empty. I had this problem and
solved it by writing

JAVA_HEAP_INIT_SIZE=64

at the top of /usr/local/bin/jedit

  




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
  


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: jedit jaundice

2009-11-06 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)

Yes, I found now: that's a bug in the installer. I'm going to report it.

Bert


Francisco Vila wrote:

2009/11/6 Chris Angelico :
  

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, joe ferguson  wrote:


The console says:

 jedit -Xms2m -Xma8M
Invalid initial heap size: -XmsM
  


This means that  JAVA_HEAP_INIT_SIZE is empty. I had this problem and
solved it by writing

JAVA_HEAP_INIT_SIZE=64

at the top of /usr/local/bin/jedit

  


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: jedit jaundice

2009-11-06 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/11/6 Chris Angelico :
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, joe ferguson  wrote:
>> The console says:
>>
>>  jedit -Xms2m -Xma8M
>> Invalid initial heap size: -XmsM

This means that  JAVA_HEAP_INIT_SIZE is empty. I had this problem and
solved it by writing

JAVA_HEAP_INIT_SIZE=64

at the top of /usr/local/bin/jedit

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
www.csmbadajoz.com


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: lilypond 2.13.7 is released

2009-11-06 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Roman Stawski  wrote:
> Does this mean that you'll rename \pageBreak to \manger ... where
> the carriage horse, if it's on form, feeds ?

I think this needs to be put to a vote. All those in favour, aye; all
against, neigh.

ChrisA


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: lilypond 2.13.7 is released

2009-11-06 Thread Roman Stawski
Graham Percival  percival-music.ca> writes:

> 
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:52:59PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Graham Percival  percival-music.ca> writes:
> > 
> > > LilyPond 2.13.7 is out.  This release theoretically works on osx
> > > 10.6, without breaking anything on other OSes,
> > 
> > Not even lines?
> 
> Those aren't breaks; they're... carriage returns.  During GLISS,
> we'll rename \break to \stable, to better indicate that this is
> the place to which the carriage returns.  :)

Does this mean that you'll rename \pageBreak to \manger ... where
the carriage horse, if it's on form, feeds ?






___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Feathered beams with tuplet fractions

2009-11-06 Thread Trevor Daniels

As David said, the syntax is wrong.

Both examples work fine if you prefix them with

\include "english.ly"
\score { {

and terminate with } }

Trevor

- Original Message - 
From: "Qian Li" 

To: 
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 3:37 AM
Subject: Feathered beams with tuplet fractions


Why does lilypond choke on feathered 8:10 notes but handles 4:6 no 
problem?
The first example works (even the slur works), but the second 
doesn't.


Thanks.
Qian

\times 4/6{
\featherDurations #(ly:make-moment 6 8 ) {
\once \override Beam #'grow-direction = #RIGHT
bf16 ( ef g bf' g ef
}
}
cs,2)

%second example

\times 8/10{
\featherDurations #(ly:make-moment 6 8 ) {
\once \override Beam #'grow-direction = #RIGHT
as'16 ( bf cs bs as bs as g fs g }
}
fs4)








___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Canorus and Lilypond 2.13.x

2009-11-06 Thread Martin Tarenskeen


Hi,

Lilypond and Canorus are both officially available for my Linux Fedora 11 
system. But for correct display of the fonts on screen this canorus 
distribution depends on lilypond version 2.12.x.


But I want to try and use the latest lilypond devel version 2.13.x.
If I compile and install lilypond 2.13.x , canorus' screen display of 
fonts is broken.


The problem is, I think, the emmentaler-14 font. But I have not been able 
to work around this problem yet.


Has anyone else seen this problem ?
Is there a way to have both the newest (devel) versions of Lilypond and 
Canorus installed, and still have fonts displayed correctly in Canorus ?


--

Martin


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Feathered beams with tuplet fractions

2009-11-06 Thread David Kastrup
Qian Li  writes:

> Why does lilypond choke on feathered 8:10 notes but handles 4:6 no problem?
> The first example works (even the slur works), but the second doesn't.

Neither example works since it does not have lilypond syntax.  Apart
from that, you set the featherDurations to 6/8 in the second example.

> \times 4/6{
> \featherDurations #(ly:make-moment 6 8 ) {
> \once \override Beam #'grow-direction = #RIGHT
>  bf16 ( ef g bf' g ef
> }
> }
> cs,2)
>
> %second example
>
> \times 8/10{
> \featherDurations #(ly:make-moment 6 8 ) {
> \once \override Beam #'grow-direction = #RIGHT
> as'16 ( bf cs bs as bs as g fs g }
> }
> fs4)


-- 
David Kastrup



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Penderecki noteheads

2009-11-06 Thread 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
Hello
  I recently asked a composer about noteheads. In Penderecki's scores, a normal 
triangle with top upwards means as high as possible, and vice versa. But in LP, 
I only find a single triangle notehead. Is it possible to invert it?
Regards
Haipeng


 ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user