Re: Counter in Markup
Francisco (and Carl) thank you very much for your help! It's working great for me. best, Adam ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
function argument computation
I'm trying to factor out common code in some music functions. Below is a fragment of the code illustrating my problem. It's been years since I've used Lisp so please appreciate the naivety in this question. I want to do a computation at the call and pass the result as an argument to a function parameter: \base (concat "XXX" $suffix) #$suffix % DOES NOT WORK I've tried a number of things but I'm just guessing. Is this possible? And if it is possible, what is the syntax? \version "2.13.40" \include "english.ly" #(set-default-paper-size "letter") #(set-global-staff-size 24) base = #(define-music-function (parser location prefix suffix) (string? string?) #{ \once \override TextSpanner #'bound-details #'left #'text = \markup { \concat { $prefix ":" $suffix } } #}) specialA = #(define-music-function (parser location suffix) (string?) #{ \base #"Foo" #$suffix #}) specialB = #(define-music-function (parser location suffix) (string?) #{ \base (concat "XXX" $suffix) #$suffix % DOES NOT WORK #}) \score { \relative c' { \base #"Foo" #"Bar" a \startTextSpan b c d e g \stopTextSpan \specialA #"Bar"a \startTextSpan b c d e g \stopTextSpan \specialB #"YYY"a \startTextSpan b c d e g \stopTextSpan } % relative } % score % Local Variables: % % tab-width: 4 % % compile-command: "lilypond --ps test.ly" % % End: % ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Feta Fonts
Notice that shaped note format for Feta is not the same as the traditional shapes used in my 1950s hymn book. Would like to modify these specific glyphs. Metafont is not a problem for me to use but where do I go to find the sources for the Feta fonts? Tim Sheasby t...@sheafpublishing.co.za <> ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: function argument computation
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Peter Buhr wrote: > specialB = #(define-music-function (parser location suffix) (string?) > #{ >\base (concat "XXX" $suffix) #$suffix % DOES NOT WORK > #}) > Hi Peter, I think the following does what you're looking for. specialB = #(define-music-function (parser location suffix) (string?) (define combined (string-append "XXX" suffix)) #{ \base $combined $suffix #}) Cheers, Mike ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Feta Fonts
2011/2/24 Tim Sheasby : > Notice that shaped note format for Feta is not the same as the traditional > shapes used in my 1950s hymn book. Would like to modify these specific > glyphs. Metafont is not a problem for me to use but where do I go to find the > sources for the Feta fonts? In the mf/ directory of the lilypond source code, if I'm not wrong. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Feta Fonts
Hello )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of Francisco Vila )Sent: 25 February 2011 15:27 )To: Tim Sheasby )Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org )Subject: Re: Feta Fonts ) )2011/2/24 Tim Sheasby : )> Notice that shaped note format for Feta is not the same as the )traditional shapes used in my 1950s hymn book. Would like to modify )these specific glyphs. Metafont is not a problem for me to use but where )do I go to find the sources for the Feta fonts? ) )In the mf/ directory of the lilypond source code, if I'm not wrong. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/getting-the-source-code James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: J. S. Bach - 371 Chorals à 4 voix + Etudes d'anamorphoses: les différentes versions d'un choral.
Hi, An updated version with included tar.bz2 sources is available: http://superbonus.project.free.fr/spip.php?article48 Some slight inconsistencies were corrected. Midi files of Lilypond were updated to take into account the duration of the fermatas, which improves the scansion of a chorale. Note however that the tempi are not relevant at all. But by changing the \guidemidi-ly in the sources you will be able to more easily produce a midi file that suits you. For those wishing a really detailed analysis of Chorales (especially the students) , I would advertise them when the time comes of the release: "Les colles de Bach - The Bach's School (You've got me, there)" for GNU Solfege which should include 352 chorales, each choral being an exercise of musical dictation of 1, 2, 3 or 4 voices. Because of an overlap midi problem as soon as two voices share an unison with different durations (we don't know that in Lilypond) I'm waiting the next version (GNU Solfege 3.19.3). The author, Tom Cato Amundsen, is taking this issue on hand. Be happy. Phil. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Feta Fonts
Feel stupid. Once I opened the mf Feta files found that the correct glyphs do exist. Just had to change the default notehead for the Mi to the alternative already there. Now my songs look like I want them to.On 25 Feb 2011, at 6:15 PM, James Lowe wrote:Hello)-Original Message-)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On)Behalf Of Francisco Vila)Sent: 25 February 2011 15:27)To: Tim Sheasby)Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org)Subject: Re: Feta Fonts))2011/2/24 Tim Sheasby:)> Notice that shaped note format for Feta is not the same as the)traditional shapes used in my 1950s hymn book. Would like to modify)these specific glyphs. Metafont is not a problem for me to use but where)do I go to find the sources for the Feta fonts?))In the mf/ directory of the lilypond source code, if I'm not wrong.http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/getting-the-source-codeJames___lilypond-user mailing listlilypond-user@gnu.orghttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Tim Sheasbyt...@sheafpublishing.co.za ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Slur offset over articulations: Error or Intentional?
Whenever there is an articulation on the first or last note of a slur the other end is offset by the same amount, whether it has an articulation or not. Is this intentional in the algorithm or a problem? And is there a way to fix it generally (obviously a slur can be adjusted manually one at a time...). Example: \version "2.13.51" \relative c' { c( c-.) c-.( c) c( c-. c-. c) } -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slur-offset-over-articulations%3A-Error-or-Intentional--tp31017880p31017880.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user