Re: Dynamics on chords
Albu wrote:
\version 2.12.1
\relative c'
{
f1~
f c'~ ais' %I want to put a crescendo and decrescendo here
c'4
c2\pp c b' g' %and a decrescendo here
}
I found an espressivo and an sforzando to put in place, its as close as
I've got, but it is not stylized nor correct.
Albu
what is the disapproval exaxtly?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Dynamics-on-chords-tp31642805p31655217.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LSR is not available
- Original Message - Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 2:58 PM Subject: LSR is not available FYI the LSR is not available at this hour http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ HTTP Status 404 - Servlet SearchPage is not available Does anyone have access to LSR website ? Is this the correct URL ? I can't find the link to LSR website from Lilypond website ! Please make it more visible. G. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LSR is not available
2011/5/19 ggit ggit@gmail.com - Original Message - *Sent:* Saturday, May 14, 2011 2:58 PM *Subject:* LSR is not available FYI the LSR is not available at this hour http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ HTTP Status 404 - Servlet SearchPage is not available Does anyone have access to LSR website ? Is this the correct URL ? I can't find the link to LSR website from Lilypond website ! Please make it more visible. G. I've found it immediately: Manuals Snippets The website is still down. I'll try to contact Sebastiano (he is in charge of the LSR?). ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: LSR is not available
Hello - From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On Behalf Of ggit Sent: 19 May 2011 12:59 To: Marc Mouries Cc: Lilypond users Subject: Re: LSR is not available - Original Message - Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 2:58 PM Subject: LSR is not available FYI the LSR is not available at this hour http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ HTTP Status 404 - Servlet SearchPage is not available Does anyone have access to LSR website ? Is this the correct URL ? I can't find the link to LSR website from Lilypond website ! Please make it more visible. G. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/lsr/lilypond-snippets/index.html Second Link. James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LSR is not available
Sebastiano has fixed the error (he doesn't read this mailing list). 2011/5/19 ggit ggit@gmail.com - Original Message - *Sent:* Saturday, May 14, 2011 2:58 PM *Subject:* LSR is not available FYI the LSR is not available at this hour http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ HTTP Status 404 - Servlet SearchPage is not available Does anyone have access to LSR website ? Is this the correct URL ? I can't find the link to LSR website from Lilypond website ! Please make it more visible. G. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LSR is not available
T -- H -- A -- N -- K -- Y -- O -- U_! - Original Message - Sebastiano has fixed the error (he doesn't read this mailing list). ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LSR is not available
- Original Message - From: James Lowe Hello Subject: LSR is not available FYI the LSR is not available at this hour http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ HTTP Status 404 - Servlet SearchPage is not available Does anyone have access to LSR website ? Is this the correct URL ? I can't find the link to LSR website from Lilypond website ! Please make it more visible. G. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/input/lsr/lilypond-snippets/index.html Second Link. James Thank you James ! Lilypond website provides only a *selected set* of snippets from LSR, which is not easy to search. The page you pointed me at does provide a link to the actual LSR website, indeed. But it's not easy to find. So I have a suggestion/request to the webmaster : Could we have a link to LSR on the main doc page ? (http://lilypond.org/manuals.html) - in Regular use beneath Snippets: short tricks and tips. please add the line : LSR: all the snippets contributed by users. (with a link) - in the tool bar on top of the page, add a link LSR between Snippets and FAQ That would make the so valuable LSR content way more accessible for us users ! How do you feel ? Thanks, G. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: test of convert-ly
On 5/18/11 11:36 AM, ggit ggit@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've done some tests with convert-ly. Could be of use for a next improving. (I
don't master myself regular expressions).
Using tools from Lilypond 2-13-61.
Applying conversion from \version 2.13.31 (to 2.13.51).
Input file :
%%%
\version 2.13.31
%% 0 : comment with the words : converted from \version 2.13.31 on may 18th
\paper {
%% 1 : KO
top-system-spacing = #`((space . ,(* 8 mm))(stretchability . 0)(padding . 1))
%% 2 : OK
top-system-spacing = #'((space . 8)(stretchability . 0)(padding . 1))
%% 3 : comment with the words : foot-separation is obsolete.
%% 4 : comment with the words : foot-separation.
%% 5 : comment with this word : foot-separationn
%% 6 : comment with this word : foot-separatio
}
%%%
Results :
-the line 0 *is* converted to ...2.13.51..., which is bad to me
This should probably be an enhancement request -- to have convert-ly ignore
lines with comments. We currently don't have any status checking to see if
we are in a comment or not.
-the line (after) 1 is *not* converted.
IIRC, this was a choice to not handle potentially troublesome conversions.
But perhaps we should include a NOT_SMART rule, if possible.
-the line (after) 2 is converted to correct syntax :
top-system-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 8)(stretchability . 0)(padding .
1))
-the lines 3, 4 or 5 (in spite of being comments) cause convert-ly to complain
(Not smart enough...)
Same as the version string.
Line 5 is a limitation in our convert-ly rules for NOT_SMART, because we
don't restrict ourselves to whole words only. There is already an issue out
for this -- issue 798.
-the line 6 is ok (no complain, no conversion) (test after deleting lines 3
and 4)
Thanks for the test!
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
