Re: more scores one midi output
thank you for the anwser..this is very helpfull..:)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:54 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
2012/1/17 Stjepan Horvat zvanste...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Is there a possibility to output more \score {} into one midi output.
No but see:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00218.html
--
--
James
--
*Nesmotren govori kao da mačem probada, a jezik je mudrih iscjeljenje.
Izreke 12:18*
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: pdf to .ly?
On 01/19/2012 10:00 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:47:06 +0100 Rutger Hofmanrut...@cs.vu.nl wrote: SharpEye also has a freeware version with some restrictions. One of them is that it does not generate MusicXML. It can create NIFF though, and I wrote a converter from NIFF to Lilypond: niff2ly. Actually, there are two versions available for download. The newer is 2.68, the older is 1.27. Version 2.68 can save MusicXML and NIFF. Version 1.27 only saves NIFF. Neither version is freeware though. Both have a 30 day limit. The good thing is that both work in Wine. Even though this is technically true, the old version doesn't actually expire after 30 days. It just nags you, but keeps working. So, SharpEye 1.27 and niff2ly are a free (as in beer) solution. niff2ly generates quite old Lilypond, so you will want to run convert-ly over its output, and it has its restrictions when voicing becomes complicated. Download niff and niff2ly from http://www.cs.vu.nl/~rutger/music.html It's good to see this effort, as Visiv can discontinue MusicXML support at will. But please use decent release engineering. *.old, *.orig and *.a don't belong to the source release. Ah thanks sorry, I had been too hasty in making a newest .tgz. I have cleaned it up. Maybe you could host the source it on Gitorious or Github? Perhaps NIFF belongs there too (fully unpacked and converted to UNIX newlines). I'll consider that. Rutger ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill
On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:42 PM, Caio Barros wrote:
In this example is not so visible. But is there.
But the collision disappears if you use Keith Ohara's suggestion to force the
tie below the note head.
In smaller staff sizes it gets worse because the tie is thicker. I actually
saw this error in an orchestral score with very small staffs.
\version 2.14.2
#(set-global-staff-size 8)
\relative g'' {
\pitchedTrill g1 ~ \startTrillSpan a g2
No collision with: \pitchedTrill g1_ ~ \startTrillSpan a g2
}
If you use other interval other than the second it's even more visible
\version 2.14.2
\relative g'' {
\pitchedTrill g1 ~ \startTrillSpan bes g2
No collision with: \pitchedTrill g1_ ~ \startTrillSpan bes g2
}
2012/1/19 Patrick Karl pck...@mac.com
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:34:09 -0200
From: Caio Barros caio.bar...@gmail.com
To: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill
Yes, but it's still a collision.
It looks ok at 2.14.2. I don't see a collision.
2012/1/19 Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
Caio Barros caio.barros at gmail.com writes:
\relative g'' {
\pitchedTrill g1 ~ \startTrillSpan aes g2
}
You can use '^' or '_' to force the tie above or below the note head
{ \pitchedTrill g''1_~ \startTrillSpan aes g''2 }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Collision between tie and pitched trill
But the collision disappears if you use Keith Ohara's suggestion to force the tie below the note head. Yes, I understand this. But isn't the purpose of lilypond to automatize the position of the objects? That's why I don't have to say to each slur, tie and dynamics where they should be, it's angle, if it's up or down. A lot of collision problems that where issued during lilypond's development where possible to correct manually before, but this kills the title of automatic music engraver that lilypond holds proudly and deservedly. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Reduce width of single measure
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:34:21AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: G, I wrote a reply yesterday, but _atain_ only replied to one person instead of the list. Hi Frank, 2012/1/17 Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de: Is there an automatic way to resolve this, i.e. that all ness syllables are properly aligned again? It appears the text will be aligned to the head of the first note between , so specify the upper of the two first: so, rather than c des, des c Yes, the solution was so simple. It worked like a charm, thanks. -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services. Everyone wants your best. Don’t let them take it from you. pgpGQOiu6UVYQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?)
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:11 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: David Raleigh Arnold d...@openguitar.com writes: On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:52:03 +0100, Hans Aberg wrote: On 19 Jan 2012, at 21:58, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:05 -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote: Open software people tend to consider artists as being equivalent to programmers, so they think artists should starve. I have no sympathy with that view. Obviously. Knowledge should be free, Yale to the contrary. Art shouldn't be free until the artist gets his. The source code of the lilypond score is not the `music' or even `art', so maybe people get confused. That is true of the program code, but not the data. According to the WIPO Copyright Treaty, computer programs are protected as literary works as in the Berne Convention: http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/trtdocs_wo033.html#P56_5626 The document must carry a copyright notice if it contains the notes, because it is the composition written in a form of musical notation. The complete source, published with a copyright notice, would copyright the piece. Published without the notice, all copyright would be lost. This is not the case in the US since 1989: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_notice Hans We have drifted from the issue here. If your recommendation is to include the notes of an original copyrightable musical composition in an upload to be used as an exemplar of lilypond, your advice is absolutely terrible. Substitute something in the public domain, and make it short. Computer programs should have been without protection until new laws were written. They are a bad fit for either copyrights or patents. There was a bad judge who didn't have the discipline or wisdom to dismiss the first case, and so we have a lot of bad law. Proprietary programs are already greatly retarding progress or halting it instead of advancing it. The time on programs should be *less* than the time on patents, since no physical working model needs to be made. Copyrighted material is intended to have a useful life after the expiration of copyright, not to be useless, like CP/M or Windows 3.2 or 98 for example. Regards, daveA -- Information is not knowledge, indoctrination is not teaching, tradition is not evidence, and belief is not truth. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?)
David Raleigh Arnold d...@openguitar.com writes: Copyrighted material is intended to have a useful life after the expiration of copyright, not to be useless, like CP/M or Windows 3.2 or 98 for example. There is not much of a point for topical newspaper articles being copyrighted until 90 years after the author's death either. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: pdf to .ly?
At 20:42 on 19 Jan 2012, Frédéric Bron wrote: Does anybody here know of software that could convert a .pdf into .ly? Mayber .pdf to .xml first, then to .ly? Or .pdf into .svg, or some sort of image file? I got some music from the IMSLP site, it needs to be rotated and cleaned up a bit. free command line software: - pdftk: http://www.pdflabs.com/tools/pdftk-the-pdf-toolkit/ - convert: http://www.imagemagick.org/ unpaper is ideal for this also http://unpaper.berlios.de/ -- Mark Knoop ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Enhancement request for vim filetype plugin
Good evening I'll write my request first for those who are not interested in the whole background story :-) It is about the vim filetype plugin that comes shipped with lilypond. The following line needs to be added before any key mapping (blatantly taken from the ftplugin file for mail and adapted accordingly): if !exists(no_plugin_maps) !exists(no_lilypond_maps) and of course the accompanying endif after the last mapping. Now the background story: I wrote to the maintainer who was given in the file, but the message couldn't be delivered (I almost expected it, since the date of last change is 2004). So I hope there are some vim enthusiasts here that put my request to good use. I was wondering yesterday why my own key bindings for lilypond files didn't work in vim (I want to press F9 to compile a file). It took me more than two hours to find it out -- including the help of #vim on IRC. It turned out that: - the file defines some key mappings of its own - by default, global key mappings have precedence over those in ~/.vimrc ... fair enough, but - the F9 keymap doesn't just call :make, but also sets makeprg=make -k - I tried to disable ftplugin keymaps, just for lilypond and also for all types - the way of disabling ftplugin mappings recommended by the manual doesn't work - because the ftplugin file doesn't check for it » hence the above request I'm assumeing that the vim file comes directly from lilypond itself, because it is in the tarball and not from within the package manager directory. (OTOH, there is no such file in Ubuntu whatsoever, I guess us Gentooans are lucky). Thanks for your time. -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services. The only thing still keeping me here is Earth’s gravity. pgpRujc8IXkh2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The LilyPond Report #23 has been released
Greetings! After a long hiatus, the LilyPond Report #23 URL:http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-23 has been released on 2012-01-20. The report contains current news about the development of LilyPond, the GNU Music Typesetter URL:http://www.lilypond.org/ and features an article about recent work to make extending LilyPond with the GNU project's Scheme interpreter and extension language Guile URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ more accessible and powerful. Here is the intro: Greetings everybody, and welcome to this twenty-third issue of the LilyPond Report! Another year, another Report. This month we’re welcoming new LilyPond Report editor David Kastrup, who (in addition to being a talented developer) has been busy writing about some of the new, awesome features recently added to LilyPond... And speaking of awesomeness, don’t miss his interview with composer/contributor Mike Solomon, whose work never ceases to amaze! The table of contents features: Editorial Release news What’s up with LilyPond? An Interview With Mike Solomon Feature story: Prelude #1 in Scheme Bug Report of the Report Enjoy! -- For the editing team: David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: pdf to .ly?
Rutger Hofman rut...@cs.vu.nl writes: Maybe you could host the source it on Gitorious or Github? Perhaps NIFF belongs there too (fully unpacked and converted to UNIX newlines). I'll consider that. Probably best is to integrate NIFF into NIFF2LY since no other tools (seem to) exist that uses it. -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?)
PMA wrote: ... Yes, I've sniffed posted in IMSLP's site now -- enough to see that my public-domain-like status fears were misconceived, and to appreciate the gist of licenses being offered. I tend to expect that their 6th listed, Attribution + Non-commercial + No Derivatives would do me just fine (provided I can overcome the guilt from refusing to offer my works up as programmers' fodder :) ). That last was pretty snotty! So, appreciating the help that several of you have extended, I feel obliged to add -- *If* I thought that my __newbie!__ .ly code were worthy of being shown to others (as I apparently think its results are), then I might reconsider *whether* to show it. But there's just no way I could think this. Best regards, Pete ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Select one PDF to generate from .ly with multiple books
Let's say I have a .ly file of a piano trio. The file has three book
sections, one for each of the instruments, so when I compile my .ly file I
get three pdf files, a piano part, a violin part and a cello part.
Something like the following.
\book {
% piano
}
\book {
% violin
}
\book {
% cello
}
Is there a way to tell lilypond to only generate the cello part from this
file? I understand that there are other solutions to this, like using
multiple files and include statements. I'm just curious if this particular
functionality exists.
- Hayden
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Select one PDF to generate from .ly with multiple books
Hello,
On 20 January 2012 23:38, Hayden Muhl haydenm...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's say I have a .ly file of a piano trio. The file has three book
sections, one for each of the instruments, so when I compile my .ly file I
get three pdf files, a piano part, a violin part and a cello part. Something
like the following.
\book {
% piano
}
\book {
% violin
}
\book {
% cello
}
Is there a way to tell lilypond to only generate the cello part from this
file? I understand that there are other solutions to this, like using
multiple files and include statements. I'm just curious if this particular
functionality exists.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage
Something here will help I think.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Breath marks at the end of a \divisioMaijor or \divisioMaxima
Hullo, I have found the simple method of adding a breath mark (/breath), but so far am unable to accomplish this at the end of a a line (i.e. before a \divisioMaior or a \divisioMaxima). Any help here would be appreciated. Thanks. -Michael D. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Select one PDF to generate from .ly with multiple books
Hayden Muhl haydenmuhl at gmail.com writes:
\book {
% violin
}
\book {
% cello
}
Is there a way to tell lilypond to only generate the cello part
I use %{ %} block comments, with an extra % at the opening comment
to quickly activate/deactivate the block
%%{
\book {
% cello
}
%}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
