Re: Point-and-click on Frescobaldi?
Hello, On 14 March 2012 23:35, Father Gordon Gilbert fatherg...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, Wilbert, I had figured it was something like that, but I am too far from geeky to be able to implement something that complicated. I certainly do make use of it, though! I have another problem now, however. When I upgraded Lily to the latest (2.15.33) and began to use Fresco again to work on a new file, the whole thing seems broken! Not sure what I did, but in the compliation panel, all I get is the following: Starting lilypond-windows.exe. [file.ly]... Could not start lilypond-windows.exe. Please check path and permissions. I didn't *actively* do anything to the path or permissions, and I even tried uninstalling and reinstalling both Frescobaldi and LilyPond, with no improvement. Where to I look to find the problem, and how can I fix it? Holy Week is coming up, and I have some things I need to do! Help! It almost certainly won't be Frescobaldi it'll be where/how windows has installed your later version of LilyPond. Install LilyPond as normal and then open a 'cmd' prompt (if you don't know what that is then click on the start menu in the task bar and either look for the 'run' menu option and type cmd or you can search for 'cmd.exe' and open it. Then from that command prompt type path This will list all the 'paths' to the applications you have installed. It'll be a long list, and you should (hopefully) see something like C;/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/bin; in there (I may have got that slightly inaccurate - I am doing this from memory) but you will see 'LilyPond' somewhere. If you don't see it then this is the problem and you will need to add it manually. I am about to leave for work, but if you still have problems or no one else answers I'll be around in an hour or so. -- -- James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Point-and-click on Frescobaldi?
2012/3/15 Father Gordon Gilbert fatherg...@gmail.com: Starting lilypond-windows.exe. [file.ly]... Could not start lilypond-windows.exe. Please check path and permissions. Sounds like Frescobaldi does not find your new lilypond install in the directory where it used to be, maybe it has been installed in another directory. Go to Preferences - LilyPond preferences. Highlight the first entry at the right, push Edit and then push the file browser dialog button at tthe right of 'lilypond command' box. Once there, find c:\Program Files\whatever\whatever\lilypond.exe where 'whatever' is something like \usr\bin\ , I'm sorry but I do not remember exactly (I am not a windows user) Once found, click 'Open', OK, OK. Test your whole set by compiling some music. Good luck! -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: separating design from pure score
Hello all..thank you for you anwsers..i really appreciate it..It's not
exactly what i wanted..but it helps me figure out more what i want and
what will be my solution..!
David Kastrup leads in this direction what i'm trying ta achive..The
diference form Hans Aikema is that i want to include music in a
diffrent file which i compile afterwords..The reason for that is that
i want to define music as is..Becouse each song is uniq and
unchangable..So i dont ever have to change the music file.
For Example:
1. I want the score to be minimalistic and to be sufficient in itself.
= score.ly =
\verison 2.14.2
\header { title = TITLE composer = COMPOSER }
mymusic = \relative c' { c4 d e f \mark \default g }
mylyrics = \lyricmode { c d e f g }
mychords = \chordmode { c1 c4 }
\score {
\new ChordNames { \mychords }
\new Staff { \mymusic }
\addlyrics { \mylyrics }
}
end of score.ly
Minimalistic as i said. Maybe even without \mark \default.
So now in design.ly i would set the fonts and paper and whatever would
be static in project period. I think the layout should work here.
And on the end.
master.ly
\include ./desing.ly
\include ./score.ly
%now here should go the paddings for this specifig song couse every
song looks difrent and has diffrent bar numbers..Now i would want to
maybe use \break command but inside the score..So here comes my
problem. Becouse the score block is included while including score.ly
(i would want only the variable to be included) i can't make a mark
blok where i would define simple marks and bar brakes.
paper {
markup-system-spacing #'padding = #5
markup-system-spacing #'stretchability = #5
score-system-spacing #'padding = #5
last-bottom-spacing #'padding = #5
score-markup-spacing #'padding = #5
top-system-spacing #'padding = #17.5
}
marks = {
\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-barnumbers
\hideNotes
R1 \break
\bar ||
\mark \default
\unHideNotes
\bar |.
}
\score {
\new ChordNames { \mychords }
\new Staff { \mymusic \marks }
\addlyrics { \mylyrics }
}
end of master.ly
I would only compile the maste.ly file..
I think i made myself clear..:) Thanks for further guidence.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net wrote:
On 14-3-2012 19:16, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on a project and i want to separate the design from score
because i want to have a clear score so that in the future when i
maybe want to change the design i dont have to change the score
(something like html and CSS :) ). So when i include my score into my
design file variables are included but score block also. Now when i
what to change, for example, \mark \default to have a preety box i
dont know where to put it. Is there a way not to include a score block
but all variables, or insert stuff into a score block that is
invisible to me?
If I understand your request correctly you're looking for a similar
structure as what I'm working with for generating beamerslides of songs
including their music. In that case the \include command is your friend.
What I have in my projects:
format/BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly
contains
- a \paper section containing lots of formatting settings
- a \layout setting containing lots of formatting settings
- an include for yet another lilypond file containing useful scheme
functions such as the override-color-for-allgrobs scheme funtion I found in
the LSR: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=443
- variable definitions for a music staff (muziekbalk) and its associated
lyrics (verstekst):
muziekbalk = { \new Staff \new Voice = myMelody { \melodie } }
verstekst = {\new Lyrics \lyricsto myMelody { \tekst }}
format/BeamerRegular.ly
contains
- an include of format\BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly
- a Score block combining the variables defined in BaseBeamerSlideDesign
into an actual Score and override of the grob-colors to get colored output:
=== format/BeamerRegular.ly sample ===
\include BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly
\score {
\applyContext #(override-color-for-all-grobs white)
\muziekbalk
\verstekst
}
=== end of format/BeamerRegular.ly ===
Then any song requiring the beamer slide format:
- a \header block
- a variable definition called 'melodie' (which is refered to in the
format\BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly mentioned above) containing the melody of
the song
- a variable definition called 'tekst' which is refered to in the
format\BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly mentioned above) containing the lyrics of
the song
- an include of the format/BeamerRegular.ly
e.g.:
=== MySong.ly sample ===
\version 2.15.26
\header {
title = Just some sample song
}
melodie = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\time 4/4
\key c \major
c d e f \bar |.
}
tekst = \lyricmode {
this is a song
}
\include format/BeamerGewoon.ly
=== end of MySong.ly sample ===
The reason for the BeamerRegular.ly is that I also have separate files for
Re: Point-and-click on Frescobaldi?
Father Gilbert On 14 March 2012 23:35, Father Gordon Gilbert fatherg...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, Wilbert, I had figured it was something like that, but I am too far from geeky to be able to implement something that complicated. I certainly do make use of it, though! I have another problem now, however. When I upgraded Lily to the latest (2.15.33) and began to use Fresco again to work on a new file, the whole thing seems broken! Not sure what I did, but in the compliation panel, all I get is the following: Starting lilypond-windows.exe. [file.ly]... Could not start lilypond-windows.exe. Please check path and permissions. I didn't *actively* do anything to the path or permissions, and I even tried uninstalling and reinstalling both Frescobaldi and LilyPond, with no improvement. Where to I look to find the problem, and how can I fix it? Holy Week is coming up, and I have some things I need to do! Help! Thanks for a fantastic program. I have realised that *if* you do not have LilyPond in your 'path' (see my last email to you) and you need to add it, the instructions will be slightly different depending if you are running Windows XP or Windows 7 - as things like file names and where settings are have changed. What I would do because I forgot we had added this to our instructions on teh website is to look here http://lilypond.org/windows.html See 'Running on the command line' section. This tells you how to check and configure. I do not know your technical ability (so sorry if I am patronizing you - many of us on these lists take it for granted users know how to configure these settings in Windows) to understand how to set a PATH etc. and as I know you have a very limited internet connection so are not permanently online, can you let me know if my last response is helpful and if not which version of Windows you are using and I can give you more detailed instructions in 'one go' -- -- James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Combine \default rehearsal mark with another mark
Dear List,
I'd like to put two rehearsal marks over the same barline. However, this gives
an error:
\mark \markup{
\center-align{
\line{ \default }
\line{ 8 }
}
} s4*8
The error is: 'error: syntax error, unexpected \default'
I also tried to access the value of \default, however, I couldn't find out how
to do that. The documentation says: 'The value to use is stored in the property
rehearsalMark', however, I didn't find any property like
RehearsalMark.rehearsalMark nor Score.rehearsalMark, or at least I didn't find
out how to access these in a \markup block.
Do you have any suggestion for this?
Thanks,
Ádám
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Combine \default rehearsal mark with another mark
Hello,
2012/3/15 Siska Ádám sa...@sadam.hu:
Dear List,
I'd like to put two rehearsal marks over the same barline. However, this
gives an error:
\mark \markup{
\center-align{
\line{ \default }
\line{ 8 }
}
} s4*8
The error is: 'error: syntax error, unexpected \default'
I also tried to access the value of \default, however, I couldn't find out
how to do that. The documentation says: 'The value to use is stored in the
property rehearsalMark', however, I didn't find any property like
RehearsalMark.rehearsalMark nor Score.rehearsalMark, or at least I didn't
find out how to access these in a \markup block.
Do you have any suggestion for this?
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=rehearsal+mark
--
--
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Combine \default rehearsal mark with another mark
On 2012.03.15., at 12:08, James wrote:
Hello,
2012/3/15 Siska Ádám sa...@sadam.hu:
Dear List,
I'd like to put two rehearsal marks over the same barline. However, this
gives an error:
\mark \markup{
\center-align{
\line{ \default }
\line{ 8 }
}
} s4*8
The error is: 'error: syntax error, unexpected \default'
I also tried to access the value of \default, however, I couldn't find out
how to do that. The documentation says: 'The value to use is stored in the
property rehearsalMark', however, I didn't find any property like
RehearsalMark.rehearsalMark nor Score.rehearsalMark, or at least I didn't
find out how to access these in a \markup block.
Do you have any suggestion for this?
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=rehearsal+mark
James
Hello,
thanks a lot!
Best,
Ádám
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Point-and-click on Frescobaldi?
Hi guys, For whatever reason, Fresco was not showing the full path to LilyPond. Never had this problem before, but when I put it in there, all worked! Thanks! Gordon+ On 15/03/2012, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: Father Gilbert On 14 March 2012 23:35, Father Gordon Gilbert fatherg...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, Wilbert, I had figured it was something like that, but I am too far from geeky to be able to implement something that complicated. I certainly do make use of it, though! I have another problem now, however. When I upgraded Lily to the latest (2.15.33) and began to use Fresco again to work on a new file, the whole thing seems broken! Not sure what I did, but in the compliation panel, all I get is the following: Starting lilypond-windows.exe. [file.ly]... Could not start lilypond-windows.exe. Please check path and permissions. I didn't *actively* do anything to the path or permissions, and I even tried uninstalling and reinstalling both Frescobaldi and LilyPond, with no improvement. Where to I look to find the problem, and how can I fix it? Holy Week is coming up, and I have some things I need to do! Help! Thanks for a fantastic program. I have realised that *if* you do not have LilyPond in your 'path' (see my last email to you) and you need to add it, the instructions will be slightly different depending if you are running Windows XP or Windows 7 - as things like file names and where settings are have changed. What I would do because I forgot we had added this to our instructions on teh website is to look here http://lilypond.org/windows.html See 'Running on the command line' section. This tells you how to check and configure. I do not know your technical ability (so sorry if I am patronizing you - many of us on these lists take it for granted users know how to configure these settings in Windows) to understand how to set a PATH etc. and as I know you have a very limited internet connection so are not permanently online, can you let me know if my last response is helpful and if not which version of Windows you are using and I can give you more detailed instructions in 'one go' -- -- James -- Fr. Gordon Gilbert Penetanguishene, ON ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: midiInstrument changes play one note too late.
Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net writes: On 14-3-2012 14:30, Michael Ellis wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com wrote: Is this a known problem? I don't see any prior reports online and I've been seeing it since at least 2.12 but assumed it was because I was doing some fairly complicated things. I took time to reduce it to a minimal example today. It's still present in 2.15.33 as shown by the example below. FWIW, I'm running OS X 10.6.7 and playing the midi with QuickTime. I'm attaching the midi file. Is there a workaround? Thanks, Mike Wow. It's rare not to get a response from this list. Did I phrase the question incredibly poorly? Don't worry, IMHO your phrasing was perfectly clear. Sometimes it just takes more than a day 5:30pm to 9:30am is not more than a day. It is just few hours of daylight. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
full rest side effect
Oops, I sent this to lilypond@googlecode by mistake. Please ignore there...
Hello,
In the following example the left hand gets rhythmically augmented.
What screwy thing am I doing?
This score boilerplate was generated using LilypondTool and I removed the
irrelevant parts.
Thanks,
Jonathan
% Created on Wed Mar 14 14:40:30 EDT 2012
\version 2.14.2
staffPiano = \new PianoStaff {
\time 3/4
\context Staff = RH { % Right hand
\clef treble
\key c \major
\relative c' {
c c c |
c c c |
R2.*2
}
}
\context Staff = LH { % Left hand
\clef bass
\key c \major
\relative c {
c c c |
c c c |
c c c |
c c c |
}
}
}
\score {
\staffPiano
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: midiInstrument changes play one note too late.
Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com writes: In any case, this seems to me like a fairly serious defect. I hope it's on the list for 2.16. Don't worry. No stock options will be emitted to the responsible developers unless this deficiency is cured before 2.16 gets released. In other words: no, this is not on the list for 2.16. If you are interested in the release criteria for stable releases, they can be found in the Contributor's Guide in the documentation if memory serves me right. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
delay test [you can ignore it]
sorry for the noise, just testing. i sent a message to the list yesterday and i haven't seen it yet... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Combining lyrics lines
Dear Lilypond users,
I am typesetting a musical-theater style song, with the parts of several
singers appearing on the same staff.
For unrelated reasons, I want to use a separate Voice context for each
singer, even though the melodies usually don't overlap. The lyrics are
defined separately for each voice, too.
Here is a simplified example of what I'm doing:
\version 2.14.2
\new Staff
\new Voice = a { f'4 g' r2 | s1 }
\new Voice = b { s1| a'2 g' }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto a \lyricmode { may -- be }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto b \lyricmode { that the }
Now, the lyrics to a and b appear on separate lines, like this:
maybe
that the
Instead, I would like to see them combined on one line whereever
possible, like this:
maybe that the
Lilypond 2.12.3 did this by default. Is there a way to achieve it in
newer versions?
As mentioned before, the melodies usually don't overlap, so it would
probably be sufficient to overlay both Lyrics contexts in the same
vertical space. I naively attempted to do this by putting both into a
StaffGroup and then setting their Y-extents to zero, but this had no
effect; neither had various experiments with the staff-staff-spacing
property of the StaffGroup or the Lyrics contexts.
I also considered using a single Lyrics context and associatedVoice:
\version 2.14.2
\new Staff
\new Voice = a { f'4 g' r2 | s1 }
\new Voice = b { s1| a'2 g' }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto a {
\lyricmode { may -- be }
\set associatedVoice = b
\lyricmode { that the }
}
This fails, I guess, because of the requirement to change the associated
voice one syllable early (2.1.1)? While that would be easy to fix in
this minimal example, it would be inconvenient in the actual score,
where the lyrics are stored in separate variables defined outside the
\score block.
Any other ideas?
Thanks and best regards,
Reedmace Star
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: midiInstrument changes play one note too late.
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure how I would go about implementing the suggested workaround for my application. I run into the problem primarily when transcribing individual choral parts for my section. It's nice in the midi output if cues from other parts are sounded by a different instrument. Since I don't have time to transcribe the entire score, it's not practical to use the built-in LilyPond cue methods Hmm? IIRC to use the LilyPond method you don't need to transcribe the entire score, just the fragment you want to quote. Be sure to add appropriate number of skips to have it appear at the right moment. In any case, this seems to me like a fairly serious defect. I hope it's on the list for 2.16. I'm sorry if it will sound harsh, but compared to some other things i definitely won't call it serious... And it's not on the list for 2.16, unless you pay someone to fix it (i recommend David Kastrup). I hope this won't discourage you, but i don't expect it to be on 2.18 list, too - i guess it will be fixed in, like, 2 years or so. Our development resources are *really that limited*. So, please seriously consider fixing it yourself (we will provide basic guidance to you) or paying David. Bugs that manifest themselves on proprietary software only (and it sounds like it is a problem with a proprietary player) are not something I could reproduce, so while I thank you for your recommendation, this would not be a task I would have the means to tackle. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
wrong beaming
hello list,
i have a problem with beaming when combining a sixteenth notes triplet
with straight 16ths.
without any kind of tweaks, the following code produces the output in the
attached image:
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
c16 c \times 2/3 { c8 c16 }
\times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c }
as you see, lilypond behaves differently if the triplet is in the first
part of the quarter note, or in the second. in both cases the beaming is
wrong.
i guess this is related to issues that have been discussed before. i tried
both the latest stable (2.14.2) and the latest unstable or development
version. the results are similar.
is there a simple tweak to get the correct output?
thanks,
ljattachment: bug.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: articulate.ly with rall not working?
Malte == Malte Meyn malte.m...@studium.uni-erlangen.de writes: Malte On 13.03.2012 03:52, Peter Chubb wrote: Thomas == Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: Malte Hm. I see two problems: 1. Did I understand right, that -rall Malte changes the tempo in a single step? That’s more like “subito Malte meno mosso” than “rallentando”, isn’t it?. Yes but it's as close as I can get wihtout a LOT more work. 2. \set Malte tempoWholesPerMinute doesn’t have any effect in the midi Malte output. Is that a bug or a misunderstanding? I use Lilypond Malte 2.14.2-1 Linux 64. It worked before feb last year. -- Dr Peter Chubb peter.chubb AT nicta.com.au http://www.ssrg.nicta.com.au Software Systems Research Group/NICTA ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: moving rhythmic dots down
Jeffrey Trevino wrote: Just a quick question -- I'm making a glissando that goes across several unstemmed noteheads; I need to move any rhythmic dots down, so that the glissando doesn't obscure them. What's the proper override for this? use \dotsDown (or \voiceTwo ) hth Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/moving-rhythmic-dots-down-tp33510040p33510210.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: full rest side effect
Hi Jonathan, On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote: Oops, I sent this to lilypond@googlecode by mistake. Please ignore there... Hello, In the following example the left hand gets rhythmically augmented. What screwy thing am I doing? This score boilerplate was generated using LilypondTool and I removed the irrelevant parts. In the absence of an explicit duration, LilyPond will continue to use the last duration given it. So all the notes in the new Staff context are assigned a dotted half times 2. Make the first note in the LH context a c4 -David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Combining lyrics lines
Reedmace Star wrote: For unrelated reasons, I want to use a separate Voice context for each singer, even though the melodies usually don't overlap. The lyrics are defined separately for each voice, too. one quick+dirty solution: \override LyricText #'Y-offset = #2.85 where 2.85 was just working for my individual test. hth Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Combining-lyrics-lines-tp33510107p33510377.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: wrong beaming
Hello,
On 15 March 2012 02:45, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
hello list,
i have a problem with beaming when combining a sixteenth notes triplet
with straight 16ths.
without any kind of tweaks, the following code produces the output in the
attached image:
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
c16 c \times 2/3 { c8 c16 }
\times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c }
as you see, lilypond behaves differently if the triplet is in the first
part of the quarter note, or in the second. in both cases the beaming is
wrong.
i guess this is related to issues that have been discussed before. i tried
both the latest stable (2.14.2) and the latest unstable or development
version. the results are similar.
This actually worked in 2.12.3
So I have opened
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2408
is there a simple tweak to get the correct output?
Use manual beaming?
--
--
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Variables: structure vs layout
I'm getting a bit confused about the use of variables to reflect the structure of the music, or the distribution of notes between different voices etc. The passage where I'm struggling with this right now is for one instrument*. The passage has three voices, which I finally decided to split onto two staves (but the beginning is simple enough to put on one staff, using \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t). After it goes to two staves, I have drones and bass notes in one staff. The bass (though not very low) is there only sometimes. I see a couple of options to write it in ly: - Write a variable for the drones, with \voiceOne and \oneVoice interspersed where needed. - Write lots of variables for the drones, one for each bit where the voice needs to change, and lay them out in the staff block, e.g. \oneVoice \droneA \voiceOne \droneB etc The latter may have the advantage of putting all the voice of assignments in one place (the score), but then the variables are too fragmentary to be meaningful to read. I guess it's a fairly vague question. I guess the best way to narrow it down is -- especially asking experienced users -- what level of atomization seems to work the best for variables? Can you estimate a rough guideline where breaking the variables down further becomes more cumbersome than it's worth? Thanks, James * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheng_%28instrument%29 -- James Harkins /// dewdrop world jamshar...@dewdrop-world.net http://www.dewdrop-world.net Come said the Muse, Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted, Sing me the universal. -- Whitman blog: http://www.dewdrop-world.net/words audio clips: http://www.dewdrop-world.net/audio more audio: http://soundcloud.com/dewdrop_world/tracks ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: delay test [you can ignore it]
on 2012-03-15 at 08:02 luis jure wrote: sorry for the noise, just testing. i sent a message to the list yesterday and i haven't seen it yet... ah... now i see it! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: wrong beaming
on 2012-03-15 at 15:26 James wrote:
This actually worked in 2.12.3
So I have opened
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2408
great, thank you. i see, however, that 2.12.3 was not quite correct in the
second case: the beamlet belonging to the triplet sixteenth should be
pointing to the left, and not beamed together with the straight 16th.
Use manual beaming?
yes, manual beaming solved the first quarter note:
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
c16[ c \times 2/3 { c8 c16] }
\times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c }
but i still don't know how to correct the second quarter note (steven's
suggestion gives beaming by eight notes, that i don't find satisfactory).
i know i saw once a solution to this, but i can't find where...
best,
lj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Point-and-click on Frescobaldi?
On 3/15/12 5:36 AM, Father Gordon Gilbert fatherg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, For whatever reason, Fresco was not showing the full path to LilyPond. Never had this problem before, but when I put it in there, all worked! I think this is a reflection of a solution to issue 1948. The windows installer no longer adds a path entry (by design), so the user will need to add their own path in the future. Perhaps this should be part of the Frescobaldi documentation. Thanks, Carl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: wrong beaming
You can always manually override the beaming:
c16 c \times 2/3 { c8[ c16] }
\times 2/3 { c8[ c16] } c16 c }
--Steven
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+panteck=hotmail@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+panteck=hotmail@gnu.org] On Behalf Of luis
jure
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:46 PM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: wrong beaming
hello list,
i have a problem with beaming when combining a sixteenth notes triplet with
straight 16ths.
without any kind of tweaks, the following code produces the output in the
attached image:
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
c16 c \times 2/3 { c8 c16 }
\times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c }
as you see, lilypond behaves differently if the triplet is in the first part
of the quarter note, or in the second. in both cases the beaming is wrong.
i guess this is related to issues that have been discussed before. i tried
both the latest stable (2.14.2) and the latest unstable or development
version. the results are similar.
is there a simple tweak to get the correct output?
thanks,
lj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Add more space between arbitrary groups of notes
Hello, James! 14.03.2012, 17:09, James pkx1...@gmail.com: Hello, See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-03/msg00379.html This might help. I cannot help you with the others :/ -- -- James Thank you! This is not really what I wanted (I want more space only between phrasing slurs, not between each note), but following links from that messages I've found appropriate shortest-duration-space and spacing-increment values for better results, so, my first wish looks like solved. Can anyone give me directions for automatic adding \skip1 after each lyrics syllable? If nothing helps, I can pre-process my lyrics in self-written php script, but this makes it hard to mantain. Regards, Svetlana. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: wrong beaming
On 3/14/12 8:45 PM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
hello list,
i have a problem with beaming when combining a sixteenth notes triplet
with straight 16ths.
without any kind of tweaks, the following code produces the output in the
attached image:
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
c16 c \times 2/3 { c8 c16 }
\times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c }
as you see, lilypond behaves differently if the triplet is in the first
part of the quarter note, or in the second. in both cases the beaming is
wrong.
i guess this is related to issues that have been discussed before.
What issues do you believe it is related to?
i tried
both the latest stable (2.14.2) and the latest unstable or development
version. the results are similar.
Similar, or identical?
is there a simple tweak to get the correct output?
You never say what correct output you want. If you want it to be beamed
by eighths, instead of by quarters, you can do
\set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
HTH,
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Manual bars: PDF and MIDI have different opinion on melismas
Dear list
I just discovered that 2.14 produces different lyrics for PDF and MIDI output,
when there are manual beams. Is this intentional?
A minimal example is attached. Note that, in the PDF, the text three and
four appears as expected under the notes, whereas in the MIDI, the notes on
three and are regarded as a melisma.
At first I thought it a regression over 2.12, but then found out that 2.12 did
the same thing and I never noticed the errors in my old MIDIs.
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
while (!asleep()) ++sheep;
\version 2.14.2
music = \relative c'' { g4 a8( g) f8[ g] g4 }
text = \lyricmode { one twohoo three and four }
\score {
\new Staff = staff \new Voice = voice \music
\new Lyrics \lyricsto voice \text
\layout{}
\midi{}
}
pgpAjdI5vp6Ru.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: full rest side effect
From: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:34 AM Subject: Re: full rest side effect Hi Jonathan, On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote: Oops, I sent this to lilypond@googlecode by mistake. Please ignore there... Hello, In the following example the left hand gets rhythmically augmented. What screwy thing am I doing? This score boilerplate was generated using LilypondTool and I removed the irrelevant parts. In the absence of an explicit duration, LilyPond will continue to use the last duration given it. So all the notes in the new Staff context are assigned a dotted half times 2. Make the first note in the LH context a c4 -David Thanks, David. I actually figured this out about 2 minutes after I posted. Some time ago someone posted a proposal for best practices on here-- one of them was to explicitly write the duration for the note at the beginning of each line. I started out doing that, then got lazy. But I got punished for that! -Jonathan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: wrong beaming
At 13:01 on 15 Mar 2012, luis jure wrote:
on 2012-03-15 at 15:26 James wrote:
Use manual beaming?
yes, manual beaming solved the first quarter note:
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
c16[ c \times 2/3 { c8 c16] }
\times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c }
but i still don't know how to correct the second quarter note (steven's
suggestion gives beaming by eight notes, that i don't find
satisfactory).
i know i saw once a solution to this, but i can't find where...
\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
--
Mark Knoop
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: separating design from pure score
Hi Stjepan,
sorry that I don't have the time to really go through this thread (so I
might misunderstand sth).
But I think you should separate your music variables from your score
definition, so you can \include them separately:
music.ly
myMusic = { ... }
score.ly
\score {
\new Staff
\myMusic
\myMarks
}
Then you can have your master file like:
\include music.ly
myMarks = { ... }
\include score.ly
Does that help?
Best
Urs
Am 15.03.2012 11:23, schrieb Stjepan Horvat:
Hello all..thank you for you anwsers..i really appreciate it..It's not
exactly what i wanted..but it helps me figure out more what i want and
what will be my solution..!
David Kastrup leads in this direction what i'm trying ta achive..The
diference form Hans Aikema is that i want to include music in a
diffrent file which i compile afterwords..The reason for that is that
i want to define music as is..Becouse each song is uniq and
unchangable..So i dont ever have to change the music file.
For Example:
1. I want the score to be minimalistic and to be sufficient in itself.
= score.ly =
\verison 2.14.2
\header { title = TITLE composer = COMPOSER }
mymusic = \relative c' { c4 d e f \mark \default g }
mylyrics = \lyricmode { c d e f g }
mychords = \chordmode { c1 c4 }
\score {
\new ChordNames { \mychords }
\new Staff { \mymusic }
\addlyrics { \mylyrics }
}
end of score.ly
Minimalistic as i said. Maybe even without \mark \default.
So now in design.ly i would set the fonts and paper and whatever would
be static in project period. I think the layout should work here.
And on the end.
master.ly
\include ./desing.ly
\include ./score.ly
%now here should go the paddings for this specifig song couse every
song looks difrent and has diffrent bar numbers..Now i would want to
maybe use \break command but inside the score..So here comes my
problem. Becouse the score block is included while including score.ly
(i would want only the variable to be included) i can't make a mark
blok where i would define simple marks and bar brakes.
paper {
markup-system-spacing #'padding = #5
markup-system-spacing #'stretchability = #5
score-system-spacing #'padding = #5
last-bottom-spacing #'padding = #5
score-markup-spacing #'padding = #5
top-system-spacing #'padding = #17.5
}
marks = {
\set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-barnumbers
\hideNotes
R1 \break
\bar ||
\mark \default
\unHideNotes
\bar |.
}
\score {
\new ChordNames { \mychords }
\new Staff { \mymusic \marks}
\addlyrics { \mylyrics }
}
end of master.ly
I would only compile the maste.ly file..
I think i made myself clear..:) Thanks for further guidence.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Hans Aikemahans.aik...@aikebah.net wrote:
On 14-3-2012 19:16, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on a project and i want to separate the design from score
because i want to have a clear score so that in the future when i
maybe want to change the design i dont have to change the score
(something like html and CSS :) ). So when i include my score into my
design file variables are included but score block also. Now when i
what to change, for example, \mark \default to have a preety box i
dont know where to put it. Is there a way not to include a score block
but all variables, or insert stuff into a score block that is
invisible to me?
If I understand your request correctly you're looking for a similar
structure as what I'm working with for generating beamerslides of songs
including their music. In that case the \include command is your friend.
What I have in my projects:
format/BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly
contains
- a \paper section containing lots of formatting settings
- a \layout setting containing lots of formatting settings
- an include for yet another lilypond file containing useful scheme
functions such as the override-color-for-allgrobs scheme funtion I found in
the LSR: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=443
- variable definitions for a music staff (muziekbalk) and its associated
lyrics (verstekst):
muziekbalk = { \new Staff \new Voice = myMelody { \melodie } }
verstekst = {\new Lyrics \lyricsto myMelody { \tekst }}
format/BeamerRegular.ly
contains
- an include of format\BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly
- a Score block combining the variables defined in BaseBeamerSlideDesign
into an actual Score and override of the grob-colors to get colored output:
=== format/BeamerRegular.ly sample ===
\include BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly
\score {
\applyContext #(override-color-for-all-grobs white)
\muziekbalk
\verstekst
}
=== end of format/BeamerRegular.ly ===
Then any song requiring the beamer slide format:
- a \header block
- a variable definition called 'melodie' (which is refered to in the
format\BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly mentioned above) containing the melody of
the song
- a variable definition called 'tekst' which is refered to in the
format\BaseBeamerslideDesign.ly mentioned above)
Re: Combining lyrics lines
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Reedmace Star reedmaces...@googlemail.com wrote: I am typesetting a musical-theater style song, with the parts of several singers appearing on the same staff. [..] maybe that the Instead, I would like to see them combined on one line wherever possible, like this: maybe that the Lilypond 2.12.3 did this by default. Is there a way to achieve it in newer versions? Search for centering the new Lyrics thread by Keith OHara, from December 2010. it might be exactly what you're looking for. hope this helps, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Variables: structure vs layout
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote: I'm getting a bit confused about the use of variables to reflect the structure of the music, or the distribution of notes between different voices etc. The passage where I'm struggling with this right now is for one instrument*. The passage has three voices, which I finally decided to split onto two staves (but the beginning is simple enough to put on one staff, using \RemoveEmptyStaffContext and \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t). After it goes to two staves, I have drones and bass notes in one staff. The bass (though not very low) is there only sometimes. I see a couple of options to write it in ly: - Write a variable for the drones, with \voiceOne and \oneVoice interspersed where needed. - Write lots of variables for the drones, one for each bit where the voice needs to change, and lay them out in the staff block, e.g. \oneVoice \droneA \voiceOne \droneB etc The latter may have the advantage of putting all the voice of assignments in one place (the score), but then the variables are too fragmentary to be meaningful to read. Have you tried using \partcombine on bass and drones? hope this helps, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Frenched score with glissandi
Dear List,
I'd like to forcefully remove a staff from an orchestral score at a given
point. Here's the scenario:
There are 6 violas playing in 2 staves (Vle 1-3 in the first and Vle 4-6 in the
second). From some point, all the violas play the same material, so I'd like to
remove one of the staves to avoid duplications. However, I can't find out how
to achieve this. I enabled 'frenched spacing' with \RemoveEmptyStaves, but it
seems that the hidden notes that end the glissandi (created with \hideNotes)
will keep the staff 'alive', as in the attached example.
(Note that this example is a minimal extract, it doesn't contain the rest of
the orchestra, however, there's a dummy timeline and a dummy first page
inserted, to simulate the actual situation).
Does anybody have an idea about how to activate the frenched spacing in this
specific case?
Thanks,
Ádám
%%%
Here's the example:
%%%
\version 2.14.1
#(set-default-paper-size b4)
#(set-global-staff-size 12)
#(define adjust-for-note-head(
lambda (grob)(
let* ((refp (ly:grob-system grob))
(bar-coord (ly:grob-relative-coordinate grob refp X))
(all (ly:grob-array-list (ly:grob-object refp 'all-elements)))
(note-heads
(filter
(lambda (n)
(eq? (assq-ref (ly:grob-property n 'meta) 'name)
'NoteColumn))
all))
(note-head-coords
(map
(lambda (heads)
(interval-center (ly:grob-extent heads refp X)))
note-heads))
(coords-to-right
(filter
(lambda (coord) ( bar-coord coord))
note-head-coords))
(closest-coord
(if (pair? coords-to-right)
(apply min
(map (lambda (coord) (- coord bar-coord))
coords-to-right))
0)))
(set! (ly:grob-property grob 'extra-offset) (cons closest-coord 0))
)
)
)
dottedNoteHead = {
\once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override NoteHead #'text = \markup { \concat { \musicglyph #dots.dot
\musicglyph #dots.dot \musicglyph #dots.dot } }
}
timing = {
\relative d'' {
\hideNotes
\time 8/4 \mark 8 s4*8 \pageBreak
\time 5/4 \mark 5 s4*5 \noBreak
\time 5/4 \mark 5 s4*5 \noBreak
\time 5/4 \mark 5 s4*5 \noBreak
\time 5/4 \mark 5 s4*5 \noBreak
\time 8/4 \mark 8 s4*8 \noBreak
\time 3/4 \mark 3 s4*3 \noBreak
\time 3/4 \mark 3 s4*3 \noBreak
\time 3/4 \mark 3 s4*3 \noBreak
\time 4/4 \mark 4 s4*4 \break
\time 4/4 \mark 4 s4*4 \noBreak
\time 5/4 \mark 5 s4*5 \noBreak
\time 4/4 \mark 4 s4*4 \noBreak
\time 3/4 \mark 3 s4*3 \noBreak
\time 4/4 \mark 4 s4*4 \noBreak
\time 3/4 \mark 3 s4*3 \noBreak
\time 3/4 \mark 3 s4*3 \noBreak
\time 3/4 \mark 3 s4*3 \noBreak
\time 4/4 \mark 4 s4*4 \noBreak
\time 4/4 \mark 4 s4*4 \noBreak
\time 3/4 \mark 3 s4*3 \pageBreak
\time 5/4 \mark 5 s4*5
\unHideNotes}
}
\score {
\new Staff {
\set Staff.instrumentName = #Dummy
\set Staff.shortInstrumentName = #Dummy
{ \timing } \\ { \repeat unfold 94 { d'4 } }
}
\new StaffGroup
\new Staff {
\relative d' {
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup { \center-column { \line {
Viole } \line { 1-3 } } }
\set Staff.shortInstrumentName = \markup { \center-column { \line {
Vle. } \line { 1-3 } } }
\clef alto
{ d4*49 \glissando \hideNotes d4*4 \unHideNotes } \new Voice {
\hideNotes d4*13 \once \override Hairpin #'circled-tip = ##f d4*5\ \once
\override Hairpin #'circled-tip = ##f \once \override TextSpanner
#'(bound-details left text) = tremolo \once \override TextSpanner
#'(bound-details right text) = ord. d4*5\mp\\startTextSpan
d4*26\ppp\stopTextSpan \unHideNotes }
}
}
\new Staff {
\relative d' {
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup { \center-column { \line {
Viole } \line { 4-6 } } }
\set Staff.shortInstrumentName = \markup { \center-column { \line {
Vle. } \line { 4-6 } } }
\clef alto
{ \once \override Glissando #'bound-details = #'((right
(attach-dir . 0) (padding . 1.5))) d4*18 \glissando d8 d d d d \dottedNoteHead
d8*5 \once \override Glissando #'bound-details = #'((left (attach-dir . 0)
(padding . 0.0))) \hideNotes d4*42 \glissando d4*4 \unHideNotes } \new Voice {
\hideNotes d4*13 \once \override Hairpin #'circled-tip = ##f d4*5\ \once
\override Hairpin #'circled-tip = ##f d4*5\mp\^\markup{\raise #0.35
\musicglyph #noteheads.s2 ~ 60} d4*39\ppp d4*3\ d4*4\! \unHideNotes }
}
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\remove Forbid_line_break_engraver
}
\context {
\Staff
\RemoveEmptyStaves
\remove Time_signature_engraver
\remove
Re: Combining lyrics lines
* 2012-03-15 21:53 +0100Janek Warchoł:
* 20012-03-15 3:01 PM, Reedmace Star
Search for centering the new Lyrics thread by Keith OHara, from
December 2010. it might be exactly what you're looking for.
Thank you, yes, that was exactly what I needed.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-12/msg00674.html
For reference, this is my example fixed:
\version 2.14.2
\layout {
\context {
\Lyrics
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'nonstaff-nonstaff-spacing
#'minimum-distance = ##f
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'nonstaff-unrelatedstaff-spacing
#'minumum-distance = ##f
\override LyricText #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-0.6 . 2.0)
}
}
\new Staff
\new Voice = a { f'4 g' r2 | s1 }
\new Voice = b { s1| a'2 g' }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto a \lyricmode { may -- be }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto b \lyricmode { that the }
Best regards,
Reedmace Star
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Point-and-click on Frescobaldi?
Yes it should. Especially for us non-geeks who understand a bit of this kind of thing. We need to know where to click and exactly what to type. Blessings, Gordon+ On 15/03/2012, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: On 3/15/12 5:36 AM, Father Gordon Gilbert fatherg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, For whatever reason, Fresco was not showing the full path to LilyPond. Never had this problem before, but when I put it in there, all worked! I think this is a reflection of a solution to issue 1948. The windows installer no longer adds a path entry (by design), so the user will need to add their own path in the future. Perhaps this should be part of the Frescobaldi documentation. Thanks, Carl -- Fr. Gordon Gilbert Penetanguishene, ON ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: moving rhythmic dots down
please always reply to the list! Just a quick question -- I'm making a glissando that goes across several unstemmed noteheads; I need to move any rhythmic dots down, so that the glissando doesn't obscure them. What's the proper override for this? Eluze wrote: use \dotsDown (or \voiceTwo ) Jeffrey Trevino wrote: Some questions about this: Why does \voiceTwo have the same effect as \dotsDown? \dotsDown just directs dots below the staff line while \voiceTwo (or \voiceFour) directs all items down (stems, dots, slurs, ties, phrasing slurs, dynamics, text spanners and tuplet brackets,…) - it's up to you to decide what you really want. Jeffrey Trevino wrote: Also, moving the dots down has resolved the case in which the glissando line moves up from an initial notehead; however, if the line needs to go down, the problem is different. I either need to move the dots down even further, or I need to invert the stems and then move the dots up. Is there a /dotsUp for this new case? maybe you should provide a small example of what you are trying to do and where there are problems - that makes it easier to find solutions! hth Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/moving-rhythmic-dots-down-tp33510040p33514010.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Variables: structure vs layout
El 15/03/2012 16:35, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com escribió: I guess it's a fairly vague question. I guess the best way to narrow it down is -- especially asking experienced users -- what level of atomization seems to work the best for variables? I'd use a variable for each voice undoubtedly. Use spacing rests as a padding. Paco ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.4
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Wilbert Berendsen wbs...@xs4all.nl wrote: Tab and Shift-tab handle the indent, Ctrl+I inserts a plain Tab. Yeah, I think Ctrl-I as in re-indent the selected part was a LilyPondTool/jEdit thing. Speaking of confusing shortcuts: Ctrl-D used to mean comment this line (that's the default in Kate I think), now it means Delete - I've inadvertently lost a few lines because of that :-) To keep Frescobaldi simple its indenting defaults to the LilyPond-recommended way of indenting. But you can override the behaviour by placing document variables in the document (see manual-editor-document variables). Wow. Wouldn't have thought of that. I put much love in the PDF view to make it better than the old one (I hope ;-) You can copy images: drag a square with the right button or Shift-left button, and then choose Copy to Image in the context menu or the Edit menu. It even copies images in a specified DPI setting, instead of the current scale! You can drag both the image or the image's file, and also specify the antialiasing, background color (which in the Copy to Image dialog defaults to white :-) and whether to auto-crop the image. OK. I had missed the menu entry. And did you notice the magnifying glass? Ctrl+Click in the Music View! I did not. I only used Ctrl-mousewheel (it wouldn't have occured to me ;) The old pdf view did not support finding point and click objects (due to Okular limitations), but the new one has: Ctrl+J highlights the object the text cursor is at. Yes, that must be the most welcome new feature. Plus, since I rarely have a mouse (I'm running ratpoison these days), I've come to realize that Frescobaldi can be easily be controlled with the keyboard only! I tried to make the config pages simple and not too crowded. But I think an 'Editor' page is needed, with settings related to editing behaviour, indenting etc. That's what I'd be expecting to see, indeed. Please take a look at the snippets manager, it is quite powerful and also powers the File-New from template menu. It has support for python scripts as well and some nice default snippets. A larger library could be put on the Frescobaldi website. Yeah, I should consider using it for quick tuplets and stuff. There is: see www.frescobaldi.org/download . The Windows installer works very well! I have no Mac to test and build a Mac installer. But users are using Frescobaldi on Mac OS X and it works. Cool. I hope to see a Mac application available for download soon! Yes there are many French translators, and I can't see which which translations are the best. It would be nice if someone with good understanding of LilyPond and Frescobaldi and translating desktop applications could 'govern' the French translation :-) Well, I'd be happy to :-) Keep up the good work! Cheers, V. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: wrong beaming
on 2012-03-15 at 16:23 Carl Sorensen wrote:
What issues do you believe it is related to?
i thought that it might be related to issues like 11 and 2113, for
example:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=11
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2113
(not the same, though)
Similar, or identical?
well, identical is a very strong word... but as far as i can see, yes, the
results are exactly the same in 2.14.2 and in 2.15.33.
You never say what correct output you want.
sorry about that, please see the attached file.
it's the result of this code (thanks, mark):
\version 2.15.32
\relative c' {
\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\time 2/4
c16[ c \times 2/3 { c8 c16] }
\times 2/3 { c8 c16 } c16 c
}
what other options would be considered correct?
best,
ljattachment: correct.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: wrong beaming
on 2012-03-15 at 16:22 Mark Knoop wrote: \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8) \set subdivideBeams = ##t yes! thank you very much. (when the triplet is in the second half of the quarter note, i still have to hard-code a manual beam, though. works great when the triplet is in the first half). best, lj ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Add more space between arbitrary groups of notes
Hi Svetlana:
I want more space only between phrasing slurs, not between each note
What about this solution?
\version 2.15.32
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override BreathingSign #'transparent = ##t
\override BreathingSign #'X-extent = #'(0 . 1)
}
}
theMusic = \relative c' {
c\( d e f
g\) \breathe g f\( e
d e\) \breathe d c
}
\score { \theMusic }
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
