lyrics - vertical position
hello list, i have some code with two markups on a note (one of them postscript code), and some tweaks including \once \override TextScript #'extra-offset and \shapeSlur. for some reason, the presence of the markups forces the lyrics down too far away from the staff (see image). i studied an example from the notation manual (2.1.2 Techniques specific to lyrics - Placing lyrics vertically), but i can only make it work at the \layout level, thus affecting the whole score. i only need to adjust the position of this particular line, to compensate the displacement caused by the markups. is there a way to adjust the vertical position of lyrics locally? TIA, lj attachment: lyrics.jpg___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: partcombine - whole note : slash on grace note
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 06:21:00AM -0700, MING TSANG wrote:
Mark,
I try as suggested. The print seems to suggest no voice two. When I just
extract voice two (the bass) there is no midi sound for the s1~ s1. This
is not what I want.
When I encounter this, I use tags. In your case:
notes = relative c' {
...
\tag #'pdf { s1 s1 }
\tag #'midi { g1~ g }
}
This needs separate scores for PDF and MIDI output. The former then uses
\keepWithTag #'pdf \notes, and the latter \keepwithTag #'midi \notes.
Blessing in+,
Blessing in plus?
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
Please do not use my email addresses within any Facebook service.
Arrogant is he who, on his birthday, sends his parents a good wishes card.
pgpu1QyJxaLaA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Score layout in a separate file
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 15:17 +0200, Siska Ádám wrote: Dear List, is there a way to put the layout block for a score in a variable that lives in a separate file? Unfortunately the following won't compile: This does something similar: http://www.openguitar.com/files/slyce.py Regards, daveA -- Guitar teaching materials and original music for all styles and levels. Site: http://www.openguitar.com (()) eMail: d.raleigh.arn...@gmail.com Contact: http://www.openguitar.com/contact.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Another tricky music situation. This time: Repeat Nightmare with alternative endings.
Hello list, Maybe you have an opinion about this musical situation, described here: http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/04/05/nightmare-repeats/ In my eyes it should be forbidden. The real cause it that alternative endings use the same glyph as boundary as repeats: the repeat close barline. Better would be a glyph that is explicitely and only for the first/second ending bracket, but well.. we don't got that over the last few hundred years. Nils ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Another tricky music situation. This time: Repeat Nightmare with alternative endings.
Hello, On 5 April 2012 15:20, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote: Hello list, Maybe you have an opinion about this musical situation, described here: http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/04/05/nightmare-repeats/ In my eyes it should be forbidden. The real cause it that alternative endings use the same glyph as boundary as repeats: the repeat close barline. Better would be a glyph that is explicitely and only for the first/second ending bracket, but well.. we don't got that over the last few hundred years. better would be to write out in full, it's not like we need to worry about the cost of parchment is it ;) Why muck about like this in the first place? James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lyrics - vertical position
On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:24 PM, luis jure wrote: for some reason, the presence of the markups forces the lyrics down too far away from the staff (see image). is there a way to adjust the vertical position of lyrics locally? There's always extra-offset, but it's kludgy. Could you send an image of the line you're talking about? It may be a bug if the markups force the lyrics down too low. Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Another tricky music situation. This time: Repeat Nightmare with alternative endings.
Am Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:31:48 +0100 schrieb James pkx1...@gmail.com: Hello, On 5 April 2012 15:20, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote: Hello list, Maybe you have an opinion about this musical situation, described here: http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/04/05/nightmare-repeats/ In my eyes it should be forbidden. The real cause it that alternative endings use the same glyph as boundary as repeats: the repeat close barline. Better would be a glyph that is explicitely and only for the first/second ending bracket, but well.. we don't got that over the last few hundred years. better would be to write out in full, it's not like we need to worry about the cost of parchment is it ;) Why muck about like this in the first place? James I is somehow my (future) Job as music theorist to think about these problems. At least I want to think about it. Writing your music down in a correct way helps the intpreter to play better and the composer to think better. There are many strange and inconsequent things in music notation. If you know them you can avoid them and make your music or score clearer. This is where Lilypond comes in because I use it to create scores :) Nils ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Another tricky music situation. This time: Repeat Nightmare with alternative endings.
Hello, On 5 April 2012 15:42, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote: Am Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:31:48 +0100 schrieb James pkx1...@gmail.com: Hello, On 5 April 2012 15:20, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote: Hello list, Maybe you have an opinion about this musical situation, described here: http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/04/05/nightmare-repeats/ In my eyes it should be forbidden. The real cause it that alternative endings use the same glyph as boundary as repeats: the repeat close barline. Better would be a glyph that is explicitely and only for the first/second ending bracket, but well.. we don't got that over the last few hundred years. better would be to write out in full, it's not like we need to worry about the cost of parchment is it ;) Why muck about like this in the first place? James I is somehow my (future) Job as music theorist to think about these problems. At least I want to think about it. Writing your music down in a correct way helps the intpreter to play better and the composer to think better. There are many strange and inconsequent things in music notation. If you know them you can avoid them and make your music or score clearer. This is where Lilypond comes in because I use it to create scores :) Isn't this just the old adage, 'Just because we can, doesn't mean we should'. I cannot think what problem this is solving. or how it is adding to the music in any way at all. Otherwise you simply add a note saying to go back to repeat X instead of Y. I think your example is far too short to get the point across. Maybe there could be some piece where you start at A got Z repeat back to B got to Y repeat back to C and so on, in ever decreasing 'circles', that may be something a 'modern' composer might do. Or even me come to think of it. :) But then you'd just label your repeat bars. regards James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: partcombine - whole note : slash on grace note
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 13:40, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 06:21:00AM -0700, MING TSANG wrote: Blessing in+, Blessing in plus? I think it refers to the 'cross' symbol that the Catholic people use when they say 'the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, Amen' Christ van WIllegen -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lyrics - vertical position
on 2012-04-05 at 16:36 m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
There's always extra-offset, but it's kludgy. Could you send an image of
the line you're talking about? It may be a bug if the markups force the
lyrics down too low.
hi mike, i sent a tiny image in my previous mail, here's attached the
whole fragment. the problematic line is the first one. please note that
the lyrics are much more separated from the staff than in the other two
lines. this is caused by the markups on the a16 at the end of the line
(lyrics time).
note also that doing away with the markups the lyrics regain its proper
distance (2nd image).
the code of the markups is the following:
\shapeSlur #'(0 0 -.3 -1.2 .9 -1.5 0.5 -0.3)
\once \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 5)
a16
-\markup {
\postscript #0.2 setlinewidth
1 setlinecap
1.8 -9 moveto
3 -9.7 lineto
4.2 -9 lineto
stroke }
-\markup {
\override #'(font-name . Emmentaler)
\fontsize #1
\halign #-12
\char ##xe11a }
thanks for your attention,
lj
(BTW, i wouldn't mind some kludgy code if i could get a quick and dirty
solution to this particular problem soon...)attachment: lyrics1.pngattachment: lyrics2.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lyrics - vertical position
on 2012-04-05 at 16:36 m...@apollinemike.com wrote: There's always extra-offset, but it's kludgy. using \override LyricText #'extra-offset = #'(0.0 . 2.0) before that line of text, and \revert LyricText #'extra-offset after it, i got the correct spacing. i don't know what makes extra-offset kludgy, but it sure was my friend on this one... (after all, kludgy comes from the german word klug...) best, lj ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
