Multiple-staff ossia

2012-04-07 Thread Siska Ádám
Dear List,


is there a way to create a multiple-staff ossia? I need to expand a divisi 
section in a string part score that lasts a couple of bars only. The basic idea 
would be to have a StaffGroup that starts in the middle of the page (at the 
point where the divisi section begins) and which end at the end of the divisi 
section. I tried the same solution that works for single-stave ossias as 
explained in the Documentation, but unfortunately that doesn't work (the main 
problem is that the bracket starts at the beginning of the line and also it was 
not possible to assign instrumentName and/or shordInstrumentName values to the 
ossia staves created that way).


Thank you for any help,
Ádám


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Multiple-staff ossia

2012-04-07 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - 
From: Siska Ádám sa...@sadam.hu

To: lilypond-user Users lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 2:05 PM
Subject: Multiple-staff ossia


Dear List,


is there a way to create a multiple-staff ossia? I need to expand a divisi 
section in a string part score that lasts a couple of bars only. The basic 
idea would be to have a StaffGroup that starts in the middle of the page (at 
the point where the divisi section begins) and which end at the end of the 
divisi section. I tried the same solution that works for single-stave ossias 
as explained in the Documentation, but unfortunately that doesn't work (the 
main problem is that the bracket starts at the beginning of the line and 
also it was not possible to assign instrumentName and/or shordInstrumentName 
values to the ossia staves created that way).



Thank you for any help,
Ádám


===

From your description, I'm not sure what you're trying to do.  Could you 
provide a small graphic showing what you have, and another edited version to 
show what you want?


--
Phil Holmes



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: tie to note inside double backslashing voicing

2012-04-07 Thread trandrusiii

Thanks for your input. I've tried both methods and I have the same problem.
When I add a cresc. to the measure, the spacing of my entire piece gets
completely messed up. I don't understand why Lilypond won't allow me to
create dynamics without destroying the spacing of my piece.


Kieren MacMillan wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Look up explicitly instantiating voices in the docs.
 
 a better way to do single note dynamics?
 
 If you're not worried about MIDI/playback, then g2.*2/3\ s4\! works well
 [visually].
 
 Hope this helps!
 Kieren.
 
 On 2012-Apr-6, at 12:00, trandrusiii wrote:
 
 
 Hi,
 
 The only way I've found to create dynamics for a single note is to use
 voicing with spacers. This worked ok for a while but now I have a note
 that
 is tied to the upper voice and I get an error message saying that the tie
 is
 not terminated and nothing shows up on the score. Has anyone experienced
 this before? or know a better way to do single note dynamics?  Thanks.
 
 r c'( a
 fis'\ a, d,)
 g2.~\mp 
  { g2. } \\ { s4\ s4 s4\! }  %no tie
 -- 
 View this message in context:
 http://old.nabble.com/tie-to-note-inside-double-backslashing-voicing-tp33637252p33637252.html
 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list
 lilypond-user@gnu.org
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 
 
 
 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list
 lilypond-user@gnu.org
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/tie-to-note-inside-double-backslashing-voicing-tp33637252p33648682.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Multiple-staff ossia

2012-04-07 Thread Siska Ádám
On 2012.04.07., at 16:16, Phil Holmes wrote:
 - Original Message - From: Siska Ádám sa...@sadam.hu
 To: lilypond-user Users lilypond-user@gnu.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 2:05 PM
 Subject: Multiple-staff ossia
 
 
 Dear List,
 
 
 is there a way to create a multiple-staff ossia? I need to expand a divisi 
 section in a string part score that lasts a couple of bars only. The basic 
 idea would be to have a StaffGroup that starts in the middle of the page (at 
 the point where the divisi section begins) and which end at the end of the 
 divisi section. I tried the same solution that works for single-stave ossias 
 as explained in the Documentation, but unfortunately that doesn't work (the 
 main problem is that the bracket starts at the beginning of the line and also 
 it was not possible to assign instrumentName and/or shordInstrumentName 
 values to the ossia staves created that way).
 
 
 Thank you for any help,
 Ádám
 
 
 ===
 
 From your description, I'm not sure what you're trying to do.  Could you 
 provide a small graphic showing what you have, and another edited version to 
 show what you want?
 
 --
 Phil Holmes


Dear Phil,


in the meantime I almost solved it, you'll find my current solution with some 
dummy minimal-example material at the end of this mail. What I'm still missing 
here is the ability of giving instrument names (like 1, 2, 3 etc.) to the ossia 
staves.


Thanks,
Ádám


\version 2.14.2
\score {
  \new Staff = main {
  \relative c' {
\clef treble \time 4/4
% Example played by all strings
c4 d e f
% Example played divisi

  % Main material
  { c d e f g1^div. \glissando g' f e d c1 \glissando c, d e f 
g }
  % Ossia staves explaining how to make the glissandi
  \new StaffGroup \with {
alignAboveContext = #main
fontSize = #-3
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -4)
\override SpanBar #'transparent = ##t
\override BarLine #'transparent = ##t
\override StaffGrouper #'staff-staff-spacing #'minimum-distance = #0
\override StaffGrouper #'staff-staff-spacing #'basic-distance = #0
\override SystemStartBracket #'X-offset = #0
  } 
\new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver } {
  \relative c' {
\clef treble c1 \glissando g'1 \glissando c,1
  }
}
\new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver } {
  \relative c' {
\clef treble d1 \glissando f1 \glissando d1
  }
}
\new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver } {
  \relative c' {
\clef treble e1 \glissando \hideNotes e128 \unHideNotes 
\stopStaff \once \override TextScript #'Y-offset = #-0.5 s4^etc.
  }
}
\new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver } {
  \relative c' {
\clef treble f1 \glissando d1 \glissando f1
  }
}
\new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver } {
  \relative c' {
\clef treble g'1 \glissando c,1 \glissando g'1
  }
}
  

% Example played by all strings
f4 e d c
}
  }
  % Increase glissando visibility
  \layout { \context { \Voice \override Glissando #'thickness = #3 } }
}



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Laborejo Release 0.2 Announcement

2012-04-07 Thread Nils
Exactly one month after the first release, here is Laborejo 0.2!

Laborejo, Esperanto for Workshop, is used to craft music through
notation. It is a Lilypond GUI frontend, a MIDI creator and finally a
tool collection to inspire and help you compose. It works by reducing
music-redundancy and by seperating layout and data.

The next release is scheduled for May, 8th. One month from now.

Before you read the details make sure to connect to Laborejos Facebook,
Twitter or Google Plus! https://www.facebook.com/Laborejo
https://twitter.com/#!/Laborejo
https://plus.google.com/b/116744898976321238325/

Screenshot (Laborejo and Lilypond, side by side):
http://www.laborejo.org/images/screenshots/latestscreenshot.png

This is the release of version 0.2
Download: https://github.com/nilsgey/Laborejo/tarball/0.2
Dependencies: http://www.laborejo.org/documentation

Linux Instructions: Unpack, cd into the created directoy, execute:
./laborejo-qt.sh

Then use the number- and cursor keys for immediate success! 
Check Help-Manual for navigational and note/rest entry keys.
Everything else is in the menus.

New since version 0.1:
- Repeats, Alternate Ends and Jumps in various forms. The main Feature
for this release.
- Playback Trigger (Only reduce volume in the second repeat or Mute
track if python weather module reports rain)
- Master Track (Merges with every other Track. Use to structure your
piece, make global changes, change tempo etc.)
- Various Commands like Join Selection to Chord and Add Octave to
Chord/Selection 
- The usual breadbutter bugfixing and improving.

Most important known problems:
* This is Alpha Grade Software. Don't use for long-term work. However,
the produced midis and PDFs will last forever.
* There is no built-in jack midi output yet. You have to export midi
files.
* Documentation is nearly non-existent.

Have fun, it would be nice to hear from you!

Nils
http://www.laborejo.org

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Bug: lyrics vertical spacing and dynamics with extra-offset

2012-04-07 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Dear list

I am writing down the Tenor part of Mendelssohn’s Elias (Elijah) and stumbled
upon the following, which clearly is a bug (to me).

I attached the three bars of the piece in which it appears.  Notice that both
the upper and the lower voice contain a Dynamic mark.  The two marks have an
extra-offset each to get them closer to the staff.

In the first score, the lyrics are put nicely close to the staff. But as soon
as the lower lyrics span across the space where the dynamic mark would be
without the offset, both lyrics seem to ignore the space that became available
by using the extra-offset.  Thus, the distance to the staff increases again.

Is that a bug?  Or am I making a mistake here?



PS.: Because there has been no reply to it and others also reported problems
with ML delivery, did you get my mail about a regression concerning order of
MIDI tracks (from 3. April)?
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
Please do not use my email addresses within any Facebook service.

I hate being bi-polar.  It’s fantastic!
\version 2.14.2
 
\paper {
score-system-spacing #'padding = #13
}

music = \relative c' {
\clef G_8
\key f \major

a c8. f16 f4  { \voiceTwo
r2

r4 g
\once \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'(-2.5 . 1.5)
b4._\ff b8
} \new Voice = TenorInsert { \voiceOne
c4. g8 d'2(
\once \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'(-0.5 . -1.5)
e4.)^\sf c8
}  \oneVoice
a c2 r
}
text  = \lyricmode { hö -- re uns, er -- hö -- re uns! }
textShort = \lyricmode { hö -- re uns, er }

\score {
\new ChoirStaff  \new Staff = Tenor 
\music
\addlyrics \textShort
\new Lyrics \with {alignAboveContext = Tenor}
\lyricsto TenorInsert
\lyricmode { Baal, er -- hö -- re }


}

\score {
\new ChoirStaff  \new Staff = Tenor 
\music
\addlyrics \text
\new Lyrics \with {alignAboveContext = Tenor}
\lyricsto TenorInsert
\lyricmode { Baal, er -- hö -- re }


}


pgpHVaIfS3GyW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: lyrics vertical spacing and dynamics with extra-offset

2012-04-07 Thread Trevor Daniels


Frank, you wrote Saturday, April 07, 2012 7:33 PM

I attached the three bars of the piece in which it appears.  Notice that 
both
the upper and the lower voice contain a Dynamic mark.  The two marks have 
an

extra-offset each to get them closer to the staff.

In the first score, the lyrics are put nicely close to the staff. But as 
soon

as the lower lyrics span across the space where the dynamic mark would be
without the offset, both lyrics seem to ignore the space that became 
available
by using the extra-offset.  Thus, the distance to the staff increases 
again.


Is that a bug?  Or am I making a mistake here?


It's not a bug, and not really a mistake either.  But extra-offset should
be used only as a last resort, as the extra displacement is made only
_after_ _all_ typesetting is finished.  So extra space is ignored.

This is explained in the Learning Manual:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/learning/moving-objects

Trevor


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: tie to note inside double backslashing voicing

2012-04-07 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:29 PM, trandrusiii tr.and...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for your input. I've tried both methods and I have the same problem.
 When I add a cresc. to the measure, the spacing of my entire piece gets
 completely messed up. I don't understand why Lilypond won't allow me to
 create dynamics without destroying the spacing of my piece.

I don't understand.  Is this a new problem or do you have trouble with
explicit voices?  I don't see a \cresc in the code you posted.
Can you post sample code again, with an illustration of what you want
to achieve?

cheers,
Janek

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: lyrics vertical spacing and dynamics with extra-offset

2012-04-07 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:

 Frank, you wrote Saturday, April 07, 2012 7:33 PM

 I attached the three bars of the piece in which it appears.  Notice that
 both
 the upper and the lower voice contain a Dynamic mark.  The two marks have
 an
 extra-offset each to get them closer to the staff.

 In the first score, the lyrics are put nicely close to the staff. But as
 soon
 as the lower lyrics span across the space where the dynamic mark would be
 without the offset, both lyrics seem to ignore the space that became
 available
 by using the extra-offset.  Thus, the distance to the staff increases
 again.

 Is that a bug?  Or am I making a mistake here?

 It's not a bug, and not really a mistake either.  But extra-offset should
 be used only as a last resort, as the extra displacement is made only
 _after_ _all_ typesetting is finished.  So extra space is ignored.

In other words zou should override X-offset and Y-offset here, not extra-offset.

HTH,
Janek

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


v 2.15.36 on Mac OS

2012-04-07 Thread Stan Sanderson
I can confirm that LilyPond v. 2.15.36 on both x86 and PPC platforms running OS 
X 10.5.8 correctly compiles previously coded files.

Stan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: v 2.15.36 on Mac OS

2012-04-07 Thread James Worlton

On Apr 7, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:

I can confirm that LilyPond v. 2.15.36 on both x86 and PPC  
platforms running OS X 10.5.8 correctly compiles previously coded  
files.


Stan


LilyPond 2.15.36 ran and compiled with no problems that I could see  
on Mac PPC OSX 10.4.11.


James Worlton


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: tie to note inside double backslashing voicing

2012-04-07 Thread trandrusiii

Hi. The problem I am having now is different. When I attempt to add a hairpin
decres the spacing of my entire piece gets corrupted. I've attached a
screencap to illustrate. I would like the spacing to remain at 31 or 32
pages.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p33649921/spacingproblem.jpg spacingproblem.jpg 



Janek Warchoł-2 wrote:
 
 On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:29 PM, trandrusiii tr.and...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for your input. I've tried both methods and I have the same
 problem.
 When I add a cresc. to the measure, the spacing of my entire piece gets
 completely messed up. I don't understand why Lilypond won't allow me to
 create dynamics without destroying the spacing of my piece.
 
 I don't understand.  Is this a new problem or do you have trouble with
 explicit voices?  I don't see a \cresc in the code you posted.
 Can you post sample code again, with an illustration of what you want
 to achieve?
 
 cheers,
 Janek
 
 ___
 lilypond-user mailing list
 lilypond-user@gnu.org
 https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
 
 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/tie-to-note-inside-double-backslashing-voicing-tp33637252p33649921.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: tie to note inside double backslashing voicing

2012-04-07 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer

On 2012-04-06 18:00, trandrusiii wrote:

The only way I've found to create dynamics for a single note is to use
voicing with spacers. This worked ok for a while but now I have a note that
is tied to the upper voice and I get an error message saying that the tie is
not terminated and nothing shows up on the score. Has anyone experienced
this before? or know a better way to do single note dynamics?


Don't use \\ (i.e. simply leave the double backslash out, which creates 
two separate voices):



  { g2. } { s4\  s4 s4\! }  %no tie


This does not create new voices, but simply placed the g2. in parallel 
with the spacers in the same voice (i.e. if you would use notes instead 
of the spacers, you would get collisions etc.)


Cheers,
Reinhold

--
--
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial  Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


non-standard mensural clef

2012-04-07 Thread Wasil Sergejczyk
i'm trying to re-create this hymn and i've stumbled upon the clef(s) i didn't
find in lilypond documentation and anywhere on the Internet. does anybody know
what's this and how can i do it in lilypond?
here's the scan:
http://i35.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0407/b2/0d1272c45e5e8c98575c8fa1838c5ab2.png
it's from Manvale choricanum ab utriusque sexus choricistis concupitum by
Casoni, Giovanni Agostino (1649).


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Bug: lyrics vertical spacing and dynamics with extra-offset

2012-04-07 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer

On 2012-04-07 20:33, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

In the first score, the lyrics are put nicely close to the staff. But as soon
as the lower lyrics span across the space where the dynamic mark would be
without the offset, both lyrics seem to ignore the space that became available
by using the extra-offset.  Thus, the distance to the staff increases again.

Is that a bug?  Or am I making a mistake here?


As the internals documentation says, extra-offset is only applied AFTER 
all layouting has been done. The vertical spacing is still done with the 
original position. You can, however, override the *-position.


Cheers,
Reinhold


--
--
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial  Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: non-standard mensural clef

2012-04-07 Thread James
Hello,

On 7 April 2012 15:57, Wasil Sergejczyk szelga@gmail.com wrote:
 i'm trying to re-create this hymn and i've stumbled upon the clef(s) i 
 didn't
 find in lilypond documentation and anywhere on the Internet. does anybody know
 what's this and how can i do it in lilypond?
 here's the scan:
 http://i35.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0407/b2/0d1272c45e5e8c98575c8fa1838c5ab2.png
 it's from Manvale choricanum ab utriusque sexus choricistis concupitum by
 Casoni, Giovanni Agostino (1649).

I'm absolutely no expert but looks sort of petrucci to me

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/the-feta-font#petrucci-glyphs

James

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Status of Mutopia Project

2012-04-07 Thread Nick Payne
Has the Mutopia Project gone moribund again? There were some new scores 
being added a few months ago, but nothing new has appeared since early 
February, and I haven't received any response to a couple of mails I 
sent about errors in a couple of ly files on the site.


Nick


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user