Re: status of release 2.16.0
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:02:01AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > there is a long-ish explanation about the release process in our > latest LilyPond Report: > http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-26#the_road_to_2_16 Can we get a news item for this? and maybe a (general) email to the user list? - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor
Hi, Trevor,
I cannot access lilybin.com for at least two weeks now. What happened?
Just want to follow up with the request of generating a midi file available to
download, same as the pdf file?
Blessing in+,
Ming
>
> From: MING TSANG
>To: "trevordi...@gmail.com"
>Cc: lilypond-usermailinglist
>Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:59:50 PM
>Subject: Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor
>
>
>Hi, Trevor,
>
>
>
>I just want to follow up with the midi file available for download same as the
>pdf file.
>
>
>Addition request, it seems that lilybin does not support utf-8 (the editor
>side does display utf-8 code but the pdf side does not.) Please refer to
>attach png file.
>
>
>Blessing in+,
>Ming.
>
>
>>
>> From: "trevordi...@gmail.com"
>>To: MING TSANG
>>Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2012 11:07:03 PM
>>Subject: Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor
>>
>>
>>I'll get a button in there soon so that will be possible. Glad you like it!
>>
>>Trevor
>>
>>
>>- Reply message -
>>From: "MING TSANG"
>>To: "trevordi...@gmail.com"
>>Cc: "lilypond-usermailinglist"
>>Subject: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor
>>Date: Sun, Mar 4, 2012 9:02 pm
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi, Trevor:
>>
>>
>>There is "\midi { }' in your sample .ly on lilybin.com (lilybin editor). How
>>can I save this midi file the same as to save pdf output?
>>
>>Blessing in+,
>>Ming.
>>
>>
>>
>
>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Four Bars per Line/System, again :)
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Johan, > > Please submit to LSR... > > > Will do. The LSR is running 2.14.2 right now, so I'll have to make some > changes. (In particular, the function uses David Kastrup's make-engraver > macro which is fairly recent.) > Added as http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=838 -David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:08:44PM -0300, Marcos da Silva Sampaio wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails > and I got this error message: > > Drawing systems...lilypond: ../flower/include/drul-array.hh:35: T& > Drul_array::at(Direction) [with T = double]: Assertion `d == 1 || d > == -1' failed. Thanks for reporting this, Marcos. Your lilypond source has stimulated a programming error; this is not an error on your part, but a flaw in the Lilypond software. Such errors are only reported by un-optimised builds and cause Lilypond to report the error and exit, as you have witnessed. Did you build Lilypond from source by any chance? An official Lilypond release binary does not include these checks and will continue past a programming error. This may well allow you to typeset your music successfully. It would be very helpful to us if you tried an official Lilypond release binary on your Lilypond source. If it works, great, the job is done. If it fails please let us know. There is a known issue with tremolo which looks similar to your report: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444 Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LilyPond wins LoMuS 2012!
2012/5/21 David Kastrup : > Francisco Vila writes: >> Bravo! Is there any linkable notice in the web? > > I just found http://concours.afim-asso.org/2012/index.php>. It is > not really easy to find, and it not exactly containing an impressive > amount of information. Indeed. Thanks for keeping this in mind, -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: status of release 2.16.0
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote: > Can someone provide a status update re: this event, please? Greetings, there is a long-ish explanation about the release process in our latest LilyPond Report: http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-26#the_road_to_2_16 Cheers, Valentin. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LilyPond wins LoMuS 2012!
Francisco Vila writes: > 2012/5/12 m...@apollinemike.com : >> Hey LilyPond users, >> >> I have an exciting piece of news to share with you. LilyPond won LoMuS >> 2012, one of the most prestigious awards in the open source community for >> musical software. >> >> http://concours.afim-asso.org/ >> >> All of you should be very proud, as your work with LilyPond helps those who >> develop the program make it a better piece of software. >> >> Tweet the news far and wide! It would be wonderful if the community of >> users grew as a result of this award. >> > > Bravo! Is there any linkable notice in the web? I just found http://concours.afim-asso.org/2012/index.php>. It is not really easy to find, and it not exactly containing an impressive amount of information. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Volta repeat with different lyrics places all words on lower staff
Hi Colin
Sorry to top-post.
The quick solution is to name the first Lyrics context something like VerseOne
like this:
\new Lyrics = "VerseOne" \lyricsto "melody"
and specify that the second Lyrics context is positioned immediately beneath it
with
\new Lyrics \with { alignBelowContext = "VerseOne" }
leaving all the other lines unchanged.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Colin Jesse Kinlund
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 9:43 AM
Subject: Volta repeat with different lyrics places all words on lower staff
Hi everyone, I’m using ver 2.15.38 (since the 2.16 release isn’t out), and
being the first time I’ve used an unstable build I don’t know if this is a bug,
since there are no examples on the website that directly correspond.
I’m setting a piece for three voices with sections that repeat for the
purpose of the next verse. So what I want to have happen is (view with a
monospace font):
Top voice - - - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blah First verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Middle voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blah First verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Bottom voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blah First verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Diligently following the instructions at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/techniques-specific-to-lyrics#lyrics-and-repeats
, there is no trouble with a single-staff system as in the example, but adding
another voice causes all the text in the second verse to drop to the
bottom-most staff, like this:
Top voice - - - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blah First verse lyrics
Middle voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blah First verse lyrics
Bottom voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blah First verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
I have worked on this problem for days now, and I have no idea if I’m doing
something wrong or if this is a real bug. I could not find any examples that
dealt with volta repeats of different text with more than a single voice.
Please, please help!
Below is a small example with actual code (25 lines due to formatting).
Un-comment the commented lines to see the issue.
Thanks in advance for any assistance!
- Colin
\version "2.15.38"
\score {
<<
\new ChoirStaff {
<<
\new Voice = "melody" \relative c''
{ a4 a a a \repeat volta 2 { b4 b b b } c4 c8 c c2 }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "melody"
{ The start -- ing words.
<<
{ The first time words. }
\new Lyrics
{
\set associatedVoice = "melody"
Sec -- ond time words.
}
>>
The fin -- al words.
}
% \new Voice = "harmony" \relative c'
% { f4 f f f \repeat volta 2 { g8 g g4 g2 } a4 a8. a16 a2 }
>>
}
>>
}
--
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Volta repeat with different lyrics places all words on lower staff
Am 20.05.2012 10:43, schrieb Colin Jesse Kinlund:
Hi everyone, I’m using ver 2.15.38 (since the 2.16 release isn’t out), and
being the first time I’ve used an unstable build I don’t know if this is a bug,
since there are no examples on the website that directly correspond.
I’m setting a piece for three voices with sections that repeat for the purpose
of the next verse. So what I want to have happen is (view with a monospace
font):
Top voice - - - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Middle voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Bottom voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Diligently following the instructions at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/techniques-specific-to-lyrics#lyrics-and-repeats
, there is no trouble with a single-staff system as in the example, but adding
another voice causes all the text in the second verse to drop to the
bottom-most staff, like this:
Top voice - - - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Middle voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Bottom voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
I have worked on this problem for days now, and I have no idea if I’m doing
something wrong or if this is a real bug. I could not find any examples that
dealt with volta repeats of different text with more than a single voice.
Please, please help!
Below is a small example with actual code (25 lines due to formatting).
Un-comment the commented lines to see the issue.
Thanks in advance for any assistance!
- Colin
\version "2.15.38"
\score {
<<
\new ChoirStaff {
<<
\new Voice = "melody" \relative c''
{ a4 a a a \repeat volta 2 { b4 b b b } c4 c8 c c2 }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "melody"
{ The start -- ing words.
<<
{ The first time words. }
\new Lyrics
{
\set associatedVoice = "melody"
Sec -- ond time words.
}
>>
The fin -- al words.
}
% \new Voice = "harmony" \relative c'
% { f4 f f f \repeat volta 2 { g8 g g4 g2 } a4 a8. a16 a2 }
>>
}
>>
}
I think your two voices "melody" and "harmony" are not contained in the
same staff - try (within your choirstaff, if needed)
\new Staff <<
\new Voice = melody …
\new Voice = harmony …
>>
hth
Eluze
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails
Eluze writes:
> Am 20.05.2012 17:08, schrieb Marcos da Silva Sampaio:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
>> and I got this error message:
>>
>> Drawing systems...lilypond: ../flower/include/drul-array.hh:35: T&
>> Drul_array::at(Direction) [with T = double]: Assertion `d == 1 || d
>> == -1' failed.
>>
>>
>> { \repeat tremolo 16 { ees32 a } }
>>
>> There is no problem without the accidental:
>>
>> { \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a } }
>>
>>
>> Lilypond fails in the same way when I use cautionary accidentals also:
>>
>> { \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a! } }
>>
>>
>> Am I doing anything wrong?
> yep, what version are you using?
> with 2.15.38 or 2.14.2 (stable) I don't get any error!
Possibly because of
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1908#c3>. You
need an unoptimized binary to verify this report, and I have no idea who
considered that a good idea.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails
Marcos da Silva Sampaio writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
> and I got this error message:
>
> Drawing systems...lilypond: ../flower/include/drul-array.hh:35: T&
> Drul_array::at(Direction) [with T = double]: Assertion `d == 1 || d
> == -1' failed.
>
>
> { \repeat tremolo 16 { ees32 a } }
>
> There is no problem without the accidental:
>
> { \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a } }
>
>
> Lilypond fails in the same way when I use cautionary accidentals also:
>
> { \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a! } }
>
>
> Am I doing anything wrong?
The only wrong thing I can detect is not reporting this to the
lilypond-bug list, but it would seem like you can easily fix that.
An "assertion failed" should not be triggerable with unadorned user code
not touching the Scheme layer.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails
Am 20.05.2012 17:08, schrieb Marcos da Silva Sampaio:
Hello,
I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
and I got this error message:
Drawing systems...lilypond: ../flower/include/drul-array.hh:35: T&
Drul_array::at(Direction) [with T = double]: Assertion `d == 1 || d
== -1' failed.
{ \repeat tremolo 16 { ees32 a } }
There is no problem without the accidental:
{ \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a } }
Lilypond fails in the same way when I use cautionary accidentals also:
{ \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a! } }
Am I doing anything wrong?
yep, what version are you using?
with 2.15.38 or 2.14.2 (stable) I don't get any error!
Eluze
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails
Hello,
I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
and I got this error message:
Drawing systems...lilypond: ../flower/include/drul-array.hh:35: T&
Drul_array::at(Direction) [with T = double]: Assertion `d == 1 || d
== -1' failed.
{ \repeat tremolo 16 { ees32 a } }
There is no problem without the accidental:
{ \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a } }
Lilypond fails in the same way when I use cautionary accidentals also:
{ \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a! } }
Am I doing anything wrong?
--
Marcos da Silva Sampaio
Professor de Teoria, Composição e Computação Musical
Universidade Federal da Bahia / Escola de Música
http://marcosdisilva.net
http://genosmus.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Volta repeat with different lyrics places all words on lower staff
Hi everyone, I’m using ver 2.15.38 (since the 2.16 release isn’t out), and
being the first time I’ve used an unstable build I don’t know if this is a bug,
since there are no examples on the website that directly correspond.
I’m setting a piece for three voices with sections that repeat for the purpose
of the next verse. So what I want to have happen is (view with a monospace
font):
Top voice - - - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Middle voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Bottom voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Diligently following the instructions at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/techniques-specific-to-lyrics#lyrics-and-repeats
, there is no trouble with a single-staff system as in the example, but adding
another voice causes all the text in the second verse to drop to the
bottom-most staff, like this:
Top voice - - - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Middle voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Bottom voice - - - - - |: - - - - - - - - - :|
Lyrics, blah blah blahFirst verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
Second verse lyrics
I have worked on this problem for days now, and I have no idea if I’m doing
something wrong or if this is a real bug. I could not find any examples that
dealt with volta repeats of different text with more than a single voice.
Please, please help!
Below is a small example with actual code (25 lines due to formatting).
Un-comment the commented lines to see the issue.
Thanks in advance for any assistance!
- Colin
\version "2.15.38"
\score {
<<
\new ChoirStaff {
<<
\new Voice = "melody" \relative c''
{ a4 a a a \repeat volta 2 { b4 b b b } c4 c8 c c2 }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "melody"
{ The start -- ing words.
<<
{ The first time words. }
\new Lyrics
{
\set associatedVoice = "melody"
Sec -- ond time words.
}
>>
The fin -- al words.
}
% \new Voice = "harmony" \relative c'
% { f4 f f f \repeat volta 2 { g8 g g4 g2 } a4 a8. a16 a2 }
>>
}
>>
}___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: suppress warnings
Graham Percival writes: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:01:40PM +0200, Peter O'Doherty wrote: >> Is it possible to suppress specific (expected) warnings? > > No, unfortunately. -- Function: ly:expect-warning str rest A Scheme callable function to register a warning to be expected and subsequently suppressed. If the warning is not encountered, a warning about the missing warning will be shown. The message should be translated with `(_ ...)' and changing parameters given after the format string. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: suppress warnings
Am 20.05.2012 21:12, schrieb Graham Percival: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:01:40PM +0200, Peter O'Doherty wrote: Is it possible to suppress specific (expected) warnings? No, unfortunately. - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user The only warning you can deliberately suppress is that about "too many clashing note columns" (for example: ignoreCollision = \once \override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t). But that's probably not exactly what you wanted to read. Best Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: suppress warnings
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:01:40PM +0200, Peter O'Doherty wrote: > Is it possible to suppress specific (expected) warnings? No, unfortunately. - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Source management tools for lilypond projects
On 05/19/2012 11:46 PM, Federico Bruni wrote: > > Free as Free Software (GPL). > SparkleShare is a software, not a hosting service (even though it may > become also a hosting service, see sparkleshare.net). It looks very nice, you can use with your own server via ssh. It seems to use git behind the scenes. Thanks. -- Bernardo Barros ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Source management tools for lilypond projects
On 12-05-20 12:39 AM, Graham Percival wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:36:35PM +0200, Christian Andersson wrote: Now, sit down and await all flames from proponents of all the other tools! Saving different versions of files to floppy disks and writing a label in a thick pen was good enough for us in 1986. Especially when we re-used a floppy disk and scratched out the previous version number and wrote a new one on top. - Graham Floppy disks?! You had floppy disks? In my day, we had to glue the chad back into the cards. Kids these days! Colin -- I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both hands. You need to be able to throw something back. -Maya Angelou, poet (1928- ) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
suppress warnings
Hi, Is it possible to suppress specific (expected) warnings? The one in particular I would like to suppress (as there are a lot of them) is: warning: cannot find start of piano pedal: 'Sustain' Many thanks, Peter -- //= -> Peter O'Doherty -> http://www.peterodoherty.net -> m...@peterodoherty.net -> https://joindiaspora.com/people/70716 //= ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: TupletNumber placement - can you improve this function?
Hi Janek,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:02 AM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
> > Hi Janek,
> >
> >> today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646[...]
> >
> > Just yesterday I was updating the score which was the reason for me
> writing
> > this in the first place!!
>
> Ah, so it was yours! I didn't find any information about the authorship.
>
> > Probably about a hundred cross-staff tuplets, no
> > brackets, and a manual adjustment needed for each one of them... Ugh.
>
> That's the true LilyPond way: instead of fixing the same thing all the
> time, write one fix once and for all - kudos! I wish everyone
> operated this way.
>
Thanks! But with the time it took me to write it (and with the things that
keep happening to it), I think I should specialize in cross-staff tuplets
as a composer :)
>
> > The conditions in the function were designed to leave ordinary beams
> > untouched, and also to ignore tuplets with visible brackets. (In earlier
> > versions of LilyPond, the functions actually would give OK results with
> > ordinary beams.)
>
> Interesting - that wasn't the case when i tested it.
>
It looks for several conditions: if the beam isn't kneed, or if there is a
visible tuplet bracket (you've forced one, or there is no beam attached to
the first stem of the group), the functions will return the default values
of 'X-offset and 'Y-offset. Originally these properties were unset by
default, so I simply left them unset if no adjustment to the number was
needed. At some point after 2.14, both 'X and 'Y-offset of TupletNumber
were set to procedures. The original LSR functions, applied in this
circumstances, clear the default values and all horizontal and vertical
positioning is lost! (The number appears on the midline of the staff at
the first stem of the beam.)
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:45 AM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
> > OK, I got it to work with 2.15.38.
>
> Amazing!
> However, i see a weird bug - with visible TupletBrackets, some are not
> left unchanged (see attachment). The most interesting thing is that
> this happens in 2.15.38, 2.15.36 is ok!
>
Try using manual beaming. When I change the one tuplet causing problems in
the example you attach, the problem goes away.
Here I noticed something interesting, which might actually be a bug. Try
the example without any overrides. So:
\version "2.15.38"
\paper {
indent = 0
}
top = \change Staff = "1"
bottom = \change Staff = "2"
music = \relative c {
\override Beam #'auto-knee-gap = #1
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\times 2/3 {
c8 b c
g a' f % autobeaming necessary here when example doubled
f f,4
e c'8
}
\times 2/3 {
\bottom c8[ g' \top e']
c'[ e, \bottom g,]
\top e''[ \bottom c,, \top g'']
}
\times 4/5 {
\bottom c,,16[ \top g'' e' \bottom g,, \top c']
}
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "1" {
s1 s
s s
}
\new Staff = "2" {
\clef bass
\music
\bar "||"
\music % no problem when commented out
}
>>
}
You get different results for the second tuplet depending on whether the
example is doubled. Autobeaming for that one tuplet fixes the problem.
Very interesting!
> > You don't need to change anything for the snippet to work with 2.14.
>
> Unfortunately, when i added some non-cross-staff beams an error
> "Unbound variable: ly:tuplet-number::calc-y-offset" appears when i try
> with 2.14.2. I attach my expanded example.
>
Exactly--this procedure wasn't there in 2.14.2.
Thank you for looking at this in such depth! (Don't know how long it would
have been otherwise since I "fixed" that score I was updating...)
Best,
David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: status of release 2.16.0
Neil Thornock writes: >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Tom Cloyd wrote: >>> I've had it marked on my calendar for days that May 17 is the scheduled >>> release date, " If no Critical bugs are found..." (Ly website). >>> >>> The website in no way indicates that this occurred, nor are there any >>> announcements that I can find on this list. >>> >>> Can someone provide a status update re: this event, please? >>> > According to this list: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list > > it looks like critical issues were found. Not sure why nothing was > mentioned on the website. "If no critical bugs are found" is announced on the LilyPond website, and that's accurate. We don't announce every critical bug, and Graham is on vacation schedule anyway. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Source management tools for lilypond projects
Am 20.05.2012 09:25, schrieb James Harkins: From: Graham Percival On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:36:35PM +0200, Christian Andersson wrote: Now, sit down and await all flames from proponents of all the other tools! Saving different versions of files to floppy disks and writing a label in a thick pen was good enough for us in 1986. Especially when we re-used a floppy disk and scratched out the previous version number and wrote a new one on top. Fine until you need to revert to a previous version... From: Federico Bruni Free as Free Software (GPL). SparkleShare is a software, not a hosting service (even though it may become also a hosting service, see sparkleshare.net). You can put your git repository wherever you want: personal server, github, bitbucket (which has unlimited free private repositories at the moment). I'm not familiar at all with SparkleShare. I started using it two days ago to share some files with a person who uses Windows and knows nothing about Git. FWIW, I taught a couple of my students to "git pull" from here[1] and here[2] in about 5 minutes. Lack of knowledge of git is a minor consideration. Especially if you provide that user with a script to do this: git stash save git pull --rebase git stash pop Thanks, this is the answer to one question I had about the suggestions: Would it be achievable to use a git repository with collaborators who first have to learn this from scratch. _I_ could/can take some effort to learn git to set up and manage a repo, but I couldn't expect prospective contributors to do this. :-) Best Urs hjh [1] https://github.com/jamshark70/hadron [2] https://github.com/jamshark70/workshop2012 -- James Harkins /// dewdrop world jamshar...@dewdrop-world.net http://www.dewdrop-world.net "Come said the Muse, Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted, Sing me the universal." -- Whitman blog: http://www.dewdrop-world.net/words audio clips: http://www.dewdrop-world.net/audio more audio: http://soundcloud.com/dewdrop_world/tracks ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: mention canceled releases on website?
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote: >> Does that mean the website gets updated? AFAIK, the website gets updated automatically every few hours. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: TupletNumber placement - can you improve this function?
Hi David, On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:02 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Janek, > >> today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646 [...] > > Just yesterday I was updating the score which was the reason for me writing > this in the first place!! Ah, so it was yours! I didn't find any information about the authorship. > Probably about a hundred cross-staff tuplets, no > brackets, and a manual adjustment needed for each one of them... Ugh. That's the true LilyPond way: instead of fixing the same thing all the time, write one fix once and for all - kudos! I wish everyone operated this way. > The conditions in the function were designed to leave ordinary beams > untouched, and also to ignore tuplets with visible brackets. (In earlier > versions of LilyPond, the functions actually would give OK results with > ordinary beams.) Interesting - that wasn't the case when i tested it. On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:45 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > OK, I got it to work with 2.15.38. Amazing! However, i see a weird bug - with visible TupletBrackets, some are not left unchanged (see attachment). The most interesting thing is that this happens in 2.15.38, 2.15.36 is ok! > You don't need to change anything for the snippet to work with 2.14. Unfortunately, when i added some non-cross-staff beams an error "Unbound variable: ly:tuplet-number::calc-y-offset" appears when i try with 2.14.2. I attach my expanded example. thanks! Janek <> lsr-646-update02.ly Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Source management tools for lilypond projects
From: Graham Percival > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:36:35PM +0200, Christian Andersson wrote: > > Now, sit down and await all flames from proponents of all the other tools! > > Saving different versions of files to floppy disks and writing a > label in a thick pen was good enough for us in 1986. Especially > when we re-used a floppy disk and scratched out the previous > version number and wrote a new one on top. Fine until you need to revert to a previous version... From: Federico Bruni > Free as Free Software (GPL). > SparkleShare is a software, not a hosting service (even though it may > become also a hosting service, see sparkleshare.net). > > You can put your git repository wherever you want: personal server, > github, bitbucket (which has unlimited free private repositories at the > moment). > > I'm not familiar at all with SparkleShare. I started using it two days > ago to share some files with a person who uses Windows and knows nothing > about Git. FWIW, I taught a couple of my students to "git pull" from here[1] and here[2] in about 5 minutes. Lack of knowledge of git is a minor consideration. Especially if you provide that user with a script to do this: git stash save git pull --rebase git stash pop hjh [1] https://github.com/jamshark70/hadron [2] https://github.com/jamshark70/workshop2012 -- James Harkins /// dewdrop world jamshar...@dewdrop-world.net http://www.dewdrop-world.net "Come said the Muse, Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted, Sing me the universal." -- Whitman blog: http://www.dewdrop-world.net/words audio clips: http://www.dewdrop-world.net/audio more audio: http://soundcloud.com/dewdrop_world/tracks ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: mention canceled releases on website?
On 05/20/2012 01:07 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote: On 05/20/2012 12:56 AM, Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock wrote: Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website. I'm not happy with this practice, either. I eagerly await your patch. If it looks ok I'll tell you to push directly to staging. I suggest the following: when a critical bug is found, /modify/ second paragraph of the "release candidate" news to this:There are no known Critical issues with this release. A Critical bug was found, this release candidate is canceled. (date) Just make a new news item. - Graham Does that mean the website gets updated? t. ~~ Tom Cloyd / t...@tomcloyd.com / (435) 272-3332 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
