Re: [SNIPPET] "Inserting large plain text sections" (update)
There are a number of errors running with 2.14, which is the version the LSR
uses:
error: program too old: 2.14.0 (file requires: 2.18.0)
Brouillon.ly:24:2: error: unknown escaped string: `\markuplist'
\markuplist {
Brouillon.ly:24:2: error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
\markuplist {
Brouillon.ly:26:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\vspace'
\vspace#2
Brouillon.ly:27:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\justify'
\justify {
Brouillon.ly:35:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\vspace'
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:36:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\fill'
\fill-line {
Brouillon.ly:43:8: error: syntax error, unexpected \layout
\layout {}
Brouillon.ly:47:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\vspace'
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:47:4: error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:48:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\wordwrap'
\wordwrap {
Brouillon.ly:62:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\vspace'
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:69:6: error: syntax error, unexpected \layout
\layout {
Brouillon.ly:74:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\vspace'
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:74:4: error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:75:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\fill'
\fill-line {
Brouillon.ly:77:6: error: unknown escaped string: `\justify'
\justify {
Brouillon.ly:91:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\vspace'
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:92:4: error: unknown escaped string: `\fill'
\fill-line {
Brouillon.ly:93:6: error: unknown escaped string: `\column'
\column {
Brouillon.ly:100:10: error: syntax error, unexpected \layout
\layout {}
Brouillon.ly:103:8: error: unknown escaped string: `\vspace'
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:103:8: error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:105:8: error: unknown escaped string: `\justify'
\justify {
Brouillon.ly:114:6: error: unknown escaped string: `\column'
\column {
Brouillon.ly:121:10: error: syntax error, unexpected \layout
\layout {}
Brouillon.ly:124:8: error: unknown escaped string: `\vspace'
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:124:8: error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
\vspace#1
Brouillon.ly:126:8: error: unknown escaped string: `\justify'
\justify {
Brouillon.ly:24:14: error: errors found, ignoring music expression
\markuplist
{
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider
To: lilypond-user
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:52 PM
Subject: [SNIPPET] "Inserting large plain text sections" (update)
Dear All,
I've tried to update this snippet :
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=300
by simply trying to add a new one.
For some reason, the LSR system refuses to compile.
Please find my file herewith, if someone could tell me where comes the
problem.
Cheers,
Pierre
--
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [SNIPPET] "Inserting large plain text sections" (update)
Am 10.02.2014 19:52, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Dear All, I've tried to update this snippet : http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=300 by simply trying to add a new one. For some reason, the LSR system refuses to compile. Please find my file herewith, if someone could tell me where comes the problem. The problem is simply that the LSR runs on LilyPond 2.14, and your file uses syntax that was only introduced later. Urs Cheers, Pierre ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [SNIPPET] "Inserting large plain text sections" (update)
Sorry for that folks, I forgot that those command were that young. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
News secrets
Hi all, there are exciting things going on, and we'll have breaking news on Scores of Beauty (http://lilypondblog.org) scheduled for March 11. Of course it is most exciting for Janek and me, but it will probably be of some relevance for LilyPond too. So stay tuned and don't miss to subscribe until then ;-) Best Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: News secrets
Urs Liska writes: > there are exciting things going on, and we'll have breaking news on > Scores of Beauty (http://lilypondblog.org) scheduled for March 11. Of > course it is most exciting for Janek and me, but it will probably be > of some relevance for LilyPond too. Way to call the banns! > So stay tuned and don't miss to subscribe until then ;-) Of course. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [SPAM] Re: News secrets
Am 12.02.2014 12:35, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: there are exciting things going on, and we'll have breaking news on Scores of Beauty (http://lilypondblog.org) scheduled for March 11. Of course it is most exciting for Janek and me, but it will probably be of some relevance for LilyPond too. Way to call the banns! LOL. But please don't tell my wife ;-/ So stay tuned and don't miss to subscribe until then ;-) Of course. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Scheme: default values?
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 12:09 +0100, Marc Hohl wrote: > I found another solution somewhere buried in my files: > > #(define TACTUS > (if (defined? TACTUS) > TACTUS > 50)) > > Perhaps that's something better suited to your needs? > > Marc > > Brilliant! Thanks Marc. Just one minor correction: (if (defined? 'TACTUS) (note the quote before the variable name) -- Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Scheme: default values?
You may find problems between scheme 1.8 and the newer 2.0 on this topic, I don't have the details at my fingertips but the solution involves creating a macro define-once instead of that (defined? xxx) test: ;;; for guile 2.0 compatibility define the define-once procedure to work in guile 1.8 (cond-expand (guile-2) ; nothing (else ; guile < 2.0 (define-macro (define-once sym exp) `(define ,sym (if (module-locally-bound? (current-module) ',sym) ,sym ,exp) this solution was given to me on the guile-user mailing list, it is executed at the start of Denemo and after that you can just write (define-once TACTUS 50) wherever you need to be sure it already is defined. HTH Richard On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 07:09 +, Graham King wrote: > On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 12:09 +0100, Marc Hohl wrote: > > > I found another solution somewhere buried in my files: > > > > #(define TACTUS > > (if (defined? TACTUS) > > TACTUS > > 50)) > > > > Perhaps that's something better suited to your needs? > > > > Marc > > > > > Brilliant! Thanks Marc. > Just one minor correction: > (if (defined? 'TACTUS) > (note the quote before the variable name) > > -- Graham > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: News secrets
Hi all, 2014-02-12 12:30 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska : > Hi all, > > there are exciting things going on, and we'll have breaking news on Scores > of Beauty (http://lilypondblog.org) scheduled for March 11. Of course it is > most exciting for Janek and me, but it will probably be of some relevance > for LilyPond too. > So stay tuned and don't miss to subscribe until then ;-) Let me tell you just one important detail: the Secret Thing will officially happen at Frankfurt Musikmesse, on March 14 (http://musik.messefrankfurt.com/frankfurt/en/besucher/willkommen.html). Be sure to come if you can! best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Scheme: default values?
Am 12.02.2014 08:09, schrieb Graham King: On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 12:09 +0100, Marc Hohl wrote: I found another solution somewhere buried in my files: #(define TACTUS (if (defined? TACTUS) TACTUS 50)) Perhaps that's something better suited to your needs? Marc Brilliant! Thanks Marc. Just one minor correction: (if (defined? 'TACTUS) (note the quote before the variable name) Oops, of course you're right. -- Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ottava
Hi, what is the recommended/default formatting for ottava marks/brackets (8va)? I would like to collect some opinions/examples/references on this. 1) 8 2) 8va 3) 8^va (8 + va superscript) or others? In bold or not bold? And with dashed lines or dotted or others? What does E. Gould say or do you know 19th century scores with ottava brackets? I am pretty sure that I have seen 8^va bold, but I can't find it. The only occurrence I could find in my scores was: Boosey & Hawkes: 8 bold (with dotted lines) Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: News secrets
Am 12.02.2014 20:11, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi all, 2014-02-12 12:30 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska : Hi all, there are exciting things going on, and we'll have breaking news on Scores of Beauty (http://lilypondblog.org) scheduled for March 11. Of course it is most exciting for Janek and me, but it will probably be of some relevance for LilyPond too. So stay tuned and don't miss to subscribe until then ;-) Let me tell you just one important detail: the Secret Thing will officially happen at Frankfurt Musikmesse, on March 14 (http://musik.messefrankfurt.com/frankfurt/en/besucher/willkommen.html). Be sure to come if you can! best, Janek So maybe this leak might have been too much already ... If someone has any guesses what Janek meant with that please don't guess publicly (we won't comment) but only by private message. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ottava
\italic \bold "8" \superscript "a" in regular type with dotted line and uses loco. also in regular type to indicate a return to normal octavation. Mechetto, Vienna circa 1870's Just happened to be staring at it. Shane On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Noeck wrote: > Hi, > > what is the recommended/default formatting for ottava marks/brackets > (8va)? I would like to collect some opinions/examples/references on this. > > 1) 8 > 2) 8va > 3) 8^va (8 + va superscript) > or others? > > In bold or not bold? And with dashed lines or dotted or others? > > What does E. Gould say or do you know 19th century scores with ottava > brackets? > > I am pretty sure that I have seen 8^va bold, but I can't find it. The > only occurrence I could find in my scores was: > Boosey & Hawkes: 8 bold (with dotted lines) > > Cheers, > Joram > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:Weird behaviour of new NullVoice feature
>> Is it a bug ?
>
> I think so and I've created
> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3825&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary
> for this
>
> thanks for reporting it!
> Eluze
>
Thanks for creating the issue on the tracker.
I was playing again with NullVoice, and I noticed some unpredictable
behaviour with the following example :
\version "2.18.0"
<<
\new Staff <<
\new Voice = "melodie" \relative c''{ \voiceOne c4. g8 c2 | }
\new Voice = "alto" \relative c' { \voiceTwo c4 b c( bes) | }
\new NullVoice = "xyz" \relative c' { c4 b c2 | }
>>
\lyricsto "xyz" \new Lyrics \lyricmode {Glo -- ri -- a __ }
>>
Here, if I'm not mistaken, as the lyrics are associated with NullVoice
"xyz", the extender should end before, but it acts as if it was
associated with "alto" voice instead. The extender looks the same if I
define "xyz" as :
\new NullVoice = "xyz" \relative c'' { c4. g8 c2 | }
(melodie notes)
I rather like this behaviour of having the lyric extender lasting to
match the melismata of other voices (was trying to do something like
this), but I don't understand why it does so here, as this behaviour
is not systematic.
Should I add it as a comment to the issue you created last time, or
report it as a new one ?
Yann
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New try with lyric extender
> Looking at the link though, it strikes me that automating this could be a
> rather challenging problem, though, and involve > more labor than simply
> tweaking Kieren's solution to fit different situations.
Hi again,
After some tries, as I'm not comfortable enough using scheme, I didn't
find a suitable approach to automatically solve this problem.
I think the best solution for me now is to use the method described in
the manual :
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/techniques-specific-to-lyrics#polyphony-with-shared-lyrics
and to manually build and tailor the NullVoice to have proper extenders.
(example from the manual :)
soprano = \relative { b'8( c d c) d2 }
altoOne = \relative { g'2 b8( a b4) }
altoTwo = \relative { d'2 g4( fis8 g) }
aligner = \relative { b'8( c d c) d( d d d) }
words = \lyricmode { la __ la __ }
\new ChoirStaff <<
\new Staff <<
\soprano
\new NullVoice = "aligner" \aligner
>>
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "aligner" \words
\new Staff \partcombine \altoOne \altoTwo
>>
I prefer this method over the other (modifying associatedVoice within
the lyrics).
Now I wonder if by chance there is a possibility to automatically
"build" the "aligner" voice, but I think it is quite complicated (too
much for me now, at least !)
Yann
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Ottava
I this is the norm, should Lilypond be changed to conform? Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Shane Brandes Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 1:03 PM To: Noeck Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: Ottava \italic \bold "8" \superscript "a" in regular type with dotted line and uses loco. also in regular type to indicate a return to normal octavation. Mechetto, Vienna circa 1870's Just happened to be staring at it. Shane On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Noeck wrote: > Hi, > > what is the recommended/default formatting for ottava marks/brackets > (8va)? I would like to collect some opinions/examples/references on this. > > 1) 8 > 2) 8va > 3) 8^va (8 + va superscript) > or others? > > In bold or not bold? And with dashed lines or dotted or others? > > What does E. Gould say or do you know 19th century scores with ottava > brackets? > > I am pretty sure that I have seen 8^va bold, but I can't find it. The > only occurrence I could find in my scores was: > Boosey & Hawkes: 8 bold (with dotted lines) > > Cheers, > Joram > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Horizontalized scores
> > From: lilypond-user-bounces+chris=crossen@gnu.org > [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+chris=crossen@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Erik > Linde > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:24 > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Horizontalized scores > > Hi, > > I am the creator of Notezilla, a popular (and fairly new) web application > that allows users to both listen to classical music, as well as see a > scrolling representation of the score that has been synced exactly to the > recording. > > A big thing for us is being able to generate horizontal scores, ie scores > where there are no line breaks or page breaks. This allows us and our users > to enjoy a very constant visual flow of the music without skipping around too > much. LilyPond is an integral component for us when it comes to generating > these scores, as it is very important to us that the music looks and feels > like "real" sheet music - this is one of the primary reasons for why we love > LilyPond. > Erik, Your site is very impressive. I am also generating single, continuous line scores with Lilypond and am wondering what you use to extract your images from PDF. I was originally using Adobe Acrobat and a plug-in to extract .png images from the .pdf. But, as you may have discovered, Acrobat has a 200-inch width limitation. I am currently using Foxit Reader to view and check my very wide PDFs and GIMP-2 to extract the images from the PDF. Do you mind telling me what you use? Thanks, Chris Crossen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ottava
At 20:19 12/02/2014 +0100, Noeck "Joram" Marburg wrote: what is the recommended/default formatting for ottava marks/brackets (8va)? In bold or not bold? And with dashed lines or dotted or others? What does E. Gould say ... Page 28: The octave sign is written in italic, the numeral '8' is 1 1/2 stave-paces high. The optional 'va' is placed flush with the top of _ottava sopra_ (_8^va_), flush with the base of _ottava bassa_ (_8va_). Indicate the extent of the transposition with a line of dashes (hereafter called a dotted line). The line extends from the top edge of the _8_ for _8 sopra_ and the base of the _8_ for _8 bassa_, and runs parallel to the stave. And those 8s look bold to me. Brian Barker ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
