adjustment of arc shape according to papersize
Hi All, Would you see the following to codes? http://lilybin.com/57gfma/2 http://lilybin.com/57gfma/3 The paper widths, and according to them, the lists of control points for slurs differ between these examples. I'd like to switch the control points on the paper size in one code as: If paper-width is 210mm, pass the control points for 210mm paper width to \shape. If paper-width is 297mm, pass the control points for 297mm paper width to \shape. (So far, only for 210mm and for 297mm are enough.) How could I realize it? Thanks Venus' Wink FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Polyphonic notes slur solution
Nathan Ho wrote: % And, of course, the slur's too short vertically Adjust 0.3 to taste: \override Staff.Arpeggio #'positions = #(lambda (grob) (interval-widen (ly:arpeggio::calc-positions grob) 0.3)) Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: kneed beam a la Bach
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
{
b'8\stemDown a'' g'' b'\stemUp
}
– however, it doesn’t work… (Why?)
Hi Simon,
just put \stemDown and \stemUp *before* the note:
{
\stemDown b'8a'' g'' \stemUp b'
}
Cheers,
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/kneed-beam-a-la-Bach-tp178005p178019.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: adjustment of arc shape according to papersize
Hi Marc, Thanks for your reply. To say the truth, I'm under situation that I can't access the setting of paper size, so I can't put tag to stand for paper width. I'd like to expect a way with scheme. I've tried like as: \shape #((if (= paper-width 210 mm) '(( ...points for 210 mm width...))) (if (= paper-width 297 mm) '(( ...points for 297 mm width... which issues an error that paper-width hasn't been bind... I don't know scheme very well. Thanks Venus' Wink -Original Message- From: m...@hohlart.de Sent: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 12:24:27 +0200 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: adjustment of arc shape according to papersize Am 20.06.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Venus' Wink: Hi All, Would you see the following to codes? http://lilybin.com/57gfma/2 http://lilybin.com/57gfma/3 The paper widths, and according to them, the lists of control points for slurs differ between these examples. I'd like to switch the control points on the paper size in one code as: If paper-width is 210mm, pass the control points for 210mm paper width to \shape. If paper-width is 297mm, pass the control points for 297mm paper width to \shape. If you have to switch between two shapes, you could use tags: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#index-tag-1 I assume there is a way to detect the paper width via scheme and switch between two shape calls, but that's beyond my knowledge. HTH a bit, Marc (So far, only for 210mm and for 297mm are enough.) How could I realize it? Thanks Venus' Wink FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Can't remember your password? Do you need a strong and secure password? Use Password manager! It stores your passwords protects your account. Check it out at http://mysecurelogon.com/password-manager ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Re: Re: A bunch of problems at score part changeover, and another one
On 2015-06-19 23:25, tisimst wrote:
Kaj,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:05 PM, 70147persson [via Lilypond] [hidden
email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=178002i=0 wrote:
However, when I should apply this on my real score, I stumbled
over a new issue. I had not mentioned this, as I was not aware of
it being a problem. How can I put an instrument name on the
staves? Possibly I can have the name written at the first measure,
but when the first staff is increased with another one, I cannot
put a name on that. I can use \shortInstrumentName, but then I get
the name written at every staff, and this is not what I want. Is
there possibly a way to force a writing once, at the start of the
new staff?
You bet. Try this for your snippet:
choirII = {
s1*3 |
\once \set Staff.shortInstrumentName = Choir 2
c''4 c'' c'' c'' |
}
HTH,
Abraham
View this message in context: Re: Re: A bunch of problems at score
part changeover, and another one
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/A-bunch-of-problems-at-score-part-changeover-tp177962p178002.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html at Nabble.com.
Works perfect. Thank you Abraham!
/Kaj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Polyphonic notes slur solution
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:48 PM, rsfjr rsfj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to overcome an issue. I need to place some slurs in a
polyphonic
pair, connecting the noteheads. Is there any workaround?
Hi rsfjr,
LilyPond doesn't support vertical slurs. What you're looking for is
\arpeggioParenthesis + \arpeggio:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#arpeggio
Cross-voice arpeggios are supported via Staff.connectArpeggios.
Unfortunately, cross-voice arpeggios *and *\arpeggioParenthesis don't work
together (!), requiring us to excavate the inner workings of
\arpeggioParenthesis and adapt them to the Staff context. It's details like
this that make me hate LilyPond sometimes :)
The final outcome:
\new Staff \with {
\consists Span_arpeggio_engraver
} {
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\override Staff.Arpeggio.stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-slur
\override Staff.Arpeggio.X-extent = #ly:grob::stencil-width
{ b'\arpeggio } \\ { g'\arpeggio }
% And, of course, the slur's too short vertically and there's no simple
override to fix it...
}
Regards,
Nathan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: kneed beam a la Bach
Am 20.06.2015 um 12:15 schrieb Klaus Blum:
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
{
b'8\stemDown a'' g'' b'\stemUp
}
– however, it doesn’t work… (Why?)
Hi Simon,
just put \stemDown and \stemUp *before* the note:
Silly me… it was too late at night :-)
Best regards, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: adjustment of arc shape according to papersize
Am 20.06.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Venus' Wink: Hi All, Would you see the following to codes? http://lilybin.com/57gfma/2 http://lilybin.com/57gfma/3 The paper widths, and according to them, the lists of control points for slurs differ between these examples. I'd like to switch the control points on the paper size in one code as: If paper-width is 210mm, pass the control points for 210mm paper width to \shape. If paper-width is 297mm, pass the control points for 297mm paper width to \shape. If you have to switch between two shapes, you could use tags: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#index-tag-1 I assume there is a way to detect the paper width via scheme and switch between two shape calls, but that's beyond my knowledge. HTH a bit, Marc (So far, only for 210mm and for 297mm are enough.) How could I realize it? Thanks Venus' Wink FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision parenthesize and sharp symbol
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de writes: Am 20.06.2015 um 00:27 schrieb MarcM: is this collision a bug or is it expected and require to add padding manually? You might call it a bug, but of course it’s not a bug of Lilypond but a bug in the \startParenthesis and \stopParenthesis variables defined here. In that case, there are no bugs in LilyPond: every other behavior is also a consequence of the code in LilyPond. At any rate, it is issue 155 URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=155 and has been fixed in version 2.19.20. Sorry for the confusion: I did not realise that this wasn't part of LilyPond. At any rate, the code (and properties) defined in issue 155 might help for refining the respective \startParenthesis/\stopParenthesis code to take accidentals in account. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision parenthesize and sharp symbol
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de writes: Am 20.06.2015 um 00:27 schrieb MarcM: is this collision a bug or is it expected and require to add padding manually? You might call it a bug, but of course it’s not a bug of Lilypond but a bug in the \startParenthesis and \stopParenthesis variables defined here. In that case, there are no bugs in LilyPond: every other behavior is also a consequence of the code in LilyPond. At any rate, it is issue 155 URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=155 and has been fixed in version 2.19.20. Sorry for the confusion: I did not realise that this wasn't part of LilyPond. At any rate, the code (and properties) defined in issue 155 might help for refining the respective \startParenthesis/\stopParenthesis code to take accidentals in account. And it turns out that no redefinition is necessary. This code produces proper parentheses without overlap perfectly well right now. So just upgrade to 2.19.20 or newer. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Polyphonic notes slur solution
Hello,
I am trying to overcome an issue. I need to place some slurs in a polyphonic
pair, connecting the noteheads. Is there any workaround?
\new Staff {
{b'}\\{g'}
}
I have tried creating other notes and forcing a horizontal shift, but no
success, only the first note overlays the entire polyphonic note, like this:
\new Staff {
{b'}
\\
{g'}
\\
{
\override NoteColumn.force-hshift = 0 b'(
\override NoteColumn.force-hshift = 0 g')
}
}
I even tried negative numbers for the g', but it just won't overlap the
other notes.
All the Best
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: kneed beam a la Bach
Hi Mark,
I'd do:
\version 2.19.21
{
\offset positions #'(2 . 0) Beam
b'8 a'' g'' \once\stemUp b'
}
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-06-20 0:30 GMT+02:00 MarcM m...@mouries.net:
i played with the kneed beam settings but could not find a way to reproduce
this kneed beam from Bach.
Is that feasible?
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n178005/kneed_beam_Bach.png
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/kneed-beam-a-la-Bach-tp178005.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Problem with tied chords in TAB
In the following minimal tablature example, the repeated g in the chord,
shows up in the tied chord.
Which g shows up depends on whether I retype the tied chord (bar 1), use the
'q' symbol (bar 2), or use 'q' with \tabChordRepeats set (bar 3).
\version 2.18.2
\score {
\new TabStaff {
\new TabVoice {
\relative c {
c g'\4 g ~ c g'\4 g c c
c g'\4 g ~ q c c }
\tabChordRepeats
\relative c {
c g'\4 g ~ q c c }
}
}
}
Any solutions/workarounds ?
Regards,
Phil.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with tied chords in TAB
Phil Burfitt phil.burf...@talktalk.net writes:
In the following minimal tablature example, the repeated g in the
chord, shows up in the tied chord.
Which g shows up depends on whether I retype the tied chord (bar 1),
use the 'q' symbol (bar 2), or use 'q' with \tabChordRepeats set (bar
3).
\version 2.18.2
\score {
\new TabStaff {
\new TabVoice {
\relative c {
c g'\4 g ~ c g'\4 g c c
c g'\4 g ~ q c c }
\tabChordRepeats
\relative c {
c g'\4 g ~ q c c }
}
}
}
Any solutions/workarounds ?
This is URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3066,
fixed in version 2.19.16.
The issue description is somewhat misleading as the bug concerns more
than just tied unisons.
The code in question is in the Tie_engraver in C++ so it cannot be
brought into 2.18.2 without recompilation.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with tied chords in TAB
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Burfitt phil.burf...@talktalk.net
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with tied chords in TAB
Phil Burfitt phil.burf...@talktalk.net writes:
In the following minimal tablature example, the repeated g in the
chord, shows up in the tied chord.
Which g shows up depends on whether I retype the tied chord (bar 1),
use the 'q' symbol (bar 2), or use 'q' with \tabChordRepeats set (bar
3).
\version 2.18.2
\score {
\new TabStaff {
\new TabVoice {
\relative c {
c g'\4 g ~ c g'\4 g c c
c g'\4 g ~ q c c }
\tabChordRepeats
\relative c {
c g'\4 g ~ q c c }
}
}
}
Any solutions/workarounds ?
This is URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3066,
fixed in version 2.19.16.
The issue description is somewhat misleading as the bug concerns more
than just tied unisons.
The code in question is in the Tie_engraver in C++ so it cannot be
brought into 2.18.2 without recompilation.
--
David Kastrup
Ok - another reason to upgrade then.
Many thanks,
Phil.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Polyphonic notes slur solution
rsfjr wrote: It keeps throwing an error message Well, tell us some more ... - what message - with what lilypond version But preferably, send a small .ly file which has this problem. Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Polyphonic notes slur solution
Thank you all, It keeps throwing an error message, when I use these: \override Staff.Arpeggio.stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-slur \override Staff.Arpeggio.X-extent = #ly:grob::stencil-width Without those the arpeggios are slurred, but with the arpeggio symbol. I believe the Lilypond documentation is a bit non intuitive, for example: stencil (stencil): ly:arpeggio::print The symbol to print. What kind of symbols I can print? Sorry for taking your time, need to learn how to use the docu properly. All The Best, Ronaldo 2015-06-20 7:07 GMT-03:00 Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch: Nathan Ho wrote: % And, of course, the slur's too short vertically Adjust 0.3 to taste: \override Staff.Arpeggio #'positions = #(lambda (grob) (interval-widen (ly:arpeggio::calc-positions grob) 0.3)) Cheers, Robin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: collision parenthesize and sharp symbol
i switched to 2.19.21 and the parenthesis collide with the stem of the previous note. see http://lilybin.com/fy9guz/4 -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/collision-parenthesize-and-sharp-symbol-tp178004p178036.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Polyphonic notes slur solution
2015-06-20 12:07 GMT+02:00 Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch: Nathan Ho wrote: % And, of course, the slur's too short vertically Adjust 0.3 to taste: \override Staff.Arpeggio #'positions = #(lambda (grob) (interval-widen (ly:arpeggio::calc-positions grob) 0.3)) or: \once \offset positions #'(-0.3 . 0.3) Staff.Arpeggio \offset lacks documentation, though Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
