Re: positioning a natural
Am 03.01.20 um 06:55 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
Hello All,
In the following the natural should be associated with the a4.
Any suggestions/corrections welcome.
How about this?
\version "2.19.83"
\relative c'' {
<<
{
ais8 ([b])
} \\ {
\once \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #2.2
\once \override Accidental.X-extent = #'(1 . 0)
\once \override Accidental.extra-offset = #'(3 . 0)
a!4
}
>>
}
positioning a natural
Hello All,
In the following the natural should be associated with the a4.
Any suggestions/corrections welcome.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Mark
\version "2.19.83"
\relative c'' {
<<{ais8 ([b])}\\
{\once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #1
a!4}>>
}
Re: Understanding fancy-gliss
Am Do., 2. Jan. 2020 um 00:48 Uhr schrieb Daniel Rosen :
>
> > Harm,
> >
> > Thank you so, so much for the primer---it cleared up everything that I had
> > been unable to surmise for myself. I would highly recommend you update
> > the LSR entry to include it.
There's already
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2019-12/msg00447.html
adding the possibility to print arrows.
Alas, it needs 2.19.x, thus I can't put it in LSR.
> Harm, one other question: is it possible to use your function in conjunction
> with a different style of line than the default, like 'zigzag? And if so,
> how? Using \override Glissando.style doesn't seem to do anything.
Well, fancy-gliss sets a new stencil, which does not react upon 'style.
Consider the code below (it's all pure manually, not using fancy-gliss).
You'll observe the two zigzag-lines don't join. For me it means, it's
not acceptable.
{
\override Glissando.springs-and-rods = #ly:spanner::set-spacing-rods
\override Glissando.minimum-length = 20
\override Glissando.style = #'zigzag
\override Glissando.stencil =
#(lambda (grob)
(ly:stencil-add
(ly:line-interface::line grob 1.5 0 10 5)
(ly:line-interface::line grob 10 5 19.8 0)
(ly:stencil-translate
(stencil-with-color (make-circle-stencil 1 0.1 #f) red)
'(10 . 5))
))
b'4\glissando
b'
}
Furthermore, there is no chance to extend this to cover printing
bezier-curves zigzag-styled.
I don't say it's impossible, but it will likely need a complete new coding.
This will most likely take too much of my time.
Sorry,
Harm
RE: [SPAM] Re: Score Wizard Fresco 3.1
On 02.01.20 13:19, Peter Gentry wrote:
> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:31:10 -0700 (MST)
> From: Michael Rivers
>
> The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows
> version). I uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose
> score wizard works fine.
>
> If you mean the \score{...} option in Snippets then it works fine for me.
That’s not the score wizard.
Best, Simon
--
I thought not - found it now (I never use it) : all the other selections work
but not the "wizard".
You learn something new every day but that displaces something you knew the
day before..
Re: Score Wizard Fresco 3.1
On 02.01.20 13:19, Peter Gentry wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:31:10 -0700 (MST)
From: Michael Rivers
The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows version). I
uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose score wizard works
fine.
If you mean the \score{...} option in Snippets then it works fine for me.
That’s not the score wizard.
Best, Simon
RE: Score Wizard Fresco 3.1
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:31:10 -0700 (MST)
From: Michael Rivers
The score wizard does nothing for me in Frescobaldi 3.1 (Windows version). I
uninstalled it and reinstalled the old version, whose score wizard works
fine.
If you mean the \score{...} option in Snippets then it works fine for me. I
haven't found anything that doesn't work yet. The 3.1 team have done a
brilliant job.
