Re: lilypond on freebsd 6.1
Karl Hammar karl at aspodata.se writes: After installing lilypond 2.10.5 freebsd-x86 I get this, /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 :shared object lidm.so.2 not found required by lilypond. Are you sure it said lidm and not libm? What can I do next to get it working? I would try ldd, like: $ ldd /usr/bin/lilypond libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4003) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x40034000) ... And resolve any not found lines, which will probably be libm. Do you have (this is BSD4.11): $ ls -l /usr/lib/libm.s* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 9 Sep 15 2005 /usr/lib/libm.so - libm.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 117024 Jan 21 2005 /usr/lib/libm.so.2 Regards, /Karl --- Karl HammarAspö Data karl at aspodata.se Lilla Aspö 2340Networks S-742 94 Östhammar +46 173 140 57 Computers Sweden +46 70 511 97 84 Consulting --- On my laptop I did a new install of freebsd 6.1 One of the first things is trying to get lilypond op and running. This is the result : .!!! marcel# ldd /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: libintl.so.8 = not found (0x0) libguile.so.17 = not found (0x0) libgmp.so.7 = not found (0x0) libpangoft2-1.0.so.1400 = not found (0x0) libpango-1.0.so.1400 = not found (0x0) libgobject-2.0.so.1000 = not found (0x0) libgmodule-2.0.so.1000 = not found (0x0) libglib-2.0.so.1000 = not found (0x0) libiconv.so.6 = not found (0x0) libfontconfig.so.2 = not found (0x0) libfreetype.so.9 = /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x2832c000) libz.so = /usr/lib/libz.so (0x28391000) libm.so.2 = not found (0x0) libc.so.4 = not found (0x0) And the ls -l : marcel# ls -l /usr/lib/libm.s* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 14 Dec 25 17:09 /usr/lib/libm.so - /lib/libm.so.4 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 9 Dec 27 09:07 /usr/lib/libm.so.2 - libm.so.3 What I don't understand is how to solve this missing libm. because it is there in /usr/lib directory. When I do lilypond it come back with this message; marcel# lilypond /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libm.so.2 not found, required by lilypond Regards Marcel. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: accordion symb.
Thies Albrecht ta_lily at gmx.de writes:
Hi Marcel!
I hope that's what you're looking for...
accBasson = ^\markup \combine
\musicglyph #accordion.accDiscant
\raise #0.5 \musicglyph #accordion.accDot
\score {
\relative c'' {
\time 4/4 \key c \major \clef treble
c \once \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(5 . 3) d
\accBasson e f
}
}
Kind regards,
Thies Albrecht
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user at gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thank you very much.
Now I see where I went wrong.
\once \override accBasson
#'extra-offset = #'(5.0 )
I have been playing with the accBasson and the
musicglyph text just didn't think that TextScript
wouldt do the trick.
Regards Marcel.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
accordion symb.
I'am trying to place a accordion symbol higher on the staff.
When I use a raise command on the first symbol it goes up. fine.
Now when I raise the dot it all comes down on the same level as before!
I tryed using { } different places for the raise command but no sucses.
Can anyone help me out on this one.
Bellow is a piese of the code.
regards Marcel.
accBasson =
^\markup
\combine
\musicglyph #accordion.accDiscant
\raise #0.5 \musicglyph #accordion.accDot
\score
{
\relative c''
{
\time 4/4
\key c \major
\clef treble
c d \accBasson e f
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: accordion symb.
Thies Albrecht ta_lily at gmx.de writes: Hi Marcel! You don't write, what lily version you use... but have a look at the definitions to be found here: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=194 Using them you should be able to raise them as a whole... (I prefer the extra-offset by the way...) Kind regards, Thies Albrecht Hallo, The version I use is 2.10.0 on SuSe linux 10/0. I tryed raising the symbols in de definitions part. But then I can raise the cirkel --I can raise the dot. But If I want the dot in the cirkel meaning that the amount of extra vertical movement of both symbols is equal , the whole thing is baxk to the original position. If I use extra-offset I get unknown grub. This was uused in the score part. Can you give me a example on how you do it? regards Marcel. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
