Re: Analysis brackets
Many thanks for this. I need to experiment a little to see if I can fit the
brackets into a rather congested setting.
With best wishes, MT
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 12:49, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> That may work, e.g.:
>
> \version "2.20.0"
>
> #(define-markup-command (lcb layout props arg)
>(number?)
> "Draw a curly bracket with a variable length."
> (interpret-markup layout props
>(markup
> (#:override (cons (quote filled) #t)
> (#:path 0 `(
>(moveto -0.8 0.0)
>(curveto -0.2 0.4 -0.3 0.7 -0.3 1.5)
>(lineto -0.3 ,arg)
>(curveto -0.4 ,(+ arg 1.3) 0.5 ,(+ arg 2.8) 0.7 ,(+ arg 2.8))
>(curveto 0.6 ,(+ arg 2.5) 0.1 ,(+ arg 2) 0.1 ,arg)
>(lineto0.1 1.5)
>(curveto 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.0 -0.8 0.0)
>(closepath)
>(curveto -0.2 -0.4 -0.3 -0.7 -0.3 -1.5)
>(lineto -0.3 ,(* arg -1))
>(curveto -0.4 ,(* (+ arg 1.3) -1) 0.5 ,(* (+ arg 2.8) -1)
> 0.7 ,(* (+ arg 2.8) -1))
>(curveto 0.6 ,(* (+ arg 2.5) -1) 0.1 ,(* (+ arg 2) -1)
> 0.1 ,(* arg -1))
>(lineto0.1 -1.5)
>(curveto 0.1 -0.7 0.1 0.0 -0.8 0.0)
>(closepath)))
>
>
> \relative c'' {
> c4 _\markup {
> \with-dimensions-from \null
> \left-align {
> \override #'(baseline-skip . 0)
> \center-column {
> "a" \vspace #-.1
> \rotate #90 \lcb #3
> \vspace #.1 "b"
> }
> }
> } d e
> -\tweak extra-offset #'(0 . -5)
>_\markup {
> \with-dimensions-from \null
> \left-align {
> \override #'(baseline-skip . 0)
> \center-column {
> "a" \vspace #-.1
> \rotate #90 \lcb #5
> \vspace #.1 "b"
> }
> }
> }d c
> b
> -\tweak extra-offset #'(.5 . 3)
> ^\markup {
> \with-dimensions-from \null
> \left-align {
> \override #'(baseline-skip . 0)
> \center-column {
> "a" \vspace #.1
> \rotate #-90 \lcb #6
> \vspace #-.1 "b"
> }
> }
> } a g f e d c
> }
>
> HTH,
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
> Le jeu. 9 avr. 2020 à 17:27, Michael Taylor a
> écrit :
>
>> Dear David,
>> Many thanks for this. I was curious about the curly analysis brackets
>> when I saw this in Snippets http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=curly but
>> couldn't figure out how (or if) these
>> shapes could be used for what I wanted. The only application I could find
>> was to group an
>> ensemble within a larger instrumental contingent.
>> With best wishes
>> Michael
>>
>> On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 23:00, David Nalesnik
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:07 AM Michael Taylor
>>> wrote:
>>> > Would it be possible in a future version to have the option of placing
>>> text within analysis brackets as well as the default above? MT
>>>
>>> HorizontalBracketText.direction with a little more tweaking than
>>> should be necessary.
>>>
>>> \layout {
>>> \context {
>>> \Voice
>>> \consists "Horizontal_bracket_engraver"
>>> \override HorizontalBracket.direction = #UP
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> {
>>> \once\override HorizontalBracketText.direction = #DOWN
>>> \once\override HorizontalBracketText.text = "a"
>>> \once\override HorizontalBracketText.padding = #-0.5
>>> \once\override HorizontalBracket.padding = 1
>>> c''\startGroup d''\stopGroup
>>> }
>>>
>>
Re: Analysis brackets
Dear David,
Many thanks for this. I was curious about the curly analysis brackets when
I saw this in Snippets http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=curly but
couldn't figure out how (or if) these
shapes could be used for what I wanted. The only application I could find
was to group an
ensemble within a larger instrumental contingent.
With best wishes
Michael
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 23:00, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:07 AM Michael Taylor
> wrote:
> > Would it be possible in a future version to have the option of placing
> text within analysis brackets as well as the default above? MT
>
> HorizontalBracketText.direction with a little more tweaking than
> should be necessary.
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Voice
> \consists "Horizontal_bracket_engraver"
> \override HorizontalBracket.direction = #UP
> }
> }
>
> {
> \once\override HorizontalBracketText.direction = #DOWN
> \once\override HorizontalBracketText.text = "a"
> \once\override HorizontalBracketText.padding = #-0.5
> \once\override HorizontalBracket.padding = 1
> c''\startGroup d''\stopGroup
> }
>
Analysis brackets
Dear collective wisdom, in transcribing analytical markings I encountered a curly horizontal bracket over a number of pitches. Is it possible to format the existing analysis bracket to reproduce this, or are there other solutions? Would it be possible in a future version to have the option of placing text within analysis brackets as well as the default above? MT
Re: Pitch inflection
No, the arrow modifications are the only departures from standard notation. MT On 31 January 2018 at 16:47, Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> wrote: > > > > On 31 Jan 2018, at 21:25, Michael Taylor <wmichael.tay...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thank you for your message & the links. I have attached a fragment of > the source to clarify what I am trying to replicate. > > Are there any other microtonal accidentals, except for plain up and down > arrows? Check these microtonal systems, which have that: > http://www.smufl.org/version/latest/range/gouldArrowQuartert > oneAccidentals24Edo/ > http://www.smufl.org/version/latest/range/simsAccidentals72Edo/ > http://www.smufl.org/version/latest/range/johnstonAccidental > sJustIntonation/ > http://www.smufl.org/version/latest/range/spartanSagittalSin > gleShaftAccidentals/ > > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Pitch inflection
Thank you for your message. I am hoping to reproduce the arrow notation used by the composer, rather than substituting a different notational convention (which this composer has employed in other pieces). The fact that he implies a difference between a slightly lowered F & a slightly raised E makes me think that he is seeking to inflect the note rather than achieving an identifiable quartertone. Thank you also for alerting me to the resources you mentioned which I had not found. MT On 30 January 2018 at 09:16, Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com <mailto:haber...@telia.com>> wrote: > On 29 Jan 2018, at 22:39, Michael Taylor <wmichael.tay...@gmail.com > <mailto:wmichael.tay...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I am transcribing sketches in which small pitch adjustments are notated using > up & down arrows. As my aim is to reproduce the composer's notation as > closely as possible I don't want to substitute quarter-tone symbols. Is there > a simple way to insert arrows in place of accidentals? Playback is not an > issue. One can use Helmholtz-Ellis notation in E53 using OpenLilyLib, SMuFL, and Graham Breed's regular.ly <http://regular.ly/>. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user> ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Pitch inflection
I am transcribing sketches in which small pitch adjustments are notated using up & down arrows. As my aim is to reproduce the composer's notation as closely as possible I don't want to substitute quarter-tone symbols. Is there a simple way to insert arrows in place of accidentals? Playback is not an issue. MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
