lilypond-2.19.41-1.documentation.tar.bz2 file missing
http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/documentation/lilypond-2.19.41-1.documentation.tar.bz2 returns a 404 Not found Is the link provided on the web site wrong? -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
converting old to new version not working right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to build Messiah I downloaded from a WEB -site. There is no version in the lily files, but the WEB site and also the pdf from the same web- site says, it's 2.13.8 but when I convert this file with the command convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly it adds on top of the file \version 2.16.0 I have version 2.18.2 installed. why is it only updating to version 2.16.0? FYI $ rpm -qa |grep lilypond lilypond-2.18.2-1.mga - -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTZHOoACgkQjsMgV2ARTmPygACdHdMjB05dC/1FS9IzP2qC93nF Vx4An1wKAifwCNOD1YDIo2pg/amrG6Zj =pG/s -END PGP SIGNATURE- part-vocal-keyboard.ly~ Description: application/trash ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: converting old to new version not working right
On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:09:59 PM you wrote: One possible explanation is that you have more than one version of convert-ly on your system, perhaps from having installed the software using different methods. If the older one is in a path that gets searched before the new binary's location, then your shell will find and run the old one. $ find / -name convert-ly should confirm or refute that theory. If it's not that, another possibility is that perhaps your package management tools or procedures have led you astray somehow. Download a new package, and check its contents before you re-install it. Afterward see whether the convert-ly binary that got installed is the same as the one inside the package archive. HTH, Jim On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:47:31PM -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to build Messiah I downloaded from a WEB -site. There is no version in the lily files, but the WEB site and also the pdf from the same web- site says, it's 2.13.8 but when I convert this file with the command convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly it adds on top of the file \version 2.16.0 I have version 2.18.2 installed. why is it only updating to version 2.16.0? FYI $ rpm -qa |grep lilypond lilypond-2.18.2-1.mga - -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTZHOoACgkQjsMgV2ARTmPygACdHdMjB05dC/1FS9IzP2qC93nF Vx4An1wKAifwCNOD1YDIo2pg/amrG6Zj =pG/s -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user $ locate convert-ly /usr/bin/convert-ly /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1 /usr/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1.xz Looking into the file /usr/bin/convert-ly shows, it's 2.18.2 BTW, the package was installed using the distro provided rpm (of which I am the packager) -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: EB Garamond font-series
On Monday, February 09, 2015 04:41:22 AM Kevin Barry wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Thomas Spuhler thomas.spuh...@btspuhler.com wrote: Are you sure: see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold When there is no bold face present, a word processor might `fake' one by modifying the regular (roman) face. I don't know if that is what happened in your attachment, but the zip archive for the EB Garamond font linked to in your first message does not contain any files for a bold face. Normally a typeface has separate files for regular, bold, italic, bold-italic and so on, which LilyPond will attempt to use, but in this case it can't because that file presumably doesn't exist on your system. Elsewhere on the website the author does mention bold in the list of goals, but it does not appear in the specimen pdf which suggests it is not implemented yet. Yep, I realized it after firing off the message. They do substitutes. -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: converting old to new version not working right
On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:39:57 PM Jim Long wrote: $ locate convert-ly /usr/bin/convert-ly /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1 /usr/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1.xz You likely know, but for the benefit of others who may not, locate is not definitive. At least on systems I'm familiar with, locate uses a database which is updated only periodically, and which could be several days out of date. 'find' OTOH, *is* definitive, which is why I suggested its usage. In case you had found multiple executables, I should have also suggested running 'which convert-ly' to show which executable comes first in the search path. But no matter. Looking into the file /usr/bin/convert-ly shows, it's 2.18.2 What's the URL of the source file you're converting? Jim http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/index.php/2009/06/20/40 click on LiliPond sources The file is considered a mess by some folks that have been trying to compile it on a Mac using Lilipond. But the pdf he made looks great and I would like to make some changes. -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: converting old to new version not working right
On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:52:41 PM Jim Long wrote: but when I convert this file with the command convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly it adds on top of the file \version 2.16.0 I have version 2.18.2 installed. why is it only updating to version 2.16.0? Sorry, I didn't read closely enough and check your args against the man page. -d says that the version number won't be changed if the file doesn't require any modifications. I would surmise that the code you're using, once raised to 2.16.0, requires no further mods to run under 2.18.2. Therefore, the version statement is updated only to 2.16.0. Lose the -d switch if you don't want that behaviour. HTH, Jim Thanks Jim. My mistake. This makes sense. -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: converting old to new version not working right
On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:18:17 PM Thomas Spuhler wrote: On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:09:59 PM you wrote: One possible explanation is that you have more than one version of convert-ly on your system, perhaps from having installed the software using different methods. If the older one is in a path that gets searched before the new binary's location, then your shell will find and run the old one. $ find / -name convert-ly should confirm or refute that theory. If it's not that, another possibility is that perhaps your package management tools or procedures have led you astray somehow. Download a new package, and check its contents before you re-install it. Afterward see whether the convert-ly binary that got installed is the same as the one inside the package archive. HTH, Jim On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:47:31PM -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to build Messiah I downloaded from a WEB -site. There is no version in the lily files, but the WEB site and also the pdf from the same web- site says, it's 2.13.8 but when I convert this file with the command convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly it adds on top of the file \version 2.16.0 I have version 2.18.2 installed. why is it only updating to version 2.16.0? FYI $ rpm -qa |grep lilypond lilypond-2.18.2-1.mga - -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTZHOoACgkQjsMgV2ARTmPygACdHdMjB05dC/1FS9IzP2qC93nF Vx4An1wKAifwCNOD1YDIo2pg/amrG6Zj =pG/s -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user $ locate convert-ly /usr/bin/convert-ly /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1 /usr/share/man/man1/convert-ly.1.xz Looking into the file /usr/bin/convert-ly shows, it's 2.18.2 BTW, the package was installed using the distro provided rpm (of which I am the packager) OK, transferred the file to another box withe same Lilpond version (2.18.2). I get this: $ convert-ly -e --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly convert-ly (GNU LilyPond) 2.18.2 and the first line reads \version 2.18.0 $ convert-ly -ec --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly convert-ly (GNU LilyPond) 2.18.2 and the first line reads \version 2.18.0 This looks as if the default is not accurate -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: converting old to new version not working right
On Monday, February 09, 2015 10:21:31 PM Mats Bengtsson wrote: Thomas Spuhler thomas.spuhler at btspuhler.com writes: On Monday, February 09, 2015 01:52:41 PM Jim Long wrote: but when I convert this file with the command convert-ly -edc --from=2.13.8 part-vocal-keyboard.ly it adds on top of the file \version 2.16.0 I have version 2.18.2 installed. why is it only updating to version 2.16.0? Did you check if the convert-ly command resulted in any warning or error messages? It's not uncommon that convert-ly finds a construct that it's not able to handle automatically. If this is the case, it write an error message on the output and only converts the file up to the version that it was able to handle. You then have to manually edit that specific part of the file and then you can use convert-ly to continue its automatic updates. I have experienced some old files where this process has to be repeated several times before convert-ly is able to bring it all up to the latest version (i.e. the latest version that required any changes of the syntax). On this one, I only got a two warnings, but o other files I did. This project actually uses a Makefile (and of course it needs to be trimmed too) /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: EB Garamond font-series
On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:13:53 AM Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello list, I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/ https://bitbucket.org/georgd/eb-garamond/downloads/EBGaramond-0.016.zip, but apparently Lily can’t find the bold font series. Can anyone tell me where to search for a solution? Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Can you provide more details on how to test it? Can you see them using another program such as libereoffice writer. Does your system show them as imported? Last but not least which fonts did you install, the otf? -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: EB Garamond font-series
On Sunday, February 08, 2015 09:16:40 PM tisimst wrote: No need to test that. There isn't a bold variant (yet), though it seems like the author hopes to get that far. Hope that doesn't make you too sad :) -Abraham On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Thomas Spuhler [via Lilypond] ml-node+s1069038n171634...@n5.nabble.com wrote: On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:13:53 AM Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello list, I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/ https://bitbucket.org/georgd/eb-garamond/downloads/EBGaramond-0.016.zip, but apparently Lily can’t find the bold font series. Can anyone tell me where to search for a solution? Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Can you provide more details on how to test it? Can you see them using another program such as libereoffice writer. Does your system show them as imported? Last but not least which fonts did you install, the otf? -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/EB-Garamond-font-series-tp171632p171635.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Are you sure: see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 EBGaramond_08_20points_normal_bold.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lilypond-2.20
I am the packager of Lilypond for Mageia. I haven't seen any development releases since September 2014 which is really very unusual. Are there any explanation for this. We are pretty close to a new OS release and I would like to incorporate 2.20.0 -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lilypond-2.20
I am the packager of Lilypond for Mageia. I haven't seen any development releases since September 2014 which is really very unusual. Are there any explanation for this. We are pretty close to a new OS release and I would like to incorporate 2.20.0 -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Guile 2 for Lilypond
The documentation says, lilypond needs at least Guile (1.8.2 or newer) Can I assume the guile-2.0-6 will now work? At least with the development version? -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: LilyKDE, tool to work with LilyPond in KDE
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Larry Kent wrote: KDE easier. If you use KDE you might like it: http://lilykde.googlecode.com/ The site says if you want to preview pdf files, you need KPDF, but there's no button (that I can see) for downloading that. What am I missing? -LK Larry Kent Tampa FL [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! http://biggestloser.msn.com/ In Mandriva it's called kdegraphics-kpdf $ rpm -qa |grep kpdf kdegraphics-kpdf-3.5.7-8.1mdv2008.0 -- Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: midi set instrument problem
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Op zaterdag 26 januari 2008, schreef Thomas Spuhler:
Lilypond doesn't like my midi section:
Try:
\midi {
\context {
\Score
tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 90 4)
}
\context {
\Staff
midiInstrument = recorder
}
}
The \set Staff.midiInstrument command shows that midiInstrument is to be
set in the Staff context. I guess it will work when you place it in the
\Staff context section. The '\set' and the 'Staff.' are not necessary then.
Alternatively, you can use
\set Staff.midiInstrument = recorder
just in the music.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world.
-- Mahatma Gandi
Thanks for the hint. Got it to work like this:
\midi {
\context {
\Score
tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 90 4)
midiInstrument = recorder
}
}
}
--
Thomas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
midi set instrument problem
Lilypond doesn't like my midi section:
\midi {
\context {
\Score
tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 90 4)
}
\set Staff.midiInstrument = recorder
}
I get:
score.ly:20:16: error: syntax error, unexpected \set
\set Staff.midiInstrument = recorder
I actually took it from a sample and changed the instrument. recorder is in
the list of the manual.
When deleting the \set Staff.midiInstrument = recorder line, it compiles.
--
Thomas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Deleting the Lilypond sentence at the end
I don't like that Lilypond Engraving sentence at the end. How do I skip it? Could not find it in the Manual. -- Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Creating a book of music
On Sunday 06 January 2008, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: Le 6 janv. 08 à 21:56, Graham Percival a écrit : On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:50:38 +0100 Nicolas Sceaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le 4 janv. 08 __ 00:15, Reinhold Kainhofer a __crit : Are you thinking about turning your framework into a general lilypond-for-books package (with some documentation on how to use ;-) ) so that we ordinary lilypond users can also benefit from it? A book titling stylesheet has been published on LSR: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=368 It requires a 2.11.something LilyPond version. This could be a problem; LSR is currently on 2.10.12. If you have any difficulty publishing it on LSR, you could try sending it ot Valentin privately; he can add it to LSR once it's been upgraded. Actually, that's what I've done: Valentin added it to LSR. nicolas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user I am pretty new to Lilypond and wanted to experiment with this sample, but no success. The stylesheet also has a lot of strange characters. I think they are not correctly stored in the document: * %%;; an accented character is seen as two characters by guile #(let ((lower-case-accented-string éèêëáà âäÃìîïóòà ´Ã¶ÃºÃ¹Ã»Ã¼Ã§Åæ) (upper-case-accented-string ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà ÅÃ)) My Lilypond version is 2.11.31 -- Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Uninstalling Liliypond
Mats Bengtsson wrote: Which operating system? On Windows, it's in the Start menu - All Programs - LilyPond - On Linux, just run the command uninstall-lilypond. On Mac, I don't know. /Mats Martin Nopola wrote: I have searched everywhere for the uninstall command so I can install the newest version which I downloaded for Linux. I remember seeing it when I installed v 2.10.15. How do i do it? Is it still necessary to uninstall first? Marty ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user If you have an rpm based system and installed it from the distribution then use your tool to uninstall it. It will remove everything. If you upgrade from your distribution, you don't need to uninstall the old version. Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Making an RPM
Lylipond looks like an interesting program and I want to install it. However, I like to have it as an rpm to easily un-install it, even after month and after I forgot where the script and the program chunks are. Has anybody a spec file that can be used or adapted for building the rpm? -- Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Making an RPM
On Sunday 14 October 2007 17:44, Thomas Spuhler wrote: Lylipond looks like an interesting program and I want to install it. However, I like to have it as an rpm to easily un-install it, even after month and after I forgot where the script and the program chunks are. Has anybody a spec file that can be used or adapted for building the rpm? Never mind. I found it after I spelled lilypond correct. -- Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
