Newbie: strange bar

2006-02-08 Thread debian
Unless my ear has a virus, bar 4 of this piece plays all wrong.  When
I submit it to timidity, bar 4 seems to have extra notes in it that
are not printed in the pdf.  The pdf is correct.

The 2nd half plays fine.  Most strange.

Thanks

Joe

\version 2.6.3
\header {
composer =  
piece = The Arigna River
dedication = Not identified yet, probably some female
}

melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key g \major
  \repeat volta 2 { %TUNE_START
\time 4/4
\clef treble
d'8 e g   e  d4  b8 g
g'  a b   g  e4  d8 e 
c   b c   g' g,  c  b c
b   g g   e  c'4 d 

d8  e g   e  d4 b8 g
g'  a b   g  e4 d8 e 
c   b c   g  g' c, b c
b   g g   e  d4 d4
  } 

  \repeat volta 2 { 
  }
% TUNE_END
}

\score {
\new Staff \melody
\layout { }
}

\score {
\unfoldRepeats
\repeat unfold 2 {\melody} %UNFOLD
\midi { \tempo 4=70 }
}




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Newbie: strange bar !SOLVED!

2006-02-08 Thread debian
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:02:14PM +, debian wrote:
 Unless my ear has a virus, bar 4 of this piece plays all wrong.  When

Nah, it wasn't my ear that was the problem.  It was my brain.

There was a bug in my perl wrapper !

Sorry about that.

[Embarrassment on hard.]

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


midi file names only 3 parts

2006-02-07 Thread debian
Please,

lilypond 2.6.3:

lilypond the.bottom.bracket.ly

produces a midi file named:

the.bottom.midi

It chops off the third part of the name.  Any way round this ?

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: lilypond-book and misalignment

2006-02-05 Thread debian
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:17:32AM +0200, Nahum wengrov wrote:
 Try including 
\layout { indent = 0.0\cm }
 In your .ly file, or adding the indent = 0.0\cm statement to your existing
 \layout { } statement.

Makes no difference, sorry.

There seems to be some sort of bug associated with behaviour see:

http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/bug-lilypond@gnu.org/1851520.html

but no conclusion.

It only happens with _some_ tunes, but I cannot see the pattern.

Thanks a lot.

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


lilypond-book and misalignment

2006-02-01 Thread debian
NEWBIE: on debian sarge with lilypond 2.6.3.

Please,

my googling leads me to believe that there is some kind of bug in
Lilypond-book which causes it to output misaligned staves ?

I seem to be suffering from this, in that _sometimes_, only sometimes,
the first stave is far too far to the right.

Is there a fix for this or some kind of work around ?

Thanks a lot.

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


NEWBIE: repeating whole tunes

2006-01-26 Thread debian
Please,

what is the best way to ask lilypond to create a midi file in such a
way that the _whole_ tune is played n times.  n will be passed from
the command line.  

I have written perl code to extract the essential parts of the tune
and create a new ly file with the essential parts repeated n times.
But the repeats are played an octave up each time.

I know this must be simple.

Thanks.

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: NEWBIE: repeating whole tunes

2006-01-26 Thread debian
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:04:28PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
 Repeating is simple:
 
 \score{

I had to put \unfoldRepeats here

  \repeat unfold 20 {...}
  \midi{...}
 }

but, it is working fine.  The perl bit is easy.

Thanks a lot.

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-21 Thread debian
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 06:27:38PM +, Brian Haddon wrote:
 martial martial at cathemline.org writes:
 
  
I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated 
editors emacs and vim.
  
  I am blind  or utf-8 is not supported  
  
  http://forum.context.cx/index.php?topic=678.0
  
 
 Though (relatively) new to LilyPond, I have used ConTEXT for some time, and 
 can
 recommend it.  As mentioned in the first post, it makes a great IDE for 
 LilyPond
 on Windows.  You can compile your scripts, view the PDF's, play the MIDI's and
 even summon LilyPond help files, all from within ConTEXT.  Syntax highlighting
 is easy to set up (the hardest part is typing in all the keywords). :)

my xemacs does all this already.  And _much_ more.

I too am _very_ new to lilypond.

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


short tunes

2006-01-20 Thread debian
Traditional tunes tend to be short.  Just a burst of eight bars,
repeated usually and then a burst of another eight bars again
repeated.

I would like to play the tune a number of times 1,2,3 perhaps 4 times.

I could go:

timidity my.tune
timidity my.tune
timidity my.tune

but is no good as there is a delay between tunes.

How can I tell Lilypond to put out the tune (ie the notes) n times,
where n is taken from the command line ?

I would like to have my tunes stand alone, so I can edit them an play
them individually.  But I would also like to suck the essential
parts of these same tunes into a book for sharing or perhaps
publications.

I don't mind writing some perl code to do this, but I need to know the
essential parts to suck in.

Thanks a lot.

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: writing Irish Traditional music

2006-01-19 Thread debian
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:46:44AM +0100, Gilles wrote:

  is there any recommended sources of info on writing Irish Tradition tunes 
  using Lilypond ?
 
 Are there specifics for Irish music?

Not that I know of.  It is largely an aural tradition.  The emphasis is not on 
scores at all.
Pieces are short and there is usually a lot of repetition.

  Does anyone have any hints for a fast:
  
  editor - score - midi
  
  revision cycles ?
 
 
 What do you mean?  [I just do what you described below.]

I suppose it all boils down to processor speed.  From the time I edit
the score until I get the finished pdf and midi files, there is quite
a delay.  

Due to my own lack of skill, I make lots of mistakes, so I
end up going round this cycle a goodly number of times.

Programming an xemacs function key will probably help.

-- 
Thanks

Joe Mc Cool
Snark, currently Shannon Harbour


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


writing Irish Traditional music

2006-01-17 Thread debian
Please, 

is there any recommended sources of info on writing Irish Tradition tunes using 
Lilypond ?

(For example, how does one stipulate rolls ?)

Lilypond is a super system.  I love it already, after years of using ABC.  
Thanks a lot.

Does anyone have any hints for a fast:

editor - score - midi

revision cycles ?

I use timidity and xemacs.

I see no point in involving products like Rosegarden or Noteedit et
al.  I just key the Lilypond source straight into the file using
xemacs and then browse the score and listen to the midi, before doing
corrections.

Thanks again.

Joe Mc Cool


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


output files where ?

2006-01-17 Thread debian
Please,

how can I control where Lilypond (v2.2.6) puts her output files: dvi, tex, mid,
ps, pdf etc ?  At the moment she puts them in the current directory.

Thanks

Joe Mc Cool


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: newbie:poor quality output

2006-01-14 Thread debian
Quoting may be screwed up:

 On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:26:36PM +0100, Erik Sandberg wrote:
 
  Starting at version 2.6, lilypond handles fonts etc. in a completely 
  different 
  way (without using TeX), so the smoothest fix could be to install version 
  2.6.
 
 On the debian web site, their search for packages facility is down at the 
 moment !
 
 From their ftp site I was able to pull down a deb but:
 
 ###
 # dpkg -i lilypond_2.6.3-9_i386.deb 
 tar: Read 9728 bytes from -
 (Reading database ... 144082 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to replace lilypond 2.2.6-3 (using lilypond_2.6.3-9_i386.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement lilypond ...
 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of lilypond:
  lilypond depends on libc6 (= 2.3.5-1); however:
   Version of libc6 on system is 2.3.2.ds1-22.
  lilypond depends on libglib2.0-0 (= 2.8.0); however:
   Version of libglib2.0-0 on system is 2.6.4-1.
  lilypond depends on libpango1.0-0 (= 1.8.2); however:
   Version of libpango1.0-0 on system is 1.8.1-1.
  lilypond depends on libstdc++6 (= 4.0.2); however:
   Version of libstdc++6 on system is 3.4.3-13.
  lilypond depends on lilypond-data (= 2.6.3-9); however:
   Version of lilypond-data on system is 2.2.6-3.
 dpkg: error processing lilypond (--install):
  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  lilypond
 ###
 
 When I try 
 
 ###
  apt-get install libc6
 Reading Package Lists... Done
 Building Dependency Tree... Done
 libc6 is already the newest version.
 ###
 
 When I pull down the source and run ./configure, I get: 
 
 ###
 WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs:  /usr/local/bin/gs = 
 8.14 (installed: 7.05.6)
 
 ERROR: Please install required programs:  libguile (libguile-dev, guile-devel 
 or guile-dev package). mftrace fontforge libpango1.0-dev or pango?-devel = 
 1.6.0 (installed: )
 ###
 
 When I try to install libguile-dev, I get still more dependencies and so on.
 
 When I hit the install button from the any 386 on the lilypond.org site, 
 the hour glass appears and the my machine seems to go off into noddy land :-)
 
 Perhaps I'd be better waiting until the debian site is back running properly.

thanks

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


newbie:poor quality output

2006-01-11 Thread debian
Please,

I have just started using Lilypond (2.4.5) on a debian sarge system
and I am getting on reasonably well with the syntax.

But, the quality of my pdf files is very poor.  Notes and staff lines
etc look ugly.  Probably this is a font problem, but I do not know how
to proceed.

Thanks

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user