Again: Questions about Stem #'length

2009-09-27 Thread Marc Hohl 

Despite of the answers that were given
(and which normally are sufficient enough for a workaround):

can someone explain to me why lilypond still (at least sometimes)
displays stems when I
\override Stem #'length = #0?

Thanks in advance

Marc



\version 2.13.4

test = \relative c' {
   c4 d e f
   g a b c
   \stemUp
   c, d e f
   g a b c
   \stemDown
   c, d e f
   g a b c
}

\score {
  \new Voice {
\test
\break
\override Voice.Stem #'length = #0
\test
  }
}


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Again: Questions about Stem #'length

2009-09-27 Thread Robin Bannister 
Marc Hohl asked:   

  why lilypond still (at least sometimes) displays stems


You probably haven't enabled no-stem-extend   


Cheers,
Robin


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Again: Questions about Stem #'length

2009-09-27 Thread Marc Hohl 

Robin Bannister schrieb:
Marc Hohl asked:  

  why lilypond still (at least sometimes) displays stems


You probably haven't enabled no-stem-extend  
Cheers,

Robin


Ah, yes - thanks for the hint; I did't know that there is such a property.
Now it works like a charm.

Marc


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user