Re: And now for something completely different.
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes: Or zeroline.ly , not true ordinary word but a likely filename. Some filenames make gs crash; expect bug reports on this sooner or later. A pity tiger.ly does not work $ rm -f align.ps $ touch align.ps $ ps2pdf align.ps $ gs align.ps # looks fine $ evince align.pdf # surprise -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes: David Kastrup writes: No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. Nice. How did you come by this one? Accidentally. The weird thing is that I then tried using the file name lines.ly instead. Turns out that those are pretty much the only two more or less ordinary words afflicted. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
2013/11/2 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes: David Kastrup writes: No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. Nice. How did you come by this one? Accidentally. The weird thing is that I then tried using the file name lines.ly instead. Turns out that those are pretty much the only two more or less ordinary words afflicted. Or zeroline.ly , not true ordinary word but a likely filename. Some filenames make gs crash; expect bug reports on this sooner or later. A pity tiger.ly does not work -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes: Or zeroline.ly , not true ordinary word but a likely filename. Some filenames make gs crash; expect bug reports on this sooner or later. A pity tiger.ly does not work I was actually looking for the tiger, but it seems that it is no longer being distributed. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
And now for something completely different.
Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file
will be?
\markup \center-align { hoi hoo }
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file will be? Is the surprising output related to this? If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in LilyPond's installation files, LilyPond's file from the installation files takes precedence. http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/including-lilypond-files I run into the later issue earlier this week... Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes: On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file will be? Is the surprising output related to this? If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in LilyPond's installation files, LilyPond's file from the installation files takes precedence. http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/including-lilypond-files Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one. Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-) Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes: On 11/01/2013 07:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Can you guess what the output of saving and running the following file will be? Is the surprising output related to this? If an included file is given a name which is the same as one in LilyPond's installation files, LilyPond's file from the installation files takes precedence. http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/including-lilypond-files Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one. I was thinking that whatever the function may or may not do, there will be a \version warning if the file is run as-is by itself. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote: On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one. Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-) I guess it must be related to the creation of the postscript...(?) Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes: On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote: On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one. Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-) I guess it must be related to the creation of the postscript...(?) No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
On 11/01/2013 09:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote: No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. Ok! At first I thought it was an easter egg, but so close to Halloween it must be a bug! Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
David Kastrup writes: No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert. Nice. How did you come by this one? Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: And now for something completely different.
For me, it does not occur with 2.17 versions (.9 and .26) but only with 2.16.2. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
