Re: Another tricky music situation. This time: Repeat Nightmare with alternative endings.
Hello, On 5 April 2012 15:42, Nils wrote: > Am Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:31:48 +0100 > schrieb James : > >> Hello, >> >> On 5 April 2012 15:20, Nils wrote: >> > Hello list, >> > >> > Maybe you have an opinion about this musical situation, described >> > here: http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/04/05/nightmare-repeats/ >> > >> > In my eyes it should be forbidden. The real cause it that >> > alternative endings use the same glyph as boundary as repeats: the >> > repeat close barline. Better would be a glyph that is explicitely >> > and only for the first/second ending bracket, but well.. we don't >> > got that over the last few hundred years. >> >> better would be to write out in full, it's not like we need to worry >> about the cost of parchment is it ;) >> >> Why muck about like this in the first place? >> >> James >> > > I is somehow my (future) Job as music theorist to think about these > problems. At least I want to think about it. > > Writing your music down in a correct way helps the intpreter to play > better and the composer to think better. > > There are many strange and inconsequent things in music notation. If > you know them you can avoid them and make your music or score clearer. > This is where Lilypond comes in because I use it to create scores :) Isn't this just the old adage, 'Just because we can, doesn't mean we should'. I cannot think what problem this is solving. or how it is adding to the music in any way at all. Otherwise you simply add a note saying to go back to repeat X instead of Y. I think your example is far too short to get the point across. Maybe there could be some piece where you start at A got Z repeat back to B got to Y repeat back to C and so on, in ever decreasing 'circles', that may be something a 'modern' composer might do. Or even me come to think of it. :) But then you'd just label your repeat bars. regards James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Another tricky music situation. This time: Repeat Nightmare with alternative endings.
Am Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:31:48 +0100 schrieb James : > Hello, > > On 5 April 2012 15:20, Nils wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > Maybe you have an opinion about this musical situation, described > > here: http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/04/05/nightmare-repeats/ > > > > In my eyes it should be forbidden. The real cause it that > > alternative endings use the same glyph as boundary as repeats: the > > repeat close barline. Better would be a glyph that is explicitely > > and only for the first/second ending bracket, but well.. we don't > > got that over the last few hundred years. > > better would be to write out in full, it's not like we need to worry > about the cost of parchment is it ;) > > Why muck about like this in the first place? > > James > I is somehow my (future) Job as music theorist to think about these problems. At least I want to think about it. Writing your music down in a correct way helps the intpreter to play better and the composer to think better. There are many strange and inconsequent things in music notation. If you know them you can avoid them and make your music or score clearer. This is where Lilypond comes in because I use it to create scores :) Nils ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Another tricky music situation. This time: Repeat Nightmare with alternative endings.
Hello, On 5 April 2012 15:20, Nils wrote: > Hello list, > > Maybe you have an opinion about this musical situation, described here: > http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/04/05/nightmare-repeats/ > > In my eyes it should be forbidden. The real cause it that alternative > endings use the same glyph as boundary as repeats: the repeat close > barline. Better would be a glyph that is explicitely and only for the > first/second ending bracket, but well.. we don't got that over the > last few hundred years. better would be to write out in full, it's not like we need to worry about the cost of parchment is it ;) Why muck about like this in the first place? James ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Another tricky music situation. This time: Repeat Nightmare with alternative endings.
Hello list, Maybe you have an opinion about this musical situation, described here: http://www.nilsgey.de/2012/04/05/nightmare-repeats/ In my eyes it should be forbidden. The real cause it that alternative endings use the same glyph as boundary as repeats: the repeat close barline. Better would be a glyph that is explicitely and only for the first/second ending bracket, but well.. we don't got that over the last few hundred years. Nils ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user