Re: Frescobaldi custom script
Am 26.10.2014 18:28, schrieb Joram: To explain my use case a bit more: My purpose is to provide a single file, a list of files or (main usage) a file containing a list of all files for a project. The script then produces pdf midi output, the latter for each voice separately. The midi output is converted to mp3 or ogg. These scores and audio files are zipped and prepared for uploading on the choir web page and the html snippet is prepared. In my opinion, this is a nice example how LilyPond is suitable for an integrated workflow and cooperation of different tools. Once this is more mature it might also be interesting for a post on the lilypondblog. Definitely. You can just write something when you're ready, and then email us when you have saved the post as pending. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi custom script
On 25 October 2014 20:35, Davide Liessi davide.lie...@gmail.com wrote: However I think that having the possibility to define custom compilers would be very useful. Sorry if I’m wrong, but can’t you type anything you like into Frescobaldi’s Engrave (Custom) command line window? Something like: python ~/scripts/myLilypondScript.py $filename ...should run the script and pass it the filename, however that works in Python. There are two issues I have at the moment- one is that it doesn’t seem to be possible to direct Lilypond output to stdout (Postscript in my case for piping to Ghostscript with lots of special options), and the second is that Frescobaldi forgets the custom command every time it quits, so you have to store it elsewhere. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi custom script
On 2014-10-26 13:31, Vaughan McAlley wrote: Sorry if I’m wrong, but can’t you type anything you like into Frescobaldi’s Engrave (Custom) command line window? Something like: python ~/scripts/myLilypondScript.py $filename ...should run the script and pass it the filename, however that works in Python. The command line window is of course expecting a command to run LilyPond. The flexibility of changing the command that is executed is thought for custom LilyPond calls. But as I understand it any command would be executed. The advantage is that you can make use of the shortcut $filename for the current document. Otherwise it's hard to see any benefits of that approach, I think. There are two issues I have at the moment- one is that it doesn’t seem to be possible to direct Lilypond output to stdout (Postscript in my case for piping to Ghostscript with lots of special options), and the second is that Frescobaldi forgets the custom command every time it quits, so you have to store it elsewhere. The ability to save a custom commands could perhaps be argued. At the moment the command is construed by the other settings. To catch the stdout message I think the best approach is to run the python script as a Snippet and to add the functionality to handle this. Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi custom script
However I think that having the possibility to define custom compilers would be very useful. Sorry if I’m wrong, but can’t you type anything you like into Frescobaldi’s Engrave (Custom) command line window? Something like: python ~/scripts/myLilypondScript.py $filename ...should run the script and pass it the filename, however that works in Python. Yes, that’s what I tried yesterday, too. And it works. This is actually pretty close to what I want. It also puts the output in the output window, very nicely. The only thing is: I can’t have such an entry in the menu in addition to the custom engraving item and (more important) it is reverted once I restart Frescobaldi, so I have to enter the command again. The suggestion with the snippets works. There is no standard output within Frescobaldi, though. I can live with the second solution, but having a persistent additional custom compile would be even better – perhaps with a dropdown version of the compile button from which different compiles can be chosen. To explain my use case a bit more: My purpose is to provide a single file, a list of files or (main usage) a file containing a list of all files for a project. The script then produces pdf midi output, the latter for each voice separately. The midi output is converted to mp3 or ogg. These scores and audio files are zipped and prepared for uploading on the choir web page and the html snippet is prepared. In my opinion, this is a nice example how LilyPond is suitable for an integrated workflow and cooperation of different tools. Once this is more mature it might also be interesting for a post on the lilypondblog. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi custom script
See https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/512 Am 26. Oktober 2014 18:28:01 MEZ, schrieb Joram noeck.marb...@gmx.de: However I think that having the possibility to define custom compilers would be very useful. Sorry if I’m wrong, but can’t you type anything you like into Frescobaldi’s Engrave (Custom) command line window? Something like: python ~/scripts/myLilypondScript.py $filename ...should run the script and pass it the filename, however that works in Python. Yes, that’s what I tried yesterday, too. And it works. This is actually pretty close to what I want. It also puts the output in the output window, very nicely. The only thing is: I can’t have such an entry in the menu in addition to the custom engraving item and (more important) it is reverted once I restart Frescobaldi, so I have to enter the command again. The suggestion with the snippets works. There is no standard output within Frescobaldi, though. I can live with the second solution, but having a persistent additional custom compile would be even better – perhaps with a dropdown version of the compile button from which different compiles can be chosen. To explain my use case a bit more: My purpose is to provide a single file, a list of files or (main usage) a file containing a list of all files for a project. The script then produces pdf midi output, the latter for each voice separately. The midi output is converted to mp3 or ogg. These scores and audio files are zipped and prepared for uploading on the choir web page and the html snippet is prepared. In my opinion, this is a nice example how LilyPond is suitable for an integrated workflow and cooperation of different tools. Once this is more mature it might also be interesting for a post on the lilypondblog. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi custom script
On 2014-10-24 15:01, Noeck wrote: Hi, I have a question concerning Frescobaldi: Is it possible to run a custom script (bash/python) from Frescobaldi. This would be my use case: I have a script that runs lilypond and then timidity and other tools to get ogg rehearsal files which are then packed in zip files. If I could run it from within Frescobaldi that would be cool. If I had a button or menu entry in Frescobaldi that runs it, and displays the output in the protocol area and the progress with the progress bar, that would be even better. Does anyone know if something like this is possible? Cheers, Joram Hi Joram, you can run a python script as a Snippet (Tools - Snippets). If it's possible to implement in detail is hard for me to say (without seeing your code), but I think that is what you could try if you want to do it within Frescobaldi. Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi custom script
Am 25.10.2014 10:41, schrieb Peter Bjuhr: On 2014-10-24 15:01, Noeck wrote: Hi, I have a question concerning Frescobaldi: Is it possible to run a custom script (bash/python) from Frescobaldi. This would be my use case: I have a script that runs lilypond and then timidity and other tools to get ogg rehearsal files which are then packed in zip files. If I could run it from within Frescobaldi that would be cool. Wouldn't it be possible to even run this from within LilyPond itself? It should be possible to run external code from a Scheme function, isn't it? Then it should also be possible to make that run upon compilation. No idea how to approach that, though. If I had a button or menu entry in Frescobaldi that runs it, and displays the output in the protocol area and the progress with the progress bar, that would be even better. Does anyone know if something like this is possible? Cheers, Joram Hi Joram, you can run a python script as a Snippet (Tools - Snippets). If it's possible to implement in detail is hard for me to say (without seeing your code), but I think that is what you could try if you want to do it within Frescobaldi. Yes, I also think you should be able to access the outer world of shell processes through Python that way. This wouldn't give you a menu entry (although you *could* even do that for your own copy if you run Frescobaldi from its Git repository) but you can assign a keyboard shortcut to a snippet. Best Urs Best Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi custom script
Hi. 2014-10-25 10:41 GMT+02:00 Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com: you can run a python script as a Snippet (Tools - Snippets). If it's possible to implement in detail is hard for me to say (without seeing your code), but I think that is what you could try if you want to do it within Frescobaldi. I think that what Joram is thinking about is being able to define different compilers in Frescobaldi that point to arbitrary programs, similar to different compilers in LaTeX editors... 2014-10-25 11:06 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: Wouldn't it be possible to even run this from within LilyPond itself? It should be possible to run external code from a Scheme function, isn't it? Then it should also be possible to make that run upon compilation. No idea how to approach that, though. ... and I think that this belongs to the editor and not to LilyPond. 2014-10-24 15:01 GMT+02:00 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de: I have a question concerning Frescobaldi: Is it possible to run a custom script (bash/python) from Frescobaldi. At the moment the only easy solution is using Snippets, as Peter said. However I think that having the possibility to define custom compilers would be very useful. I'll open an issue on Frescobaldi's GitHub tracker about this. Best wishes. Davide ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi custom script
2014-10-25 11:35 GMT+02:00 Davide Liessi davide.lie...@gmail.com: I'll open an issue on Frescobaldi's GitHub tracker about this. https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/512 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Frescobaldi custom script
Hi, I have a question concerning Frescobaldi: Is it possible to run a custom script (bash/python) from Frescobaldi. This would be my use case: I have a script that runs lilypond and then timidity and other tools to get ogg rehearsal files which are then packed in zip files. If I could run it from within Frescobaldi that would be cool. If I had a button or menu entry in Frescobaldi that runs it, and displays the output in the protocol area and the progress with the progress bar, that would be even better. Does anyone know if something like this is possible? Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
