Re: Frescobaldi testing requested
On 9-9-2018 08:58, Urs Liska wrote: I found the problem, a pretty stupid programming error. It *had* worked at some point so I didn't always check again all options ... It should be fixed now on the main dev/urs/refactor-job branch. Indeed, works as expected now. If you find further issues please report them at https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/pull/1100 instead of this list, it's more reliable when all the discussion takes place in one place. Will do. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi testing requested
Am 08.09.2018 um 09:59 schrieb Partitura Organum: On 7-9-2018 09:48, Urs Liska wrote: Please pull and checkout the branch dev/urs/refactor-job-test-windows. This includes two test prints on the command line to check what code is actually reached and the value(s) of some variables. Is anything printed with that when you use Engrave (custom)? Urs Before I could test the new branche, somehow Ctrl-Shift-M suddenly did work. Seemingly. I then noticed Frescobaldi produces a PDF, irrespective of what is asked. ... I found the problem, a pretty stupid programming error. It *had* worked at some point so I didn't always check again all options ... It should be fixed now on the main dev/urs/refactor-job branch. If you find further issues please report them at https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/pull/1100 instead of this list, it's more reliable when all the discussion takes place in one place. Urs Auke ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi testing requested
On 7-9-2018 09:48, Urs Liska wrote: Please pull and checkout the branch dev/urs/refactor-job-test-windows. This includes two test prints on the command line to check what code is actually reached and the value(s) of some variables. Is anything printed with that when you use Engrave (custom)? Urs Before I could test the new branche, somehow Ctrl-Shift-M suddenly did work. Seemingly. I then noticed Frescobaldi produces a PDF, irrespective of what is asked. Below the output when asked for a PNG (with the refactor-job-test-windows branche). Verwerken van 'D:/Lilypond/Sorge, Georg Andreas/Sorge, Ein Lamlein geht.ly' Ontleden... Vertolken van muziek...[8][16][24][32][40][48][48] Voorbewerken van grafische objecten... Zoeken naar het ideale aantal pagina's... Muziek wordt passend gemaakt voor 2 of 3 pagina's... Tekenen van systemen... Opmaakuitvoer naar './tmp-lilypond-ZoZPRv'... Converteren naar 'Sorge, Ein Lamlein geht.pdf'... Verwijderen van './tmp-lilypond-ZoZPRv'... Gelukt: compilatie is met succes voltooid Succesvol beëindigd in 2.2". As this is in Dutch it is probably not very readable for most people... :-) The meaningful line is: "Converteren naar 'Sorge, Ein Lammlein geht.pdf' " I then checked my Linux installation. It produces the same result (with the most recent refactor-job branche). Frescobaldi from master does what it is expected to do: produce a PNG, both on Windows and on Linux. Below two screenshots: the first of the dialog with the refactor-job branche; the second of the dialog with the master-branche. Both from the Linux-version. Somehow the commandline is not filled correctly. As the Linux-version is run from a virtual machine on my Windows desktop, this could still be Windows related... Auke ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi testing requested
Am 06.09.2018 um 21:10 schrieb Partitura Organum: This is not what happens for me. Could you specify the OS/distribution you're running? And maybe provide a screenshot of the dialog. I could imagine that some combination of options would be able to produce unwanted behaviour. I'm running it on Windows. Here's a screenshot of the dialog. ... I doesn't matter which option I choose, PDF, PNG, SVG or some of the other options. Starting Lilypond results in nothing. The dialog disappears and that's it. When I run it on Linux, it works as expected. So it's somehow Windows-related. Please pull and checkout the branch dev/urs/refactor-job-test-windows. This includes two test prints on the command line to check what code is actually reached and the value(s) of some variables. Is anything printed with that when you use Engrave (custom)? Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi testing requested
Am 06.09.2018 um 21:10 schrieb Partitura Organum: This is not what happens for me. Could you specify the OS/distribution you're running? And maybe provide a screenshot of the dialog. I could imagine that some combination of options would be able to produce unwanted behaviour. I'm running it on Windows. Here's a screenshot of the dialog. ... I doesn't matter which option I choose, PDF, PNG, SVG or some of the other options. Starting Lilypond results in nothing. The dialog disappears and that's it. When I run it on Linux, it works as expected. So it's somehow Windows-related. What would be the path to LilyPond on your Linux system? My first suspicion would be that it chokes on the spaces in the file name (which of course should be fixed in Frescobaldi). Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi testing requested
This is not what happens for me. Could you specify the OS/distribution you're running? And maybe provide a screenshot of the dialog. I could imagine that some combination of options would be able to produce unwanted behaviour. I'm running it on Windows. Here's a screenshot of the dialog. I doesn't matter which option I choose, PDF, PNG, SVG or some of the other options. Starting Lilypond results in nothing. The dialog disappears and that's it. When I run it on Linux, it works as expected. So it's somehow Windows-related. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi testing requested
Am 04.09.2018 um 23:08 schrieb Partitura Organum: On 4-9-2018 17:36, Urs Liska wrote: Hi to all those who use Frescobaldi from the Git repository, I've done some refactoring of the code handling LilyPond jobs, as a preparation for further work. So far there *should* be no differences in behaviour or performance, but I think my code introduces plenty opportunity for new bugs and unwanted side-effects. Therefore I'd be glad about anyone who tests https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/pull/1100. As there are no new functions involved it's "only" about stability and errors, with anything that involves external processes like LilyPond, the regular engrave modes, the score wizard preview etc. (the only thing I've deliberately not fixed *now* is the "show available fonts" dialog). Thanks Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user I worked this evening with the refactor-job-branche. I encountered one glitch: Engrave (adapted) does not work. Pressing Ctrl+Shift+M brings up the familiar pop up screen. But then clicking 'Start Lilypond' does exactly nothing. I had to switch back to the master branch to be able to create some PNG's. This is not what happens for me. Could you specify the OS/distribution you're running? And maybe provide a screenshot of the dialog. I could imagine that some combination of options would be able to produce unwanted behaviour. Urs Other than that, no problems so far. Regarsd, Auke ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi testing requested
On 4-9-2018 17:36, Urs Liska wrote: Hi to all those who use Frescobaldi from the Git repository, I've done some refactoring of the code handling LilyPond jobs, as a preparation for further work. So far there *should* be no differences in behaviour or performance, but I think my code introduces plenty opportunity for new bugs and unwanted side-effects. Therefore I'd be glad about anyone who tests https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/pull/1100. As there are no new functions involved it's "only" about stability and errors, with anything that involves external processes like LilyPond, the regular engrave modes, the score wizard preview etc. (the only thing I've deliberately not fixed *now* is the "show available fonts" dialog). Thanks Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user I worked this evening with the refactor-job-branche. I encountered one glitch: Engrave (adapted) does not work. Pressing Ctrl+Shift+M brings up the familiar pop up screen. But then clicking 'Start Lilypond' does exactly nothing. I had to switch back to the master branch to be able to create some PNG's. Other than that, no problems so far. Regarsd, Auke ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Frescobaldi testing requested
Hi to all those who use Frescobaldi from the Git repository, I've done some refactoring of the code handling LilyPond jobs, as a preparation for further work. So far there *should* be no differences in behaviour or performance, but I think my code introduces plenty opportunity for new bugs and unwanted side-effects. Therefore I'd be glad about anyone who tests https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/pull/1100. As there are no new functions involved it's "only" about stability and errors, with anything that involves external processes like LilyPond, the regular engrave modes, the score wizard preview etc. (the only thing I've deliberately not fixed *now* is the "show available fonts" dialog). Thanks Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
