Re: IRC freenode issue
David Kastrup writes: > I thought that freenode changing to SSL-traffic only was supposed to > deal with the Spam problem? Or was that ineffective? I have no idea. All I know is that #lilypond still received lots of spam. Hopefully freenode fixes this so we can re-allow unregistered users to post. janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ® http://AvatarAcademy.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: IRC freenode issue
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > As per > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-08/msg7.html > > I set /mode +q $~a on #lilypond. This means that non-registered nicks > can join but not post. That's not great...hoping for a better solution. I thought that freenode changing to SSL-traffic only was supposed to deal with the Spam problem? Or was that ineffective? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
IRC freenode issue
As per https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-08/msg7.html I set /mode +q $~a on #lilypond. This means that non-registered nicks can join but not post. That's not great...hoping for a better solution. Greetings, janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ® http://AvatarAcademy.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user