Re: Increasing grace note separation
On 3 January 2011 06:18, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >>> I have recently had a discussion on the list about unstretchable >>> grace note groups. The solution was to set GraceSpacing >>> spacing-increment to zero. That is fine in all instances except for >>> the one in the example. >> >> \relative c'' { >> a {\squeeze \grace {\small \stemspace #'(0 . 0.5) c32[ a8 g32]}} a4 >> } > > This is a nice ad-hoc solution, but the whole issue rather smells like > a spacing bug, triggered by some untypical conditions... Can you > isolate the problem, providing a minimal example? Well, I get the same problem without squeezing the grace note group. It is really only happening for beamlets to the right, so here's a minified example. \relative c'' { a { \grace {\small b32[ g8]}} a4 } Also try the original example witout any fixups, and notice the disproportionate spacing, caused of course by the different note lengths. But it looks pretty bad. -- Sven Axelsson ++[>++>+++>++>++ ><-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<. +++.>-.<<++.>>.<++.>>>++..>>.<. <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Increasing grace note separation
>> I have recently had a discussion on the list about unstretchable >> grace note groups. The solution was to set GraceSpacing >> spacing-increment to zero. That is fine in all instances except for >> the one in the example. > > \relative c'' { > a {\squeeze \grace {\small \stemspace #'(0 . 0.5) c32[ a8 g32]}} a4 > } This is a nice ad-hoc solution, but the whole issue rather smells like a spacing bug, triggered by some untypical conditions... Can you isolate the problem, providing a minimal example? Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Increasing grace note separation
On 03/01/11 10:36, Sven Axelsson wrote: I have just now started using the latest 2.13 (2.12.2 before), and noticed that the inter-note spacing has been tightened in some instances. I have recently had a discussion on the list about unstretchable grace note groups. The solution was to set GraceSpacing spacing-increment to zero. That is fine in all instances except for the one in the example. I'd like to get a little extra space between the c and a, and can't figure out what to tweak. The obvious (I thought) solution to insert s32 or so actually has the opposite effect, making the spacing even tighter. Any ideas are much appreciated. squeeze = { \override Score.GraceSpacing #'spacing-increment = #0 \override Score.Stem #'beamlet-max-length-proportion = #'(0.5 . 0.5) } \relative c'' { a {\squeeze \grace {\small c32[ a8 g32]}} a4 } \version "2.13.44" squeeze = { \override Score.GraceSpacing #'spacing-increment = #0 \override Score.Stem #'beamlet-max-length-proportion = #'(0.5 . 0.5) } stemspace = #(define-music-function (parser location extent) (pair?) #{ \once \override Staff.Stem #'X-extent = #$extent #}) \relative c'' { a {\squeeze \grace {\small \stemspace #'(0 . 0.5) c32[ a8 g32]}} a4 } Nick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Increasing grace note separation
Hi list. I have just now started using the latest 2.13 (2.12.2 before), and noticed that the inter-note spacing has been tightened in some instances. I have recently had a discussion on the list about unstretchable grace note groups. The solution was to set GraceSpacing spacing-increment to zero. That is fine in all instances except for the one in the example. I'd like to get a little extra space between the c and a, and can't figure out what to tweak. The obvious (I thought) solution to insert s32 or so actually has the opposite effect, making the spacing even tighter. Any ideas are much appreciated. squeeze = { \override Score.GraceSpacing #'spacing-increment = #0 \override Score.Stem #'beamlet-max-length-proportion = #'(0.5 . 0.5) } \relative c'' { a {\squeeze \grace {\small c32[ a8 g32]}} a4 } Thanks a lot -- Sven Axelsson ++[>++>+++>++>++ ><-]>.+..>+.>+.<<-.>>+.>.<<. +++.>-.<<++.>>.<++.>>>++..>>.<. <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user