Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-10-16 Thread TiagoM

The extra-offset solves the problem of closeness between the arpeggio itself
and the notes. if the fingering is oriented right, the fingering numbers are
still far away. and even with extra-offset on the fingering, there will
still be a visible gap between everything (fingers arpeggio and notes) and
whatelse came before.

\version "2.10.25"
staffClassicalGuitar = \new Staff  {
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
<<
{ \relative c''
  \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
a'4  2.\arpeggio
   \override Fingering #'extra-offset = #'(2.2 . 0)
 \override Staff.Arpeggio #'extra-offset = #'(2.2 . 0.0 ) 
a'4  2.\arpeggio
}
\\
{a'4 a2.\arpeggio a'4 a2.\arpeggio }
>>
}

\score {
\staffClassicalGuitar
\layout {
\context { \Staff
\consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver"
}
}
} 
\paper {
  ragged-right=##t
}

Any solution for this?

Regards

Tiago


Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 
> 2007/8/14, Peter Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Peter Terpstra in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>>
>> > Arpeggio and lefthandfingering
>>
>> Nobody?
>>
>> I tried it with " \override Arpeggio #'force-hshift" and differt other
>> objectnames but the arpeggio doe not want to come close to the notes when
>> there is lefthandfingering.
> 
> Since you put the Span_arpeggio_engraver in the Staff context, you
> have to specify it when entering your \override; otherwise LilyPond
> doesn't know how to handle it.
> 
> For instance,
>   \override Staff.Arpeggio #'extra-offset = #'(2.2 . 0.0 )
> does the trick.
> 
> Regards,
> Valentin
> 
> 
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Arpeggio-and-lefthandfingering-tf4263370.html#a13241971
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-08-20 Thread Peter Terpstra
Mats Bengtsson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :


> If you want an arpeggio that spans two separate chords
> in the same stave, then you certainly need the trick to
> add Span_arpeggio_engraver in the Staff context.

Okay, Thanks.

P.


-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-08-20 Thread Mats Bengtsson

If you want an arpeggio that spans two separate chords
in the same stave, then you certainly need the trick to
add Span_arpeggio_engraver in the Staff context.

  /Mats

Peter Terpstra wrote:


Valentin Villenave in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

 


The lilypondtool provides met the span context, you think this is not
necessary?
 


I can't say I understand your question...
   



Sorry, used the wrong word. I was referring to:
 


Since you put the Span_arpeggio_engraver in the Staff context, you
have to specify it when entering your \override; otherwise LilyPond
doesn't know how to handle it.
   



The document wizzard (lilypondtool) provided me a staff context which i used
to create a template. Now the Staff context seems to give problems, so i
thought maybe i don't need it.

Kind regards,

  Peter




 




--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 
   Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-08-20 Thread Peter Terpstra
Valentin Villenave in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

>> The lilypondtool provides met the span context, you think this is not
>> necessary?
> 
> I can't say I understand your question...

Sorry, used the wrong word. I was referring to:
> Since you put the Span_arpeggio_engraver in the Staff context, you
> have to specify it when entering your \override; otherwise LilyPond
> doesn't know how to handle it.

The document wizzard (lilypondtool) provided me a staff context which i used
to create a template. Now the Staff context seems to give problems, so i
thought maybe i don't need it.

Kind regards,

   Peter




-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-08-20 Thread Valentin Villenave
2007/8/20, Peter Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> The lilypondtool provides met the span context, you think this is not
> necessary?

I can't say I understand your question... Could you be more specific?
Maybe you're refering to the (veryveryvery useful, I use it 50 times a
day) dialog box which pops up when you want to move an object in the
JPedal PDF viewer, with the "Override grop property" checkbox, you
have to select first the context of your grob, then the appropriate
grob. However, these are the defaults contexts and engravers; whenever
you modify the context associated to an engraver (in this case, the
Span_arpeggio_engraver), LilyPondTool's default settings are no longer
relevant.

(Maybe you're talking about something else, just tell me if you're.)

Regards,
Valentin


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-08-20 Thread Peter Terpstra
Valentin Villenave in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

Still have a qeustion.

> Since you put the Span_arpeggio_engraver in the Staff context, you
> have to specify it when entering your \override; otherwise LilyPond
> doesn't know how to handle it.

The lilypondtool provides met the span context, you think this is not
necessary?

Kind Regards,

   Peter


-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-08-19 Thread Peter Terpstra
Valentin Villenave in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

> For instance,
> \override Staff.Arpeggio #'extra-offset = #'(2.2 . 0.0 )
> does the trick.

Thank you very very much! This helps.

Kind Regards,

   Peter

-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-08-19 Thread Valentin Villenave
2007/8/14, Peter Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Peter Terpstra in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>
> > Arpeggio and lefthandfingering
>
> Nobody?
>
> I tried it with " \override Arpeggio #'force-hshift" and differt other
> objectnames but the arpeggio doe not want to come close to the notes when
> there is lefthandfingering.

Since you put the Span_arpeggio_engraver in the Staff context, you
have to specify it when entering your \override; otherwise LilyPond
doesn't know how to handle it.

For instance,
  \override Staff.Arpeggio #'extra-offset = #'(2.2 . 0.0 )
does the trick.

Regards,
Valentin


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

2007-08-14 Thread Peter Terpstra
Peter Terpstra in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

> Arpeggio and lefthandfingering

Nobody?

I tried it with " \override Arpeggio #'force-hshift" and differt other
objectnames but the arpeggio doe not want to come close to the notes when
there is lefthandfingering.

Kind Regards,

   Peter

-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user