Re: Increasing grace note separation

2011-01-02 Thread Nick Payne 


  
  
On 03/01/11 10:36, Sven Axelsson wrote:

  I have just now started using the latest 2.13 (2.12.2 before), and
noticed that the inter-note spacing has been tightened in some
instances. I have recently had a discussion on the list about
unstretchable grace note groups. The solution was to set GraceSpacing
spacing-increment to zero. That is fine in all instances except for
the one in the example. I'd like to get a little extra space between
the c and a, and can't figure out what to tweak. The obvious (I
thought) solution to insert s32 or so actually has the opposite
effect, making the spacing even tighter.

Any ideas are much appreciated.

squeeze = {
\override Score.GraceSpacing #'spacing-increment = #0
\override Score.Stem #'beamlet-max-length-proportion = #'(0.5 . 0.5)
}
\relative c'' {
a {\squeeze \grace {\small c32[ a8 g32]}} a4
}



\version "2.13.44"

squeeze = {
 \override Score.GraceSpacing #'spacing-increment = #0
 \override Score.Stem #'beamlet-max-length-proportion = #'(0.5 .
0.5)
}

stemspace = #(define-music-function (parser location extent) (pair?)
#{
 \once \override Staff.Stem #'X-extent = #$extent
#})

\relative c'' {
 a {\squeeze \grace {\small \stemspace #'(0 . 0.5) c32[ a8 g32]}}
a4
}



Nick
  

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Increasing grace note separation

2011-01-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG 

 I have recently had a discussion on the list about unstretchable
 grace note groups. The solution was to set GraceSpacing
 spacing-increment to zero. That is fine in all instances except for
 the one in the example.

 \relative c'' {
 a {\squeeze \grace {\small \stemspace #'(0 . 0.5) c32[ a8 g32]}} a4
 }

This is a nice ad-hoc solution, but the whole issue rather smells like
a spacing bug, triggered by some untypical conditions...  Can you
isolate the problem, providing a minimal example?


Werner

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Increasing grace note separation

2011-01-02 Thread Sven Axelsson 
On 3 January 2011 06:18, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:

 I have recently had a discussion on the list about unstretchable
 grace note groups. The solution was to set GraceSpacing
 spacing-increment to zero. That is fine in all instances except for
 the one in the example.

 \relative c'' {
     a {\squeeze \grace {\small \stemspace #'(0 . 0.5) c32[ a8 g32]}} a4
 }

 This is a nice ad-hoc solution, but the whole issue rather smells like
 a spacing bug, triggered by some untypical conditions...  Can you
 isolate the problem, providing a minimal example?

Well, I get the same problem without squeezing the grace note group.
It is really only happening for beamlets to the right, so here's a
minified example.

\relative c'' {
a { \grace {\small b32[ g8]}} a4
}

Also try the original example witout any fixups, and notice the
disproportionate spacing, caused of course by the different note
lengths. But it looks pretty bad.

-- 
Sven Axelsson
++[+
-].+..+.+.-.+...
+++.-.++..++.++....
attachment: tight spacing with beamlets to the right.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user