Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:17 AM Valentin Villenave
 wrote:
>
> I’ve received reports from two FreeBSD users that the x86_64 installer
> doesn’t work.
> - One said that the binary isn’t recognized as an "amd64" arch (he’s
> using FreeBSD 12.0 on a core i7).

I saw the same thing; apparently FreeBSD wants to see "amd64" and
LilyPond gives "x86_64" instead. The installer still resulted in a
working LilyPond, though...

> - Another user has extracted the sh installer using -E option, then
> decompressing the tar.bz2 archive; however he couldn’t launch lilypond
> because of incompatible libs:
> "Shared object "libm.so.4" not found" (his distro has .5).

...after following Masamichi Hosoda's advice to install compat6x,
which resolved the libm.so.# error.




-- 
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Valentin Villenave]

On 2/6/19, Karlin High  wrote:
> I got the LilyPond app extracted from .tar.bz and it opens and runs.

Greetings Knut,

I’ve received reports from two FreeBSD users that the x86_64 installer
doesn’t work.
- One said that the binary isn’t recognized as an "amd64" arch (he’s
using FreeBSD 12.0 on a core i7).
- Another user has extracted the sh installer using -E option, then
decompressing the tar.bz2 archive; however he couldn’t launch lilypond
because of incompatible libs:
"Shared object "libm.so.4" not found" (his distro has .5).

Cheers,
V.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Knut Petersen]

On 05.02.19 00:36, Karlin High wrote:

On 1/29/2019 3:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:

lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh

Intel Core i5-3450 3.10 GHz
Windows 7 Pro 64-bit SP1
VirtualBox 5.2.22r126460
VM with 2 cores and 4 GB RAM

$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd32-vbox 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  i386

# pkg install compat6x-i386

And it seems to work. A simple C-Major scale compiled just fine.

Ok.


It does look like there would be some further issues to resolve,
dependencies perhaps. I was going to give it a good test by compiling
the Heinrich Schütz "Schwanengesang" Psalm 119 that Brent Annable had
posted back in May 2018 - makes 194 pages. LilyPond parsed and
interpreted music and preprocessed graphical objects, then said "fatal
error: cannot allocate 70423 bytes."


Hmm ... 32bit ... 194 pages ... it could be that job really consumed all usable 
memory ;-)


I tried convert-ly, it gave a Python error that ended with "Undefined
symbol "PyString_Type"

Executing lilypond/usr/bin/python said: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libstdc++.so.6" not found, required by "python"


Direct execution of binaries in lilypond/usr/bin is not expected to  work, they 
need some help ... see ~/bin/lilypond-wrapper.python.



That's about as far as I want to go here; the test was mainly just for
the installer.


Thanks for your help.

Knut


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On 1/29/2019 3:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh

Intel Core i5-3450 3.10 GHz
Windows 7 Pro 64-bit SP1
VirtualBox 5.2.22r126460
VM with 2 cores and 4 GB RAM

$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd32-vbox 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  i386

# pkg install compat6x-i386

And it seems to work. A simple C-Major scale compiled just fine.

It does look like there would be some further issues to resolve,
dependencies perhaps. I was going to give it a good test by compiling
the Heinrich Schütz "Schwanengesang" Psalm 119 that Brent Annable had
posted back in May 2018 - makes 194 pages. LilyPond parsed and
interpreted music and preprocessed graphical objects, then said "fatal
error: cannot allocate 70423 bytes."

I tried convert-ly, it gave a Python error that ended with "Undefined
symbol "PyString_Type"

Executing lilypond/usr/bin/python said: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libstdc++.so.6" not found, required by "python"

That's about as far as I want to go here; the test was mainly just for
the installer.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Knut Petersen]

Hi Karlin!


Maybe, installing compat6x package is required.

# pkg install compat6x-amd64

...and it did indeed fix the issue. LilyPond seems fully functional.

Next, I want to make a FreeBSD 32-bit VM, and see about reviving an
iMac G5 to test the PowerPC installers. Although I doubt there's a
very big user base for those.


Thanks for your help!

Yes, some of the installers target somewhat aged platforms ... but as long as 
the installers are functional and don't cause too much work to maintain there's 
no reason  not to keep them around.

Knut


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

> > ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "lilypond"
> >
> > Are there any further efforts anyone would like to see made here?
>
> Maybe, installing compat6x package is required.

# pkg install compat6x-amd64

...and it did indeed fix the issue. LilyPond seems fully functional.

Next, I want to make a FreeBSD 32-bit VM, and see about reviving an
iMac G5 to test the PowerPC installers. Although I doubt there's a
very big user base for those.
-- 
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Masamichi Hosoda]

> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD freebsd-hyperv 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  
> amd64

> ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "lilypond"
> 
> Are there any further efforts anyone would like to see made here?

Maybe, installing compat6x package is required.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:20 AM Knut Petersen  wrote:

> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh

I have little experience with FreeBSD, but decided to have a go at this.

Intel Core i5-2400 3.10 GHz
Windows 10 Pro x64 Version 1803
Hyper-V virtual machine, 2 processors and 2 GB RAM

$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd-hyperv 12.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE r341666 GENERIC  amd64

Executing the LilyPond installer goes like this. I renamed the installer

lilypond installer for version 2.21.0 release 1,
x86_64 build.
For a list of options, abort (^C) then do:
sh ./lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh --help

Warning: this build is not optimized for your architecture;
please install a amd64 build instead.

Press C to install the program anyway (not recommended),
E to only extract the program files, or any other key to exit.

Well, I pressed C. This is what VMs are for, right? Install seemed to
go OK. But running lilypond says this:

ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "lilypond"

Are there any further efforts anyone would like to see made here?
-- 
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Abraham Lee]

Hi, Knut, et al!

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:19 AM Knut Petersen 
wrote:

> Hi everybody
>
> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by
> an updated version of our build system GUB:
>
> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
>
> There you'll find
> ...
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
> ...
> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report
> success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results
> already have been posted.
>
> Knut
>

Installation + Compile works on my Windows 8.1 (64-bit) machine.

Best,
Abraham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Jonathan Armitage]

Since no-one else seems to have tried this particular combination:

It works fine (on fairly simple files) on Mac Mini (Late 2014) 2.6GHz 
i5, OS X Mojave 10.14.2.


Jon

On 29/01/2019 21:52, Michael Käppler wrote:

Am 29.01.2019 um 10:19 schrieb Knut Petersen:


lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh

Works fine, Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, Kernel 4.15.0-36-generic running as 
guest in VirtualBox 5.2.22 r126460, host Windows 10 Version 1803.


lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe


Works fine too, Windows 10 Version 1803.

Thank you all for your great work!

Michael


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Henning Hraban Ramm]

Am 2019-01-30 um 09:45 schrieb Knut Petersen :

> Thanks for testing the installers. Below I try to summarize your results:

Thanks for your work!
(And to everyone involved, of course!)

>  lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2 
> OK:
>   • Works on MacBook Air (mid 2012) with Intel Core i5 and macOS Mojave 
> 10.14.2 [Karlin High]
>   • iMac with High Sierra (installer worked ok but Michael reports a 
> problem with lilypond not finding the external lilyjazz font) [Michael Hendry]

Looks OK on Mac mini Server Core i7 (2013) and OSX 10.9.5: works. Long 
first-run delay, to be expected. Chokes on my old code, didn’t check further.


Greetlings, Hraban
---
fiëé visuëlle
Henning Hraban Ramm
https://www.fiee.net





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Michael Hendry]

> On 29 Jan 2019, at 19:00, Urs Liska  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Am 29. Januar 2019 19:47:07 MEZ schrieb Michael Hendry 
> :
>>> On 29 Jan 2019, at 09:19, Knut Petersen 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everybody
>>> 
>>> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond,
>> generated by an updated version of our build system GUB:
>>> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
>>> There you'll find
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
>>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
>>> lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
>>> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and
>> report success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical
>> test results already have been posted.
>>> 
>>> Knut
>>> ___
>>> lilypond-user mailing list
>>> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>> 
>> Failed with a previously successfully compiled leadsheet file. Same
>> result after running convert.ly.
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> 
>> Starting lilypond 2.21.0 [Swing 39.ly]...
>> Processing `/Users/michaelhendry/LilyPond Working/Swing 39/Swing 39.ly'
>> Parsing...
>> Interpreting
>> music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][192][200][208][216][224][224]
>> Preprocessing graphical objects...
>> fatal error: cannot find font: `lilyjazz-11'
>> Exited with return code 1.
> 
> If you use alternative notation fonts you have to "install" them for every 
> new LilyPond installation.

Thanks, I hadn’t been aware of that and had assumed that “installation” was a 
system-wide procedure. 

Michael


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Thomas Scharkowski]

LilyPond 2.21.0 installation works here:

macOS Mojave 10.14.2
iMac late 2013
Frescobaldi 2.20.0

I have tested several files, everything seems to be ok.

For one file 2.21.0 shows these errors, though:
...
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 113.948878
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 114.051065
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 114.330572
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 115.915120
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 116.017228
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 113.811024 ~= 116.017228
continuing, cross fingers
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 2 or 3 pages...
...
Success: compilation successfully completed

The result is ok, I don't know what the error messages mean.

No errors with 2.19.82

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Paolo Cantamessa]

Tested with:

CPU Intel Core i5-6200U 2,30 GHz 4 GB RAM
Win 10 Home 1809

Works fine!

Thank-you for all your great work!

Paolo



[image: Mailtrack]

Sender
notified by
Mailtrack

30/01/19,
10:22:59




Il giorno mer 30 gen 2019 alle ore 09:46 Knut Petersen <
knut_peter...@t-online.de> ha scritto:

> Hi everybody!
>
> Thanks for testing the installers. Below I try to summarize your results:
>
> *lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh *
>
> OK:
>
>- Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (bionic), running under Windows Subsystem for
>Linux  Windows 10 Version 1803 (OS Build 17134.523) [Aaron Hill]
>- [Johan Vromans]
>- Debian 9 stretch [David Wright]
>- Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS [Paul Morris]
>
> *lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh  *
>
> OK:
>
>- Debian 9 stretch [David Wright]
>
> *lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe*
>
> OK:
>
>- Windows 10 Pro 64-bit version 1803. [Karlin High]
>- Windows 10 Home on Intel Core i7-7500U cpu [Trevor Daniels]
>- Windows 10 Home 1809, installation proceeds without problems.
>[Matthias Böhringer]
>- Windows 10 Version 1803. [Michael Käppler]
>
> * lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2 *
>
> OK:
>
>- Works on MacBook Air (mid 2012) with Intel Core i5 and macOS Mojave
>10.14.2 [Karlin High]
>- iMac with High Sierra (installer worked ok but Michael reports a
>problem with lilypond not finding the external lilyjazz font) [Michael
>Hendry]
>
> *No test reports for*
>
>
>- lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>- lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>- lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>- lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>
> Knut
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Knut Petersen]

Hi everybody!

Thanks for testing the installers. Below I try to summarize your results:

*lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh*

   OK:

 * Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (bionic), running under Windows Subsystem for Linux  
Windows 10 Version 1803 (OS Build 17134.523) [Aaron Hill]
 * [Johan Vromans]
 * Debian 9 stretch [David Wright]
 * Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS [Paul Morris]

***lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh *

   OK:

 * Debian 9 stretch [David Wright]

*lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe*

   OK:

 * Windows 10 Pro 64-bit version 1803. [Karlin High]
 * Windows 10 Home on Intel Core i7-7500U cpu [Trevor Daniels]
 * Windows 10 Home 1809, installation proceeds without problems. [Matthias 
Böhringer]
 * Windows 10 Version 1803. [Michael Käppler]

* lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2 *

   OK:

 * Works on MacBook Air (mid 2012) with Intel Core i5 and macOS Mojave 
10.14.2 [Karlin High]
 * iMac with High Sierra (installer worked ok but Michael reports a problem 
with lilypond not finding the external lilyjazz font) [Michael Hendry]

*No test reports for*

 * lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
 * lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
 * lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
 * lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh

Knut


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Michael Käppler]

Am 29.01.2019 um 10:19 schrieb Knut Petersen:


lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh


Works fine, Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, Kernel 4.15.0-36-generic running as
guest in VirtualBox 5.2.22 r126460, host Windows 10 Version 1803.


lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe


Works fine too, Windows 10 Version 1803.

Thank you all for your great work!

Michael

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Paul Morris]

On 1/29/19 1:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:


Paul Morris  writes:


On 1/29/19 4:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:


lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh

Installed on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS and tested with a couple of
pieces. Everything appears to be working fine.

Thanks to all for the work on GUB and the next stable LilyPond release!

Well, 21.0 is the next unstable release...


Ah, yes, I didn't intend to imply otherwise, but I see how what I wrote 
could have been misleading.  (I was just thinking along the lines of 
'work on GUB contributes to the release of the next stable', but I may 
not be fully aware of all the details there.)


Thanks for the clarification.

-Paul


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[David Wright]

On Tue 29 Jan 2019 at 13:56:00 (-0600), David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 29 Jan 2019 at 10:19:33 (+0100), Knut Petersen wrote:
> > Hi everybody
> > 
> > Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by 
> > an updated version of our build system GUB:
> > 
> >https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
> > 
> > There you'll find
> > 
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
> >lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
> >lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
> > 
> > Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
> > success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
> > already have been posted.
> 
> I downloaded and installed lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh.
> Running this on a couple of scores, things looked fine.

And just the same with lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh,
both these on Debian 9 stretch.

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[David Wright]

On Tue 29 Jan 2019 at 10:19:33 (+0100), Knut Petersen wrote:
> Hi everybody
> 
> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by an 
> updated version of our build system GUB:
> 
>https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
> 
> There you'll find
> 
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
>lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
>lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
> 
> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
> success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
> already have been posted.

I downloaded and installed lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh.
Running this on a couple of scores, things looked fine.
(One slight spacing difference in comparison with 2.19.80.)

The tree of files has some differences, but I don't know enough
about where things should be to have an opinion on what's right/better.

The only thing that might concern you is that I went to the web page
above, RightClicked on the file I wanted, selected 'Copy link location'
and pasted the result as the target of wget.

Here's the resulting dialogue:

$ wget 
https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu/download?path=%2F&files=lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
[1] 24275
$ --2019-01-29 12:58:33-- 
https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu/download?path=%2F
Resolving cloud.ursliska.de (cloud.ursliska.de)... 85.25.3.15
Connecting to cloud.ursliska.de (cloud.ursliska.de)|85.25.3.15|:443... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [application/zip]
Saving to: ‘download?path=%2F’

download?path=%2F[<=>] 245.60M  
2.14MB/sin 2m 48s

2019-01-29 13:01:24 (1.46 MB/s) - ‘download?path=%2F’ saved [257530138]

^C
[1]+  Done  wget 
https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu/download?path=%2F
$ 

In other words, I got the lot. It doesn't concern me, but you might
prefer less traffic on the site.

Archive:  download?path=%2F
  Length  DateTimeName
-  -- -   
0  2019-01-29 18:58   gub/
 26609979  2019-01-29 07:36   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
 26597456  2019-01-29 07:37   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
 31320357  2019-01-29 07:38   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
 28015239  2019-01-29 07:38   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
 31292293  2019-01-29 07:39   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
 30542915  2019-01-29 07:40   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
 31158331  2019-01-29 07:41   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
 34771252  2019-01-29 07:42   gub/lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
 17220012  2019-01-29 07:35   gub/lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
- ---
257527834 10 files

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Hans Åberg]

> On 29 Jan 2019, at 20:00, Urs Liska  wrote:
> 
> If you use alternative notation fonts you have to "install" them for every 
> new LilyPond installation.

On MacOS it used used to work installing as a system font, and then only once 
is required. Tried with Bravura.otf.



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Urs Liska]

Am 29. Januar 2019 19:47:07 MEZ schrieb Michael Hendry 
:
>> On 29 Jan 2019, at 09:19, Knut Petersen 
>wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everybody
>> 
>> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond,
>generated by an updated version of our build system GUB:
>> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
>> There you'll find
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
>> lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
>> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and
>report success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical
>test results already have been posted.
>> 
>> Knut
>> ___
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>Failed with a previously successfully compiled leadsheet file. Same
>result after running convert.ly.
>
>Michael
>
>
> Starting lilypond 2.21.0 [Swing 39.ly]...
>Processing `/Users/michaelhendry/LilyPond Working/Swing 39/Swing 39.ly'
>Parsing...
>Interpreting
>music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][192][200][208][216][224][224]
>Preprocessing graphical objects...
>fatal error: cannot find font: `lilyjazz-11'
>Exited with return code 1.

If you use alternative notation fonts you have to "install" them for every new 
LilyPond installation.

>___
>lilypond-devel mailing list
>lilypond-de...@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Michael Hendry]

> On 29 Jan 2019, at 09:19, Knut Petersen  wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody
> 
> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by an 
> updated version of our build system GUB:
> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
> There you'll find
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
> lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
> success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
> already have been posted.
> 
> Knut
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

PS Apologies, should have said I’m using an iMac with High Sierra, and had 
launched the compilation from Frescobaldi.

Michael


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Michael Hendry]

> On 29 Jan 2019, at 09:19, Knut Petersen  wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody
> 
> Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by an 
> updated version of our build system GUB:
> https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu
> There you'll find
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
> lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
> Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
> success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
> already have been posted.
> 
> Knut
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Failed with a previously successfully compiled leadsheet file. Same result 
after running convert.ly.

Michael


 Starting lilypond 2.21.0 [Swing 39.ly]...
Processing `/Users/michaelhendry/LilyPond Working/Swing 39/Swing 39.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting 
music...[8][16][24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][152][160][168][176][184][192][200][208][216][224][224]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
fatal error: cannot find font: `lilyjazz-11'
Exited with return code 1.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Paul Morris]

On 1/29/19 4:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:


lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh


Installed on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS and tested with a couple of pieces. 
Everything appears to be working fine.


Thanks to all for the work on GUB and the next stable LilyPond release!

-Paul


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[David Kastrup]

Paul Morris  writes:

> On 1/29/19 4:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:
>
>> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>
> Installed on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS and tested with a couple of
> pieces. Everything appears to be working fine.
>
> Thanks to all for the work on GUB and the next stable LilyPond release!

Well, 21.0 is the next unstable release...

-- 
David Kastrup

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[David Wright]

On Tue 29 Jan 2019 at 12:19:11 (+0100), Johan Vromans wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:19:33 +0100, Knut Petersen
>  wrote:
> 
> > lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
> 
> I tried an install into /opt/lilypond. I do not have access to /opt but the
> folder /opt/lilypond is completely mine.
> 
> The help says it will install into PREFIX/lilypond, but it also tries to
> install scripts outside this directory in PREFIX/bin.

Yes, PREFIX/lilypond contains the distribution and PREFIX/bin is for
all the wrappers which can go into your PATH.

So, if /opt/lilypond is under your control, you'd normally put a
distribution into, say, PREFIX/lilypond/lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64
which (a) makes it trivial to support multiple versions and (b)
means you can put, say, your own local lilypond-support-programs
into /opt/lilypond without polluting the distribution.

> It refuses to install into an existing (even empty¹) directory. While this
> may be good in some cases, it would be nice if this could be overridden.
> 
> Fun fact: The script first checks if the directory exists and bails out if
> so. If not, it carefully checks if the directory exists before creating
> it :).

Creating the top-level directory is safe. Anything else risks
polluting the distribution with other files. It's trivial to
move the new lilypond-xxx tree yourself after it's been created
and, that way, you take responsibility for any merging or overwriting
that takes place as a result.

So it's not worth putting the complication² into the installer
rather than leaving it as the responsibility of the sysadmin.

> I choose to install with PREFIX=/opt/lilypond and everything went fine.
> 
>$ /opt/lilypond/bin/lilypond --version
>GNU LilyPond 2.21.0
> 
> Verified some scores with Frescobaldi, looks ok.
> 
> Good job!

¹ It's no big deal to install into PREFIX=…//
and then type
  mv …///* …//
  rmdir …//

² for example, what happens when there's a file in the distribution
whose name coincides with a directory in the target? (Or vice versa.)
If you decide under those circumstances to back out, who's responsible
for cleaning up the files already written? We now need a manifest with
MD5s so the installer can distinguish its own files from the ones that
were or were not overwritten.

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Matthias Böhringer]

Hello there,

seems to work just fine: Windows 10 Home 1809, installation proceeds 
without problems.


I tested one small file with Frescobaldi (so, Frescobladi, too, seems to 
do Just The Right Thing(TM)), and this was (type)set without problems.


HTH
Matthias


Am 29.01.2019 um 10:19 schrieb Knut Petersen:

Hi everybody

Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated 
by an updated version of our build system GUB:


https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu

There you'll find

lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz

Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and 
report success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test 
results already have been posted.


Knut


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




--
Matthias Böhringer
Brunnenstraße 6
72296 Schopfloch-Unteriflingen

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On 1/29/2019 3:19 AM, Knut Petersen wrote:

    lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2


Works on MacBook Air (mid 2012) with Intel Core i5 and macOS Mojave 10.14.2
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Urs Liska]

Am 29.01.19 um 13:06 schrieb Trevor:
Looking good! Many thanks to David, Knut, Urs and all those involved 
in generating this release!



Just to be clear (I assume you know it but your comment might mislead 
others): What is currently being discussed is testing LilyPond's 
cross-platform build system. The installers that I uploaded to my cloud 
are *not* a "release"!


Best
Urs

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Trevor]

Knut Petersen wrote 29/01/2019 09:19:33

Urs Liska provides installers for branch master of lilypond, generated by an 
updated version of our build system GUB:

   https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/QPINwLqJNeVslCu

There you'll find

   lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
   lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
   lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz

Please test if those files provide valid lilypond installations and report 
success / failure by replying to this thread if no identical test results 
already have been posted.
The mingw.exe download appears to work fine in Frescobaldi running under 
Windows 10 Home on Intel Core i7-7500U cpu. I'll continue to use it for 
all future typesetting.


Looking good! Many thanks to David, Knut, Urs and all those involved in 
generating this release!


Trevor
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Werner LEMBERG]

> The help says it will install into PREFIX/lilypond, but it also
> tries to install scripts outside this directory in PREFIX/bin.
> 
> It refuses to install into an existing (even empty) directory. While
> this may be good in some cases, it would be nice if this could be
> overridden.

Please send this to `bug-lilypond' so that issues can created.


Werner

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Johan Vromans]

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:21:43 +0100, Urs Liska  wrote:

> Are these observations specific to that new GUB build, or would the 
> downloaded release behave the same?

AFAICS the release download (2.18.2-1) behaves the same.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Urs Liska]

Am 29.01.19 um 12:19 schrieb Johan Vromans:

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:19:33 +0100, Knut Petersen
 wrote:


 lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh

I tried an install into /opt/lilypond. I do not have access to /opt but the
folder /opt/lilypond is completely mine.

The help says it will install into PREFIX/lilypond, but it also tries to
install scripts outside this directory in PREFIX/bin.

It refuses to install into an existing (even empty) directory. While this
may be good in some cases, it would be nice if this could be overridden.



Are these observations specific to that new GUB build, or would the 
downloaded release behave the same?

This would be a relatively important difference in the current context.

Urs


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Johan Vromans]

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:19:33 +0100, Knut Petersen
 wrote:

> lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh

I tried an install into /opt/lilypond. I do not have access to /opt but the
folder /opt/lilypond is completely mine.

The help says it will install into PREFIX/lilypond, but it also tries to
install scripts outside this directory in PREFIX/bin.

It refuses to install into an existing (even empty) directory. While this
may be good in some cases, it would be nice if this could be overridden.

Fun fact: The script first checks if the directory exists and bails out if
so. If not, it carefully checks if the directory exists before creating
it :).

I choose to install with PREFIX=/opt/lilypond and everything went fine.

   $ /opt/lilypond/bin/lilypond --version
   GNU LilyPond 2.21.0

Verified some scores with Frescobaldi, looks ok.

Good job!

-- Johan

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Karlin High]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:20 AM Knut Petersen  wrote:
> lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe

Seems to work on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit version 1803.

And it's definitely LilyPond 2.21 because it choked on \partcombine
and needed \partCombine instead. Fixed with convert-ly.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Please test new lilypond installers

[Aaron Hill]

On 2019-01-29 1:19 am, Knut Petersen wrote:


   lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh


Tested on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (bionic)
  Running under Windows Subsystem for Linux
  Windows 10 Version 1803 (OS Build 17134.523)

Installation worked for both non-sudo and sudo.

Compiled a few projects with no errors.  Results seem acceptable.

-- Aaron Hill

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user