Re: allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation
Thanks Jeff, (btw, it has been way too long since we have spoken and it is great to hear from you even if through this list). You kind of nailed it on the head. I want to allow illegible accidentals so that I can adjust the spacing to make them legible. Since those collisions are avoided at all costs, I cannot even begin to guess if they would be colliding in a totally strict situation. Best, Mike On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:04 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 22:04:00 -0800 > From: Jeffrey Trevino > To: lilypond-user > Subject: Re: allowing any horizontal collision in proportional > notation > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Michael, > > Do you still want legible accidentals? In that case, you might just invent > an alternate notation that gives you exact horizontal spacing by > eliminating all traditionally placed accidentals and places them over the > notes instead. > > or something, > Jeff > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Michael Winter > wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not >> allow collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any >> collision such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? >> Or maybe I am missing something >> >> Many thanks in advance, >> >> Mike >> >> ___ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> > > > > -- > Jeff Trevi?o > PhD Candidate in Music Composition > @ the University of California, San Diego > Skype: jeffreytrevino > E-mail: jeffrey.trev...@gmail.com > Web: www.jeffreytrevino.com > Cell: (619)565-9611 > 9310H Redwood Dr. > La Jolla, CA 92037 > USA ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation
Hi Michael, Do you still want legible accidentals? In that case, you might just invent an alternate notation that gives you exact horizontal spacing by eliminating all traditionally placed accidentals and places them over the notes instead. or something, Jeff On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Michael Winter wrote: > Dear All, > > It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not > allow collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any > collision such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? > Or maybe I am missing something > > Many thanks in advance, > > Mike > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > -- Jeff Treviño PhD Candidate in Music Composition @ the University of California, San Diego Skype: jeffreytrevino E-mail: jeffrey.trev...@gmail.com Web: www.jeffreytrevino.com Cell: (619)565-9611 9310H Redwood Dr. La Jolla, CA 92037 USA ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation
Dear All, It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not allow collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any collision such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? Or maybe I am missing something Many thanks in advance, Mike ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
allowing any horizontal collision in proportional notation
Dear All, It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not allow collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any collision such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? Or maybe I am missing something Many thanks in advance, Mike ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
