Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes?
Le 27/10/2020 à 17:21, 98123981293 1293812397123 a écrit :
Hi Aaron,
I tried all three of your solutions and get the same error:
Unsupported SCM value for format: (rmoveto 2.777338 1/2 rcurveto
1.81180552352106 0 5.43541657056318 -1 5.43541657056318 -3/2)
Converting to `document.pdf'...
warning: `(gs -q -dNODISPLAY -dNOSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH
-dAutoRotatePages=/None -dPrinted=false ./tmp--tmp-1982250)' failed (1)
I appreciate the attempt though. Will keep this in the back of my mind
for future learning; for now will probably just use regular glissando.
-Kyle
Hello,
In recent versions of LilyPond (2.21.5 and higher), you have to remove
inner quoting when constructing stencils:
\version "2.20.0"
bend-glissando-print =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((lnh (ly:spanner-bound grob LEFT))
(rnh (ly:spanner-bound grob RIGHT))
(lsp (ly:grob-staff-position lnh))
(rsp (ly:grob-staff-position rnh))
(dy (/ (- rsp lsp) 2))
(dot (ly:grob-object lnh 'dot))
(acc (ly:grob-object rnh 'accidental-grob))
(th (* (ly:grob-property grob 'thickness 1)
(ly:output-def-lookup (ly:grob-layout grob)
'line-thickness)))
(pad (ly:grob-property grob 'padding 0.5))
(cmx (ly:grob-common-refpoint
(ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh X) rnh X))
(cmy (ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh Y))
(lx (+ pad (max (interval-end (ly:generic-bound-extent lnh cmx))
(if dot
(interval-end
(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent dot cmx X))
(- INFINITY-INT)
(rx (- (min (interval-start (ly:generic-bound-extent rnh cmx))
(if acc
(interval-start
(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent acc cmx X))
INFINITY-INT))
pad))
(dx (- rx lx))
(sx (ly:grob-relative-coordinate grob cmx X)))
(ly:make-stencil
(list 'path th
` ; (quote
(rmoveto ,(- lx sx) ,(/ lsp 2)
rcurveto ,(/ dx 3) 0 ,dx ,(* dy 2/3) ,dx ,dy)) ; )
(cons (- lx sx) (- rx sx))
(cons (+ (/ lsp 2) (min 0 dy)) (+ (/ lsp 2) (max 0 dy))
bendGlissando =
\tweak thickness #2
\tweak stencil #bend-glissando-print
\glissando
{ c''2. \bendGlissando
\once \override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
e'4 gis'1 }
Best regards,
Jean
Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes?
Hi Aaron,
I tried all three of your solutions and get the same error:
Unsupported SCM value for format: (rmoveto 2.777338 1/2 rcurveto
1.81180552352106 0 5.43541657056318 -1 5.43541657056318 -3/2)
Converting to `document.pdf'...
warning: `(gs -q -dNODISPLAY -dNOSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH
-dAutoRotatePages=/None -dPrinted=false ./tmp--tmp-1982250)' failed (1)
I appreciate the attempt though. Will keep this in the back of my mind for
future learning; for now will probably just use regular glissando.
-Kyle
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:58 AM wrote:
> Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes? (Aaron Hill)
>2. Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes? (Aaron Hill)
>3. Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes? (Aaron Hill)
>4. Problems with Barré (sir.teddy.the.fi...@gmail.com)
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Aaron Hill
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 22:54:31 -0700
> Subject: Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes?
> On 2020-10-26 7:37 pm, 98123981293 1293812397123 wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I usually use the following snippet to handle glissandi across hidden
> > noteheads:
> >
> > glissandoSkipOn = {
> > \override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
> > \hide NoteHead
> > \override Accidental.transparent = ##t
> > \override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
> > }
> >
> > is it possible to implement something similar for bendAfter? A quick
> > check
> > of the archives did not reveal anything relevant but please link me if
> > this
> > has already been covered. Pic attached with the line as I want it to
> > look
> > in green.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kyle
>
> The Glissando_engraver knows to look for glissando-skip, however no such
> logic exists for Bend_engraver. It would be possible to re-write the
> engraver and introduce a new bend-skip context property, however a
> perhaps simpler option is to change the stencil for a glissando to look
> like a bend:
>
>
> \version "2.20.0"
>
> bend-glissando-print =
> #(lambda (grob)
>(let* ((lnh (ly:spanner-bound grob LEFT))
> (rnh (ly:spanner-bound grob RIGHT))
> (lsp (ly:grob-staff-position lnh))
> (rsp (ly:grob-staff-position rnh))
> (dy (/ (- rsp lsp) 2))
> (dot (ly:grob-object lnh 'dot))
> (acc (ly:grob-object rnh 'accidental-grob))
> (th (* (ly:grob-property grob 'thickness 1)
> (ly:output-def-lookup (ly:grob-layout grob)
>'line-thickness)))
> (pad (ly:grob-property grob 'padding 0.5))
> (cmx (ly:grob-common-refpoint
> (ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh X) rnh X))
> (cmy (ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh Y))
> (lx (+ pad (max (interval-end (ly:generic-bound-extent lnh
> cmx))
> (if dot
> (interval-end
>(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent dot cmx
> X))
> (- INFINITY-INT)
> (rx (- (min (interval-start (ly:generic-bound-extent rnh cmx))
> (if acc
> (interval-start
>(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent acc cmx X))
> INFINITY-INT))
> pad))
> (dx (- rx lx))
> (sx (ly:grob-relative-coordinate grob cmx X)))
> (ly:make-stencil
>(list 'path th
> `(quote
>(rmoveto ,(- lx sx) 0.5
> rcurveto ,(/ dx 3) 0 ,dx ,(* dy 2/3) ,dx ,dy)))
>(cons (- lx sx) (- rx sx))
> (cons (+ 0.5 (min 0 dy)) (+ 0.5 (max 0 dy))
>
> bendGlissando =
>\tweak thickness #2
>\tweak stencil #bend-glissando-print
>\glissando
>
> { c''2. \bendGlissando
>\once \override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
>e'4 gis'1 }
>
>
>
> -- Aaron Hill
>
>
> ---
Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes?
On 2020-10-26 10:56 pm, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2020-10-26 10:54 pm, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2020-10-26 7:37 pm, 98123981293 1293812397123 wrote:
Hi list,
I usually use the following snippet to handle glissandi across hidden
noteheads:
glissandoSkipOn = {
\override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
\hide NoteHead
\override Accidental.transparent = ##t
\override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
}
is it possible to implement something similar for bendAfter? A quick
check
of the archives did not reveal anything relevant but please link me
if this
has already been covered. Pic attached with the line as I want it to
look
in green.
Thank you,
Kyle
The Glissando_engraver knows to look for glissando-skip, however no
such logic exists for Bend_engraver. It would be possible to re-write
the engraver and introduce a new bend-skip context property, however a
perhaps simpler option is to change the stencil for a glissando to
look like a bend:
[...]
Sorry, I pasted an old version of the code that did not handle the
vertical alignment properly:
[...]
Grr. I must be getting really tired. One more attempt and then I give
up:
\version "2.20.0"
bend-glissando-print =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((lnh (ly:spanner-bound grob LEFT))
(rnh (ly:spanner-bound grob RIGHT))
(lsp (ly:grob-staff-position lnh))
(rsp (ly:grob-staff-position rnh))
(dy (/ (- rsp lsp) 2))
(dot (ly:grob-object lnh 'dot))
(acc (ly:grob-object rnh 'accidental-grob))
(th (* (ly:grob-property grob 'thickness 1)
(ly:output-def-lookup (ly:grob-layout grob)
'line-thickness)))
(pad (ly:grob-property grob 'padding 0.5))
(cmx (ly:grob-common-refpoint
(ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh X) rnh X))
(cmy (ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh Y))
(lx (+ pad (max (interval-end (ly:generic-bound-extent lnh
cmx))
(if dot
(interval-end
(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent dot cmx
X))
(- INFINITY-INT)
(rx (- (min (interval-start (ly:generic-bound-extent rnh cmx))
(if acc
(interval-start
(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent acc cmx X))
INFINITY-INT))
pad))
(dx (- rx lx))
(sx (ly:grob-relative-coordinate grob cmx X)))
(ly:make-stencil
(list 'path th
`(quote
(rmoveto ,(- lx sx) ,(/ lsp 2)
rcurveto ,(/ dx 3) 0 ,dx ,(* dy 2/3) ,dx ,dy)))
(cons (- lx sx) (- rx sx))
(cons (+ (/ lsp 2) (min 0 dy)) (+ (/ lsp 2) (max 0 dy))
bendGlissando =
\tweak thickness #2
\tweak stencil #bend-glissando-print
\glissando
{ c''2. \bendGlissando
\once \override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
e'4 gis'1 }
-- Aaron Hill
Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes?
On 2020-10-26 10:54 pm, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2020-10-26 7:37 pm, 98123981293 1293812397123 wrote:
Hi list,
I usually use the following snippet to handle glissandi across hidden
noteheads:
glissandoSkipOn = {
\override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
\hide NoteHead
\override Accidental.transparent = ##t
\override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
}
is it possible to implement something similar for bendAfter? A quick
check
of the archives did not reveal anything relevant but please link me if
this
has already been covered. Pic attached with the line as I want it to
look
in green.
Thank you,
Kyle
The Glissando_engraver knows to look for glissando-skip, however no
such logic exists for Bend_engraver. It would be possible to re-write
the engraver and introduce a new bend-skip context property, however a
perhaps simpler option is to change the stencil for a glissando to
look like a bend:
[...]
Sorry, I pasted an old version of the code that did not handle the
vertical alignment properly:
\version "2.20.0"
bend-glissando-print =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((lnh (ly:spanner-bound grob LEFT))
(rnh (ly:spanner-bound grob RIGHT))
(lsp (ly:grob-staff-position lnh))
(rsp (ly:grob-staff-position rnh))
(dy (/ (- rsp lsp) 2))
(dot (ly:grob-object lnh 'dot))
(acc (ly:grob-object rnh 'accidental-grob))
(th (* (ly:grob-property grob 'thickness 1)
(ly:output-def-lookup (ly:grob-layout grob)
'line-thickness)))
(pad (ly:grob-property grob 'padding 0.5))
(cmx (ly:grob-common-refpoint
(ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh X) rnh X))
(cmy (ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh Y))
(lx (+ pad (max (interval-end (ly:generic-bound-extent lnh
cmx))
(if dot
(interval-end
(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent dot cmx
X))
(- INFINITY-INT)
(rx (- (min (interval-start (ly:generic-bound-extent rnh cmx))
(if acc
(interval-start
(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent acc cmx X))
INFINITY-INT))
pad))
(dx (- rx lx))
(sx (ly:grob-relative-coordinate grob cmx X)))
(ly:make-stencil
(list 'path th
`(quote
(rmoveto ,(- lx sx) ,(/ lsp 2)
rcurveto ,(/ dx 3) 0 ,dx ,(* dy 2/3) ,dx ,dy)))
(cons (- lx sx) (- rx sx))
(cons (+ (/ lsp 2) (min 0 dy)) (+ 0.5 (max 0 dy))
bendGlissando =
\tweak thickness #2
\tweak stencil #bend-glissando-print
\glissando
{ c''2. \bendGlissando
\once \override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
e'4 gis'1 }
-- Aaron Hill
Re: can bendAfter be made to skip over notes?
On 2020-10-26 7:37 pm, 98123981293 1293812397123 wrote:
Hi list,
I usually use the following snippet to handle glissandi across hidden
noteheads:
glissandoSkipOn = {
\override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
\hide NoteHead
\override Accidental.transparent = ##t
\override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
}
is it possible to implement something similar for bendAfter? A quick
check
of the archives did not reveal anything relevant but please link me if
this
has already been covered. Pic attached with the line as I want it to
look
in green.
Thank you,
Kyle
The Glissando_engraver knows to look for glissando-skip, however no such
logic exists for Bend_engraver. It would be possible to re-write the
engraver and introduce a new bend-skip context property, however a
perhaps simpler option is to change the stencil for a glissando to look
like a bend:
\version "2.20.0"
bend-glissando-print =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((lnh (ly:spanner-bound grob LEFT))
(rnh (ly:spanner-bound grob RIGHT))
(lsp (ly:grob-staff-position lnh))
(rsp (ly:grob-staff-position rnh))
(dy (/ (- rsp lsp) 2))
(dot (ly:grob-object lnh 'dot))
(acc (ly:grob-object rnh 'accidental-grob))
(th (* (ly:grob-property grob 'thickness 1)
(ly:output-def-lookup (ly:grob-layout grob)
'line-thickness)))
(pad (ly:grob-property grob 'padding 0.5))
(cmx (ly:grob-common-refpoint
(ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh X) rnh X))
(cmy (ly:grob-common-refpoint grob lnh Y))
(lx (+ pad (max (interval-end (ly:generic-bound-extent lnh
cmx))
(if dot
(interval-end
(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent dot cmx
X))
(- INFINITY-INT)
(rx (- (min (interval-start (ly:generic-bound-extent rnh cmx))
(if acc
(interval-start
(ly:grob-robust-relative-extent acc cmx X))
INFINITY-INT))
pad))
(dx (- rx lx))
(sx (ly:grob-relative-coordinate grob cmx X)))
(ly:make-stencil
(list 'path th
`(quote
(rmoveto ,(- lx sx) 0.5
rcurveto ,(/ dx 3) 0 ,dx ,(* dy 2/3) ,dx ,dy)))
(cons (- lx sx) (- rx sx))
(cons (+ 0.5 (min 0 dy)) (+ 0.5 (max 0 dy))
bendGlissando =
\tweak thickness #2
\tweak stencil #bend-glissando-print
\glissando
{ c''2. \bendGlissando
\once \override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
e'4 gis'1 }
-- Aaron Hill
can bendAfter be made to skip over notes?
Hi list,
I usually use the following snippet to handle glissandi across hidden
noteheads:
glissandoSkipOn = {
\override NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t
\hide NoteHead
\override Accidental.transparent = ##t
\override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
}
is it possible to implement something similar for bendAfter? A quick check
of the archives did not reveal anything relevant but please link me if this
has already been covered. Pic attached with the line as I want it to look
in green.
Thank you,
Kyle
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 7:01 PM wrote:
> Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: I ought to have a bar line here... (Aaron Hill)
>2. Re: I ought to have a bar line here... (Carl Sorensen)
>3. Re: I ought to have a bar line here... (Thomas Morley)
>4. Re: I ought to have a bar line here... (Carl Sorensen)
>5. Re: I ought to have a bar line here... (Thomas Morley)
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Aaron Hill
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:17:32 -0700
> Subject: Re: I ought to have a bar line here...
> On 2020-10-26 3:03 pm, Mike Dean wrote:
> > Hi Carl:
> > Is \include "english.ly" different from \language "english"?
> >
> > Part of my residing in the weeds is not being sure where \define
> > command
> > (and its relatives like \defineBarLine) ought to go...while the
> > compilation
> > didn't crash, the bar line construction was ignored in this case
> > Mike Dean
>
> \language "english" is preferred over \include "english.ly". The latter
> is a vestige of older LilyPond versions where the \language command did
> not exist, and the "english.ly" include files did more stuff. Now,
> "english.ly" is just a \version and \language statement.
>
> I think you can get away with \defineBarLine being inside music, but it
> would probably be poor practice. It is better to place all definition
> (or definition-type things) at the top-level. The only exceptions are
> things that specifically require scope, like \paper variables.
>
>
>
> As to why the bar line did not appear in your snippet, you redefined the
> bar twice in the same moment. Only use \bar once. In this case you
> would place the \bar command at the end of the alternative or at the
> beginning of the "Trio" section. As to which, that is probably personal
> taste.
>
>
> -- Aaron Hill
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Carl Sorensen
> To: Mike Dean
> Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:26:53 -0600
> Subject: Re: I ought to have a bar line here...
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:07 PM Mike Dean wrote:
>
>> Hi Carl:
>> Is \include "english.ly" different from \language "english"?
>>
>
> It's an old form that predates \language "english". I'm an old dog, so
> sometimes I forget the new tricks. At any rate, your snippet didn't
> include \language "english", so I had to fix it.
>
>
>>
>> Part of my residing in the weeds is not being sure where \define command
>> (and its relatives like \defineBarLine) ought to go...while the
>> compilation didn't crash, the bar line construction was ignored in this case
>>
>
> \define always goes at the top level -- outside of any other expressions.
>
> The other change I had to make in order to avoid errors was to replace #f
> with "" as the third element in the \defineBarLine list. The documentation
> allows the use of #f, but it threw an error and I changed it to "",
> which worked. That was a successful guess on my part.
>
> Carl
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Thomas Morley
> To: Carl Sorensen
> Cc: Mike Dean , "lilypond-user@gnu.org" <
> lilypond-user@gnu.org>
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:34:44 +0100
> Subject: Re: I ought to have a bar line here...
> Hi Carl,
>
> Am Mo., 26. Okt. 2020 um 23:04 Uhr schrieb Carl Sorensen <
> c_soren...@byu.edu>:
> >
> > Try this:
>
> > \defineBarLine ".|:-|." #'("|." ".|:" "")
>
> Though, \defineBarLine ".|:-|." #'("|." ".|:" #f) _should_ work as well.
>
> It's a bug in 'ly:bar-line::calc-anchor' in bar-line.scm, triggered by
> the RehearsalMark requiring an anchor.
> The anchor-calculating procedure compares the span-glyph using
> string=? which bombs out if span-glyph is not a string.
> One should likely use equal? here.
>
> I'll check that more thoroughly and probably ut up a patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Carl Sorensen
> To: Thomas Morley
> Cc: Carl S
