RE: double dot articulation
I should have searched the lsr for “double”; easy now that I know.
Thank you all.
Mogens
From: Klaus Blum
Sent: May 17, 2020 9:15
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: double dot articulation
Hi Mogens,
Am 17.05.2020 um 17:11 schrieb lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org:
> How do I put two dots (like .. ) over the note in
>
> \version "2.20.0"
> { c''8:32-. }
>
> (to indicate that the staccato applies to every note in the tremolo)?
There is a snippet for that subject:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=772
Is that what you need?
Cheers,
Klaus
Re: double dot articulation
(Besides: the solution in "puntitosmarkup" came from this post (
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2019-09/msg00182.html) and
was written by Aaron Hill.)
El dom., 17 may. 2020 a las 14:13, Federico Sarudiansky ()
escribió:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> of course. I tried that. My problem (and the reason for writing "my"
> puntitosmarkup) was the need to use the \tie command to add the slur.
> I couldn't find the way to add it to the original tongue function. (I'm
> sure there will be a one-line-of-code solution for that, but
> inaccessible to me). So I re-wrote the idea using a markup function.
> Besides that, as the symbol is not symmetrical, I needed the ability to
> specify the direction. Again, I know there is a better solution.
>
> Regards!
>
> F.
>
> El dom., 17 may. 2020 a las 13:58, Pierre Perol-Schneider (<
> pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hi Federico,
>> How about:
>>
>> \version "2.20.0"
>> % after Harm:
>> puntitosmarkup =
>> #(define-music-function (dots) (integer?)
>> #{
>> \tweak stencil
>> #(lambda (grob)
>> (let ((stil (ly:script-interface::print grob)))
>> (let loop ((count (1- dots)) (new-stil stil))
>> (if (> count 0)
>> (loop (1- count)
>> (ly:stencil-combine-at-edge new-stil X RIGHT stil
>> 0.6))
>> (ly:stencil-aligned-to new-stil X CENTER)
>> \staccato
>> #})
>>
>> \relative c' {
>> c2:8-\puntitosmarkup #4
>> }
>>
>> HTH, cheers,
>> Pierre
>>
>> Le dim. 17 mai 2020 à 18:48, Federico Sarudiansky a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> besides de LSR solution given by other user (
>>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=772) I wrote this:
>>>
>>> #(define-markup-command (puntitosmarkup layout props cant) (number?)
>>>(interpret-markup layout props
>>> #{ \markup {
>>> \halign #(+ (* 2.5 cant) -6)
>>> $@(map (lambda (x) #{
>>>\markup { \hspace #0
>>> \musicglyph "scripts.staccato" }
>>> #}) (iota cant)) } #}
>>> ))
>>>
>>> \relative c' { c2:8 _\markup \puntitosmarkup #4 }
>>>
>>> I did it because I want to add a little slur below (or above) to
>>> indicate, for string players, that those notes should be played in the same
>>> bow.
>>>
>>> My approximation to that is
>>>
>>> #(define-markup-command (puntitosligadosmarkup layout props cant dir)
>>> (number? number? )
>>>(interpret-markup layout props
>>> #{ \markup {
>>> \override #(cons "direction" dir)
>>> \tie
>>> \raise #0.2
>>> \puntitosmarkup #cant } #}
>>> ))
>>>
>>> \relative c' { c2:8 _\markup \puntitosligadosmarkup #4 #-1 c'2:8^\markup
>>> \puntitosligadosmarkup #4 #1 }
>>>
>>> which seems to work in version 2.20.0.
>>>
>>> I'd really want to improve this, converting it to a script stencil in
>>> the way the solution in LSR works, but I didn't fint at least for now.
>>>
>>> Regards!
>>>
>>> F.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: double dot articulation
Hi Pierre,
of course. I tried that. My problem (and the reason for writing "my"
puntitosmarkup) was the need to use the \tie command to add the slur.
I couldn't find the way to add it to the original tongue function. (I'm
sure there will be a one-line-of-code solution for that, but
inaccessible to me). So I re-wrote the idea using a markup function.
Besides that, as the symbol is not symmetrical, I needed the ability to
specify the direction. Again, I know there is a better solution.
Regards!
F.
El dom., 17 may. 2020 a las 13:58, Pierre Perol-Schneider (<
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi Federico,
> How about:
>
> \version "2.20.0"
> % after Harm:
> puntitosmarkup =
> #(define-music-function (dots) (integer?)
> #{
> \tweak stencil
> #(lambda (grob)
> (let ((stil (ly:script-interface::print grob)))
> (let loop ((count (1- dots)) (new-stil stil))
> (if (> count 0)
> (loop (1- count)
> (ly:stencil-combine-at-edge new-stil X RIGHT stil
> 0.6))
> (ly:stencil-aligned-to new-stil X CENTER)
> \staccato
> #})
>
> \relative c' {
> c2:8-\puntitosmarkup #4
> }
>
> HTH, cheers,
> Pierre
>
> Le dim. 17 mai 2020 à 18:48, Federico Sarudiansky a
> écrit :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> besides de LSR solution given by other user (
>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=772) I wrote this:
>>
>> #(define-markup-command (puntitosmarkup layout props cant) (number?)
>>(interpret-markup layout props
>> #{ \markup {
>> \halign #(+ (* 2.5 cant) -6)
>> $@(map (lambda (x) #{
>>\markup { \hspace #0
>> \musicglyph "scripts.staccato" }
>> #}) (iota cant)) } #}
>> ))
>>
>> \relative c' { c2:8 _\markup \puntitosmarkup #4 }
>>
>> I did it because I want to add a little slur below (or above) to
>> indicate, for string players, that those notes should be played in the same
>> bow.
>>
>> My approximation to that is
>>
>> #(define-markup-command (puntitosligadosmarkup layout props cant dir)
>> (number? number? )
>>(interpret-markup layout props
>> #{ \markup {
>> \override #(cons "direction" dir)
>> \tie
>> \raise #0.2
>> \puntitosmarkup #cant } #}
>> ))
>>
>> \relative c' { c2:8 _\markup \puntitosligadosmarkup #4 #-1 c'2:8^\markup
>> \puntitosligadosmarkup #4 #1 }
>>
>> which seems to work in version 2.20.0.
>>
>> I'd really want to improve this, converting it to a script stencil in the
>> way the solution in LSR works, but I didn't fint at least for now.
>>
>> Regards!
>>
>> F.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: double dot articulation
Hi Federico,
How about:
\version "2.20.0"
% after Harm:
puntitosmarkup =
#(define-music-function (dots) (integer?)
#{
\tweak stencil
#(lambda (grob)
(let ((stil (ly:script-interface::print grob)))
(let loop ((count (1- dots)) (new-stil stil))
(if (> count 0)
(loop (1- count)
(ly:stencil-combine-at-edge new-stil X RIGHT stil
0.6))
(ly:stencil-aligned-to new-stil X CENTER)
\staccato
#})
\relative c' {
c2:8-\puntitosmarkup #4
}
HTH, cheers,
Pierre
Le dim. 17 mai 2020 à 18:48, Federico Sarudiansky a
écrit :
> Hello,
>
> besides de LSR solution given by other user (
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=772) I wrote this:
>
> #(define-markup-command (puntitosmarkup layout props cant) (number?)
>(interpret-markup layout props
> #{ \markup {
> \halign #(+ (* 2.5 cant) -6)
> $@(map (lambda (x) #{
>\markup { \hspace #0
> \musicglyph "scripts.staccato" }
> #}) (iota cant)) } #}
> ))
>
> \relative c' { c2:8 _\markup \puntitosmarkup #4 }
>
> I did it because I want to add a little slur below (or above) to indicate,
> for string players, that those notes should be played in the same bow.
>
> My approximation to that is
>
> #(define-markup-command (puntitosligadosmarkup layout props cant dir)
> (number? number? )
>(interpret-markup layout props
> #{ \markup {
> \override #(cons "direction" dir)
> \tie
> \raise #0.2
> \puntitosmarkup #cant } #}
> ))
>
> \relative c' { c2:8 _\markup \puntitosligadosmarkup #4 #-1 c'2:8^\markup
> \puntitosligadosmarkup #4 #1 }
>
> which seems to work in version 2.20.0.
>
> I'd really want to improve this, converting it to a script stencil in the
> way the solution in LSR works, but I didn't fint at least for now.
>
> Regards!
>
> F.
>
>
>
>
>
double dot articulation
Hello,
besides de LSR solution given by other user (
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=772) I wrote this:
#(define-markup-command (puntitosmarkup layout props cant) (number?)
(interpret-markup layout props
#{ \markup {
\halign #(+ (* 2.5 cant) -6)
$@(map (lambda (x) #{
\markup { \hspace #0
\musicglyph "scripts.staccato" }
#}) (iota cant)) } #}
))
\relative c' { c2:8 _\markup \puntitosmarkup #4 }
I did it because I want to add a little slur below (or above) to indicate,
for string players, that those notes should be played in the same bow.
My approximation to that is
#(define-markup-command (puntitosligadosmarkup layout props cant dir)
(number? number? )
(interpret-markup layout props
#{ \markup {
\override #(cons "direction" dir)
\tie
\raise #0.2
\puntitosmarkup #cant } #}
))
\relative c' { c2:8 _\markup \puntitosligadosmarkup #4 #-1 c'2:8^\markup
\puntitosligadosmarkup #4 #1 }
which seems to work in version 2.20.0.
I'd really want to improve this, converting it to a script stencil in the
way the solution in LSR works, but I didn't fint at least for now.
Regards!
F.
Re: double dot articulation
Am So., 17. Mai 2020 um 17:11 Uhr schrieb Mogens Lemvig Hansen
:
>
> Hi List,
>
>
>
> How do I put two dots (like .. ) over the note in
>
>
>
> \version "2.20.0"
>
> { c''8:32-. }
>
>
>
> (to indicate that the staccato applies to every note in the tremolo)?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mogens
>
>
>
>
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=772
may help?
Cheers,
Harm
Re: double dot articulation
Hi Mogens,
Am 17.05.2020 um 17:11 schrieb lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org:
How do I put two dots (like .. ) over the note in
\version "2.20.0"
{ c''8:32-. }
(to indicate that the staccato applies to every note in the tremolo)?
There is a snippet for that subject:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=772
Is that what you need?
Cheers,
Klaus
double dot articulation
Hi List,
How do I put two dots (like .. ) over the note in
\version "2.20.0"
{ c''8:32-. }
(to indicate that the staccato applies to every note in the tremolo)?
Thanks,
Mogens
