Re: fermata and phrasing slurs
Ah yes, of course. It works now :) Thanks a lot! On 14 November 2013 00:32, Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote: Gagi Petrovic wrote I tried your method (see below), but it still doesn't work correctly. Now the text is nicely placed under all the fermata, but i don't understand why the slur isn't placed above them. Any help would be greatly appreciated. ugh - sorry i didn't explicitly mention I used a simple slur and not a phrasing slur - does it work like that?! Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-and-phrasing-slurs-tp153872p153894.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fermata and phrasing slurs
Gagi Petrovic wrote
Dear group, as can be seen in the added example, something seems off. Is
this a known issue?
please be specific about what you feel is wrong!
Additionally, does anyone have any pointers how to work around this? In
other words: how can i still force the TextScript to be under the longer
versions of fermata?
you can get full control over the vertical positioning of grobs (and
spanners) by specifying the outside-staff-priority of each object, eg:
\version 2.17.95
mus={ c2 ^( ^\fermata ^text c) }
{
\override Slur.outside-staff-priority=#999
\once {
\override Script.outside-staff-priority=0
\override TextScript.outside-staff-priority=1
} \mus
\once {
\override Script.outside-staff-priority=1
\override TextScript.outside-staff-priority=0
} \mus
}
maybe you'll want to \shape the slur, too
hth
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-and-phrasing-slurs-tp153872p153892.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fermata and phrasing slurs
Hi Eluze, thank you. And i'm sorry, i thought it was clear in the example.
To be more specific:
When using \longfermata and \verylongfermata the overrides i used, get
ignored. The TextScript is placed above the Script, instead of the other
way around, like it does with \fermata. (this can be seen in the screenshot)
I tried your method (see below), but it still doesn't work correctly. Now
the text is nicely placed under all the fermata, but i don't understand why
the slur isn't placed above them. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
All the best, Gagi
\version2.16.1
\relative c''{
\override Slur#' outside-staff-priority = 999
\override Script#' outside-staff-priority = 1
\override TextScript#' outside-staff-priority = 0
\phrasingSlurUp
d2^test^\fermata\( b4 c\)
d2^test^\longfermata\( b4 c\)
d2^test^\verylongfermata\( b4 c\)
}
On 13 November 2013 22:52, Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
Gagi Petrovic wrote
Dear group, as can be seen in the added example, something seems off. Is
this a known issue?
please be specific about what you feel is wrong!
Additionally, does anyone have any pointers how to work around this? In
other words: how can i still force the TextScript to be under the longer
versions of fermata?
you can get full control over the vertical positioning of grobs (and
spanners) by specifying the outside-staff-priority of each object, eg:
\version 2.17.95
mus={ c2 ^( ^\fermata ^text c) }
{
\override Slur.outside-staff-priority=#999
\once {
\override Script.outside-staff-priority=0
\override TextScript.outside-staff-priority=1
} \mus
\once {
\override Script.outside-staff-priority=1
\override TextScript.outside-staff-priority=0
} \mus
}
maybe you'll want to \shape the slur, too
hth
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-and-phrasing-slurs-tp153872p153892.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fermata and phrasing slurs
Gagi Petrovic wrote I tried your method (see below), but it still doesn't work correctly. Now the text is nicely placed under all the fermata, but i don't understand why the slur isn't placed above them. Any help would be greatly appreciated. ugh - sorry i didn't explicitly mention I used a simple slur and not a phrasing slur - does it work like that?! Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fermata-and-phrasing-slurs-tp153872p153894.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
