Re: how to shorten a TrillSpanner
2008/2/9, Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [I can't remember if I've mailed this one out before or not, but as I had to spend a couple of minutes rediscovering it myself, I thought I'd share. Also mental note to check and add to LSR ...] Sure. Feel free to comment the code that does not work yet, and add the version-specific tag so I can track it later :-) Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to shorten a TrillSpanner
Hi Trevor, There's now a *much* better way of shortening one end of a trill spanner manually: using the new (as of 2.11.something) #'bound-details list. [...] TrillSpanner implements all the goodies in the #'bound- details list Thanks for the update -- this is wonderful news! Best regards, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to shorten a TrillSpanner
On Jul 31, 2006 9:14 PM, Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/06, Kieren Richard MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello, all!
I'm trying to fix the collision in the following example:
\version 2.9.5
\relative
{
\once \override TrillSpanner #'shorten-pair = #'( 10 . 10 )
c1 \startTrillSpan b\stopTrillSpan\startTrillSpan
c\stopTrillSpan
}
Doesn't matter what numbers I use -- no effect.
[n.b., I used the same technique on an OttavaBracket, and it worked
as expected.]
Hi Kieren,
I'm facing exactly the same problem tonight; did you ever get a
solution for shortening wavy trill lines (and thus preventing their
collision)?
Your posts from June show that you weren't able to get shorten-pair to
do anything for trills, and that's my experience here, too.
Anything creative?
Always fun to reply to a thread from a year and a half ago, so here goes:
There's now a *much* better way of shortening one end of a trill spanner
manually: using the new (as of 2.11.something) #'bound-details list. Here's
an example.
Adjacent trill spanners overlap uncomfortably by default:
\new Staff {
c1 \startTrillSpan b\stopTrillSpan\startTrillSpan c\stopTrillSpan
}
You might think that #'shorten-pair would do the trick, but it doesn't:
\new Staff {
\once \override TrillSpanner #'shorten-pair = #'(0 . -2)
c1 \startTrillSpan b\stopTrillSpan\startTrillSpan c\stopTrillSpan
}
But you can instead use the #'right sublist of #'bound-details:
\new Staff {
\once \override TrillSpanner #'bound-details #'right #'padding = #2
c1 \startTrillSpan b\stopTrillSpan\startTrillSpan c\stopTrillSpan
}
The key to figuring this out is that, as of 2.11.12 or .13 or so,
TrillSpanner implements all the goodies in the #'bound-details list
described in 1.8.3.2 Text and line spanners.
[I can't remember if I've mailed this one out before or not, but as I had to
spend a couple of minutes rediscovering it myself, I thought I'd share. Also
mental note to check and add to LSR ...]
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to shorten a TrillSpanner
Hi, Trevor! did you ever get a solution for shortening wavy trill lines (and thus preventing their collision)? Just the standard fractional-skip hack: c4*99/100\startTrillSpan s4*1/100\stopTrillSpan Anything creative? How's that? =) Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to shorten a TrillSpanner
On 8/1/06, Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Trevor! did you ever get a solution for shortening wavy trill lines (and thus preventing their collision)? Just the standard fractional-skip hack: c4*99/100\startTrillSpan s4*1/100\stopTrillSpan Anything creative? How's that? =) OK, yep, that'll do! Thanks again! -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... like the dew, or like lightning ... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to shorten a TrillSpanner
On 5/25/06, Kieren Richard MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, all!
I'm trying to fix the collision in the following example:
\version 2.9.5
\relative
{
\once \override TrillSpanner #'shorten-pair = #'( 10 . 10 )
c1 \startTrillSpan b\stopTrillSpan\startTrillSpan
c\stopTrillSpan
}
Doesn't matter what numbers I use -- no effect.
[n.b., I used the same technique on an OttavaBracket, and it worked
as expected.]
Hi Kieren,
I'm facing exactly the same problem tonight; did you ever get a
solution for shortening wavy trill lines (and thus preventing their
collision)?
Your posts from June show that you weren't able to get shorten-pair to
do anything for trills, and that's my experience here, too.
Anything creative?
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... like the dew, or like lightning ...
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
